Saudi Prince Gets Royal Treatment in U.S., Let Off on Charges of Raping Multiple Women

 

Los Angeles, CA – On Monday, Los Angeles County prosecutors announced that they would not be filing charges against a Saudi prince, due to “lack of evidence,” after arresting him on suspicion of sexual assault at a Beverly Hills mansion.

The accused was connected directly to the geopolitical centers of power, as Prince Majed bin Abdullah bin Abdulaziz, 29, is the son of King Abdullah the former ruler of Saudi Arabia, who died in January at the age of 90.

On Sept. 23, at a palatial 22,000-square-foot Beverly Hills mansion currently valued at $37 million, neighbors reported seeing a bleeding woman screaming for help as she tried to scale an 8-foot-high wall that surrounds the property, according to the Los Angeles Times.Upon investigation by the police, resulting from the call by neighbors, Al-Saud was arrested on suspicion of sexual assault. Police reports allege that there were multiple victims, one of which was a female worker who alleged that Al-Saud tried to force her to perform oral sex.

In what amounts to slap in the face of the alleged victims, the case was referred to the L.A. city attorney’s office, for consideration of a misdemeanor charge.

As previously reported by The Free Thought Project, the three women accusers filed suit in civil court days after the incident:

On Friday, three women filed a civil lawsuit accusing Al-Saud of inflicting emotional distress, assault and battery, sexual discrimination, and retaliation against his domestic employees. The women claim Al-Saud attacked them inside his home for several days until his arrest on Wednesday. To avoid paying taxes and fair wages, many affluent residents of Beverly Hills and its surrounding communities often employ illegal immigrants because they are less inclined to report any form of abuse. Although the prince is a royal member of the House of Saud, the U.S. State Department eventually confirmed that Al-Saud does not have any diplomatic immunity.

Al-Saud’s attorney, Alan Jackson stated that his client was innocent and that his client was glad to have resolved the matter.

“The allegations against him are false,” Jackson said. “The decision by the D.A.’s office not to file charges shows that the accuser’s stories cannot be substantiated. The sheik is very happy to put it behind him and move on with his life.”

According to a report by the L.A. Times:

Al-Saud was detained by police for hours last month after a reported disturbance inside the compound, police said. After police interviewed other people inside the residence, they arrested Al-Saud on suspicion of forcing oral copulation.

When officers arrived at the home, they found a “party atmosphere,” LAPD Lt. John Jenal said last month.

Since his arrest on Sept. 23, Al-Saud has remained in Southern California, free on $300,000 bail, according to his attorney.  However, he may very well have been back home in Saudi as neighbors reported him moving out the day after the arrest. A scheduled court appearance on Monday failed to take place due to the fact that no charges were ultimately filed.

It seems the wealth and power of being a member of the Saudi royal family gives special privilege. The Saudi royals spend lavishly in the Beverly Hills area and police often give deference to them by engaging in a more hands-off approach.

It should come as no surprise that there is virtually no accountability for a member of the House of Saud, as they break U.S. law with impunity. They have figured out the formula that makes “American justice” work, having large amounts of wealth and being politically connected to powerful individuals.

Similarly to how the U.S. gave a tacit nod of approval to the ascension of the Saudis to the head of the UN Human Rights Council, despite having beheaded more people in the past 12 months than ISIS, Al-Saud was given the Saudi royal treatment by U.S. authorities.

The reality that the accused was the son of the former Saudi ruler cannot be disregarded as a reason for preferential treatment, and why felony charges were not filed.

People in the U.S. are arrested on far less evidence for drugs and other non-violent crimes, but get the hammer of justice upon their head. This man had a bloody woman scaling his wall, screaming for help, which was witnessed by multiple neighbors, and he’s given the green light — because he’s a ‘prince.’

Is this “justice?”

Please share this story is you are tired of seeing “justice” being bought, and want to see system with accountability for all people regardless of class, race, social status or wealth!
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/prosecutors-cite-lack-evidence-saudi-prince-neighbors-reported-bleeding-woman-screaming/#LZeFlO8P7u5GFZ81.99

Related:

‘I am a prince and I do what I want.’ Cocaine-crazed Saudi royal ‘threatened to kill Los Angeles mansion staff who watched him being pleasured by male aide’

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

7 Responses to “Saudi Prince Gets Royal Treatment in U.S., Let Off on Charges of Raping Multiple Women”

  1. beLIEve says:

    I believe I am correct in thinking, the “saudi royalty” are fake “jews” ?

    So, the behaviour of the “prince” is… par for the SCUM-BAG khazar course.

    • Hi Kingel I thought of you when I read this, hopefully we can understand together the practical implications of it all. I am aware DRO debt relief orders exist for unsecured loans. I must study the article below carefully when I can, have the mental energy to

      ”Debt Contesting Essentials – Contract, Consent and Conditional Acceptance | Unsecured Debt Can Be Terminated”
      http://sitsshow.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/debt-contesting-essentials-contract.html#more

      For the average person living in society today, debt is an ever-present concern. Most of the money we make during the course of our lives goes to paying back debts for cars, housing, medical expenses, and so on. But what if almost all debt was an elaborate fraud and could be contested lawfully? The following article will attempt to cite key knowledge and understanding demonstrating just that.

      Debt Contesting Essentials

      There are many different methods and techniques for contesting debt, but all are all founded on the same set of principles.

      Conclusion

      The theme should be clear: knowledge will only lead to power, if acted upon. Having knowledge about the fraud in the financial system isn’t enough; we actually need to use it properly in order for it to benefit us.

      Debt contesting has many forms and methods, some more successful than others, but all founded on recognizing fraud and clearly asking for clarity on alleged debts. In the absence of validity, a debt will always be rendered void, but only if the presumption of its validity is dispelled.

      To be clear, the justice system works exactly the same way. Fraud and tyranny continue to reign because good people, who have knowledge, do nothing.

      Contesting debt is one way to become braver in facing the despotic institutions of our age. As each individual finds key knowledge and uses it to empower him or herself, they encourage others around them to do the same. Eventually the mass acquiescence that has plagued our world for millennia will crumble due to a knowledgeable and active population of sovereign people.
      Debts can be purged using the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Credit history can be restored by using the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Creditors can be defended against with knowledge of simple contract law, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, rules of court and the basis that banks do not loan anything. Debt collectors can be defended against with the basis that an assignee cannot establish any contractual nexus to enforce a claim

      • beLIEve says:

        DEBT is one of the biggest SCAMs of the tribal crime syndicate i.e. KZM on Planet Earth.

        Taps article on the Babylonian money trick explains much of it.

        One colossal point, that few people seem to address, is the perpetrators of the…. FAKE MONEY FRAUD/DEBT scam the …. KZM……. are…ILLEGAL ALIENS…….under UK law.

        They were evicted from the UK in 1290 under the ‘Edict of Expulsion’ , which means EVERYTHING they have done, in the UK over the past 750 years has been unlawful.
        Including setting up the Bank of England and, all the theft that flowed from that !

        I read on a site recently that “THEY” are trying to change their label from “jew” to Jesuit.
        “They” are starting to say that RATs-child/Banking was in the control of the Jesuits not the “jews”.
        I believe “they” are trying to avoid the consequences of people waking up to the fact that as, everything they have done financially, is unlawful……750 YEARS of COMPENSATION is DUE to the BRITISH PEOPLE.

        Jesuit Imho, is simply an amended spelling of “jewsuit”.
        Same entities, a modification in the label.

        http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3302296,00.html

  2. TonyC says:

    Comment on above web page:
    zaheerhusain
    October 5, 2013

    Son of a p– without brains , You don’t know the history of this Saudy dynasty , what I was reffering to is the lineage of these Saudi princes which goes back to the first saud who was a jew , impersonated as an arab , befriended an Arab , killed the entire family at first apportunity , extended his influence , expanded to a full kingdom and these are aal e saud who rule the saudi arabia today .
    The Jewish roots of the Saudi Royal Family:
    https://www.facebook.com/notes/hidden-truth/the-jewish-roots-of-the-saudi-royal-family/277683585596093

  3. Lynn says:

    Good …this totally exposes the criminals in control. This kingdom is a totally barbaric state of human misery.head choppers and terrorists are ruling this kingdom..truly abhorrent and disliked by everyone bar the bloodlines in the western power structures.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.