9 Responses to “BREXIT. Vote rigging in full swing.”

  1. Dublinmick says:

    UK out of the EU is a done deal. The EU is gearing for war with Russia and Britannia always bows out at the last minute.

    The idea is once again for Germany and Russia to be destroyed. God save the queen.

    • Deuteronomy 33.22 says:

      Could positive factions within the Secret Government and Secret Space Programmes be using their Nikola Tesla Scalar technologies to stop or disperse San Andreas fault pressures?
      Witness says San Andreas Fault is UFO ‘major corridor’

      Posted by: Roger Marsh November 11, 2014 5 Comments

      A California witness at El Centro reported watching “an extremely slow moving” massive-sized UFO that seemed to be traveling along a “major corridor for UFOs,” according to testimony in Case 61325 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.

      The witness was standing outside on a second-story balcony about 8:13 p.m. on October 24, 2014, and was looking into the eastern sky when the object was first seen.

      “From my right, coming from the south, I first saw some kind of solid object moving extremely, extremely slow, moving northward,” the witness stated. “Once this object was in front of my field of view, I saw that whatever it was, was of a massive size.”

      ht tps :// d ublinsmickdotcom.wordpress.com/2016/05/30/3-volcanic-eruptions-and-2-strong-earthquakes-in-48-hours/

    • sovereigntea says:

      All Brits need to read this, vote in or out, we will be kept in…

      “The machinery to keep the UK as part of the EU was decided long before the referendum was announced.

      The referendum is just a safety valve to placate those citizens upset by the way they have little say in how their affairs are decided. It’s a bit like last year’s Magna Carta celebrations. Yes there was a party and much pomp and pagentry but the media was not allowed to discuss the substance of Magna Carta. Any mention of habeus corpus; the power given under Magna Carta to order the government to produce a prisoner and then justify in open court why the prisoner was being detained, had been silently discarded by the government and Ministry of Justice. There was very little discussion of this because of the censorship and the celebrations which diverted the public’s mind away from the real importance of Magna Carta.

      They are able to do this by the clerks in the high court referring all such complaints to the administrative side of the courts.

      Here an understanding of how the courts work is necessary.

      At a time which is not certain, because I doubt that it was recorded, but I guess about ten years ago, one could go to the Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand and lay a complaint at common law that someone had caused you harm or loss. There would be no charge to lay such a complaint, neither would there be any court costs because as Magna Carta dictates – justice should be free and available to all.

      About that time Lord Levenson introduced his Guide to the Queens Bench.


      In this he describes the three different catagories of Queens Bench but omits the fourth, the common law court of record. Who knows precisely why he did that; but a fair guess is that any one UK resident could make a complaint at common law that his prime minister had caused him harm by giving away his sovereignty. The judge in a common law court goes on his oath of office. If he does not follow precedent he can be sued. In all other courts although the man with a sheeps wool wig (Wolf in sheep’s clothing?) is called a judge in law he is not a judge. He is just a clerk working for the company known as the ministry of justice. This is why they are called administrative courts which conduct the business of the court. These pretend judges cannot be sued because the rules of the business, a statute also called an act with exactly the same meaning as a stage act, created by parliament, has given these clerks a protected status. This means that they do not have to follow the rules of law that the rest of the population have to do. You might now understand why some very strange decisions are made by these pretend judges.

      One persistent man was able to get past the Clerks at Royal Courts of Justice but when he tried to present his case at common law, the judge said he had no jurisdiction because he refused to go on his oath of office.

      • sovereigntea says:

        You might now be wondering what this has to do with the referendum. It’s because Cameron has already stated that he will use the Lisbon treaty to leave the EU if the vote is to leave. Bear in mind that when in opposition, Cameron rubbished the Lisbon treaty. He knows that it was designed by unelected bureaucrats to make it difficult for any country to leave and anyway is subject to qualified majority voting.

        After June the 23rd and we vote to exit the EU, the population will breathe a sigh of relief that it’s all over and leave it to the politicians to get on with it; after all isn’t that what we pay them for.?.

        This is where Cameron and Osborne are correct. All parties agree that it will take at least two years of negotiations during which time the uncertainty will cause the predicted depression in the economy. This will reverse most of the opinions of the leave group who will change their mind and agree to stay in.

        During which time Parliament will vote through the bill which is waiting in the wings, having already been debated and just waiting to be signed into law.

        Act not reported in the media removes from the Queen the duty to veto a bill that is against her subject’s sovereignty.

        You might be puzzling and wonder what this has to do with Parliament’s duty to act in the public’s interest. Wonder no more.

        Before 1972 when Prime Minister Edward Heath signed the Treaty of Rome for us to join the common market, now the EU. he asked the top law officer at the time the legal implications of signing the treaty. This man, the Lord Chancellor Lord Kilmuir described our constitution evolving from Magna Carta and even before, and wrote that giving away our sovereignty to another state would be illegal. Heath still signed it and misled parliament by stating that there was no loss of sovereignty. Before he died he admitted his conduct in his memoirs.

        Here an understanding of the international law of treaties will help you see what the government’s problem is and what is really is motivating them. Any treaty where fraud or deception is used is immediately null and void. So since 1972 when more illegal treaties have been signed the government has kept this fact from you. The letter was hidden under the thirty year rule but was prized from the archives by an activist. Then the government machine was cranked up to block any move to expose the subject to the public. The media know of the letter but dare not discuss it. The eurosceptic politicians know of the letter but will not admit in public to it’s existence. So you have the British public in a state of confusion with all the lying statistics from both sides of the Brexit argument. Don’t you think that their minds would be clarified if they knew that we had joined the EU by power mad controllers who lied to them?

        There is one silver lining to this cloud. The government’s censorship must have been so good that the parliament petitions committee did not realise the significance of a petition presented to them =

        “We require Lord Kilmuir’s letter to Edward Heath be debated in parliament”. The letter can be read from a link on this site.

    • Deuteronomy 33.22 says:

      Captain says:

      May 31, 2016 at 9:05 PM

      The owners of Snopes, a husband and wife team, were outed two years ago as being unreliable, and often deliberately mis-information. Kind of worse than Wikiepedia where anyone can post or alter information on that site.
      Captain says:

      May 31, 2016 at 8:58 PM

      Sweden is now the rape capital of the world due to refugees. Now this… http://www.infowars.com/swedish-government-kicks-local-family-out-of-home-gives-it-to-migrants/
      macdonalddon, who solved the disappearing ‘post comment’ button problem…………. says:

      May 30, 2016 at 7:00 PM

      The ‘Strawberry Fields’ referenced in that song is a graveyard where the original Paul is purportedly buried…George and Ringo openly referred to the surgically enhanced replacement as ‘Faul’ =fake Paul.

      Ringo in a recent interview referred to himself as the last Beatle.

      Blue eyed Faul has bought up all photos of the brown eyed Paul

  2. Deuteronomy 33.22 says:

    Saturday, 28 May 2016

    Brexit and Remain – the latest, distracting, pseudo-important spectacle

    US readers may be aware that there will soon be a referendum about whether Britain Exits (‘Brexit’) or ‘Remain’s in the European Union.

    Even if we did not already have decades of evidence of the evil agenda of destruction of (real) Christianity and of The Good (Truth, Beauty and Virtue) that is the foundational and in-built strategy of the EU; the nature of Remain’s support would be conclusive. The entire intellectual establishment (the neoreactionaries ‘Cathedral’) support Remain (except for a few token populist careerists) – plus the idealist ultra-extreme Leftists.

    For instance, a leaflet has just dropped through my letter slot from the Labour Party (i.e. official Opposition) Leader Jeremy Corbyn – a man whose life has been and remains devoted to revolutionary Communism on the Soviet model – and he says that he ‘believes’ that the UK should ‘remain and reform’ the EU.

    (By ‘reform’ he means make all its many existing faults more extreme – and this is indeed readily do-able – which is why he supports Remain; whereas actual reform in the sense of ‘making better’ is obviously ridiculously impossible.)

    Yet the Referendum is merely a distracting spectacle – because, whatever people think (as distortedly reflected by how they fill-out their ballots, as distortedly reflected by the actual ballots submitted for counting, which are distortedly-counted and distortedly-averaged, distortedly-interpreted and reported with extreme secular Leftist bias) — it is extremely unlikely that our ruling elites in the mass media, government, public administration, law, education, the police and military, the mainstream churches, and the public services workforce and management (leave aside, the actual demons and their servants of the international micro-ultra ruling-elite, who of course also support Remain)… will allow Britain to leave the EU*.

    (The EU has, after all – and for decades, been the major excuse for everything bad imposed on British life that the elites also covertly want — most especially uncontrolled and open-ended and subsidized mass immigration, and the comprehensive destruction -> inversion of Law, public morality and prudent social regulation.)

    But even if – by some implausible chance – the UK did leave the EU as a consequence of this referendum; we would still be stuck with ourselves: that is, with our evil elite and the cowardly, corrupt, decadent, short-termist and hedonistic population that the UK has become; and decisively since from fifty years ago we became dominantly secular and Leftist in both the mass media and official public life.

    It is a case of Garbage In – Garbage Out; and in terms of religion and spirituality, the UK is and has for a long time been ‘garbage’; meaning that what we actually want from our lives is no better than, indeed inferior to, the ethics of the farmyard: we want merely comfort, convenience, distractions, excitement, intoxication and feeling good about ourselves – underpinned (and undermined) by a sub-animal self-hatred and covert desire for self-annihilation.

    Good governance cannot come from bad people – and in Christian terms (indeed in terms of any coherent religion) we are a bad people; so very bad that we do not even want to be good – and so much so that our ideas of good and bad are officially inverted in many and vital respects (especially in that most important area of sexuality, marriage and family).

    I do not vote (about anything); and while I regard voting to Remain as an active-embrace of explicit evil – I also regard a vote for Brexit as at best deluded but mostly merely tactical selfishness.

    And the whole idea of ‘deciding’ these crucial moral issues by a faked-up process of pseudo-vote buying and intimidating, counting and averaging, is perhaps the most ridiculous and corrupting thing of all…

    There is no short term and comfortable secular or common-sense solution to Britain’s terminal problems – because we would not be where we are (actively committing national suicide, by multiple means, not just in the long term, but the medium term) except we are in a terrible state as people.

    This is not despair but hard-nosed realism.

    First there must be a religious, spiritual, and moral regeneration of a critical mass of people; and then… well, only then would we be able to see what to do.

    As things stand, the EU referendum is like asking the inmates of a prison/ hospital for the criminally insane to come up with a plan for a better world…

    First we need to cure the inmates; but even before that, the inmates must want to be cured.



    [* I mean, that leaving the EU – in the face of evil-elite opposition – requires a stronger, more sustained and unified motivation than the British population are capable of. Mere common sense and socio-economic long-termism do not suffice. To motivate such a strategic change requires either hatred (which would lead to bad outcomes, as well as being intrinsically evil) or else something a positive and constructive as a religious motivation. Nationalism was, briefly, capable of redirecting religiousness in a secular cause, but only briefly and in the past – modern nationalism, in secular societies, is feeble.
    The point must always be remembered that the Left have it ‘easy’ in political terms – because it is easier to destroy than to create, and the Left are able to use envy, resentment, hatred, short-term selfishness and all the other vices – or indeed selected virtues – in order to pursue their strategic goal of destroying the Good. But the Christian perspective knows that motivations must be Good for outcomes to be Good; and that bad motivations – as well as actions – need to be repented. In sum, to leave the EU against vast opposition and for the outcome to be net Good requires, that the motivation be Good; or else it would merely serve to aid the cause of evil. At present the UK population are religiously indifferent or anti-religious; and do not have any Good and Strong reason for leaving the EU, or staying, or indeed doing anything in particular about anyting at all – except what seems expedient.]

  3. sovereigntea says:

    There is one silver lining to this cloud. The government’s censorship must have been so good that the parliament petitions committee did not realise the significance of a petition presented to them =

    “We require Lord Kilmuir’s letter to Edward Heath be debated in parliament”. The letter can be read from a link on this site.


    If this petition gets to 10,000 before 23rd June, the government has to comment on it. This should release those previously censored as the letter’s existence would be acknowledged on a government’s own site.

    The problem is that the petition has such a boring and obscure title and more importantly even the so called alternative media with the notable exception of Don Hank and Rodney Atkinson whose site “Freenations” promotes it. Rodney Atkinson was the man who together with Norris McWhirter took John Major, Francis Maude and Douglas Hurd to court for Misprison of treason for signing the Maastricht Treaty. The attorney general then took it over and said there was no case to answer; presumably when not being on his oath of office.

    So dear reader, if you live in the UK, please sign the petition and get everyone you know to sign it.

    Think about it; if you are caught doing something wrong you have to stop doing it. Get this letter’s contents into the public domain and you can then demand that the treaties be declared null and void so that the laws that gave away our sovereignty back to 1972 would revert back to the position pertaining in 1972.

    Follow the thought through and you will realise that our exclusive 12 mile fishing boundary would be returned over night. Alright there might be some stock market jitters but the jitters felt by the other EU countries would cause them to consider what best suits them is for our trading arrangements to remain the same. The European army and other evils we could just walk away without too much trouble. So please do not let these politicians confuse you by their convoluted rhetoric. The matter is clear and simple. The EU treaties are against our laws. We the people need to get this fact out to one and all.”

    • Deuteronomy 33.22 says:

      Great detective work ST! I didn’t know about this 1972 treaty deception by the Satanist Heath
      I have signed up
      Could you add yours to the petition below? Its now gone upto 27,560!
      Disclose all the Secret Space Programs and release all the hidden technology

      Please help us in our efforts while theres still time to get this petition spread round the doors and help us end this stalemate and usher in a new Second Renaissance Golden Age where every man woman and child is living in safety and abundance and Truth thanks a lot
      Petitioning Vladimir Putin and 2 others

      It’s time to liberate and save the planet. People deserve to know the truth about the Secret Space Programs and have access to all the hidden technology that could save the planet and help humans all over the world.

      This petition will be delivered to:
      Vladimir Putin
      Xi Jinping
      United Nations

      2765 signatures
      We’ve added your signature to the petition:
      we require parliament to debate Lord Kilmuir’s letter to Edward Heath

  4. Gordon says:

    30 May 2016 19.55 BST

    Council withdraws EU referendum leaflet over ‘unfair’ remain graphic


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.