It wasn’t Putin who killed Sasha Litvinenko. Tap Blog in 2011.

Gordon Logan ‘Russia Did Not Kill Sasha Litvinenko.’

Marina Litvinenko

Ex MI5 Gordon Logan was speaking to me today. We were discussing various aspects of nuclear contamination, and what strategies the elites have for surviving the contamination they are releasing into the environment, such as from Fukushima. He dropped into the conversation that there is no way the Russians assassinated Litvinenko.

As that topic is still very much alive in the media, and the murder is being used to blacken the reputation of Putin, this information is important. Litvinenko had earlier revealed that Romano Prodi, President of Italy, was the senior KGB (FSB) agent in Italy, as declared to the Euro Parliament by his MEP Gerard Batten (UKIP).

Litvinenko’s widow is demanding a full investigation into her husband’s murder with nuclear contamination, using Polonium. The Litvinenko Foundation website seems to have made up its mind in advance that Putin is the guilty party, which defeats the declared stated objective, of finding out whodunnit. She is demanding that Cameron raises the issue of the assassination in his next visit to Moscow.

If Gordon Logan is right, she would do well to reserve judgement as to who killed her husband. Putin is being set up for a war of revenge, and Marina Litvinenko is being used as a patsy.

Gordon Logan will hopefully write more on this topic in the next few days.

There is a pattern. As with Gaddafi being falsely accused of Lockerbie, with him agreeing to concede responsibility to buy off his accusers, and supply Al Megrahi as a scapegoat, this is no doubt building up similar false accusation against Putin, in preparation for taking military action against him, at a later stage in the propagation of NATO’s wars.

Marina’s Appeal

Statement by Marina released on 16 October 2011 in London

Dear Friends,

Last Thursday H.M. Coroner indicated that he is inclined to hold a full inquest into the death of my husband. I am prepared to do whatever it takes to find the truth about the unprecedented act of nuclear terrorism that killed Sasha Litvinenko and endangered the lives of thousands of my fellow Londoners.

To judge from inquests of similar complexity, such as those into the deaths of Princess Diana and the victims of the 7/7 bombings, these hearings may last weeks, if not months. At the very least, my legal costs are likely to run into six figures.

In these proceedings the evidence collected by the Metropolitan Police will be weighed against the story presented by Sasha’s accused murderer and his sponsors, with the unlimited resources of the Russian state at their disposal. I am sure that my legal team is the best in the world, but the reality is that compared to my adversaries I am severely constrained.

TAP’s message to Marina –

Marina, you could be working with the people who killed Sasha, to wrongly accuse others, who they are setting up for punitive military retaliation. That’s why this is all happening now, and has been held in abeyance for so long. With respect, they are using you for their own ends, and deceiving you as to who was responsible for killing Sasha.

This is a Rothschild anti-Putin bandwagon. Oil and resources are their game, not the acquisition of justice.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Responses to “It wasn’t Putin who killed Sasha Litvinenko. Tap Blog in 2011.”

  1. Lynn says:

    What the dirty brigade are capable of….every move used to their advantage. War dogs indeed. No-one believes the invaders anymore they have blown their credibility too many times.

  2. Men Scryfa says:

    Last week I discovered this dude on FB after searching for people that live in Newtown CT. I found him after looking at a local Newtown business (a salon and spa) that he ‘liked’. I went to his profile and noticed his pics. He is a very sinister man and puts out a freakish vibe. I found a pic of his friend or maybe him in a ‘pregnant’ nuns outfit. The most bizarre pics are of him shirtless giving the satanic hand sign to the camera. He seems to be very political and sends weird and wacky rants via email to news and talk shows. Let me know if you see that.

    Search: with newtown ct and you will see several local establishments that he forwarded messages from.

    https://www.facebook.com/ron.pinkham.5

  3. Aldous says:

    “Help Us Beat Him – DONATE!”

    The usual suspects never miss a donating(sic) trick do they? Fleece the stupid goyim – not very difficult it has to be admitted – any and every which way.

    Tap, Gordon and Tappers, I reckon you’re gonna love this one:-

    Murdered in London. Evidence suppressed.

    The court ruling to keep key evidence secret undermined the inquest into radioactive murder of Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko. His widow is fighting for justice against the combined forces of two governments. She needs your help…

    £767 raised of £10k goal
    4 Years running

    Глядя из Лондона: публикация Фонда Литвиненко

    Правительство Великобритании, подчинившись решению суда по иску Марины Литвиненко, назначило открытое расследование убийства ее мужа. Предстоит длительный и дорогостоящий процесс. Необходимы средства на оплату связанных с этим расходов.

    $3,045 raised so far
    4 Years running

    https://fundrazr.com/profiles/litvinenko-justice-foundation

    The Litvinenko Foundation website link (in the paragraph above Gordon Logan’s image) doesn’t work for me.

    My Russian’s a little rusty but do you reckon the £767/$3,045 raised over 4 years is suspicious? These seasoned scammers don’t believe in joined-up thinking or checking currency exchange rates do they?

  4. Aldous says:

    That link from 2013 is quite telling in to how relations between the UK and Russia have deteriorated big time in less than three years.

    Here is one of a couple of posts in English I missed when posting the earlier comment:

    Financial Times EDITORIAL: Truth and spies
    May 20, 2013

    UK’s secrecy in Litvinenko case is a blow to open justice

    It took years for the UK to launch an inquest into the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, a former KGB officer allegedly turned MI6 agent who was poisoned while drinking tea in a London hotel. Now the UK government’s determination to keep crucial documents secret, some providing “prima facie” evidence of Moscow’s involvement in his death, has rendered that inquest futile even before it started.

    The Financial Times, along with other media, has made a powerful case to the coroner’s court against secrecy in this affair. The killing on British soil of a UK citizen by foreign agents using radioactive material remains of clear public interest. People who might have been contaminated were screened. Relations with Moscow went into the deep freeze.

    Yet the coroner has now upheld the application by William Hague, foreign secretary, that the public should not be allowed to hear evidence on two key questions: first, whether Moscow was involved in the killing, and second what the UK knew about threats to his life. If the coroner has to ignore evidence that cannot be made public, he cannot return a fair and truthful finding. Reluctantly, this newspaper believes there is little option now but to hold a public inquiry, which can treat certain information in camera. This is hardly open justice. The first step should be to demand that the chair of the inquiry reconsider the case for disclosure of these documents.

    The government’s motives for demanding public interest immunity remain unclear. Concerns over national security are valid. But these should be explained, and not heavily redacted as they were in the coroner’s finding. It may also be that the evidence is embarrassing to British intelligence services, should they have known of threats to Mr Litvinenko but subsequently failed to act. That is hardly a case for maintaining secrecy; in fact, the opposite.

    Secrecy fuels suspicion that finding the truth has taken second place to raison d’etat. That is to say revitalising diplomatic and trade relations with Russia. This would not only be craven, it would be a grave mistake. There is nothing to be gained by caving into pressure from Vladimir Putin’s increasingly authoritarian regime. But there is much to be lost by signalling that Britain can be pressured to give up its commitment to open justice and the rule of law.

    Moscow is bound to react. Trade and diplomatic relations may suffer. But if this is the price of British justice, it is one worth paying.

    https://fundrazr.com/profiles/litvinenko-justice-foundation

    Never forget that it was the CIA/MI6/Mossad spooks who killed WPC Yvonne Fletcher – the shortest police woman in the UK at the time – then successfully blamed it on the totally innocent Libyan People’s Bureau next to the building where the fatal shot (with a single hollow point/dum-dum round) actually came from. Did the same spooks kill Sasha Litvinenko?

    Mossad Black Ops and False Flags

    English policewoman shot….1984 In 1984, Zionist Jews staged a protest outside the Libyan embassy in London. Approximately 25 English Bobbies were used for crowd control. During the middle of the demonstration, a shot rang out and a female Bobby named Yvonne Fletcher was hit and killed. The shot came from a building used by the Mossad to spy on the Libyan embassy, but the newspapers overlooked that and blamed Libya. Israel used this false flag murder of Policewoman Fletcher, to turn world opinion against Libya.

    http://www.whale.to/b/mossad_black_ops.html

    A Comprehensive History of Zionist Crimes

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm#litvinenko

  5. Aldous says:

    I thought this excerpt worth posting from the http://www.takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm#litvinenko link:

    If Litvinenko, Kovtun and Lugovoi were couriers in a nuclear smuggling business, Israel could have decided to exploit this and orchestrated the poisoning after arranging for Kovtun and Lugovoi to contaminate sites, leaving low-level Po-210 traces in the last two weeks of October. Kovtun and Lugovoi, unable to admit to their role, would have to say they were framed for the poisoning. Or the three could have been offered smuggling jobs, in the preliminary part of Operation Polonium Putin.

    In conclusion, the Zionist criminals are aware of the precarious nature of their predicament, as their myths and propaganda crumble, and their power base becomes ever more flimsy. The vast majority of Jews are not to blame for the crimes of their leaders, and humankind has already wasted so many lives in senseless tribal warfare and pogroms. A small clique persists, whose members will stand trial for their atrocious misdeeds, provided they live long enough. Relatively minor players and puppets such as Bush and Blair can be offered commutation to lengthy imprisonment terms if they sing like canaries. But after sixty years of propagating a hoax about gas chambers, there can be only one fitting penalty for the principal perpetrators of Zionist atrocities.

  6. Gordon says:

    Paul Craig Roberts

    “Putin Did It” Concludes Secret Evidence in UK Inquiry

    On the basis of secret evidence, a UK inquiry under orders from Washington decided that the death ten years ago of a low level spy was “probably” ordered by President Putin of Russia. There is no motive whatsoever for Putin to have been concerned with the dead spy, Litvinenko. He was of no consequence or threat to Russia.

    Probably, Litvinenko’s death was due to the fact that he was engaged in the smuggling of nuclear materials and accidently poisoned himself.

    What these unsubstantiated attacks on the President of Russia are doing is elevating Russia. The non Anglo-Zionist world, which is the largest part of humanity, has lost confidence in the veracity of the West. The Western media, a collection of prostitutes, is in such lock-step mindless compliance with the anti-Russian agenda that the most implausible accusations against President Putin are reported as if they were proven fact.

    Western news organizations, such as the BBC and the New York Times, once respected news organizations, are now widely regarded as government propaganda organizations that lie for their living.

    Here is the report of a person who used to believe the lie until he looked into the case.

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/today-assumed-putins-russia-killed-litvinenko-looked.html

    As I wrote recently, all they do is to lie to us. Lies are the West’s principle weapon. As the lies wear out, the West is exposed as a liar that never can be believed about anything.

    Source:

    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/01/24/putin-did-it-concludes-secret-evidence-in-uk-inquiry/

  7. Lynn says:

    They have invented lies upon lies for the sole purpose of their inadequencies. The lying machine is running aground now. All credibility blown. A laughing stock of fantasists with an agenda too evil to comprehend. The awake now see this Imperial pantomime for what it truly is. A total fabrication and Psyop.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.