‘Satanic cult’ dismissed by judge. Millions of people around the globe have seen the videos. They’re not so sure.

See videos confirming children’s allegations are true from Hampstead Research.  The judge on the other hand goes for total denial (as expected).

http://tapnewswire.com/2015/03/videos-confirming-the-childrens-allegations-from-new-website-hampstead-research/

http://tapnewswire.com/2015/03/meeting-this-sunday-outside-christchurch-in-hampstead-london/

Main media report By Press Association

Published: 09:01 EST, 19 March 2015 | Updated: 09:01 EST, 19 March 2015
481471954_640

Claims that a “satanic cult” where children were abused by paedophiles has been operating in north London have been dismissed by a High Court judge .

Mrs Justice Pauffley said detail of the claims has been circulating on the internet.

She said she had been asked to investigate by social services bosses, and had conducted a fact-finding exercise, at a family court hearing in London.

 The judge delivered her ruling at the High Court in London

The judge said in a ruling today that the claims were “baseless” and she described people who sought to perpetuate them as “evil” or “foolish”.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said the case centred on two children – aged eight and nine – whose parents were separated.

The judge said the London Borough of Barnet had begun care proceedings in relation to the youngsters.

She said last September “lurid allegations of the most serious kind” were drawn to the attention of police.

It was suggested that the youngsters were part of a large group of children from north London who belonged to a “satanic cult”.

She said there were allegations of “significant paedophile activity” – allegations that children had been sexually abused and made to abuse one another.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said allegations were made by the two children, their mother and her partner.

“Specifically, it was said that babies were supplied from all over the world,” she said.

“They were bought, injected with drugs and then sent by TNT or DHL to London. The assertions were that babies had been abused, tortured and then sacrificed.

“Their throats were slit, blood was drunk and cult members would then dance wearing babies’ skulls (sometimes with blood and hair still attached”) on their bodies.

768cfdaaa87f9c2aa89eb7d6098c3e69

“All the cult members wore shoes made of baby skin produced by the owner of a specified shoe repair shop.”

She said it was alleged that the “main action” occurred at a school – and at least seven other schools were named.

A swimming pool was identified as a meeting place.

It was alleged that “rituals” were performed at a McDonald’s fast-food restaurant when “the boss” allowed child sacrifice because he was a member of the cult, said the judge.

And it was said that babies were prepared and cooked in ovens in a “secret kitchen” then eaten by cult members.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said it was alleged that the father of the two children at the centre of the case was the “cult leader” and members included a school head, a teacher, priest, social workers and police.

It was alleged that more than 100 people were “doing sex” to the children.

“I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true,” said Mrs Justice Pauffley in her ruling. “The claims are baseless.”

She added: “Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and/or foolish.”

Mrs Justice Pauffley said she had analysed the case at a hearing lasting nearly two weeks, heard evidence from 16 witnesses and read thousands of pages of written material.

She added: “The forensic inquiry has been full and thorough.”
source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3002267/Satanic-cult-dismissed-judge.html#ixzz3UqFfYBP7

===============================================================
Satanic cult claims dismissed by High Court judge

p

Mrs Justice Pauffley says claims circulating on internet are ‘baseless’ as she describes people who seek to perpetuate them as ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’ after fact-finding exercise

The case was heard at London’s High Court Photo: ALAMY
By Agency
11:08AM GMT 19 Mar 2015
Claims that a “satanic cult” where children were abused by paedophiles has been operating in north London have been dismissed by a High Court judge.
Mrs Justice Pauffley said detail of the claims have been circulating on the internet.
At a family court hearing in London, she said she had been asked to investigate by social services bosses and had conducted a fact-finding exercise.
The judge said in a ruling on Thursday that the claims were “baseless” and she described people who sought to perpetuate them as “evil” or “foolish”.
Mrs Justice Pauffley said the case centred on two children – aged eight and nine – whose parents were separated. The judge said the London Borough of Barnet had begun care proceedings in relation to the youngsters.She said that “lurid allegations of the most serious kind” were drawn to the attention of police last September.Russian Satanists jailed for ‘ritual sacrifice’ teen killingsSatanic cult blamed for beheaded horse on beachIt was suggested that the youngsters were part of a large group of children from north London who belonged to a “satanic cult”, the judge added.She said there were allegations of “significant paedophile activity” – allegations that children had been sexually abused and made to abuse one another.Mrs Justice Pauffley said allegations were made by the two children, their mother and her partner.“Specifically, it was said that babies were supplied from all over the world,” she said. “The assertions were that babies had been abused, tortured and then sacrificed.”

source:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11482303/
#SatanicCult? Dismissed. You must be joking! #DamePauffley knows!?

March 19, 2015March 19, 2015 Sabine Kurjo McNeill Barnet Police, Christ Church Primary School, Co-Creators, Cover-Ups, Daily Mail, Dame Anna Pauffley OBE, Facebook, High Courts of Justice, LB Barnet, LB Camden, Mainstream Media, News, Online Media, The Guardian, The Telegraph, UK Authorities, Video, , , , , , , , ,

“Here is Ella, the children’s mother, speaking to partner Abraham who got them to talk and admit that it was their father who taught them to touch each other sexually. Their audio file on a video is on:
With a key point made by Ella:
after the children retracted their allegations, why keep them in care?But there is no logic! There is only one agenda:
  • to protect the father and all his associates.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiEQ3GsYFu0
The petition relating to the above video is here. It asks alleged abusers with distinguishing marks to come forward and demonstrate their innocence.

Thanks to commenter Sancho Panzer, the judgement is published here.

The Daily Mail reports – with clearly a well prepared report rather than investigated:

The Telegraph also:

  • Satanic cult claims dismissed by judge
  • Mrs Justice Pauffley says claims circulating on internet are ‘baseless’ as she describes people who seek to perpetuate them as ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’ after fact-finding exercise.

Funny that neither article tells us about the fate of the children… Hampstead Research videos show her what fact finding is about!

And I will forever maintain that it is not compatible with EU Directives to Use the Secrecy of UK Family Courts to Cover-Up Criminal Activities. MEPs will look into this emergency application to the Petitions Committee in Brussels.

You can’t make it up. But then it is hard to live in reality. We need to go through ‘societal disillusionment’ towards ‘social empowerment’.

But: mind the gap between the internet community of good people advocating transparency and truth (99%) and the global elite (1%) using mainstream media (MSM) who thrive on secrecy and lies…

The battlefield has widened and our armies are growing, while the ‘bullets’ are being ‘sharpened’:

  1. the blog is now www.whistleblowerkids.uk
  2. the US techie-version is on www.whistleblowerkids.com with a phenomenal list of ‘leaks’ about the non-existing satanic cults relying on papa and others killing babies
  3. a NZ ‘paper publication on-screen’ is on http://bit.ly/1FEwsgK or   https://paper.li/BronnyNZ/1426379990#!headlines
  4. I have added lots of links of ‘co-creators’ to the blog
  5. I published the full story of the deletion of our two petitions – due to ‘court proceedings’ – here.

The essence is:

Dear Mr Mowrey

For you to have deleted two of my petitions, supposedly irretrievably, is a really serious violation of professional standards by an internet platform:

1. I just happened to have discovered your ‘Notice’ of 4 March, i.e. NOT an email as you claimed you sent!

2. Before removing petitions, your IT department MUST ensure that the petitioner has been ‘served’, i.e. has DEFINITELY received your ‘warning’!

3. To allow for mistakes, such as you with your Notice (rather than email with receipt confirmed) and your colleague Debbie not knowing about it, you MUST be able to RESTORE petitions!

If I didn’t have bigger fish to fry, I would certainly take you and Change.org to court.

This way, I trust that you’ll LEARN, as most people only seem to be able to learn from PAINFUL experiences, i.e. mistakes.

Yours with all possible customer dissatisfaction,

Sabine

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

19 Responses to “‘Satanic cult’ dismissed by judge. Millions of people around the globe have seen the videos. They’re not so sure.”

  1. truth says:

    What God says to ESTABLISHMENT JUDGE Mrs ‘iustitia’ Pauffley:

    The King James BIible:>
    Isa 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
    Isa 5:21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
    Isa 5:22 Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:
    Isa 5:23 Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!
    Isa 5:24 Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the flame consumeth the chaff, so their root shall be as rottenness, and their blossom shall go up as dust: because they have cast away the law of the LORD of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.

  2. Aldous says:

    Daily Mail – Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.

    I’ll bet they’re not. I wouldn’t even cover the bottom of a bird cage with this filthy worthless Zionist rag.

    • freebornman says:

      ‘The judge suggested the couple may have fed the two youngsters, aged eight and nine, cannabis soup to gain their compliance.’
      This morning’s article is even more rabid and disgusting. Should a Judge be making unsubstantiated claims such as this? They know shit sticks, the vile bastards.

  3. truth says:

    Is SATAN the god being worshipped by these child murdering raping sodomite vile gods:

    God says:
    [KJV]Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (666)

    Satanists do this:
    “They then killed them in a sacrificial ceremony, stabbing them 666 times each in homage to the so-called Number of the Beast. ”
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/7760270/Satanic-cult-teens-sacrificed-victims-then-ate-them.html

    ===============================
    https://freemelanieshaw.wordpress.com/
    ===============================

  4. Chris Hunt says:

    Keep up the Good Work, Thank you, and Many Blessings 🙂

  5. James Tannhauser says:

    “An ‘evil’ internet campaign about a satanic cult operating at a Hampstead school was a ‘fantasy’ and ‘nothing other than utter nonsense,’ a High Court judge ruled today.”

    Very few on this earth more singularly cowardly than ‘Justice’ Pauffley has shown herself to be.

    Of course these matters are no longer that of the court or legal apparatus. No. Jurisdiction now belongs to ‘higher’ authority.

    No wonder so many of the real criminals have such fear of death. It will not be kind to them no matter how they happen to arrive there.

  6. James Tannhauser says:

    Hampstead school at centre of false satanic cult allegation welcomes judge’s ruling http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/hampstead_school_at_centre_of_false_satanic_cult_allegation_welcomes_judge_s_ruling_1_4001462

    Internet campaign about satanic cult at Hampstead school was ‘fantasy’ says judge http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/internet_campaign_satanic_cult_hampstead_school_fantasy_judge_1_4000891

  7. truth says:

    Is there any way we can use such instruments as, the ‘Freedom of Information Act’ etc. to COMPEL the court to make the evidence presented to ESTABLISHMENT JUDGE Mrs ‘iustitia’ Pauffley be put into the public domain for all to examine since the case is of ‘extraordinary’ public interest and concern and this being the case normal procedures must be relaxed due the public outcry?

  8. Anon says:

    We are making these videos and we will NOT LET UP. We are uncovering what seem to be rings of cult members at large in all sorts of places……what the children say SEEMS to be true.

    Please examine our factual evidence and check back for updates – we have two more vids that should be out by the end of the week.

    https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com

  9. aye right, check their scars same as

  10. truth says:

    Dunblane massacre ‘independent’ inquiry:
    “…witnesses were selected by the Crown, not by the judge”

    THIS BEGS THE QUESTIONS – WHO SELECTED THE HEMPSTEAD ABUSE WITNESSES TO GIVE EVIDENCE IN COURT AND WHO WERE THY? IS THE CROWN THE JUDGE – I THOUGHT THE JUDGE WAS THE WIG WEARING MISERABLE CLOWN WHO SITS LOOKING DOWN AT THE WORLD IN A DRESS AND SUSPENDERS…

    http://www.dunblaneexposed.info/2005/06/i-blame-police-sex-ring-for-conspiracy-of-silence-over-the-dunblane-massacre/

  11. anon says:

    These police interviews pretty much convict Christie of torturing these kids into making it up. If you think the kids are lying about lying about lying then I suggest you reassess your critical faculties.

    Q was distressed again when talking about having to stand when cold water was poured on him – “(dressed) just in our pants – he thought we was lying – when I cried and said my Mum never touched us, he said, ‘If you’re crying you’re lying.'” By then, according to Dr Sturge, Q was crying in a very distressed way.

    Abraham, she said, “had hurt (her) and used bad words … ‘ a stupid little cunt”. She was scared and worried. Her mother had not stopped Abraham “because she loves him so much.” P described him as “an idiot.” As for her father, P said he is “fine and good.”

    Q’s interview was initially somewhat confused. He said, “Yeah there is still some of the babies killed … Not much (are there babies killed)…. I lied about it because he (Mr Christie) made me say it.” A little later, Q said, “None of it was real…. The plastic willies were not true.” Abraham had “slapped (his ear) as hard as he could.” Q said, “I hate Abraham” and he did not want to see him again. He described how his mother “would be really angry with (him).”

    P related that Mr Christie would tell her that “for lying she would go to prison for 20 years and never see her grandparents or Mum again.” P commented, “Abraham loved my Mum so much. He even blamed her for being in the gang.” He had kept on asking her, “Any other people.” He had threatened her with the spoon and poked her so hard in the chin with it that she had a big mark. When Abraham had asked her about plastic willies in her bottom, she had denied this. He had said, “How come Q told me.” The Vaseline had been, said P, Q’s idea. He knew one of her friends used it (for her lips). P said, “Thing is, Abraham came up with stuff we didn’t know and came up with ideas too.” Abraham was always saying Q was a good boy for telling him things and that she was lying and would go to jail.

    P had only a minimal understanding of ‘the facts of life’ and sex was “inappropriate stuff like touching each other in the privates.” Dr Sturge asked P about living with her mother. She said, not at the moment – “I feel angry with her, letting Abraham do all that stuff to us.” She had one question of Dr Sturge, could she live with her foster mother until she is 14 or 15?

    Q responded immediately to Dr Sturge’s question as to whether he knew why she was seeing him. He said, “cos Abraham said something I never did and he forced me to say it, he was really mean to us.” Abraham had accused him of touching his sister in the private parts which he “never, ever did.” And he forced them to say their Dad touches them. Abraham had also forced them to say they kill babies. Q said he had wanted Abraham to stop hitting him, “I was scared for him to hit me.” At that Q’s face creased up and he began to cry quietly. “He kept asking us questions again, and again and again.” His mother had started to believe him. Q said, “It upsetted me” and he became even more distressed.

    Q described how Abraham had been asking them all day. He had even woken them up and hit them. The hitting was if they didn’t wake up and talk. Asked how his mother had reacted, Q said “she didn’t mind.” He was asked about living with his mother and replied that “if she still believes it, (he) wouldn’t want to live with her.” Later he described with great vehemence that he would never live with his Mum while Abraham was still in the British Isles. She would just phone him and he’d come to their house. Q also said, spontaneously, that he hates Abraham, describing him as “the worst person I’ve ever met.”

    • Anonymous says:

      “These police interviews pretty much convict Christie of torturing these kids into making it up. If you think the kids are lying about lying about lying then I suggest you reassess your critical faculties.”

      Utterly, laughably false. One can only conclude that your ‘critical faculties’ must be malfunctioning.

      “…Cos I heard you watched a film Zorro, is that right?”
      “Yeah.”
      “and there was someone kill… killed there, someone was killed there, weren’t there?… Because it sounded to me like, what it sounded to me was similar to the story you told about the babies. And that’s why I was a bit (sic) wondering… are babies actually killed?”
      “Yeah”
      “…or is that something you’ve been made to say?”
      ”Yeah it is something I was made to say.”
      “Are babies being killed?”
      ”No, not much but there is yeah.”
      “By who?”
      “By my dad. Not much”

    • Anonymous says:

      43. On page 43 of the Crime Report it states “everything she has said about her father was untrue, she had been pressurised into saying these things by Abraham… she stated this was initiated when she was caught with her brother touching each other in a sexual way… she had learned this from another child called S who she had engaged with in a sexual way. Abraham declined to believe this and repeated a number of times who showed you and persisted with this. He has then said that he knows who showed her and that it was her father, she refuted this a number of times but eventually gave up and agreed that it was his (sic) father, she has been asked a number of other questions and is not believed by Abraham until she gives an answer that fits what he wasn’t (sic) to hear.” This shows that rather than being coached into making disclosures which is what has been alleged, that Mr Christie appears not to have believed the initial account [P] gave and has asked if it was [P]’s father who had taught her, as children often do [P] has acquiesced and then acquiesced again to further questioning…

  12. Anonymous says:

    EXTRACTS of WITNESS STATEMENT by RETIRED POLICE CONSTABLE K WILSON

    REGARDING ABE (Achieving Best Evidence) INTERVIEWS by Barnet Police

    24. People in positions of authority have a history of eliciting false
    confessions, withdrawals and admissions throughout the adversarial process of law. There have been many miscarriages of justice in UK legislation where this has occurred.

    42. In the majority of cases, the victims are not lying. They are telling you what they have come to believe has happened to them.

    54. Other named suspects are mentioned in the interviews, none of these appear to
    be recorded as suspects on the Crime Report.

    55. To state categorically that the children had been coached (which is written on the Crime Report) which I understand is the assertion from Social Services, is simply not feasible…

  13. Lynn says:

    Then let the accused be examined by a trusted doctor on record to see if the distinguishing marks the children have reported are real. Simples !!

    • RabbiT says:

      I have had a lot of experience reading court judgements as a lay advisor defending innocent folk against a tyrannical government hell bent on destroying them.

      It is pathetic, the way in which the judiciary, aided and abetted by a MoJ (which is rotten to the core) try to paint a picture which is the complete opposite of the truth.

      Working my way through this judgement, it is one of the worst efforts I have seen.

      Where Pauffley is the SUBSTANCE for your findings?

      Oh it is contained in the “1000’s of pages of written material” you have read yet somehow you are not able to quote the salient points. Bit too much effort would it be? Or is the evidence just not there?

      Do I believe for one minute you have read “1000’s of pages”? No I do not.

      I have had cases run for approaching 1000 pages and it takes someone with great personal commitment to skim such and find the salient issues.

      “I viewed a dozen or so short film clips of the children being questioned by Ms Draper and Mr Christie.” She says.

      I am not paid to judge the case but I’d be stating 20-21 and there were clips involving a gentleman with an Irish accent – miss them did you?

      I am beginning to think someone wrote the judgement in advance.

      This so called Judgement is absolutely peppered with spurious rhetoric.

      At least in cases I’ve been involved with the bent judge (almost always are by the way) has at least tried to take facts to twist the tale to the wishes of on high but this case is simply devoid of facts to support the conclusions.

      Let us take one example:

      “Ms Draper and Mr Christie have not participated by being present in court. I am as sure as I can be that their absence has been deliberate.”

      Yes the absence of the mother was deliberate as I recall in the region of 10 Police Officers attended her home illegally to arrest her and being a foreign national she decided it best to leave the country.

      Very deliberate but by the illegal actions of the Police or should I say the establishment.

      I look forward to reading more on the judgement.

  14. Cobalt says:

    Anybody that trusts a judge needs their head testing.

    They serve a higher cause: Common Purpose, their masters, protecting the Police… to name a few examples… but anything but protecting the public. Utter scum.

    At the end of the day judge[ment] is a matter of opinion and impartiality… a very dangerous area when they are messing with and destroying peoples’ lives.

    – Cobalt

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.