Shocker: Hillary Email Blows Cover Off Massive Obama Plot To Promote Terrorism

January 14 2015 | From: BeforeItsNews

What a crazy election season it’s been so far, and we are not even a quarter of the way through the first round yet.

Expect what you once considered “unthinkable” as an American to become the “ordinary”, as the campaigns on both sides continue to progress. Allow me to explain why the news about Barack and Hillary’s plot to promote terrorism should not come as a surprise to anyone.

In addition to all the allegations being levied against the President in a Drafted Resolution Consisting of 48 Separate Criminal Charges Drafted For Obama’s Impeachment, it should have been obvious to everyone a over a week ago when the news originally broke that Obama Defied a Judge’s Order and Covered For Clinton. This act alone should have landed him in the slammer, especially since it is the third time Obama has defied a judge’s order. 

It is significantly important that we fully understand why Obama is covering for Hillary. It is my belief that you would have to trace the Hillary email and personal server story all the way back to its origins.

It has been reported that within Washington’s inner circles it is well known that the devastating leaks about Clinton’s server came from none other than Valerie Jarrett. That means you KNOW the leaks were done with the full knowledge and approval of Barack Obama.

Ask yourself something. Why on earth would Obama be leaking devastating information about the only viable Democrat candidate running? What could he POSSIBLY gain from that, because there is no way Bernie Sanders will win the presidency.

That means one of two scenarios would play out. Most people would agree it is likely the House and Senate will remain under GOP control. So, by sinking Hillary, Obama is either:

1. Perfectly willing to let a Republican president succeed him, and watch his presidency and his life’s work unwind almost within hours of his replacement taking office.

Think about it: Obama’s executive orders could be undone with the stroke of a pen, and the first day Congress is in session, the new president will have a bill to repeal Obamacare on their desk. When has Mr. “I’ll just go around Congress” EVER let something go, let alone his life’s work?

Furthermore, it CANNOT be forgotten that it was Obama himself who has personally put Hillary in this position with the leaks in the first place. So, we’re supposed to believe Obama would sabotage his own life’s work on purpose? PLEASE!


2.Sinking Hillary is Proof Obama Has No Plans of Leaving Office, and His Third Term Is Unfolding Right Before Us. People say that’s not possible. Why not? Obama can’t do that because it’s not legal?

Uh, when has that stopped him before? Neither is “going around Congress.” Furthermore, when has ANYONE, Republican or Democrat, EVER stood up to this president and seriously tried to stop him before? EXACTLY! Have you stopped and asked yourself why the<Pentagon Says They Are Preparing For “Huge Civil Unrest in the U.S.?”

Civil unrest? Over what? What do they know that we don’t? It might be time for you to think about these things.

At this point, it has been reported that everyone from Obama’s OWN APPOINTEE for Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, General Michael Flynn, to Four Star Navy Admiral Lyons, Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney, Former a CIA Director James Woolsey, and Former FBI assistant director James Kallstrom, have all gone on record either directly accusing Obama of treason or implying as much, and then tomorrow the RNC votes on whether to take up Resolution Drafted For Obama’s Impeachment Consisting of 48 Separate Criminal Charges.

So, tell me, if Obama wasn’t up to something horrible, why else would he be taking out Hillary, UNLESS he has a backup plan already in place!

Keeping all that in mind, up until Obama Defied a Judge’s Order Last Week, and Covered For Clinton, it seemed pretty obvious which direction things were heading. Why the sudden about face.

As the author of that article points out, after leaking all this information and getting Hillary in THIS much hot water, what reason could Obama possibly have to reverse course and cover for her now?

Simply put, the author suggests;

The answer is becoming increasingly clear: what’s on that hard drive could possibly take down both Clinton and Obama, and it has to be sanitized and obfuscated before it’s released to the courts.”

And there you have it. Barack and Hillary are both very bad actors, and are both unfit for Presidential Office!

The Right Scoop Writes:

The Free Beacon caught a pretty remarkable email that went to Hillary and recommended that she sparked fake protests among Palestinians in order to pressure Israel:

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton considered a secret plan created by her then-advisers to foment unrest among Palestinian citizens and spark protests in order to push the Israeli government back to the negotiating table, according to emails released as part of the investigation into the Democratic presidential frontrunner’s private email server.

In a Dec, 18, 2011, email, former U.S. ambassador to Israel Thomas Pickering suggested that Clinton consider a plan to restart then-stalled peace negotiations by kickstarting Palestinian demonstrations against Israel.

Pickering described the effort as a potential “game changer in the region,” recommending that the United States undertake a clandestine campaign to generate unrest. Clinton requested that his email be printed.

“What will change the situation is a major effort to use non-violent protests and demonstrations to put peace back in the center of people’s aspirations as well as their thoughts, and use that to influence the political leadership,” Pickering wrote.

“This is far from a sure thing, but far, in my humble view, from hopeless,” he continued. “Women can and ought to be at the center of these demonstrations. Many men and others will denigrate the idea. I don’t and I don’t think that was your message.”

Palestinian women, he noted, are less likely than men to resort to violence.

“It must be all and only women. Why? On the Palestinian side the male culture is to use force,” Pickering wrote, comparing the effort to the protests in Egypt that deposed former leader Hosni Mubarak. “Palestinian men will not for long patiently demonstrate — they will be inclined over time and much too soon to be frustrated and use force. Their male culture comes close to requiring it.”

Hillary simply asks for the email to be printed, but doesn’t say anything about it via electronic correspondence.

So this begs the question of what OTHER unrest the State Department might be sparking in order to pressure others to do Hillary’s will.

Ed Morrissey at Hot Air adds more interesting but frightening possible consequences to this email:

Gee, I wonder how many other foreign protests were facilitated by the State Department? Were any others sparked against American allies in that region?One has to wonder after reading this how much the State Department might have had to do with some of the “Arab Spring” protests, too. (In fact, at one point Pickering says that the effort must be “just like Tahrir Square,” a mention that might interest our allies in Egypt.)

This e-mail thread doesn’t indicate whether Hillary took Pickering’s advice, but she certainly appeared to take it under advisement. And while the e-mail itself wasn’t classified, it’s yet another example of how these kinds of communications can harm American interests when transmitted in the open.

This would be enough to create a massive backlash among our allies, and in fact may still do so.”

Consider one mystery in light of this new information – why was Hillary so insistent the attack on Benghazi wasn’t coordinated, but just “some guys walking down the street who decided it’d be a good time to kill some Americans”?

Now how long will it take for the left-loving media to actually get of their Obamas and ask Hillary about this? Don’t hold your breath.

Sourced from:


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.