Points for discussion:
1.) ‘At least three years’ indicates a holding position to delay findings and evidence for as long as possible.
2.) Including the abuse of teenage girls by mainly Asian gangs in Rotherham will deflect full attention from the Downing Street and Westminster paedophile rings which the inquiry was supposed to be investigating. It will also add very signifcantly to the time before the inquiry reports. Rotherham should have its own inquiry.
3.) Why would a married judge – married to the Judge Advocate General of the New Zealand Armed Forces – suddenly up sticks and move to Britain for ‘at least three years’ to conduct an inquiry on the other side of the world?
4.) The same barrister accused by an inquiry panel member of bullying and intimidating her is still on the team while she is not.