Chinese Harbour Nuked?


BLOCKBUSTER: LATEST IMAGES SHOW THE BLAST PRODUCED A THREE ACRE LAKE! The new lake in China proves a 5 kiloton blast, possibly nuclear or possibly from a space based “rod from God” (pictured) weapon DEPLOYED BY THE SPACE PLANE, DING DING DING DING DING!.

Jim Stone
August 14 2015


At first I doubted the “rod from God” because I have no explanation for how one could drop out of orbit and actually fall, but evidently this system is real and they solved that problem. That would make the rod from God the prime candidate here, because the Chinese could easily trace down a nuclear blast.

UPDATE: ANOTHER BLOCKBUSTER: Blasts were NOT RELATED, blast 1, the small blast, happened on the West side of the container lot, and was the crater everyone first saw with containers laying in it, thinking that was from the big blast. It was not. Blast 2, the lake making nuke type blast, happened on the East side of the container lot. The fire happened to the South of both blasts, approximately centered between them, and was ONLY A FIRE, there is no conceivable way it could produce blasts on both sides of a container lot, separated by over 200 yards. The materials in question simply could not do it. The warehouse that supposedly holding whatever exploded was erased by the large (rod from God or nuclear) blast, as was everything else around that blast.
The crater pictures people posted previously were from the small blast, not the big one, a new picture which clearly shows where the big blast went off just got released by China. After looking through the images of the soviet nuclear tests, the new lake in China appears to have been made by a slightly sub surface burst of at least a 5 kiloton nuclear bomb. There is no way the earthquake from this was in the 2’s. Take a look at the pond made by a test of a small nuclear weapon ground burst in Russia and compare it to that new lake in China, which is many times as big as the pond made by a nuclear test in Russia!


Now we have limited options for this blast, since nothing stored there could have possibly done this.

This was NOT an accident and the fracture pattern around the crater proves a sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst,then a small nuclear weapon is the biggest possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not happen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters.

A little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake. If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the center of the lake, which opened up the cracks.

Look closely at the ground around the lake. Those who claimed it was not a nuke cited the fact that if it was, everything around the crater would be vaporized and wiped clean. Now that we have the real crater pic from the big blast, YEP, it matches that perfectly. Take a look at the containers laying in the lower left corner of this picture – they have no paint or color, which means they had the surfaces incinerated by intense heat only a nuke or other super weapon would reach. If this was a carbide blast, they would be black or have their original colors to some degree, complete color change to only gray proves this explosion was FREAKING HOT.

That type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant few alternative options (see Rod from God), No chemical blast did that, PERIOD. The building that is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get leveled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath is completely consistent with a nuclear blast.

I think a glue fire was started as an excuse for this huge blast, which came considerably later. And who knows what made the first big blast, or smaller blasts that led up to it, but I am confident it was a show and not an accident. They wanted this filmed from all angles and set up the show to make sure people would be recording when the big one went off. If there were lots of little blasts before that, why was there not a single small blast after the big one? That is when I would think the small blasts should have started if this entire scenario was not contrived from the start.

What would be the motive for this attack? I don’t buy the currency devaluation, but something else very tasty was going on that a distraction was needed for, SUCH AS:

You cannot “professionally wipe” a server and then hand it to ANY American intelligence agency, Hillary is BUSTED
The only way you can secure a hard drive that is actually in the hands of the NSA is to either incinerate it or shred it down to dust. It won’t matter if you use Norton Clean Sweep or some other app to purge it, even if a full write was done to the entire drive several times, enough stray magnetic data remains from past writes for the NSA to do a deep analysis of and extract – with errors, but they will at least know what is there, and THIS IS WHY THEY KNOW:

The tribe controlled MSM is trying to pawn off the worst proven case of espionage in America’s history as a “mishandled mail box!” The fact the NSA never found that mail box before Hillary gutted the nation also proves that spooks inside that organization covered it all up!
Hillary’s NSA spooks really are the story of the decade
Let me say this in a very simple way:

The NSA has been able to prove that Hillary had many many moles inside the NSA that used the great surveillance power of the NSA to steal America’s secrets and hand them to the Chinese, the Israelis, and the Russians. These moles were so well entrenched and at such high level that they were able to use the NSA’s own satellite uplink to send the classified data to Hillary. And if Hillary was able to get this done, who else was able to use the NSA as their own treasure trove of information? Having this happen clearly explains why almost ALL American companies are now Jewish owned, the Jews got EVERY PIECE OF INFORMATION THEY COULD POSSIBLY ASK FOR to assist in their final takeover and destruction of America. Nothing could be bigger or worse than that. It is GAME OVER.

And then we had the impossible Chinese blasts, right at the perfect time to take Hillary out of the news, people love fireworks and now that is all anyone cares about, and the story of the decade – the end of America for Americans goes down the toilet bowl in a great big swirling glurp.
They keep changing the story on what blew up to circumvent analysis. What I have here is what was really claimed to have blown up, and the correct answer for it.
I am not stupid at chemistry. The list of things that were given to cause the blasts does not add up, not even close. Carbide is practically an inert dust that is left laying around openly at steel mills, where melted blobs of metal often fly everywhere. The actual material being blamed for the blast is butanone. Butanone is airplane modeling glue. You know, that stuff they banned 20 years ago because “kids sniffed it”. Believe me, if it could blow up THAT BADLY modeling glue would have leveled many bedrooms. And then we have a compound of arsenic, which had practically no potential for anything other than creating a nasty gas or burning on the ground, if that, with no boom potential at all.

So let me put it all together here, the story goes like this, if those were the only 3 items in question:
Someone managed to get a bunch of modeling glue burning. And it sat there and burned for 45 minutes (nasty fire there, tough job putting that out, but no boom potential in the context of how it was stored or to even one percent of that magnitude.)

After it burned for a good long time, enough to ensure everyone was watching, somehow some small explosions were touched off to get people to start filming. Then the MOAB or some other huge explosive device comes in, and blows the whole place to smithereens. Bam-o, perfect show for burying the biggest known act of treason in American history – Hillary’s Wal-Mart of American secrets, open to the highest bidder. If the story is modeling glue, it does not wash for that type of explosion, it just does not work that way.

What would I believe for the Chinese blast?
I’d believe that blast if someone said five thousand gallons of acetone dissolved acetylene went off. I’d believe that blast if someone said an entire semi load of tetra hydrazine went off. But modeling glue? Whoever drew that connection should be sentenced to wearing an underwear hat at the stockade, to be buried under a mountain of rotten eggs and tomatoes. And that is why China sent nothing but weapons experts to the blast scene, 218 in total, because they are not stupid about this.

And WHY would this be done? Because a media diversion was needed to bury the fact that the NSA finally got into Hillary’s hard drive, and found text strings that identify THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of classified documents that were ripped right out of the NSA’s underground bases and from those bases Hillary’s spooks sent them straight up to a satellite that Hillary had been handed the encryption keys for. Hillary had no clearance or authorization for that, this is a massive case of espionage blown wide open. And these text strings were found AFTER all the actual documents they came from were wiped from the hard drive during Hillary’s cleanup, and were found as quotes and snips in discussion e-mails her staff overlooked during the cleanup. If Hillary does not fry for this over the next few days, you can bet on America being finished. This is the litmus test.

The latest joke is that ammonium and potassium nitrate blew up. And that IS a joke, because if it is not mixed with fuel in the correct ratios it has no explosive potential at all. Stabbing at the common core with that one I guess . . . .


25 Responses to “Chinese Harbour Nuked?”

  1. Men Scryfa says:

    Many thanks Jennifer for covering this.

    The intel over this way is: Hutchinson Effect style DEW – Direct Energy Weapon.

    Looking at the Photos:

    Cars frazzled – melted in situ. Row after row. In no way is this damage from an explosion. Notice how pockets have been left unaffected which is entirely inconsistent with damage from one or two explosive blasts:

    • sovereigntea says:

      Compare those car pics with the semi burnt cars in NY on 911.

      PS Judy Wood is wrong re imaginary secret weapons try a neutron bomb with an iron oxide jacket. Most of the energy is converted to electromagnetic radiation in those hence the 1/2 burnt cars, a short lived very strong flash of radiation ( heat in a conductor ie metal ).

      • Men Scryfa says:

        Sorry Sov we are going to have to respectfully agree to disagree. I am with the DEW explanation I have seen this too many times and it is scaleable. That discounts a neutron bomb (or a so called micro nuke – even if that type of weapon is actually viable which to many is now doubtful).

        That is not to say that if such atomic weapons exist and are viable rather than imaginary, that they were not also present during the attacks in NYC on 9/11.

      • Men Scryfa says:

        The reason is that the vaporization is a trade mark of the high powered DEW.

        The suddenly appearing sink holes and many of the real pavement explosions, and sudden cave ins are due to the use of this weaponry being used on an experimental scale on the unsuspecting public in the West and in the East too.

        There is no way that a ‘neutron bomb’ or any other so called version of an ‘atomic weapon’ as alleged, could be responsible for what is observed repeatedly in these attacks which vary in scale from massive down to car sized volumes of material being vaporized in seconds from both above and below ground.

        Carol A. Valentine covered this some time ago at the Blog of Blogs. We have been observing this phenomena for some time and have been staggered at the lack of notice the AM has taken of it and the ignorance shown about the true nature of these attacks.

        Early Experimental Use of this Technology on a small scale in the UK covered as far back as 2012:×2012.html

      • sovereigntea says:

        Immediately post 911 the radiation signature is a dead give-away as are the cancer clusters see 2003 Sandia Labs report.

        A big crater post event is a signature of a mini nuke.

        Re energy weapons they exist here is some photographic footage of the zios holocausting Palestinians with one.

      • hugheser says:

        I was thinking the exact same thing! It looks very similar to the cars shown on 9/11 by Dr. Wood.

    • Francesco says:

      Hutchison? Bwaaahahahaha!!!!

  2. Men Scryfa says:

    Here these local relatives of the dead and injured are quite clear who is to blame for the incident in Tianjin.

    Chinese people attack Westerners in retaliation:

  3. Men Scryfa says:

    Helpful series of photographs available at link below. The damage particularly to the vehicles is not consistent with an explosion. There were patches among the vast number of parked vehicles which were unaffected. A directed / targeted aerial weapon was used under the cover of explosions. The heat effects shown to these vehicles and truck is also inconsistent with simply being caused by one or two large blasts.

    If Joe Vialls was still around he would be having a field day with this!

  4. ian says:

    The late great Joe Vialls would indeed have had a field day. I remember him on Bali. He knew his stuff. I would suggest from what I managed to pick up from Joe, that there has been far too much heat radiation here going by the gutted vehicles, for it to have been anything other than nuclear.
    It is a punch on the nose of China for having the audacity to try to influence the financial markets. They will know this, let’s see how they react.

    • sovereigntea says:

      In fact, then Mossad operations chief Mike Harari, who escaped Norwegian police in 1973, after murder charges were leveled against him for killing an innocent Muslim he misidentified as a terror suspect, is the same Mike Harari who confessed to organizing the 9/11 attacks while having breakfast with VT staffer, Dimitri Khalezov on September 12, 2001 in Bangkok.

      If you don’t remember the Bali bombing of 2002, it was Australian’s 9/11 just as 7/7 was Britain’s 9/11. These attacks were all political, all involved the same people, the same “event planners” and benefited the same players, Israel and right wing extremists in the US, Britain and Australia. Mike Harari planned and executed the Bali bombing but he needed help, he said. What he needed was a “fall guy” to blame and Dimitri Khalezov, former Soviet nuclear weapons intelligence officer was a perfect patsy, or so Harari believed when he approached him.

      Harari was looking for help in a bombing project he was doing in Bali. Murdering innocent people for economic and political ends can be so tiresome. 202 people died that day, Muslims were blamed, the media said it was planned in Bangkok 10 months before. They just had the wrong “event planners.” If Khalezov were stupid enough to join the crew, news would have gotten out. Bali was a “suitcase nuke” bombing.

  5. Lynn says:

    Listened to an interview of an ex pat from County Durham living close to this, his words were the wave blew him over. What !!

  6. Aldous says:

    Under Siege 2: Travis Dane destroys the Chinese chemical plant 2:08

    Comment posted a few hours ago: “A hole in guacamole” After what has just happened in China I had to look for this movie clip. This looks exactly like the news of the explosion in that Chinese petrol-chemical plant being reported on the news right now. This is so accurate its freaky.

    Release Dates
    USA 14 July 1995
    Denmark 21 July 1995
    Australia 27 July 1995
    South Korea 5 August 1995
    Finland 18 August 1995
    Philippines 23 August 1995
    Taiwan 25 August 1995

    Under Siege 2 does not appear to have been released (at the cinema) in China (PRC) so the Taiwan (RoC) release date of 25 August 1995 is the closest in comparing release date and the date of the blasts – 12 August 2015.

    2015 Tianjin explosions

    The blasts occurring almost 20 years to the day (midway between the US and Taiwan release dates) seems a little too coincidental to me.

  7. Aldous says:

    In the same movie (Under Siege 2) a private jet is also shot down by this new energy weapon in Earth’s orbit and it now has me wondering if the recent fatal crash of the private jet carrying the Bin Laden family at Blackbushe Airport was caused by the same weapon that may have been responsible for the blasts in China. A couple of witnesses reported seeing a flash of light when the plane was on short finals. I should imagine these quotes are now hard if not impossible to find.

  8. stedra rulz says:

    So, have the Chinese been provided with a new port facility? Free of charge.

    • sovereigntea says:


      See this real drone footage of ground zero freeze frame it at 2min 18s reference the building on the bottom right the same one is top right in the Jim Stone photoshopped image.

      Is Jim Stone a serial hoaxer ?

      As regards a free harbour how will the ships get to the pond LOL.

      • Men Scryfa says:

        He is still pushing remote control planes on 9/11 which even Valentine who came up with that theory is not anymore having accepted the no planes position. That raises some questions.

        Also Stone is continually pushing the ‘micro nukes’ stuff – if the viability of large atomic weapons is questionable then that really does beg a lot of questions about ‘micro nukes’.

      • Men Scryfa says:

        By the way I must point out I am not saying that Bali was not done by a very very powerful bomb – it could well and most likely was – I am just questioning if we can really call it a ‘nuclear’ weapon.

        They have a lot of advanced weapons we know almost zero about.

      • sovereigntea says:

        The science

        Is 50 kg the amount you need for a bomb? No. You can get away with much smaller numbers if you change the conditions.

    • sovereigntea says:

      Micro Nukes 🙂 See pictures things have moved on since then

      It turns out that atomic bullets were invented in the USSR at the time when the country was striving for military parity with the US. They were not only created, but even tested. It goes about 14.3 mm and 12.7 mm caliber ammunition for heavy machine guns. Soviet engineers created a bullet of 7.62 mm – not for the Kalashnikov assault rifle, but for its machine gun. The cartridge was the most miniature nuclear weapon in the world.

      It is an open secret that any nuclear warhead should contain fissile material. For bombs, they take uranium 235 or plutonium 239. To make them work, the warhead made with the use of these metals should weigh more than one kilogram. In other words, the warhead should have a critical mass. When transuranic element was discovered – californium – or rather, its isotope with an atomic weight of 252, it was found that its critical mass was only 1.8 grams. In addition, the decay of the element would produce 5-8 neutrons at once. This is very effective fission, given the fact that uranium and plutonium produce only 2-3 neutrons. In a nutshell, it was enough to squeeze a tiny “pea” of the substance to cause a nuclear explosion. This led scientists to the idea of using californium in atomic bullets.

      • sovereigntea says:

        Micro Nukes 🙂 See the DOD film of the tests.

        M388 Davy Crockett Operational Test

      • sovereigntea says:

        The Royal Ordnance L11A5 is a 120 mm L/55 rifled tank gun design. It was the first of NATO’s 120mm tank guns which became the standard calibre for Western tanks in the later period of the Cold War.

        Nuclear rounds were available. How do I know ? Because I repaired the tele printers which were installed in the tanks, the crews point blank refused to consider firing a nuke without a written order so as not to risk being scapegoated by our political whores. The printers were manufactured by Trend the model was 800.

  9. sovereigntea says:

    Bali Whodunnit – The Bush crime family work for Israel.

  10. kingel says:

    Reference “rod from god” weapon…….this link was posted by Mike Hill on taps, other article ref: Chinese bomb.
    The video narrator at 00:58 says….witnesses saw something drop from the sky !

    2nd point…the damage to the cars reminds me of the 1,000 ? cars that were damaged on 9/11 whilst parked one mile away from the twin towers.

    Finally, who has “FORM” for this sort of genocidal, nihilistic, carnage ? ?

  11. kingel says:

    “Apparently” Hilary ‘aint the only one STEALING US Defense Dept: secrets; passing them to….. MOS-SAD…..for onward transmission to China !
    Jonathan Pollard was convicted for the same crime…………………….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.