Some questions for the Pope

Some Questions to a War Criminal

jorge-bergoglio-papa-francisco-i-480x430(aka “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio”)

1. Are you a member or participant in the sacrificial cult known as the Ninth Circle? Where were you at midnight on February 23-24, 2014?

2. Did you participate in the ceremonial rape, torture and murder of a five year old Belgian girl whose name was Anna, at a private chateau outside Gulpen, Holland on August 15, 2011?

3. In your capacity as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, and at any other time, did you organize the trafficking and sale of children of political prisoners in Argentina at the behest of its military junta, during that country’s genocidal Dirty Wars?

4. What was your professional and personal relationship with Argentine dictator General Jorge Videla?

5. Have you ever accepted a payment from the present Queen of the Netherlands, Máxima Zorreguieta Cerruti, for helping her expunge her own criminal record in Argentina?

6. As the chief fiduciary officer of the Roman Catholic Church, why have you not revoked its criminal policy known as Crimen Sollicitationas, by which every Catholic is obligated to protect child rapists in your church, and thereby subvert the laws and sovereignty of their own nation?

7. Why have you claimed publicly that your church will cooperate with outside authorities to stop child abuse in its ranks, while telling your Bishops that they are not to inform the police when children are abused in your church?

8. Why are you allowing the Vatican Bank to continue its massive laundering of the money of organized crime and drug cartels, including the Drangheta criminal syndicate? Is it because in exchange, Drangheta has provided to your church’s Ninth Circle sacrificial cult the children and adolescents to be tortured and killed at its rituals?

9. Did you or your representatives ever meet personally with leaders of Drangheta in February of 2014, or at any other time, to arrange these exchanges and other criminal acts?

10. What is the Vatican’s relationship with the governments of Russia and China, and its “BRICS” affiliated Eastern Investment Bank? Is your upcoming visit to the United States occurring at the behest of these governments?

11. What knowledge do you have of the murder of Pope John Paul 1 in September 1978 by a faction of Catholic Cardinals associated with former Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger?

12. Did you collude with Pope Benedict to conceal his own crimes in helping to traffic and kill children as part of his membership in the Ninth Circle cult and the Nazi S.S. “Knights of Darkness”, when he was a member of that sect?

13. Why are you “beatifying” the murderous California missionary Junipero Serra, who led the Spanish conquest of aboriginal nations there, enslaving and killing thousands of men, women and children on Franciscan-run slave plantations?

14. Why are you posing as a humanitarian reformer when you are the head of a global criminal syndicate known as the Vatican, Incorporated, which traffics and kills children and funds transnational organized crime?

15. Having been lawfully convicted of these and other crimes by a Citizen’s Tribunal and its common law court in September of 2013, and since an international arrest warrant has been issued against you, will you continue to evade and obstruct justice? When will you surrender yourself to justice, and the verdict of this court and humanity?

Sources: ; INTERPOL ; the sworn affidavits of Anne Marie van Blijenburgh, Toos Neijenhuis and three protected witnesses ; media and legal accounts.

TUNE IN this Sunday for more, at (3 pm pacific, 6 pm eastern, 11 pm GMT)


27 Responses to “Some questions for the Pope”

  1. Lynn says:

    Just how bad can this get . They are unbelievably evil. This is just too wrong to even contemplate. No wonder people are not waking up, it is too far out there to compute in the human mind. I’m lost for words now.

  2. Nike says:

    Some hard questions for the pope? Why not?
    However, very serious accusations, assumptions and insinuations should not rely on hearsay only but be backed by hard evidence. Is that the case?

    The questions I’m interested in refer to the alleged “six million Jews“ who died in Nazi concentration camps. I’d like to ask the Zionist Satanists why lots of evidence to the contrary is being ignored? Why are the German people (not only the WW II generation) being slandered and vilified? Why are researchers of the alleged holocaust being persecuted and even incarcerated? Why are Zionists afraid of learning the truth?

    Holocaust – Antisemitism Tricks

    Judea* Declares War on Germany March 24, 1933
    *Zionists who claim to speak for world jewry

    Ursula Haverbeck “The Greatest Problem of Our Time” w/ English Subtitles

    Breaking the Spell

    • ian says:

      It will soon be illegal everywhere to ask this. You can say what you like about anything else that happened or didn’t happen. you can say Jesus never lived and God doesn’t exist. You can say anything, but don’t question the gas chambers, because if ever the spell is broken, it can’t be reinstated.

  3. Dogman says:

    A former employee of the Holy Rosary Catholic Cathedral has revealed details of a west coast sacrificial cult involving the ritual rape and murder of children.

    The cult, known as the Twelve Mile Club, operates from private yachts owned by Catholic businessmen and moored in West Vancouver. The abducted and tortured children are taken outside Canada’s twelve mile territorial limit and their bodies are disposed of in the ocean.

    The witness shared his evidence this week with a special ITCCS Inquiry formed in the wake of the exposure of Canadian government cabinet minister Denis Lebel’s participation in a Ninth Circle ritual killing of a young boy in Rome on February 22, 2014. (see, November 4, 2014)

    The witness attended meetings during 2007 and 2008 where former Archbishop Raymond Roussin and senior parish priest Glen Dion planned with church lawyers the coverup of their own involvement in the Twelve Mile Club.

    According to the witness, the Archbishop and Glen Dion named judges and other clergy as being members of the Club, including former Chief Justice of the BC Provincial Court Hugh Stansfield, Justice William Esson and Terrance Warren of the British Columbia Supreme Court, United Church clergyman and present Moderator of that church, Gary Paterson, and national United Church officials Brian Thorpe and Jon Jessiman.

    Chief Justice Hugh Stansfield died suddenly in May, 2009 after being named as a suspected child rapist. ( … stansfield—provincial-court-of-british-columbia—suspected-pedofile—suspected-murder-victim.html)

    Archbishop Roussin resigned his position suddenly in January, 2009 due to a “nervous breakdown”, according to the Vancouver Archdiocese.

    Referring to the Archbishop, the witness stated,

    “At the last meeting I attended before he retired, that was in the spring of 2008, his Excellency was very worried about the protests at the Cathedral by the Indians and Kevin Annett’s group. He was afraid that all the reporters covering these protests would discover the Twelve Mile Club and all the children who had gone missing. It all became too much for him.”

    Common law citizen arrest warrants were issued last year against three other alleged Twelve Mile Club members – United Church Moderator Gary Paterson and church officials Brian Thorpe and Jon Jessiman – for their role in concealing the trafficking and killing of children in their church’s Indian residential schools. ( … -genocide/)

    Asked about his knowledge of any connection between the Twelve Mile Club and the Ninth Circle cult, the witness stated to ITCCS officers,

    “Being a francophone too, Archbishop Roussin was close friends with (Ninth Circle member) Archbishop Gerald Lacroix. They wrote a book together, they paired up during voting at the CCCB (Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops). You don’t get to become an Archbishop unless you know how to keep each other’s secrets. How much more of a connection do they need?”

  4. Dogman says:

    From March 2014
    After being publicly charged with child trafficking and criminal conspiracy on 4th March 2014 and served a Public Summons, the head officers of the Vatican, the Jesuits, and the Church of England have refused to deny or contest the charges and will therefore face criminal prosecution commencing 31st March.

    The announcement came today as the deadline to respond to a Common Law Court Summons lapsed on Tuesday without any communication from the primary defendants: Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Pachon, and Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.

    “Their silence is very telling and extremely important legally” said Court Secretary George Dufort from Brussels.

    “Our Prosecutor’s Office has the power now to proceed with its case and waive the normal examination procedure, since the defendants are not disputing the charges and are thereby tacitly admitting their guilt. The Court Magistrates will enter a plea of nolo contendere by the defendants into the court record and have every right to rule against them in their absence.”

    This startling development occurred as even more shocking news surfaced today in Rome that the allegedly former Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger, actually retains power at the Vatican, and that since at least 1962 has been a member of a child abuse cult known as the Corona Novem, or The Ninth Circle (or Crown).

    Francesco Zanardi of the ITCCS affiliate Rete L’Abuso in Savona, Italy said in an interview last week,

    “We know from several Cardinals that Pope Francis is a caretaker figurehead who is not actually the Pope. It’s all been a huge deception. Francis doesn’t wear the papal ring and lives in a convent in Rome, not in the Vatican. He is given no official security and wanders about like a private individual. And he makes policy statements which the Curia of Cardinals then disavow, saying Francis doesn’t reflect church doctrine. And all the top appointments have been Germans or those connected to Ratzinger, who continues to speak to reporters like he’s still the Pope.”

    Meanwhile, a former member of a child abuse cult known as The Ninth Circle has stated in a deposition that Joseph Ratzinger has been a member of the Circle since at least 1962, and as such has routinely participated in the ritual rape, torture and killing of children.

    “The witness claim to have seen both former Pope John Paul the Second, Karol Wotyja, and Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger, participate at Ninth Circle rituals held at Catholic cathedrals and a forest grove in France” said George Dufort of the Common Law court.

    This recent statement confirms the account of such a ritual involving Ratzinger made by Dutch eyewitness Toss Niejenhuis last year (see, May 8).

    The Court has also received evidence that the Ninth Circle cult is referred to in Vatican documents which describe how the participation of every new Pope in the Ninth Circle cult is mandatory for their assumption of office. The alleged documents refer to the cultic rituals as “The Magisterial Privilege” that involves the ceremonial killing of newborn children and the consumption of their blood at Circle rituals.

    The alleged document is translated from Latin and is dated December 25, 1967. This new evidence has been entered into the case records of the Citizen Prosecutors Office of the Court. and .

  5. Dogman says:

    Judy Byington — Child Abuse May 28, 2014

    Catholic Jesuit head Adolfo Panchon announced his resignation this week after the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels linked him to Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult ceremonies. For the last month five judges have “examined numerous eyewitnesses and Vatican archival documentation that clearly link Pachon, Pope Francis, former Pope Ratzinger and Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby to the ritual rape and killing of children as recently as 2010″ according to yesterday’s bulletin from the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State. Last month the ITCCS began prosecuting the case before the five international judges and 27 jury members.

    “Pope Francis’ bizarre remarks during last week’s Mid East tour that ‘Sex abuse is like a Satanic Mass’ reveals that he understands that the rape of children within his church are linked to Satanic rituals in which he himself participates” the prosecutor said from Brussels. “We consider the Pope’s remarks a tacit admission of guilt and more evidence of his involvement in this monstrous crime.”
    A Catholic Jesuit Order called the “Magisterial Privilege” dated Dec. 25 1967 concerning the Black Mass has been
    provided to the court from Vatican archives. The document was said to show that every new Pope was required to participate in Ninth Circle Satanic Black Mass ritual sacrifices of newborn children, including drinking their blood.
    “Vatican documents clearly indicate that for centuries the Jesuits had a premeditated plan to ritually murder kidnapped newborn babies and then consume their blood,” the Chief Prosecutor told the court. “The plan was born of a twisted notion to derive spiritual power from the lifeblood of the innocent, thereby assuring political stability of the Papacy in Rome. These acts are not only genocidal but systemic and institutionalized in nature. Since at least 1773, they appear to have been performed by the Roman Catholic Church, Jesuits and every Pope.”
    “The Pope’s remarks about Satanic Black Masses are the lowest kind of sadistic insensitivity” agreed Ruth Leopold, a 51 year-old American who claimed to be a survivor of Catholic Satanic Black Mass torture. “Any idiot knows that even mentioning trigger words like ‘Satanic Mass’ will re-traumatize victims of Satanic torture. Maybe his words were deliberately designed since we are accusing him of taking part in Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice killings. It’s time he stepped down.”
    Leopold’s Against Church Terror survivors’ network headed a witness delegation to the Brussels court. The 2014 court was prosecuting global elite members of the Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult said to include Pope Francis, Pachon and Welby. At least eight witnesses have testified that either Pope Francis, former Pope Ratzinger or Panchon were present with them as children at child sacrifices.
    The May 27 ITCCS bulletin announced that the court had received new evidence from Vatican sources that detailed Pope Francis’ efforts to cover up Ninth Circle activities and “attempted to disrupt the court through covert means.”
    While Pachon decided to step down, Pope Francis suggested to reporters during his recent tour of the Holy Land that he might follow former Pope Ratzinger’s example and retire. On Feb. 15 2013 the Brussels court found Ratzinger guilty of Crimes against Humanity. He resigned a few days later on Feb. 28. Evidence presented at that 2013 court could be found in Kevin Annett’s “Hidden No Longer” available for free here.
    Witnesses named Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult members as Dutch Catholic Cardinal Alfrink and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands; British, Dutch and Belgian royal family members including Queen Elizabeth, Prince Phillip, Dutch Queen Wilhemina, her family and consort King Hendrick; Pope Francis, former Pope Ratzinger, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, two British High Court Judges including Judge Fulford, a Canadian Catholic bishop and senior government ministers in Belgium and England.
    Last week the court adjourned for a few days after receiving word that the Ninth Circle Child Sacrifice Cult scheduled a child sacrifice for Aug 15 2014 in the subterranean vault beneath Marie-Reine-du-Monde Roman Catholic Cathedral in Montreal, Canada. Witnesses also testified that as children they were forced to watch child sacrifices in the crypt of the Caernarfon Castle in Wales, the sub basement catacomb under the west wing
    of the Canadian Branton Ontario Mohawk Indian residential school and at groves in France, Holland and the US.
    Some have been more recent victims of this global elite Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult. Jamacian and British Soldier Vivian Cunningham remained drugged in the St. George’s Hospital in Stafford England (ph: 44 01785 257888) just for asking questions about Queen Elizabeth’s arrest warrant for kidnapping ten native children. British citizen David Compan and his wife were accosted, drugged, arrested and incarcerated in the London Park Royal Mental Health Center for posting Queen Elizabeth’s arrest warrant on a Catholic Church. Compan’s arrest and release was captured in this video.
    Last October in Kitchener Ontario Canada Steve Finney was trying to expose the 2013 Ninth Circle Satanic Cult case on 50,000 missing native children that included Queen Elizabeth’s kidnapping charges-conviction. Finney was arrested and held in prison for three days without charges. Protests around the globe organized by the ITCCS appeared effective in Finney’s and the Compans’ releases.
    Former Kamloops School resident William Combes and others haven’t been so lucky. The Canadian native was injected into a coma then died after a 2010 radio interview where he discussed witnessing Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip leave the school with his ten friends and fellow Kamloops residents. Chief Louis Daniels, Harriet Nahanee, Jonny Bingo Dawson and Ricky Lavillee also died of mysterious causes prior to their scheduled testimonies at the 2013 international trial on 50,000 missing native children.
    More evidence on activities of the Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult has been promised in upcoming Public Information Bulletins from the ICLCJ Court Prosecutor’s Office. The case was expected to take over a year to complete prosection due to the number of witnesses coming forth and evidence presented so far to the court. To contact officers of the International Court in Brussels email or call:,, 250-591-4573, 386-323-5774

    • Nike says:

      ” International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels”

      Fraud? There is no any such “court”?
      Kevin Annett – a fraud too?
      Questions on the article.

      1.What is “the Ninth Circle“? What is meant by “sacrificial cult“?
      2.What happened at midnight on February 23-24, 2014?
      3.Who accuses “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” for having participated in the ceremonial rape, torture and murder of a five year old Belgian girl whose name was Anna, at a private chateau outside Gulpen, Holland on August 15, 2011? Any evidence for that crime? Any witnesses?
      4.Is there any evidence that “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” organized the trafficking and sale of children of political prisoners in Argentina at the behest of its military junta, during that country’s genocidal Dirty Wars?
      5.Is there any evidence that “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” accepted a payment from the present Queen of the Netherlands, Máxima Zorreguieta Cerruti, for helping her expunge her own criminal record in Argentina? Any evidence that she had such a criminal record?
      6.There is no (!) such policy known as Crimen Sollicitationas, by which every Catholic is obligated (!) to protect child rapists in the Catholic church, and thereby subvert the laws and sovereignty of their own nation. As far as I know that’s Utter nonsense.
      7.Why is “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” telling the Bishops that they are not to inform the police when children are abused in the church? He might think he is protecting the church’s reputation by sweeping those crimes under the rug.
      8.Why was Pope Benedict XVI forced to resign? Was it for refusing the Vatican Bank to continue its massive laundering of the money of organized crime and drug cartels, including the Drangheta criminal syndicate? Was it because in exchange, Drangheta has provided to the Ninth Circle sacrificial cult children and adolescents to be tortured and killed at its rituals? Did Benedict XVI object to that practices?
      9.Why should “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” have any knowledge of the circumstances under which Pope John Paul I died in September 1978? A highly suspicious sudden death of a pope after only 33 days in office.
      10.Why is former Pope Benedict XVI, Joseph Ratzinger associated with the death of Pope John Paul I? Why is he here even suspected of murder?
      11.Is there any evidence that former Pope Benedict XVI is the member of a “sacrificial cult“ called the “Ninth Circle“?
      12.Is there any evidence that both “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” and former Pope Benedict XVI colluded in the crime of helping to traffic and kill children?
      13.Why is “Jorge Bergoglio” posing as “Pope Francis” and a humanitarian reformer when he is the head of a global criminal syndicate known as the Vatican, Incorporated?
      14.Is there any evidence that the Vatican is a global crime sydicate which under the disguise of The Roman Catholic Church traffics and kills children and funds transnational organized crime?
      15.Is there a “Citizen’s Tribunal“ and a “Common Law Court“ or is that a fraud?
      16.Is it true that an international arrest warrant has been issued against “Pope Francis”, “Jorge Bergoglio” ? Or is it a fraud? (some say so)
      17.Who are Anne Marie van Blijenburgh and Toos Neijenhuis ?

  6. Mark says:

    Has Kevin revealed how he came to believe this, what sources? Are the witnesses claiming they were told this?

    “The Corona Novem, Crown or Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult began at least three centuries ago at the Vatican,” Annett said, “but has expanded to embrace local Satanic child sacrifice cults across Europe and the Americas. Thanks to Catholic pressure, the Ninth Circle affiliated strongly with Nazi cultic groups that had close ties with the Waffen S.S. during the 1930′s and ’40′s.”


  7. Nike says:

    “Waffen S.S”
    This writing is false!

    Waffen SS (“Schutzstaffel” is a combined word with a double meaning, in short “SS” meaning “protection squadron”)

  8. Nike says:

    “The Corona Novem, Crown or Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult…”

    What “Crown” or “the Crown” are we talking about?

    There are TWO operant Crowns in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.

    Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown (!), who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.

    This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply ‘The City.’

    The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.

    The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.

    When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.

    Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.

    In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world’s trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world’s oceans.

    The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown’s commerce and the Crown’s wealth.

    Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world [GLOBAL MONEY FRAUD] is held by the Crown.

    The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court.

    They are: the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln’s Inn and Gray’s Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar.

    The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world [??] are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.

    The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America.

    To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter ‘S,’ denotes a legal entity of the Crown.

    At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown.

    There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown.

    Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed.

    The Warranty Deed is only a ‘color of title.’ Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.

    The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace.

    Another ruse used to hoodwink natural persons is by enfranchisement. Those cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a corporation.
    A ‘juristic personality’ has been created, and you have entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity relationship with the Crown.

    These invisible contracts include, birth certificates, citizenship records, employment agreements, driver’s licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract.

    Tax protestors and (the coming) draft resistors trying to renounce the parts of these contracts that they now disagree with will not profit by resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges will reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract law jurisprudence. Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in effect.

    These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule the broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English common law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a ‘bill of benefits,’ conferred on us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes).

    Protestors and resistors will also lose their cases by boasting of citizenship status. Citizenship is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, “Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements.”

    “The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states,” citizens shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind”

    What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown’s debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income.[A SYSTEM OF FRAUD serving the 0,001%]

    And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all enfranchised persons (that’s you) can be held personally liable for the Crown’s debt.

    The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn’t have been possible were in not for the Crown.

    They view the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it – as an operation of law – the identical same full force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain.

    Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The Crown also views bank account records as their own private property [MANIACS!!], pursuant to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us ever read.

    The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find that they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not to disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the Crown also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of commerce.

    When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality was created. It is this personality (income and assets) that IRS agents are excising back to the Crown through taxation.
    Possession of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown’s lex as ‘conclusive evidence’ of our having accepted federal commercial benefits. This is another example of an equity relationship with the Crown.

    Presenting one’s Social Security Number to an employer seals our status as taxpayers, and gives rise to liability for a reciprocal quid pro quo payment of taxes to the Crown.

    Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement endowment benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die, your spouse gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is divided (forfeited) among other premium payers who haven’t died yet.

    But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity attachments as an act of defilement and will proceed against us with all due prejudice.

    For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thoroughgoing study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be deemed a ‘stranger to the public trust,’ forfeit all enfranchisement benefits and close all bank accounts, among other things.

    Citizenship would have to be made null and forfeit and the status of ‘denizen’ enacted. If there are any persons extant who have passed through this fire, I would certainly appreciate hearing from them.

    The United States of America is a corporation, ruled by the British Crown and the Vatican


    Vatican City (Religion)
    City of London (Finance)
    Washington D.C (Military)

    All three are separate states, completely independent of their respective countries

    The USA is, and always has been, a huge corporation ruled from abroad. Its initial name was the Virginia Company and it is owned by the British Crown and the Vatican, who receive their yearly share of the profits.

    The US presidents are appointed CEO’s (they are not elected by us!), and their allegiance is to the “board of directors,” not to the American citizens. We are seen as employees of the company and voting is designed as a distraction meant to offer us the illusion that we have a say in all this.

    • Mark says:

      Sound info Nike but in answer to, ‘what “Crown” or “the Crown” are we talking about?’ – it’s what and who KA is on about? No-one, (not Alex Jones, when interviewing him), corroborates the validity of this claim. Quickly researching leads to no trail. All roads lead to Kev. I assume those who alleged were involved have told him, and/or there’s uncovered documentation yet to be disclosed. Either way 10th Square, 4th… or who knows what, the question is – why KA is saying this? We got the crimes, rituals and elite but without even a story of where he gets the lowdown, aside I assume, ‘they’ took it from Dante’s (Inferno) circle of treachery/number nine. Plus, while we’re on it, naming Justin Welby as a perpetrator, before he was a public figure, is suspicious.

      There’s enough of an issue in establishing credibility about all this, putting out another title and to some degree definition through history, opens the investigation up to cries of D. Brown.

      I don’t expect Kevin to respond, sadly.


  9. dogman says:

    See what you make of this:
    The ICLCJ Court received a collection of Jesuit archival records about a child sacrificial cult known as the Knights of Darkness. In 1933 the Knights were established by the Catholic Jesuits and Nazi Waffen S.S. Division. The records showed Ratzinger was identified as a member of the Knights while working as an S.S. Chaplain’s assistant at the Ravensbruck Concentration Camp in Germany. The records also stated that Ratzinger participated in child sacrificial rites using kidnapped children from the camps or political prisoners.

    Another court document called the Magisterial Privilege indicated child sacrifice was a regular occurrence at the Vatican. At the tender age of 12 “Svali” of San Diego County California claimed she was brought to catacombs beneath the Vatican to witness the sacrifice of a three year-old drugged boy. In this video her interviewer said that 24 years prior a “Maria” told him she witnessed another satanic child sacrifice rite in the same Vatican Catacombs.

    Lots more at source –

  10. dogman says:

    A Gangster’s wife’s story:
    My name is Anne Marie van Blijenburgh. I have been married for twenty four years to Kees van Korlaar. Together with his three brothers, Kees van Korlaar forms a criminal organization known as the Octopus Syndicate (ed. Note: This is a slang term in Holland for Ndrangheta, the modern Italian -based Mafia). They have worked from 1960 on to today. By order of Queen Beatrix they have organized the murder, torture, rape and killing of children in a public setting. They organized that through youth detention centers in the Netherlands.

    The youth detention centers were told by the criminals that they were asking the Dutch court for children who could work for the Dutch Queen for a certain period. The detention centers were very happy; they thought that Queen Beatrix was a very social person, and they gladly volunteered in giving files of certain children to the criminals. When they wanted to verify what the criminals told them, they were given a name and a phone number of a high ranking officer in the court of Queen Beatrix, and that high ranking officer would tell them that indeed the criminals were seeking children to work for a certain period at the Dutch court.

    After receiving files of approximately three children every time, the criminals selected a child that had no relative or family. They told the youth detention center that those are the ones we want; the youth detention center would give clothes to the child and put the child on the train to Zwolle.

    In Zwolle, the criminals fetched the child from the station and brought it to a building that was equipped like a hotel but was not working as a hotel, although there were people in the lobby as if the hotel was working. The child was put on a table and was given something to drink and with that drink the child was drugged. Beside that hotel was a building where the performance took place.

    In that building there were people were sitting down and at a certain moment the child was brought into that building by the criminals, was tortured, raped and brutally murdered in front of those people.

    The audience was around Prince Johann Friso, the second son of Queen Beatrix. I was told that Johann Friso was quite insane and had an unhealthy interest in young children and had a psychiatrist with him every day of his life. That psychiatrist’s name was Guus Pareau Dumont. The criminals organized those killings in accordance with Queen Beatrix. She paid for the killings.

    And the criminals asked Johann Friso to bring his relatives and friends with him, so the whole building was filled with very important people from the Netherlands: ministers, high ranking officers and all kinds of people that the criminals could photograph so they could blackmail those people and get criminal advantages from that.

    Question: Could you name some of the people who were present?

    The people who I recognized there were Prince Johann Friso, his psychiatrist Guus Pareau Dumont; I recognized Johann’s wife Mabel Wisse Smit; she was there with an old man, I think it was George Soros. I recognized a Herr Donner, a former minister of the law department, the viceroy of the Netherlands. I recognized Ernst Hirsch Ballin, a very important former Minister of Justice; I recognized a Mr. van den Emster, he was for years the head of all judges in the Netherlands; I recognized Dick Berlijn; he’s a former head of the military department in the Netherlands. I recognized a very important journalist. I recognized Carla Eradus, the wife of Friso’s psychiatrist Guus Pareau Dumont, Carla is the President of the Court in Amsterdam, a judge. I recognized Mark Rutte, he’s at this moment the President of the Netherlands. I recognized Geert Wilders; he is at this moment the head of the political party PVV and head of the Dutch Parliament. … cused.html

  11. dogman says:

    Knights of Darkness gets mentioned linked with the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, but nothing overtly sinister mentioned.
    Source –

  12. ferryt says:

    It is very difficult to read this without puking up.

    I have no doubt it is true.

    The retribution for this behavior. What about it?

    Where are the two children from the Hampstead case? I made a spiritual promise. This has to stop ffs!

  13. dogman says:

    VANCOUVER, BC – In an exclusive interview with‘s Alfred Lambremont Webre, ITCCS Juror Alex Hunter, accompanied by residential school survivor Wa7tsek of the Burrard First Nations Band, stated that Kevin Annett did not convene a Tribunal for a 2012 trial of Pope Ratzinger, UK Queen Elizabeth Windsor, Canadian Prime Minister Harper and others for child genocide and child trafficking of First Nations children in Canada.

    Kevin Annett never served any Jury Notices, Evidence, Instructions, or held a 2012 trial in which he (Alex Hunter) or his fellow Jurors participated, says ITCCS and International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) former ‘juror’ Alex Hunter.

    “I found out about the so-called 2012 trial of the “Dirty Thirty” (UK Queen, Pope Ratzinger, Prime Minister Harper and others) from the verdicts that Kevin Annett was issuing via email and on the ITCCS website. Kevin Annett is a screen writer and we are characters in his fictional court, trials and verdicts.”

    Source -

    Very disappointing if true.

    • ferryt says:

      Awl a known shill. If I remember correctly he interviewed Eisenhower’s daughter about stargates to the moon. Wow that is some story. And it totally detracts from anything that is really going on. Which is fucking Sick BTW.

      He also interviewed Sabine.

      Tap please comment. Kick these bozos off.


      • Tapestry says:

        I normally kick off when the language gets too heated, or someone is irritating me. It’s not got to that stage yet. Perhaps the discussion will bring commenters to a more shared position. Obviously I can kick people off, and sometimes do. Let’s see how it goes. Sometimes 24 hours in the sinbin can work. But who are the offenders? And what are the charges?

    • ferryt says:

      Awl a known shill. If I remember correctly he interviewed Eisenhower’s daughter about stargates to the moon. Wow that is some story. And it totally detracts from anything that is really going on. Which is flipping Sick BTW.

      He also interviewed Sabine.

      Tap please com
      ment. Kick these bozos off.


      • ferryt says:

        Sorry Tap and other readers.

        I find the sexual abuse of children abhorrent and sometimes I get a little emotional about it. Especially when we hear of trusted and respected establishment figures taking part in such depraved sickness. It does wind me up something rotten.

        I was really talking about the mindless comments that seem to be appearing claiming in response to other comments such gems as:

        That’s bullshit.
        You’re antisemitic.
        You’re a Nazi.
        What you say is irrelevant, capiche?


        I may have lost the plot a bit in replying to these bozos last night so please accept my apologies. No offence intended.

        Obviously this is your blog too! I shouldn’t be saying kick people off etc and your guidelines posted above seem very measured and reasonable.

        Apologies again and let the great tap comments where I have learned so much flow free once again!


  14. Lynn says:

    We will go after these sicko’sat some point feryt. Make no mistake they are marked targets. Known to us and no doubt a few hiding under the radar. They will face justice in some way. This can not be allowed to go on. They will be watched and rounded on. Their rule is coming to a very sticky end. Its gonna get messy very soon.

  15. GNJ says:

    …Which is highly unlikely.

    • ferryt says:

      Get lost.

      • GNJ seems to be a shill, I find it difficult toidentify whos good, whos bad, whos a shill, whos reporting shining truths.. Even those reporting shining truths might also be reporting sophisticated disnifo,unbeknowstt them

        Im poor disinfo sensor but I sense GNJ his wooly wishy washy stranfe apologetic talk about Obama and gay LGBT rights is very suspicious. . Shouldi talk and swear and say what I feel , swear, the agenda going on?
        idnrather have a quiet life so wont say much for now

    • ferryt says:

      Where are the two children from the Hampstead case? I made a spiritual promise. This has to stop ffs!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.