Do Nuclear Bombs Actually Exist?

Do nuclear bombs as we are led to believe and fear really exist, or are more conventional weapons being used with added Hollywood style hype to create that nuclear tension and fear? Is the nuclear strategy all a very expensively stage-managed ‘theatre of war’?


30 Responses to “Do Nuclear Bombs Actually Exist?”

  1. Jennifer I must apologise for a few months ago, my curt comment to you
    Imnow sensing the deception runs much deeper, and is more complex. I still feel t t wonsend browns electrogravitics in the 1950s is real though, simply a use tapping into Qi energy physics. I am very concerned though that a deception so big, that could give me, and manyothers, a nervous breakdown. Has been played on us since birth.

    Ive tried several times to post a very very interesting interesting comment from someone. And repeatedly Jennifer , it wont register on Tap. Therefore ill send this, and then if this receives ok, ill paste it to see what happens

    • Jennifer says:

      No worries, I don’t even recall it, so no offence taken, Adam.

      • Also look at this
        43) If Earth was a ball there are several flights in the Southern hemisphere which would have their quickest, straightest path over the Antarctic continent such as Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia. Instead of taking the shortest, quickest route in a straight line over Antarctica, all such flights detour all manner of directions away from Antarctica instead claiming the temperatures too cold for airplane travel! Considering the fact that there are plenty of flights to/from/over Antarctica, and NASA claims to have technology keeping them in conditions far colder (and far hotter) than any experienced on Earth, such an excuse is clearly just an excuse, and these flights aren’t made because they are impossible.

        44) If Earth was a ball, and Antarctica was too cold to fly over, the only logical way to fly from Sydney to Santiago would be a straight shot over the Pacific staying in the Southern hemisphere the entire way. Re-fueling could be done in New Zealand or other Southern hemisphere destinations along the way if absolutely necessary. In actual fact, however, Santiago-Sydney flights go into the Northern hemisphere making stop-overs at LAX and other North American airports before continuing back down to the Southern hemisphere. Such ridiculously wayward detours make no sense on the globe but make perfect sense and form nearly straight lines when shown on a flat Earth map.
        45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.

        46) On a ball-Earth Cape Town, South Africa to Buenos Aries, Argentina should be a straight shot over the Atlantic following the same line of latitude across, but instead every flight goes to connecting locations in the Northern hemisphere first, stopping over anywhere from London to Turkey to Dubai. Once again these make absolutely no sense on the globe but are completely understandable options when mapped on a flat Earth.

        47) On a ball-Earth Johannesburg, South Africa to Sao Paolo, Brazil should be a quick straight shot along the 25th Southern latitude, but instead nearly every flight makes a re-fueling stop at the 50th degree North latitude in London first! The only reason such a ridiculous stop-over works in reality is because the Earth is flat.

        48) On a ball-Earth Santiago, Chile to Johannesburg, South Africa should be an easy flight all taking place below the Tropic of Capricorn in the Southern hemisphere, yet every listed flight makes a curious re-fueling stop in Senegal near the Tropic of Cancer in the North hemisphere first! When mapped on a flat Earth the reason why is clear to see, however, Senegal is actually directly in a straight-line path half-way between the two.

      • It appears nuclear bombs actually do exist Jennifer after what Cameron tried to get us into in march, plus there was some hero US female major or general that averted trouble
        Unless these are just dirty bombs but not true nuclear bombs as weve been lead to believe
        Or maybe its a psyop to add a layer of confusion, they don’t exist

      • TonyC says:

        Hi Adam, here are some links about the nuclear question:

        The Nuclear Scare Scam | Galen Winsor

        …and for some humour:

        Pinktonium : World’s Gayest NUKE


        Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately! Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary nuclear chain reaction.

        Check out the documentary, read through the excellent Nuke Lies Forum, and leave a comment what you think about this nuclear hoax. Was the government teaching school-children to hide under their desks just to induce fear and funnel black tax money into a fake Cold War arms race?

      • And now the tale from the likes of Cobra, David Wilcock, and various other Alien ET narrative peddlers….is that aliens are using their advanced technologies to ‘disable’ nuclear weapons. So they can never be used.

  2. it wont send. I hope henry, Mike, Gordon, can send it to believe somehow. I really want him to see tis comment ive pasted, piri reis etc

  3. sovereigntea says:

    Am I a ghost ?

    If enough Ann Coulter worshipping morons believe this crap who will be let off the hook ?

  4. jkick says:

    Here’s a couple more links, below, suggesting fakery / hoax.

    Make of them what you will.

    The Atomic Bomb Hoax 1945-2015

    The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Tests
    were Faked

    rgds JKIck

    • I assumed i have moved a fair distance along since 2013 when I started ‘awakening’. But I have felt in the last few days, thru the eric dubay Atlantean blog talking about flat earth. And now this about nuclear weapons. Im feeling a wave of cognitive dissonance, but its gentler than 2 yrs ago. ICBMs are fake don’t work? How can this be? They’ve got the technology surely? Nuclear bombs don’t work? But the mushroom clouds are so convincing of a serious bomb test. Dr Strangelove film etc.

      So nuclear bombs don’t exist, but nuclear power plants do? And fukushima has still created damage to the pacific as Gordon logan chillingly said? So that’s possible but nuclear bombs aren’t possible?

      Yes I am quite shaken

      The link you sent above, that man says its not possible for men to goto the moon. So that really was faked? We can go up high in planes. We see rockets that look like ICBMs. Electrogravitic flying saucers TTownsend Browns discs, seem real. Yet its not possible for man to goto the moon?

      Is this because the very basic reality of the moon and sun, is a total lie?

      Yes I feel strange

      • jkick says:


        “So nuclear bombs don’t exist, but nuclear power plants do? And fukushima has still created damage to the pacific as Gordon logan chillingly said? So that’s possible but nuclear bombs aren’t possible? ”

        Nuclear power plants DO work, because it is combustion, not explosion.

        check this link ‘lonebear’ explains in more scientific detail.

        Mathis paper on Faked Nuclear Explosions

        “Yet its not possible for man to goto the moon?”

        If you look into the work of the fella that died recently and is posted today above see David McGowan

        from Wagging the Moondoggie, Part I
        October 1, 2009

        “Anyway, a whole lot of people are extremely reluctant to give up their belief in the success of the Apollo missions. A lot of people, in fact, pretty much shut down at the mere mention of the Moon landings being faked, refusing to even consider the possibility (Facebook, by the way, is definitely not the best place to promote the notion that the landings were faked, in case anyone was wondering). And yet there are some among the True Believers who will allow that, though they firmly believe that we did indeed land on the Moon, they would have understood if it had been a hoax. Given the climate of the times, with Cold War tensions simmering and anxious Americans looking for some sign that their country was still dominant and not technologically inferior to the Soviets, it could be excused if NASA had duped the world.”

        Such sentiments made me realize that the Moon landing lie is somewhat unique among the big lies told to the American people in that it was, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively benign lie, and one that could be easily spun. Admitting that the landings were faked would not have nearly the same impact as, say, admitting to mass murdering 3,000 Americans and destroying billions of dollars worth of real estate and then using that crime as a pretext to wage two illegal wars and strip away civil, legal and privacy rights.

        And yet, despite the fact that it was a relatively benign lie, there is a tremendous reluctance among the American people to let go of the notion that we sent men to the Moon. There are a couple of reasons for that, one of them being that there is a romanticized notion that those were great years – years when one was proud to be an American. And in this day and age, people need that kind of romanticized nostalgia to cling to.

        But that is not the main reason that people cling so tenaciously, often even angrily, to what is essentially the adult version of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. What primarily motivates them is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive? What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community, and all the other institutions we depend on to tell us the truth? What does that say about the very nature of the world we live in?

        That is what scares the hell out of people and prevents them from even considering the possibility that they could have been so thoroughly duped. It’s not being lied to about the Moon landings that people have a problem with, it is the realization that comes with that revelation: if they could lie about that, they could lie about anything.

        “But wait,” you say, “NASA has solid evidence of the validity of the Moon landings. They have, for example, all of that film footage shot on the moon and beamed live directly into our television sets.”

        Since we’re on the subject, I have to mention that transmitting live footage back from the Moon was another rather innovative use of 1960s technology. More than two decades later, we would have trouble broadcasting live footage from the deserts of the Middle East, but in 1969, we could beam that shit back from the Moon with nary a technical glitch!

        As it turns out, however, NASA doesn’t actually have all of that Moonwalking footage anymore. Truth be told, they don’t have any of it. According to the agency, all the tapes were lost back in the late 1970s. All 700 cartons of them. As Reuters reported on August 15, 2006, “The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong’s famous ‘one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind’ … Armstrong’s famous moonwalk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaluoma said. ‘We haven’t seen them for quite a while. We’ve been looking for over a year, and they haven’t turned up,’ Hautaluoma said … In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing.”
        Given that these tapes allegedly documented an unprecedented and unduplicated historical event, one that is said to be the greatest technological achievement of the twentieth century, how in the world would it be possible to, uhmm, ‘lose’ 700 cartons of them? Would not an irreplaceable national treasure such as that be very carefully inventoried and locked away in a secure film vault? And would not copies have been made, and would not those copies also be securely tucked away somewhere? Come to think of it, would not multiple copies have been made for study by the scientific and academic communities?

        Had NASA claimed that a few tapes, or even a few cartons of tapes, had been misplaced, then maybe we could give them the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps some careless NASA employee, for example, absent-mindedly taped a Super Bowl game over one of them. Or maybe some home porn. But does it really seem at all credible to claim that the entire collection of tapes has gone missing – all 700 cartons of them, the entire film record of the alleged Moon landings? In what alternative reality would that happen ‘accidentally’?

        “Is this because the very basic reality of the moon and sun, is a total lie?”

        Maybe the basic reality that we hurtling 67,000 miles (107,000 kilometers) per hour around the sun and rotating at 1,000 miles (1600 kilometers) per hour is a total fabrication?

      • ian says:

        Hi jkick, I was with you right up to the end, but I still believe we are a planet like the rest of the planets.

    • beLIEve says:


      Yup, the moon mission was a hoax, perpetrated by lying thieving khazar/mason SCUM.

      ‘Chinchillas on Mars’.
      Is the “Mars” rover simply “roaming” around the Atacama Desert Chile ?


      They WERE “apparently” genuine.
      Their origin was related to MAGIC MUSHROOMS, those cute looking red mushrooms with white spots.

      Don’t believe ?
      Take a look at the link…………………



        Belief creates our reality. Our belief in the Second Renaissance is what will create it. It begins now.

        We are experiencing a “soft 9/11.” It’s a slower false flag attack, with the shock and awe spaced out over time, beginning with the Paris attacks and now bleeding over into California. It is traumatizing, to some extent, to wake up one month and realize that the world has changed, to realize that going about one’s daily life is happening under a different set of circumstances. When our safety and security is restricted, it is easy to begin to turn inward on ourselves. The lotus of the heart can shrivel. Hopelessness and powerlessness can set in.

        This would be the way we might view life now, if we didn’t know better. I can only offer the wisdom of the Sabian symbols with the evidence collected over the past several years of “forensically” collating the actions of the Illuminati/cabal with the astrology.

        If this full frontal assault of terror and the “Climate Summit” had been implemented last lunar month, the Libra lunar cycle with the associated Sabian symbol of “a Jewish rabbi performing his duties,” we would be talking about an entirely different thing. But we aren’t. The Zaddakim could not make it happen. This is coming during the Scorpio cycle of “a woman drawing aside two dark curtains that closed the entrance to a sacred pathway.”

        What is happening now is wholly unholy and not sacred. In fact, the Zaddakim (un-Jews)and the Wahhabists (un-Muslims) are the most misogynistic sects on the planet. So, their efforts fly in the face of the energetics, and thus will ultimately not succeed.

        What happened to the Illuminati? They are making rookie mistakes. This shows disorganization and lack of ability to implement. It shows a lack of control. It shows that it’s curtains for them because they do not have the capability to bring order out of the chaos they are inducing.


        74) From Genoa, Italy at a height of just 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Gorgona can often be seen 81 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Gorgona should be hidden beyond 3,332 feet of curvature

        75) From Genoa, Italy at a height of just 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Corsica can often be seen 99 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Corsica should fall 5,245 feet, almost an entire mile below the horizon.

        76) From Genoa, Italy 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Capraia 102 miles away can often be seen as well. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Capraia should always remain hidden behind 5,605 feet, over a mile of supposed curvature

      • Hello Kingel
        Yes. I have read. And as expected. The scum havecreated muddying the waters, discrediting, controlled opposition trolls that might appear interesting. But discredit and.distract from.the 33rd Degree Freemasonic truth they want.hidden

        I even wondered if atlantean conspiracy dubay blog was but who can argue with the italian islands. Statue of liberty seen 60 miles away. We must remember too, subtle cabal propaganda such as
        ‘ i was flying on concorde, and saw.the earths curvature ‘
        Is this true?
        Compromised cabal household names like dirk.bogarde flying to nyc on concorde said he saw the curvature, to promote his snakes and ladders book.
        But eric dubay gives considerable evidence. Go high, very high, the.horizons level
        We know the msm cabal will lie kingel. A little cgi manipulations easy, plus media trojan horse psyops. About curvature. Trojan horse trojan horse. Secondary to the headline. This is how tavistock freud khazar operates. Clement was in praia da luz.btw when things kicked off. And ‘cooked.them meals’

        All an.interconnected khazar satanic web kingel

        I recommend. Stick to eric dubay, till we know more.

      • Sorry forgot to add. Crow777. Tap posted an august i think, moon a holographic wave article. This is distracting disinfo, crow777. Thete will be others

        Who can argue with dubays 100 proofs?


        The sun, and moon, are the same size. And act as complementary, counterbalances, circling over our flat earth. And the gnostic astrology of the other planets, interacting with sun and moon. Making a trine etc. Are what cause sun and moon to overlap eqch other sometimes, and be in different positions, not always 180 degrees from each other. Sun and moon are the same size, and much closer to us than i ever thought. This is my best laymans sense and speculation off evidence clues and hunches, so far. I do not know what energy stops them flying away from our flat earth. Maybe the planets energy, in this electric universe, keep sun and moon anchored?
        Maybe the Polaris star also plays some anchoring role.
        Im wondering whether Nollidge might be a flat earth troll. His comment, If earth was obloid spheroid as.he says. I dont see why the nasa freemasons would want to lie about that, hide that
        I sense, the satanist illuminati in.past centuries, have badly needed.the sphere earth lie. Bevause it avoids any thorny questions, about what lies.beyond the antarctic perimeter edges?
        A civilisation fully knowing this truth, will be much much harder to submit to authority and tyranny
        Yes i know i sound a little crazy, pushing the envelope here.
        But ill try and find more proof to back up what i say

    • Hello jkick
      So this marine engineer from Sweden. Really seems highly highly intelligent and qualified. Like Capt Ajit. He knows what hes on about.

      – Yes fair enough the Apollo missions were all hoaxes, its all been a hoax. Im realising this.
      – But what doesn’t seem a hoax at all, is all the free energy technologies suppressed
      -T Townsend Browns electrogravitics classified in the 1950s.
      – Therefore jkick, maybe its possible. Even though conventional, Apollo era technology NEVER made it to the moon, or explored other …..planets in the cosmos. (im reluctant to say solar system now). The ease with no G Forces inside, the speed, of the secret government UFOs they have. It could still be possible some kind of secret space programme still exists.

      – The secret govt certainly has the toys, exotic toys to put on an impressive Spielberg show when the times right

      – jkick im going to study the youtubes and articles this week when I can, and report to Tap. If you have time please look at it yrself too. YRFT Yellow Rose For Texas – The Lie Nasa Told. I think this is important to review. There could indeed still be advanced govt crafts at the Sun, at the Moon etc. But just not in the Nasa/Star Wars/Star Trek type way weve been taught to view things.

      YRFT I think, speaks of flat planes and domes,

      – So satellites are a hoax? If the earths stationary. If theres a Plamnetarium dome above us. Then I suppose yes they would be.
      So does that mean Arthur c Clarke was a freemason who connived with Nasa freemasons and concocted the Tremndous Pys Op of satellites to act as a Trojan horse to deeply embed in societys minds, the eart is a fast spinning sphere?

      • jkick says:

        Hi, adamspiritualwarrior.

        “So satellites are a hoax?”

        If they are not a hoax then you would have thought there would be ample film clips (non- cgi) of Earth in motion from them in space.

        As yet I have not come across any, maybe someone can post a link.

        They tell us we spinning at over 1000mph yet I don’t feel a thing.

        They tell us its because its like being in an aeroplane.

        OK, but an aeroplane got a shell.

        Maybe you right, we are enclosed in some ‘Logans run’ type of world?

        You speak of secret space programme, one thing for sure Richard Branson not in it.

        Virgin Galactic is a spaceflight company within the Virgin Group. It is developing commercial spacecraft and aims to provide suborbital spaceflights to space tourists, suborbital launches for space science missions, and orbital launches of small satellites.

        Virgin Galactic’s founder, Sir Richard Branson, had initially suggested that he hoped to see a maiden flight by the end of 2009, but this date has been delayed on a number of occasions, most recently by the October 2014 in-flight loss of SpaceShipTwo.

        This despite much funding

        “After a claimed investment by Virgin Group of US$100 million, in 2010 the sovereign wealth fund of Abu Dhabi, Aabar Investments group, acquired a 31.8% stake in Virgin Galactic for US$280 million, receiving exclusive regional rights to launch tourism and scientific research space flights from the United Arab Emirates capital.

        In July 2011, Aabar invested a further US$100 million to develop a program to launch small satellites into low Earth orbit, raising their equity share to 37.8%.Virgin announced in June 2014 that they were in talks with Google plans for the Dream Chaser aircraft has it designed to carry five passengers and be launched from the Stratolaunch carrier aircraft.

        So there you have it, we supposedly had technology to put a man on the moon 40 odd years ago, yet despite millions cannot get a rocket / space ship to 100kms altitude today.


      Hello Dr Laviolette
      I hope you are well
      Look at this from Tapblog. It chimes with your Genic spontaneous creation of matter Super G SQK theory.

      ”DNA’s basic structure, characterised by the Fibonnaci ratio, or golden mean, appears to spontaneously emerge in an intelligent energy field. 99.9% of space dust has the same spectrographic signature as bacteria.

      The vacuum of space is more exposed to the energy field so it is constantly producing DNA out of the fundamental chemical building blocks. Space also has an stimulant effect on humans and plants.

      The Chinese took seeds into space, then brought them down to earth and grew them. The fruit was enormous.

      DNA didn’t evolve by chance. That idea is promoted to keep the people in a state of confusion, unable to recognise patterns all around them. If you stop people from recognising patterns, if you make people think everything occurs through chance, they submit to authority.”

      Something is troubling me Dr Laviolette, which I may comment on sometime soon. I ask you to please, if you get time. Go and see Eric Dubays |Atlantean Conspiracy blog

      I have been disturbed the last few days. His 100 proofs the earth is flat.
      I must mention too, in the last few years, in response to the gaining awareness and interest in the flat earth topic. The cabal/Satanists/illuminati/freemasons call them what you will. Have released controlled opposition shills , to discredit and poison the flat earth stationary earth, geocentric debate.

      But Dr Laviolette, if you read Dubays 100 proofs article. Things like the airline flight paths in the southern hemisphere. They are odd. Such as Santiago to Wellington must go into the northern hemisphere. Theres Sydney to Johannesburg, why is Dubai anecessary stopover?
      We see none of this on northern hemisphere flights, they often go along the latititudes.

      WHy is Antarctica a classified no fly xzone only visitibale with Government approval? Why no airlines flying over Antarctica? it would be a massive saving of flying time and fuel.
      Moscow to Tokyo goes over the arctic, and other flights too.
      These things don’t make sense but then make complete sense, with a flat earth map.

      Also Dr Laviolette, the identical flight times from LA to Tokyo, and Tokyo to LA. In one direction, the 1000mph flying AGAINST the earths spin. PLUS, the 1000 mph approx. of the plane speed. Should surely mean the Tokyo LA flight (or is it vice versa), would be noticeably shorter and use less fuel. Arguments about ‘wind resistance’ and adverse weather, im afraid don’t stand up, in my view.

      It seems we have a stationary earth dr Laviolette, and the Sun and Moon move around us, over our flat earth. I believe this has been a 500 year old lie, since this Truth is too powerful, to realise we are the centre of things. We cannot submit to authoirity easily with this knowledge.

      And I think this is what all 33rd degree Freemasons know. Antarctica forms a perimeter round the flat earth. There are staggering implications of who we are, what we are. That Darwinism is wrong/a lie. Who set all this up. Divine implications Dr Lavilolette, and this is what I think the Catholic church, Malta Freemasons, Scottish Rite Freemasons who set up and control NASA. I think we should seriously take a step back and question, our 20th century space achievements, and just exactly how much could the Freemasonic NASA have lied to us, brainwashed us all from this possibly explosive truth

      I hope, if after reading and watching Eric |Dubays 100 proofs film, and article. You might be able to, after recovering from the shock of it all. Incorporate this into your view of the cosmos beyond, and Subquantum Kinetics
      I still think there are secret space programmes. t Townsend Brown and Nikola Tesla , and electrogravitics, and 100MW from a cubic foot of space, seem real. As we see with the unfolding ‘alien ‘ hysteria unfolding in the mainstream media.

      I think its possible, a very very very big lie has been put on us all Dr Laviolette. If you have time, please investigate
      Best wishes, Adam

    • Jkick look below, the illuminati couldnt get their act together to harness Divine Sacred Holy Energies via astrology in last months libra period. Were now in scorpio
      The satanists are late
      Theyre showing a lack of command structure, a lack of control, and a failure to implement.
      Not like they used to have mastery over all this, in 20th century
      Shout this from the rooftops Tap readers !

      Also jkick. Watching sunrise this morning ive realised. The sun must be much closer than 93 million miles. If it is the one revolving over a flat earth.
      The heat/light must be of a much more focussed nature, with more defined edges, hence our nightimes. This could not happen if 93 million miles away

      Have a good day !

    • 121) When you observe the Sun and Moon you see two equally-sized equidistant circles tracing similar paths at similar speeds around a flat, stationary Earth. The “experts” at NASA, however, claim your common sense every day experience is false on all counts! To begin with, they say the Earth is not flat but a big ball; not stationary but spinning around 19 miles per second; they say the Sun does not revolve around the Earth as it appears, but Earth revolves around the Sun; the Moon, on the other hand, does revolve around the Earth, though not East to West as it appears, rather West to East; and the Sun is actually 400 times larger than the Moon and 400 times farther away! You can clearly see they are the same size and distance, you can see the Earth is flat, you can feel the Earth is stationary, but according to the gospel of modern astronomy, you are wrong and a simpleton worthy of endless ridicule if you dare to trust your own eyes and experience.

  5. jkick says:

    Hi Adam

    While not aligning mysef to the flat earth viewpoint I do feel you raise interesting points in regards the position of the sun.

    If it is 93,000,000 miles away, would 4000 miles make much difference we encounter in temperatures at the equator and the polar ice caps.

    Also, take a look at the sun and moon when they both out together.
    The shape of the moon does not correspond to the position of the sun.

    How’s that possible, is refraction taking place?

    • Hi Jkick
      Like a bee drawn to the pollen, I only get drawn where intriguing convincing evidence draws me to

      76) From Genoa, Italy 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Capraia 102 miles away can often be seen as well. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Capraia should always remain hidden behind 5,605 feet, over a mile of supposed curvature

      Plus a healthy scepticism and feeling that everything that surrounds on this planet now, is deception and conspiracy, and black magicians have pulled the wool over our eyes for many things in our faces.

      It occurred to me today….could the sun actually be closer to us than the moon? It does seem that way sometimes

      Also, you make a fine point, same as erci dubay does. Would 4000 miles make any difference bbetween sub zero freesing etc and Singapore temperatures? Its absurd in my view

      ‘ The shape of the moon does not correspond to the position of the sun.

      How’s that possible, is refraction taking place?’ I don’t understand what you mean here

      There are 3 big lies up for grabs to expose here
      – flat earth
      – stationary earth
      – geocentric earth

      which means
      -moving sun, and moving moon. And moving planets around us.

      If/when I find more convincing eric dubay evidence on these matters ill paste it

      I am still recovering from the thought the entire Scottish rite freemason Nasa 20th century space programme could be an entire hoax.And nuclear weapons. And satellites. I am still not recovered

    • What could be the reason for the Nasa hoax of space exploration jkick? Such a huge, all encompassing lie?
      The Voyager spacecraft, for those to be hoaxes. Is very shocking

      What could be the reason?
      Could it be, to act as a MASSIVE foundation, scaffold, to brainwash the 20th century society into fully believing till death , that planets are spherical, earth is spinning, and we all go round the sun?

      And that we are one of trillions, in the universe, nothing special?

      The Scottish Rite Freemasons at Nasa, I can well understand why theyd want to keep this knowledge from us. IF jkick Geocentrism is the real TRUTH. It places us all in a very unique, special position in the universe.

      And we would be much harder to control, to submit to authority, with this knowledge.

      Maybe Copernicus was a propaganda operation?

    • Sorry I forgot to say

      All the while , Free energy based secret space programmes in black projects could still have proceeded in the 20th century? Maybe that’s where the voyager images came from? the hexagon on top of Saturn etc.

      Because , it seems quite clear. Very interesting, very strange, fast, no G forces inside, free energy antigravity crafts exist, the UFOs that are seen the secret government have. Lets strip out alien UFO lies.

      WHos to say that mars and Jupiter and Saturn still haven’t been explored, and beyond, with these advanced secret space programmes? it might be the case

      I can see how Nasa could have been a brilliant, complete Freemason deception.

      Does this mean the Hubble images are real? Or fake? But telescopes don’t lie do they, ground based ones.

      if you reply, pls use my reply button so I don’t miss yr comment cheers

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.