‘Liberal’ British Newspaper The Guardian Exposes Itself (again) as Propaganda Wing of Fascist British Government

A poignant portrait of one of the British government’s terrorists, ruthlessly gunned down by Putin himself.

A headline, from today, on the British Guardian newspaper’s web site:

Murder in Istanbul: Kremlin’s hand suspected in shooting of Chechen

‘Oh, those terrible Russians and that ruthless Putin are up to their old extrajudicial murder tricks again! Will they never learn about real democracy! At least we, the great Western public (and therefore representatives of the ‘global community’), are holding them to account as best we can by imposing ‘sanctions’ and hysterically demonizing them every time they fly a plane near Scotland.’

The above reflects, more or less, the thoughts that would have rattled around the, largely empty, vessel that is the cranium of the average Western citizen, as he or she read the above Guardian headline. And what else can we expect when such pernicious propaganda is catapulted at them on a daily basis?

Look at that headline again: “Murder”. Well, right there you have the judgement… MURDER! And who did? The KREMLIN! Who else! And the victim? A CHECHEN! Oh dear Lord! Those poor chech-y people who have, for decades, if I vaguely remember, been trying to tear themselves away from the greedy grasp of the new Russian/Soviet Empire! There’s no need to read any further, we have all the information we need!

Headlines are very important to intelligence agency employees masquerading as lefty European journalists. With headlines, you can engage in what amounts to deliberate falsification of facts and then cover your ass by including the real details in the article itself, safe in the knowledge that the average Western news pundit has the attention span of a gold-fish on horse tranquilizers, and therefore no intention whatsoever of clicking on your sneaky piece of headline propaganda.

By now you’ll have guessed that, while the Guardian headline deliberately smears the Russian government (and “Putin”) for (yet another) “murder” of (probably) some innocent wretch, the truth behind this story is not only somewhat different, it inhabits an entirely different universe.

Open the article and, within a few paragraphs, you start to experience a certain amount of cognitive dissonance vis-a-vis the headline. Half way through the article you realise that you’re actually reading the details of an event that, had it been orchestrated by British or American or French forces, would be feted by the Western press as another victory for our brave forces in never-ending “the war on terror”!

To save you the trouble, here’s the short version of the pertinent facts: Abdulvakhid Edelgireyev was a Muslim terrorist who has been hiding for years in the Chechen mountains, from where he launched, or was involved in, several attacks against Russian civilians, including suicide attacks on Moscow’s metro and Domodedovo airport. He also served time with the Nazi Right Sektor in Ukraine, killing civilians in the Donbass, and hung out with “ISIS” in Syria, where he enjoyed a bit of head-chopping and more civilian slaughter, while still finding time to marry the sister of the wife a top “ISIS” commander. In November 2015, he was gunned down in Istanbul (Turkey being a haven for ISIS mercenaries) by an unknown, but likely Russian, gunman.

Notice the history of this individual. Chechnya, Donbass, Syria, ISIS. The only thing missing from that biography is ‘CIA asset’. US and British anti-Russian involvement in Syria and the Donbass is (or should be) more or less common knowledge. As for Chechnya, that’s just an older version of the same story. As the head of Russia’s Chechen Republic told Reuters in 2009:

We’re fighting in the mountains with the American and English intelligence agencies. They are fighting not against Kadyrov, not against traditional Islam, they are fighting against the sovereign Russian state.”

The West sought to attack both Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and the country as a whole by targeting the country’s weakest regions.

“The West is interested in cutting off the Caucasus from Russia. The Caucasus – a strategic frontier of Russia. If they take away the Caucasus from Russia, it’s like taking away half of Russia.”

Asked if he was saying there were signs of CIA and MI6 participation in the violence, he said “Of course. There was a terrorist, Chitigov, who worked for the CIA. He had U.S. citizenship. When we killed him, I was in charge of the operation and we found a U.S. driving license, and all the other documents were also American.”

So rather than a headline that actually reflects the content of the article and the reality of the life of its subject, something like: “Leading ISIS figure eliminated in Russian anti-terror operation in Turkey,” we’re treated to the above headline by the Guardian‘s ‘Shaun Walker’ in Istanbul.

I wonder though, in coming up with the title, was Mr. Walker following the orders of Erdogan, or just MI6? Or, since both Turkish and British authorities clearly support ISIS, maybe it was both? Or is the truth simply that Mr. Walker is such a pusillanimous cretin that he is unable to think for himself and merely serves as an unconscious parrot for the British government’s terror-supporting and anti-Russian propaganda?

It’s a deplorable state of affairs for sure, and someone really needs to do something about it. So I’m thinking I might send a crowbar as a gift to Mr. Walker, care of the Guardian offices, King’s Cross, London, with the suggestion that, before attempting to pen another article, he use the implement to first leverage his head out of his backside. Only then might we expect to see some honest journalism from him.


Source: http://joequinn.net/2016/01/10/liberal-british-newspaper-the-guardian-exposes-itself-again-as-propaganda-wing-of-fascist-british-government/#more-1159


7 Responses to “‘Liberal’ British Newspaper The Guardian Exposes Itself (again) as Propaganda Wing of Fascist British Government”

  1. logoagogo says:

    The website http://off-guardian.org is recommended as a deconstruction of today’s fascist mouthpiece for the globalist criminals that somehow still masquerades as a liberal/left newspaper

    • Men Scryfa says:

      “liberal/left” oh dear have not heard that term since leaving the msm about a decade ago.

      I suppose you are someone who is into truth but not into the truth, get it?

      Put another way is there really much difference between the guardian and some site that emulates what it thought the guardian was? Socialism and Marxism are greater dangers than even Fascism as they are closer to the satanic ideals of ZOG control. So frankly there really is not anything much to choose between either than “…what’s your poison”. That should be quite obvious by now to anyone serious and honest who has got this far.

      Unless they are the kind of person who actually is on the evil side just doesn’t like to admit it. A bit like much of jewry.

      • the Milibands father was a Marxist, we can see the threads of things tracing back. Who invented Marxism? What is it a cover for? And Bolshevism? the Bolshevik genocide in Russia against Christians, was noit just about killing. They seemed to revel in the most shocking evil acts just for the fun and gratification of it.
        True history is sadly not being told except by the few

        You mentioned King Arthur or was it Dublinmick. Was he a real person and his round table?

        Sanrtos Bonacci said somewhere, it was actually a way for vital teachings to be still taught, that wernt actually about 12 Knights and Arthur. There were 12 disciples of Jesus too at the Last Supper
        Bonnacci claims both these cases , are actually the astrological constellations, from Aries, to Capricorn. So I am not sure if King Arthur existed MS

        Santos Bonacci says some very strange things. Such as about 12 tissue salts, and zodiac signs relating to them. And perhaps even the sign were born under, dictates which salt were deficient in.

        As with everything it seems, I have not had time to study Bonnacci fully. Anything you know about the 12 Tissue Salts, health, possibly a zodiac connection, id be interested to read

      • Men Scryfa says:

        Of course King Arthur exists, he did not die,

        He cannot die, he is Guardian of Britain!

        According to some he was sleeping all these years, according to others he flew the winds and crossed the skies as the Chough bird awaiting his call to return

        The Raven: a powerful symbol and presence,

        The Protectors of the Prophets and Guardian to the Graves of the Saints.

        Even in more recent times the grave of St Vincent was watched over by them and it is the Ravens that guard Bran at the White Tower to this very day.

        There are still some in the Isles who did not forget and have been waiting for

        THE TIME.


      • Men Scryfa says:

        Those few are us here, we few, we happy few

        Britain arise, awake, tarry no more, your Destiny and Glory awaits

  2. salty says:

    The Neoconservatives Are Brewing a Wider War in Syria – Paul Craig Roberts

    EDITOR’S CHOICE | 15.02.2016.


    While you are enjoying your Sunday, the insane neoconservatives who control Western foreign policy and their Turkish and Saudi Arabian vassals might be preparing the end of the world.

    Any person who relies on Western media has no accurate idea of what is happening in Syria.

    I will provide a brief summary and then send you to two detailed accounts.

    The neoconservative Obama regime set-up the Syrian government headed by Assad for overthrow.

    A long propaganda campaign conducted on Washington’s behalf by the Western media portrayed the democratically-elected Assad as a “brutal dictator who uses chemical weapons against his own people”.

    Washington organized and supported a front group posing as democrats and involved them in conflict with the Syrian military.

    With conflict underway, Washington began predicting that something had to be done to overthrow Assad before he used “chemical weapons against his own people”.

    Obama turned these predictions into a “red line”. When Assad used chemical weapons against Washington’s puppets, the US would invade Syria.

    With the “red line” drawn, a false flag chemical weapons attack was staged, or an accident occurred, that Washington used to say that Assad, despite the US warning, had crossed the “red line”.

    Preparations for an invasion began, but hit two roadblocks.

    David Cameron, Washington’s puppet prime minister of Great Britain was unable to deliver British support for the invasion as the Parliament voted it down.

    This left Washington uncovered and vulnerable to the charge of naked aggression, a war crime.

    Russian diplomacy threw up the other road block by securing the removal of all chemical weapons from Syria.

    Their invasion plan frustrated, the neoconservatives sent the jihadists they had used to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya to overthrow Assad.

    Initially known as ISIS, then ISIL, then th

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.