Bloggers to be arrested, movements restricted, banned from publishing

Complete Thought Police Control in Britain starting now:

http://uk.businessinsider.com/david-cameron-to-introduce-new-counter-terrorism-bill-2015-5?r=US

Bloggers to be arrested, movements restricted, banned from publishing on the internet. Criticism of the Government by private citizens to be banned. Calling for the replacement of Cameron’s rigged government to become a criminal offence on the grounds that it is an activity deemed to be for the “purpose of overthrowing democracy.”

Internet use ban to include activities deemed to be for the “purpose of overthrowing democracy.” Justified on the grounds of “extremism”.

Read more: http://uk.businessinsider.com/david-cameron-to-introduce-new-counter-terrorism-bill-2015-5?r=US#ixzz3a1EJPYfX

THIS MUST BE COMPLETELY RESISTED: IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND AGAINST THE BASIC COMMON LAW TO RESTRICT SOMEONE’S RIGHT TO HOLD AND EXPRESS VIEWS THAT SOMEONE ELSE MAY FIND TO BE ‘EXTREMIST’ (A TOTALLY SUBJECTIVE TERM IN THE FIRST PLACE).

PERSONALLY I FIND DAVID CAMERON’S VIEW THAT THE GOVERNMENT COVER-UP OF ‘ELITE’ INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE (i.e. Child Rape and Murder) IS A “CONSPIRACY THEORY” TO BE TOTALLY EXTREME. DAVID CAMERON IN MY VIEW IS AN EXTREMIST FOR NOT ACCEPTING THAT THIS CONSPIRACY IS A FACT.

Does he want this unconstitutional law in reality so that people are prevented from alleging that he is part of that criminal conspiracy?

The criminals are now fully in control of the UK government just as Michael Shrimpton and others tried to warn.

From a comment.

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Responses to “Bloggers to be arrested, movements restricted, banned from publishing”

  1. Chris Jones says:

    Not good is it. But this would contravened by common law surely?

  2. Men Scryfa says:

    It is nice to read this on “a blog”

    😉

    • VERY GOOD BLOGGER WHO WRITES REDEFININGGOD SEEING THROUGH NWO TRICKS. HERE HE ANALYSES DAVID WILCOCKS ARTICLES

      Getting back to David’s statement, he is right when he says the solution phase will not initially take away any more of our freedoms. In fact, it will create substantially more freedom in the short term. They’re planning to loosen our leash and give out money to everyone on the planet so we’ll all welcome and participate in the new system rather than resisting it. And once we are dependent on it, they’ll start reeling in the freedoms little-by-little by switching off the financial lifeblood of those who dissent or who exhibit unapproved behaviors. For more on how they’ll do this, see the Borg entry.

      “Though there are at least three major, warring factions in the Cabal at this point, not including the Alliance, the one thing they’ve all agreed on is secrecy.”

      Incorrect. The one thing all factions agree upon is increasing their collective power over humanity. They will moderate the flow from the information spigot in whatever way advances this cause. And I suspect that any perceived infighting among Cabal factions is due to their jockeying for position in the upcoming New Order. Disinformation agents then sell this infighting as serious conflict to support the propaganda effort. Don’t forget that they have fought entire world wars in the past to settle internal differences of opinion and questions of position.

      “As soon as the public discovers the truth, in mass numbers, the Cabal can no longer maintain control. None of its factions can. It’s that simple.”

      This is true, but with an important proviso. If the public, in mass numbers, accepts the “truth” the Cabal is trying to feed them, the enslavement will continue. It is only if we see through their game to the real Truth that the herd will shift direction and leave the false shepherds behind. Fortunately, the Cabalists are already losing control of the truth movement. The fact that you’re reading this article is proof of that [and the screaming troll(s) in the comment board is further proof].

      “Furthermore, if you think that most of the ‘new information’ is over and done with, and life will just go on, all I can say is: You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

      The changes these events will produce have barely even started. This will shock and surprise even the most battle-weary, hardened cynics and skeptics.

      Thankfully, what we will get out of all this is NOT doom, fear, catastrophe and loss of freedom.

      It will be precisely the opposite.”

      He is accidentally correct again.

      The “doom, fear, catastrophe and loss of freedom” trumpeted by the engineered truth movement was meant to panic us and get us stampeding away from the old and towards the new. And when they open the gate of the current holding pen and usher us into the electrically-fenced prairie, they expect us to enthusiastically comply. If we are smart, though, we’ll break through the wooden fence on the other side of the pen and actually be free. In other words, we have to zig when they tell us to zag, and the antithesis of going global is going local.
      https://web.archive.org/web/20140209143251/http://blog.redefininggod.com/2013/07/16/david-wilcock-and-the-real-nwo-part-2-of-2.aspx

  3. Lynn says:

    They are the biggest bunch of criminals that you could ever wish to meet. They are simply putting up more blinds. Well the truth is out and it isnt going anywhere fast Mr C. We know what you have done and we will be coming to get you all.

  4. Aldous says:

    This scumbag Cameron and his partners/cohorts in crime are making this up as they go along. TRUTH has nothing to fear but fear itself.

    Does anyone seriously believe that they would have announced this in advance if they had the ability to arrest/kill Truthseekers opposed to their satanic ways and sick agenda? The guy’s (Cameron) a pussy. A wet tart(sic). A homosexual puppy with his ‘beard’ Sam.

    He might have got away with it if he had only virtually sodomised me, tortured me, BDSM’d me BUT he made one fateful error – he actually BORED me!

    I could never forgive that of anyone, especially someone as disgusting as despicable as Cameron.

    IP address does not constitute a person, judge rules in copyright suit
    March 24, 2014
    http://rt.com/usa/ip-constitute-person-copyright-suit-973/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.