Is Tony Blair holding up the Iraq inquiry report over its tough criticism of him?

by John Wight


There is a growing consensus that Tony Blair is the witness primarily responsible for the delay in publishing the Chilcot report.


Blair in jail

Cartoon by Steve Bell.


The scandal surrounding the war in Iraq, unleashed by the US in 2003 with the support of its UK ally, has never gone away. In the UK it has been compounded by an inordinate delay in the publication of the findings of the official inquiry into the war.

Chaired by retired civil servant, Sir John Chilcot, the inquiry was set up in 2009 by former Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Its overriding aim upon inception was to answer, once and for all, the lingering questions over Britain’s involvement in what undoubtedly qualifies as one of the most disastrous wars in which the country has ever been involved.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair, whose name will forever be inextricably linked to this war and its aftermath, took the decision to follow his US counterpart, George W Bush, to Baghdad on the basis of intelligence that turned out to be false, claiming that Saddam had WMD and posed a clear and present danger to his neighbors and the stability of the region.

Indeed, many believe that the intelligence used to justify the war was not only false it was fabricated, concocted to conceal the war’s real objective – namely regime change and seizing control of Iraq’s massive oil reserves.

Despite not being given the legal powers to either compel witnesses to appear in front of the inquiry or recommend legal prosecutions in instances where the inquiry adjudged the evidence justified them, Chilcot questioned dozens of people over the two years in which it sat from 2009-2011. Everyone from Tony Blair to the most junior civil servant during his government was questioned during the inquiries deliberations, along with senior military personnel and assorted functionaries.

Considering that this phase of the inquiry ended four years ago, the lack of a final report has brought the entire process – at a cost to the British taxpayer of millions of pounds and counting – into disrepute. Worse, it has completely destroyed any confidence the process may once have enjoyed from the British public over the determination and ability of Sir John Chilcot and his team to uncover the truth.

The reason cited by Chilcot – this former top government functionary civil and later privy counselor – for the inordinate delay in completing his deliberations has been the delay in gathering the responses from those witnesses who have come in for criticism in his report. Known as the Maxwellization process, it enshrines the right of witnesses who have been criticized in an official report to receive advance notice in order to allow them to rebut the criticism prior to the report being published.

The problem is that Sir John Chilcot failed to set a time limit on this process, with the result that it has allowed witnesses to draw the process out to the point where it has become a national scandal. In this regard, there is a strong and growing consensus that Tony Blair is the witness primarily responsible for the ensuing delay, doing so in response to the severe criticism that is thought to be in the report of his role and decision to take the country to war.

No one will be surprised here, what with Blair’s zeal in involving the UK in military interventions around the world during his time as prime minister only matched by his arrogant disregard for the human suffering involved. When, during his appearance at the inquiry, for example, he was offered the opportunity by Chilcot to apologize for the loss of life incurred during and as a result of the war, Blair refused.

Just to be clear, the number of Iraqis killed, injured, or whose lives were devastated either during the war, the occupation that followed, and up to the present day due to the sectarian violence and terrorism that is a daily occurrence across most of the country, is of biblical magnitude. Add to this the 179 British soldiers killed and a further 6,000 injured, many of those seriously, and you don’t have to be a genius to understand why Blair is so loathed.

Indeed, pushing the low esteem in which the former British prime minister is held even lower is the fact that since leaving political office, Blair has gone on to amass a mountain of money in return for his services as a public speaker and political advisor and consultant to assorted oil companies, international banks, and various governments – some of them of them of the decidedly unsavory kind.

He has turned into a veritable Crassus, driven by money with scant regard for where or how he gets his hands on it.

Meanwhile, as he flies around the world on a luxury private jet, the families of some of the British soldiers killed in Iraq have gone as far as threatening legal action if the Chilcot report resulting from the inquiry into the war in Iraq is not published by the end of 2015.

Just think about that – people whose sons, husbands, and brothers were killed after being sent by Tony Blair to Iraq to fight a war that many – including former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan – believe was unleashed in violation of international law, have been forced to resort to the courts in order to force the publication of an inquiry into the war that they believe is being delayed by the man responsible for it.

The dictum that justice delayed is justice denied is accurate when it comes to Iraq. The chaos and carnage resulting from this disastrous war and occupation will follow Tony Blair to the grave. However a growing number around the world believe that it should also follow him into the dock at the International Criminal Court at The Hague.

Source: RT


11 Responses to “Is Tony Blair holding up the Iraq inquiry report over its tough criticism of him?”

  1. ian says:

    We didn’t go to war based on intelligence that later proved to be false. It was demonstrably false from the start, Ask Dr Kelly. It was common knowledge that there was no logical excuse for a swaggering Bush and slimy Blair to go into Iraq. It was, I believe desired greatly by Israel, plus the oil was stolen. I will add that the oil was stolen not by us, but by oil companies who then sell it to us at vast profit. It is like the bank crash. The Banks didn’t crash, they bought stock from themselves that was worth nothing and paid themselves a fortune for it. They were with this worthless stock, but not to worry, we bought it at full market price.

    • ian says:

      We are always left with the sh1t to clear up, while these creeps retire to the Caribbean at 45 with a fortune, and force us to work till we’re nearly 70, and the BBC tells us it’s good for us.

    • Neutrino says:

      How can we ask Dr Kelly, isn’t he dead?

      • ian says:

        Yes there was supposed to be a hint of satire there, it possibly was badly written by me, as I’ll admit I’m no great academic. I tend to write as I feel at the time, some people seem to accept it others may not. If on the other hand, you are trying to be sarcastic then I can’t really do much about that. As I have said many times in my comments, what I write is simply my opinion based on what seems likely given the information at hand. I accept that I may be wrong on some occasions, and on those occasions please feel free to offer me alternative information that you may feel is more correct and we can discuss it, however on this occasion it was intended as a satirical remark. As in life begins at 40, ask John Lennon.

  2. Moggsy says:

    Scott Ritter was another one who spoke the truth, he’s now locked up for paedophilia. I wonder if this was another stitch up.

    • ian says:

      Didn’t know that about Scott Ritter Moggsy, he seemed a good guy. I don’t know if was a stitch up, but they can’t half drag their feet if it’s one of them, so I suspect involvement and facilitation of a conviction, whatever happened.

      • Nollidge says:

        Ritter literally walked into a trap.He was found guilty of trying to make sexual contact with an underage girl via the net.Which was an FBI sting operation.It’s possible that he’d done things in the past that gave the FBI the idea of catching him at this kind of thing.

  3. Lynn says:

    The man is guilty…he knows it and we know it. Who needs all this investigating cover up. The families of the murdered boys who were sent to their deaths for fun want closure. We want Blair the butcher locked away. This is total in our face corruption.

  4. Nollidge says:

    Regarding Blair;There was a well-connected financial/political journalist who went under the name of Christopher Storey.He had a website “”.
    In one report he alleged that Blair had received a payment of $100,000,000 into a bank in Belize for dragging/lying Britain into the Iraq war.From what we know of him I find this to be 100% believable.
    Storey was murdered in 2010.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.