Thow off the psychopathic paedophile Satanists, and become human beings.

I’ve worked my through the three books in Ralph Ellis’ trilogy, the last of which is Jesus King of Edessa.  There’s no doubt in my mind he’s basically right.  The biblical Jesus was a fabrication worked into shape by Josephus Flavius (St Paul).  The real Jesus lived on until 98 AD, and was exiled to Britain and held captive in Chester which was built specially for the purpose.  That happened after he lost his war to capture Judaea and bring the Parthians into a war against Rome, seizing the Empire for himself.  There are so many details, it’s mind-boggling and you need a lot of peace and quiet to read such a detailed study, and follow the code-breaking of the scribes who tried to bury this history in altered names, dates and places two thousand years ago.


Christianity was not his religion.  Jesus was not a Christian.  Christianity was carefully developed to bring the Gentiles to heel and make them ‘gentle’, by persuading them to turn the other cheek to aggression from others, and pay their taxes.  Jesus wanted to overthrow the power of Rome and bring in a new age based on science and knowledge, not slavery and subjugation.  Sadly he failed, and his name was used to make the world subservient to the Romans  in a monumental religious deception, today controlled from The Vatican, where there lies a Secret Library containing many books which would blow Christianity wide open, and enable humanity to discovery our true history.

The problem ever since the deception of Christianity was imposed on the world, is that they’ve been farmed by an invisible elite that makes war, rapes and tortures and keeps itself in control from the shadows, hiding behind the cloak of false religions.  The other major religion that’s bringing war to the world was able to launch itself  based on a belief in outright aggression, sure in the knowledge that Christian toleration would ultimately permit the newer and more blatant evil to take over everywhere.  Judaeism has been equally the victim of Islam as Christianity with millions murdered and ethnically cleansed from both.  Ellis continually draws the readers’ attention to the massive crimes committed in recent times which are barely mentioned in the media, such as half a million Jews being driven from Iraq in 1947.  Millions of Christian Armenians were murdered by Moslem Turks.

People should abandon all religion, redefine themselves as human beings with the need to build a world that is not controlled from the shadows by Satanist psychopathic paedophile killers, wearing frocks, military uniforms or suits.  People must be willing to overthrow the false world that’s imposed on them, in whatever way that requires, and relaunch themselves as gnostics, people who really know what’s going on.   Moslems and Christians and all are equally deluded as to who we are and why we’re here.  The task of unravelling the monstrosity that’s been created for our enslavement is greatly facilitated by Ralph Ellis’ books.  Reach for the knowledge they offer, as a good place to start unwinding the net that’s gripping hold of your brain, and stopping you from becoming what you truly are.

My thanks to Mark Windows, and his Windows On The World, for introducing me to Ralph Ellis via one of his videos.



32 Responses to “Thow off the psychopathic paedophile Satanists, and become human beings.”

  1. barb says:

    Can’t do a link tap sorry but could all please look at a group on Facebook called exposing ritual abuse the ladies story is horrific and totally backs up Sabine and whistleblower kids

  2. Mark says:

    OK Tap – this is good news from the ‘believers’ perspective – raises debate. I recently commented on two contrasting posts on re the Old Testament, this is an ideal New Testament companion. As I wrote on your other Ralph posts – hallelujah for the exposure. I’ll look at Ralph’s claims some more and chip in later today.

  3. NPP says:

    Perhaps a side detail…

    Re: Millions of Christian Armenians were murdered by Moslem Turks.

    Were they? According to who?

    Turks were killed. Armenians were killed. An Ottoman Empire was crumbling and various fingers were in the Anatolian pie. I suggest beware of such blazen statements. The Turks were being assaulted on all fronts by several foreign parties. They were dealing with false flag operations within their own territories; the Armenians wanted and tried for a piece of the pie.

    I was not there. I do not know. I do understand various accusations of various holocaust / genocides are not always relayed accurately in our history.

    If only the Vatican would open its library. If only today’s government would open the records of children’s homes. They do not because they choose to hide truths.

    • sovereigntea says:

      Always the same scam the “superior” elite with “secret knowledge” get to play leaders to fleece the sheeple. If you question their alleged authority you are persecuted and branded an outsider. Same psychological plot with religion, political dogma, group membership ( cults / common purpose / hitler youth )

      How it works —-

    • Tapestry says:

      In general yes, NPP, but Ellis gives specific research on Armenia, and the pattern of Moslem ethnic cleansing and murder of Jews and Christians is constant over 1400 years. It was Armenian historians from the 1-3rd centuries AD who provided some of the keys to unlock the codes of Josephus Flavius’ calculated deceptions about Edessa, Manu (Jesus) and his Royal and powerful roots. He was descended from Julius Caesar and Cleopatra. I would recommend reading the books whether you agree with their conclusion or not. The information worked together from multiple sources, including coins, statues, histories, the New Testament, the Talmud and many others is staggering. It took him twenty five years.

      • NPP says:

        TAP. I’d love to read Ellis’ books. I have listened through all Mark’s interviews with Ellis. As ever time… listening is easier for me than reading since I can attend work while listening. I’d welcome a discussion between Eliis and Greg Hallet.

        From Ataturk’s Nutuk 36 hour speech given 15-20 October 1927, there are passages relevant to the alleged Armenian ‘genocide’.

        I am writing out as per the book and as the English translation is written. Of course, being these are the words of Atatürk, they risk the accusation of bias. My ‘feeling’ is Atatürk’s account is worthy of consideration. We were not there and can only examine the apparent evidence.

        Atatürk represented a National Assembly based out of Ankara. The established ‘Government’ represented the remnants of the Caliphate and Sultanate powers based in Istanbul. The ‘Government’ were considering compromise and appeasement with foreign forces while the National Assembly sought complete national independence.

        “Gentleman! A communication from Istanbul on 19 February 1920 brought us the news that:
        “The English diplomatic representative has verbally given definite information to the Government from the Foreign Office that the capital will be left to the Ottoman Empire, but at the same time, he has demanded that the Armenian massacres shall cease forthwith and that our operations against the Allied troops – including those of Greece – shall also cease immediately. He added if this were not done, our peace conditions would be altered…

        Finally, did the Allied Powers entertain some doubt about the Government not succeeding in disbanding troops at the front which the national forces had sent into the occupied districts to oppose the forces of the enemy and put an end to the fight they carried on and the movement they made against them, and did they consequently plan to occupy Istanbul on the pretext that the Government could neither prevent the attacks against the Allied Powers (including the Greeks) nor put an end to the Armenian massacres – which, by the way, did not exist?

        I believe that later events have shown that the last of these suggestions was the nearest of all to the truth. It was, however, noticeable that the Government, far from interpreting the proposal made by the English diplomatic representative in this light, had, on the contrary, founded their hopes on it.

        Gentleman! In order to understand how ill-advised this proposal was, we shall recall certain phases of the situation as they presented themselves at the time. The assertions regarding the Armenians massacres were undoubtedly not in accordance with fact. For the Armenians in the south, armed by foreign troops and encouraged by the protection they enjoyed, attacked the Muslims of their district.

        Animated by the spirit of revenge, they pursued a relentless policy of murder and extermination everywhere. This was responsible for the tragic incident at Maras (NPP note: sounds like Marash). Making common cause with the foreign troops, the Armenians had completely destroyed an old Muslim town like Maras by their artillery and machine-gun fire.

        They killed thousands of innocent and defenceless women and children. The Armenians were the instigators of the atrocities, which were unique in history. The Muslims had merely offered resistance and had defended themselves with the object of saving their lives and their honour. The telegram which the Americans, who had remained in the town with the Muslims during the five days that the massacres continued, had sent to their representatives in Isanbul, clearly indicates in an indisputable manner who were the originators of this tragedy.

        Threatened by the bayonets of the Armenians, who were armed to the teeth, the Muslims in the Vilayet of Adana were at that time in danger of being annihilated. While this policy of oppression and annihilation carried on against the Muslims, who were only trying to save their lives and their independence, was liable to attract the attention of the civilised world and excite their commiseration, how could the denials or the proposal made to us to abandon the attitude attributed to us be taken seriously?”

        Re reading, hail pin-hole glasslesses.

        Currently, listening though 7 hours +:
        The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations by John Coleman
        John Coleman is scathing about David Icke, calling him a plagiarist etc… why do people get so upset when their work is embraced and shared? Hail to Open Source. It was an unfortunate sour note I picked up on from Coleman during this interview with Veritas Radio:

        The truth? It’s apparently both allusive and right in front of your face, if you wish to see it. It often feels more like lie detecting than knowing the absolute truth. There is common and garden ‘don’t take the piss’ bleedin’ obvious truth… you can quote the bible at me all day long, but according to who? John Lamb Lash!? I like John Lash. Entertaining and uplifting. He seems to have criticised Icke too.

        It seems the status quo is crumbling just as the Ottoman Empire did. Anything founded upon the violation of children, which seems unfathomably the case, seems destined to fall. It is an eye opener to realise my country is not the shining light I was told it to be. Then again, it is a liberation to realise it is merely a birth nation experience.

        I’m tired of hearing ‘we’re the best’. I’m happy to do my best and if that’s not good enough for some, that’s their business. I’ve written blunt letters to my MP and HSBC this last week. What good it does, heaven knows, but I did where many never do.
        I loved the Richie Allen interview with Campbell who sadly lost his brother in 9/11: Matt Campbell:
        “I’m Suing The BBC For Covering Up My Brothers Murder on 9/11”
        Share this interview! Support this chap!

        Cheers TAP. Back to the world of Tavistock mass mind control tonight and fingers crossed Arsenal stuff Man Utd. No, of course I don’t actually go – I’ll be watching it live on hypnotic BBC 1 prestitute TV in a real old English domesticated church with red wine by a log fire ha ha! Don’t let the bastards get you down, enjoy the moments as and when you can, and avoid being a mug! X

      • Tapestry says:

        Always enjoy your comments NPP. A blogger is a mug.

  4. charles allan says:

    The Bible has never been proven wrong on any point – I have found this to be true.
    If God could not give us an uncorrupted
    message – then He would be a fickle God. The Bible in its original languages has never been changed as we know from archaeology such as the dead sea scrolls.
    The NT has nothing on the sacking of Jerusalem by the Roman’s in 70 ad except the prophecy of Jesus and OT prophecies that it would happen.

    This means that the NT was done and dusted before 70 ad – even John’s book of Revelations.
    This is also testified to by NT scrolls dating from the 1st century.
    Josephus did not seem to be a Christian
    but a pragmatic Jew who decided that further resistance to the Romans was futile. He only had good things to say of the Christians though.
    The Christians who read Jesus prophecy about the Roman onslaught escaped over the rooftops to Edom just as prophesied.
    This is a double prophecy ie it happens again with the antichrist who the Jews have signed a 7 year covenant with.

  5. sovereigntea says:

    If you seek freedom from one false heirachical construct by following alternaitve leaders in another heirachical model you will merely change the flavour of your slavemasters. A world without leaders imagine that. The pinnacle of a heirachical pyramid of power is like a stinking turd to a shite fly attracting vermin seeking nourishment. You will find that a leaderless movement will invoke a confused and bewildered response from the mind controlled order following drones of a heirachy. Note how the leaderless hippie movement in the 80’s was brutally smashed and infiltrated by the self appointed authorities. Why ? Because the biggest threat to the parasitical system imposed upon us is not a direct challenge but just to walk away and express individual freedom from the imposed restrictions and rules of their so called authority.

  6. truth says:

    This is the problem with the ‘TRUTH MOVEMENT’ – they don’t know any ‘truth’ and are on another crooked road, as are the globalist and both groups and all others will merge as the finale approaches – because all are led by subtle serpent Satan, Lucifer the devil and all are deceived by him, apart from born-again Christians who follow the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ, the good sheperd.

    • sovereigntea says:

      Truth is relative what people need to seek is reality. noun
      noun: reality

      the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.
      “he refuses to face reality”

      truth is relative to belief

      a fact or belief that is accepted as true.
      plural noun: truths

      noun: believer; plural noun: believers

      a person who believes that a specified thing is effective, proper, or desirable.
      “a believer in ghosts”
      an adherent of a particular religion; someone with religious faith.
      synonyms: devotee, adherent, disciple, follower, supporter
      “a cause with few believers”

      • truth says:

        Jesus Christ = TRUTH:

        [KJV] 1Jn 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

        [KJV] Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

        [KJV] Joh 8:36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

  7. truth says:

    Mat 24:11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.

    [KJV]1Jo 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
    [KJV]Rom 16:18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
    [KJV]Gal 6:3 For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.

    [KJV]Rev 20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

    [KJV]Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
    [KJV]Eph 5:6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.
    [KJV]Eph 4:14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;

    • Tapestry says:

      St Paul was Josephus. It was noticed by historians for centuries that their styles of writing were suspiciously similar. Ellis has the balls to connect the dots. In the past no one dared.

  8. truth says:

    Your right all the FALSE religions are the cause of the problems in the world, because they are all based on men’s lies – such as darwinism, catholism and islam because they make the worshiper god etc – but true born again King James Christians worship the ONLY LIVING GOD Jesus Christ, we DENY ourselves and follow him. NOW tell me who did Jesus ever hurt or murder or steal from and who ever did Jesus fail to love…

    • Tapestry says:

      The power of the appeal to Jesus by exorcists is undeniable – from interviewing the people who’ve witnessed the casting out of demons. However the history of Jesus in the records shows that the biblical Jesus was a fairy story. Prayer to the power of good works. It just doesn’t need to be confused with the biblical story, and the Church, which are manmade creations to subjugate.

      • Very interesting words Tap, as well as your comment above

        ” Christianity was not his religion. Jesus was not a Christian. Christianity was carefully developed to bring the Gentiles to heel and make them ‘gentle’, by persuading them to turn the other cheek to aggression from others, and pay their taxes. Jesus wanted to overthrow the power of Rome and bring in a new age based on science and knowledge, not slavery and subjugation. Sadly he failed, and his name was used to make the world subservient to the Romans in a monumental religious deception, today controlled from The Vatican, where there lies a Secret Library containing many books which would blow Christianity wide open, and enable humanity to discovery our true history.”

        ” the biblical story, and the Church, which are manmade creations to subjugate.”. Yes very interesting.

        I understand King Jesus died in AD98.

        What I don’t understand is, why is the name Jesus Christ so powerful to exorcists? Those 2 words clearly have powerful special protective properties, when thought or spoken with sincerity and passion. So are the two words Jesus Christ, relating to someone/something, totally unconnected to King Jesus?

        If so, what?

        Could it be like the shape of the pentagram on the floor Tap. Icke said the shape itself, resonates a certain energetic frequency into the room.

        Could the 2 words Jesus Christ also somehow tap into some supernatural force? By the syllables and sounds?

        Theres something very special about Jesus Christ. Even though it probably has nothing to do with King Jesus, even though he seemed a very good man fighting Romes tyranny

  9. truth says:

    There are two religions in the world: the faith in Jesus Christ and faith in Satan ‘ye shall be as gods’ (all false religion fits into this paradigm).

    • Tapestry says:

      The existence of evil, satan is undeniable. The history of Jesus Christ is a fairytale calculatingly imposed on the world by Josephus and the Catholic Church. You really need to study Ellis’ work. The power of good is lost in this deception and others propagated by other religions. God needs to be rediscovered by mankind urgently and the power of goodness redeployed over Satan.

    • Mark says:

      Hey soldier, the people reading – got ya, (and get it regularly, too…). The many who read this will include very, very few who define themselves as an Evangelical… and in Evangelical-ville very, very, very few are awake. Invariably knowing the facts (-ish – normally) but believe in a future exhaustively foreknown and all go ‘end-times’ spotting. Kicked off big in the 70’s. Thankfully even those who do insist on reading the prophetic coming to pass in 2015 or soon (instead of being about AD70 in the main) believe the word from God is about engaging the powers with God to not accept the Globalist blueprint to make the futurist interpretation come to pass (from a Luciferian perspective).

      ‘This is the problem with the ‘TRUTH MOVEMENT’ – they don’t know any ‘truth’’ you write. Funny they got that name though ain’t it?

      Would Jesus (is Jesus) saying this, say on, this post/site? Two roads and in/out is spoken about – at times and in context. To who and why? Let alone describing what? The central call is invitation and grace, invitation and openness, dialogue and peace. ‘When you meet a person of peace…’ Jesus said… and another, ‘For the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light.’

      Truthers are the essential teachers for the church ‘n all.

      My point: moving toward or closer to meeting God, or moving away from searching, questioning, engaging not – in or out, we truth, you…

      And what’s all this ‘King James Christians’ – gimmie a break brother.

      Jesus attacked, spoke about hell, to only one group of people: the religious. Those loud and proud with the Law and not the Spirit.

      Reading you say ‘we DENY ourselves’, I understand your passion and zeal but please – excuse the public aspect of this – I implore you to have a bit more wisdom.

      ‘who ever did Jesus fail to love…’

      Oh yeah, I hear this, know this, maybe someone reading this might – press on ‘truth’.

      Grace and peace to you


  10. RabbiT says:

    Oh dear! Here we are again.

    I’ll share again a favourite proverb which I believe appears in very few Bible translations:

    “Why is an intelligent man wise?
    Because he knows what is right.
    Why is an ignorant man foolish?
    Because he only thinks he knows.”

    These debates rage on and it is inevitably based upon what people think rather than actual knowledge.

    Tap asserts “Knowledge Starts Here” well so be it.

    There are a number who desire to claim Christianity to be a means of pacifying the masses and there is some truth in that. The vast majority of Christians from the latter part of the 20th Century are, from my experience, much deceived by what are termed churches thanks probably to the influence of The World Council of Churches who seek to distort the truth of the gospel.

    The Bible foretells of this so it is not God’s fault that His people are deceived. The problem is they have become focused on church and not on God.

    Jesus speaks on this referring to them that hold to the outward form of religion but deny its real power.

    May I bore you with the ref: 2 Tim.5

    Christ is not the person portrayed by Ellis and Ellis is simply wrong. He is part of the problem as is Icke, Tsarion, Jordan Maxwell etc.

    Christ is who He claims to be and I find what He says to be always true to my experience.

    Through Christ I have entered into a covenant relationship with God and having done so have lived a life of approaching 40 years which has been full of the supernatural.

    This includes healing incurable diseases, prophesying the future and otherwise seeing Christ’s promises fulfilled in and around me. I see divine protection occur and revelation around me all the time.

    Indeed I had the JW’s at the door today inviting me to a meeting which I declined but I did ask id they operate in the Gifts of the Spirit.

    They don’t because God is not with them.

    Please however do not confuse gifts of the Spirit with false manifestations of such as promoted by Satanists in the so called church such as Rodney Howard Brown, Kenneth Copeland just to name two.

    So think twice before craving to belittle the most amazing person that ever walked the earth the person the Jews hate more than any other.

    Go read His words and you will see what a phenomenal individual the son of God is.

    And with all due respect to my bro “Truth” – KJ only has some valid points to make but is not a doctrinally correct position.

    The new translations however are getting worse by the minute.

    An interesting debate with validity on both sides I thought:

    (Forget Doug Harris on this subject – he was a shill.)

  11. Mark says:

    Haven’t got the respectfully required time and energy for this one but I’m going to throw a few seeds out…

    “No doubt”. Wow big up Tap, for pushing the boat out. If Jesus was a fabrication, ‘cui bono’?

    Couldn’t Joe have done a more effective job in ‘pacifying (the Jews)’ – he included a lot of provocation.

    This ‘Jesus’, saying, the temple is over and the law fulfilled. Making a whip and attacking the money. Quoting Isaiah and telling them ‘today this is fulfilled in your hearing’: ‘He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners, and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free…’

    You write, ‘…make them ‘gentle’, by persuading them to turn the other cheek to aggression from others, and pay their taxes’. People were forced to pay ever-more tax upon tax or die (and die because they resist). Jesus ‘wanted to overthrow the power of Rome’. Taxes and cheeks? No to taxes, and yes – when not led otherwise – to non-aggression.

    Grew like rabbits (Christians in double trouble, for all sorts, go from twenty five thousand to twenty million in 200 years).

    Similarities between Joe and S/Paul’s life and language is one of Ralph’s main plank. ‘Steve Caruso (MLIS), has been translating Aramaic professionally for nearly 15 years with a special focus upon Galilean (the language spoken by Jesus) and related dialects’. He challenges Ralph’s etymology.

    So is this a conspiracy? Are there documents locked in Vati-Babylon that would undermine or overturn the collection of letters and the like called, The Bible? Quite a cover-up?

    Till then, till we got more info, Tap on


  12. truth says:

    I wander if the Jesus Ellis is referring to is WHITE – because the man named Jesus Christ in the King James Bible is BLACK – as are all the Jews (bar Solomon who is a half caste):

    Jacob (Israel) had 12 sons – one of these 12 was Judah (the Jews). The Israelites have ONE father and hence cannot be white, black, chinese and? Indian all at the same time! The Bible clearly states the Israelites and Jews are a BLACK people:

    – Samson had 7 rasta LOCKS
    – Ezekiel was picked by a rasta LOCK on his head
    – Solomon was a half-caste -white skin black rasta LOCKS
    – Moses was not recognised by Pharaoh because he was black like them
    – Jesus Christ hair was like afro WOOL

  13. Tapestry says:

    Black is the same as calling him Egyptian – Kam. Jesus and Mary Magdalene his sister and wife both had red hair, in common with the Egyptian Royals their forebears such as Ahkenaton.

    • truth says:

      “Jesus and Mary Magdalene his sister and wife both had red hair” – RUBBISH – show me a black man or women born naturally with red hair – it unheard off.

  14. Tapestry says:

    Jesus’ real name was Manu. He was a great grandson of Cleopatra and of Julius Caesar. He was bloodline. As Princess Diana was bloodline, and she tried to resist the Empire, so did Manu try to reset the path of humanity onto something more constructive and positive, than slavery and subjugation. Like Diana, he was taken out by the treachery of the spies in his camp who worked for the system – in his day the Romans, like Josephus, his cousin who worked in secret for the Emperors. After destroying Manu, Josephus created Christianity and hid away the real story.

    • truth says:

      “Jesus’ real name was Manu. He was a great grandson of Cleopatra and of Julius Caesar” – RUBBISH – It was under the authority of Julius Caesar (the first Antichrist) that Jesus Christ was put to death – both Pilate and Herod took their authority from Julius Caesar. And Jesus Christ was clearly innocent and Pilate admitted as much ([KJV]Mat 27:24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.) – Pilate would have KNOWN if Jesus was Caesar and stopped the death sentence – Jesus could have told him, his followers could have done – no one did because it a lie – Christ came from God and went to God, the just slain for the guilty – the one perfect sacrifice once and for all time.

      There was over 5000 manuscripts found of the New Testament – in those days they did not printing machines – they had to be written by hand – the scribes who wrote them would stop and bath every time they came across the name of God, such was the fear “.

      Chart showing history of NT:

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.