Why didn’t this happen while he was alive? 5 police forces investigating Ted Heath child sex allegations



At least five separate police forces in the UK are investigating allegations that Sir Edward Health sexually abused children after it emerged a criminal inquiry into the former prime minister may have been covered up.

Police officers from London, Wiltshire, Kent, Jersey and Hampshire are now looking into pedophilia claims against Heath after a rush of new allegations were made in the wake of accusations that he raped a 12-year-old boy.

Rape allegations were made after a senior ex-police whistleblower alleged a criminal case had been closed after a suspect threatened to expose Heath as a child sex abuser.

The suspect has now been identified as 67-year-old Myra Ford, who has been jailed twice for running a brothel in Wiltshire.

The announcement of the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s (IPCC) inquiry into the case triggered a wave of new allegations.

Wiltshire Police announced on Monday it was opening a second investigation into whether there had been a cover-up of child sex abuse claims in the 1990s and urged any further victims to come forward.

One alleged victim claimed on Tuesday he was raped in 1961, aged 12, when he was picked up by his attacker and driven to an apartment on London’s Park Lane.

The Metropolitan Police have so far rejected the allegations and sources confirmed these specific claims against the former PM had been dismissed.

However, Heath’s name has been passed to Operation Midland, the police inquiry investigating a “VIP pedophile network,” which allegedly operated throughout Westminster in the 1970s and 1980s.

On Tuesday evening, Hampshire police said it was also investigating claims. Wiltshire Police meanwhile confirmed it had received a “number of calls” on Tuesday following its appeal for victims and witnesses to come forward.

Kent Police further said it was looking into a claim of sexual assault by Heath, while Jersey Police claimed the former PM is already a suspect in its own inquiry into historical sex abuse.

Kent Police has today received a report of a sexual assault having been committed in east Kent in the 1960s. The victim has named Sir Edward Heath in connection with the allegation,” the force said in a statement.

Heath served as a Conservative Prime Minister from 1970 until 1974. He died in 2005 aged 89.

Via RT. This piece was reprinted by RINF Alternative News with permission or license.



UK body to probe ‘police failure’ in child abuse claim against ex-PM

File photo of former UK PM Edward Heath

The UK police’s monitoring body says it will investigate whether the British law enforcement failed to probe an allegation of child sex abuse against former prime minister Edward Heath in the 1990s.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said it had received an allegation “that a criminal prosecution was not pursued, when a person threatened to expose that Sir Edward Heath may have been involved in offenses concerning children.”

Heath, a Conservative, was prime minister between 1970 and 1974 and had a home in Wiltshire county. He died in 2005, aged 89.

The IPCC is now set to investigate Wiltshire Police’s handling of the allegation.

This is while the Wiltshire Police force has said it is trying to find “witnesses or victims who support the allegations of child sex abuse,” and urged victims to come forward.

Now Dr. Jon Bird, operations manager of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC), says these cases have come to the fore as victims have come out and spoken against such crimes over the past years.

A public inquiry in Britain is investigating whether police and other authorities covered up sexual abuse by powerful people over several decades.

New Zealand judge Lowell Goddard, who is leading the public inquiry, said last month that Britain had been stunned by revelations about child sexual abuse in the country, and warned that the true scale of the crime has long been underestimated.

A dam of official silence around child abuse in Britain began to break after the 2011 death of BBC entertainer Jimmy Savile, when dozens came forward to say he had abused them. Subsequent revelations have implicated other entertainers, as well as British priests and senior politicians.







10 Responses to “Why didn’t this happen while he was alive? 5 police forces investigating Ted Heath child sex allegations”

  1. Lynn says:

    All hiding in plain site. Nothing will happen, lessons learned etc etc. The police knew back then what they know now. Why now !! Hmm.

  2. Aldous says:

    Comment from this article’s RT link:

    “its a shame that pedos run westminster and the church . come on british people stand up and stop being side tracted isis migration and the rest of mainstream bs. your leaders are raping your children”

    I’m not sure which is worse; the pedos in Westminster raping British children or the parents letting their children watch Zio-Hollywood garbage like Despicable Me and Minions and having their children’s minds raped.

    “Minions” – Hollywood’s Blatant Satanic Solicitation of Children

    July 10, 2015

    Doesn’t it feel good to be evil? This is the message repeated in “Minions” a movie opening today from “Illumination Entertainment.” Minions teaches children they are androgynous widgets whose only purpose in life is to serve an evil master.

    Humanity has been inducted into a satanic cult, Cabala Judaism. Hollywood deserves much of the credit. This movie demonstrates how, in a satanic cult, evil is made to appear good, and members are corrupted and sickened, and thus controlled and exploited.

    “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World


  3. Lynn says:

    Aldous . Good evening. Good to see you marking out the evil. I swear out loud at this onslaught of our future generations. It is chilling to the bone what they are doing. It’s all to rid them of a competitive youth. Tribal and sneaky. I watched a program last week on the Belgian education system sending 6-8 year olds home with sex toys. They asked 2 British families what our reaction in UK. Would do and sure enogh they said it would cause a revolution
    well let them try it. I hope it does. We will not stand for the sexualisation of our young. This will tip the scales. Even in prison they get isolated from the other inmates.

  4. Aldous says:

    It would set a new standard for ‘hollow victories’ – and probably have the Oxford Dictionary redefine the meaning of the term – if Dead Heath was ever to be posthumously declared guilty of any wrongdoing. We all know it’s not going to happen.

    It would entail Heath’s grave in Salisbury UK – possibly a venue of satanic homage by such similar sickos – being torn up and all manner of awards, honours and offices being tainted and blighted by such an admission of guilt.

    Buck(sic) House at 1 The Mall would imho be fatally damaged by such inconvenient truth and the Houses of Windsor/Rothschild won’t let that happen without a fight to the death.

    Perhaps it’s ‘game on’ for the endgame? Interesting and exciting times for those of us with virtually one elderly foot in the grave, where we will live to see the final victory of Good over Evil; or not have to live through the nightmares that Orwell and Huxley envisaged.

  5. Lynn says:

    He was elevated to power because of what they knew about him. He was used as they all are to take us into the common market. Lol.. Not elected – selected. Hand picked like they all were. And yes exciting times watching all our true history coming to light. This will never be lost again.

    • Aldous says:

      Hi Lynn and g’day. I’ve noted how the msm ‘revelations’ about Heath are typical establishment controlled/limited (almost worthless) release of the inconvenient truth (limited hangout) that they can no longer just ignore because it is about to go, or has already gone viral.

      They seem to be diluting the truth down to ‘child abuse’ allegations – I don’t believe I have seen any mention of the word ‘rape’ and I certainly don’t think they will go anywhere near the full blown horrific truth and mention the child killing allegations.

      I see the Nick Ross creature is already attacking even these watered down allegations: “Why ARE we prioritising crimes from 50 years ago over crimes from the last 50 minutes?… Today’s crimes are being robbed of resources to pursue what happened in the past. With fewer coppers and radically shifting threats we need to tear up rule books. We have to make each pound focus on prevention.
      That means we might sometimes have to leave history to historians. When the police look back, their main concern should be the future.”


      So there we have it. The DM article is a travesty of the truth and suggesting/promoting total denial of justice for the victims. Nick Ross and the backstabbing DM are real sons of bitches.

      • Aldous says:

        “That means we might sometimes have to leave history to historians. When the police look back, their main concern should be the future.”

        Their main concern should be the future? Hang on a minute, are we talking about a Pre-Crime Police Force Here? A virtual Thought Crime Police Force? Perhaps the movie Minority Report and the use of Pre-Cogs wasn’t just a movie after all?

        Pre-Crime Policing

        There’s just one problem: David Pyles hadn’t committed any crime, nor was he suspected of having committed one. The police never obtained a warrant for either search or arrest. They never consulted with a judge or mental health professional before sending out the military-style tactical teams to take Pyle in.


        I bet the SWAT cunch of bunts wouldn’t pull such a stunt for Royal 1 at Buck House or for her 5th cousin twice removed PM at No. 10.

  6. sovereigntea says:

    They always were taking the piss. Check out this Cliff Rolf & kids footage note what to kangaroo is up to behind the kid. Cilla who didn’t know a thing thinks Rolf is OK LOL.


  7. Aldous says:

    I can’t help thinking, that the only way out of the predicament the Paedophile State aka Her Majesty’s Ingsoc finds itself in over Heath, is to post-designate him an Unperson:

    An unperson is a person who has been “vaporized”; who has not only been killed by the state, but effectively erased from existence.
    Such a person would be written out of existing books, photographs, and articles and the original copies destroyed, so that no trace of their existence could be found in the historical record.
    The idea is that such a person would, according to the principles of doublethink, be forgotten completely (for it would be impossible to provide evidence of their existence), even by close friends and family members. Mentioning his or her name, or even speaking of their past existence, is thoughtcrime; the concept that the person may have existed at one time and has disappeared cannot be expressed in Newspeak.
    Compare to the Stalinist practice of erasing people from photographs after their execution. (Wiki)

    Person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Newspeak_words#/media/File:Voroshilov,_Molotov,_Stalin,_with_Nikolai_Yezhov.jpg

    Unperson/Nonperson: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Newspeak_words#/media/File:The_Commissar_Vanishes_2.jpg

  8. Aldous says:

    “He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”
    ~ George Orwell (Nineteen Eighty-Four)

    It is now crystal clear that TPTB are trying their utmost to make the people out there think of these monstrous crimes as something in the past that isn’t happening now.

    Take the (their) term ‘Historic Child Abuse’ for example, when we all know that it’s as rife now in the corridors/sewers of power as it has ever been.

    Now we have Crimewatch’s Nick (don’t have nightmares) bloody Ross weighing in with his preposterous view that these crimes should be dealt with by historians.

    Where does he think the line of history over crime should be drawn? 1 year? 10 years? 50 years? Perpetrator alive/Victim dead? Perpetrator dead/Victim alive? Both dead – why bother?

    After all, it’s only the TRUTH and true lessons of history we’re talking about here? Aren’t Hollywood movies(sic) like Despicable Me and Minions far more important to know about?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.