CIA puppet regime in Kiev close to collapse

Yesterday Russia Insider published a lengthy account from the German magazine Der Spiegel of the Minsk negotiations.

This article is a good example of the sort of press Merkel gets in Germany. It portrays her as the heroine of the hour, battling to save peace from the sinister designs of others. The article lavishes praise on her in a way that readers outside Germany might find unsettling. Contrary to what many in the West think, the Russian media never writes about Putin in this way.

The very favourable publicity Merkel gets in Germany is coordinated by her own office. Articles like the one in Der Spiegel are written in close communication with her office. This means that though the article gives a rather one-sided account of the Minsk negotiations, it is nonetheless packed with information if one knows how to read it properly. In the case of this particular piece, we can be certain that Merkel’s office was involved since the article actually names it as a source.

The first thing we learn from the text is that what triggered the Minsk process is the disintegration of the Ukrainian economy and especially of the Ukrainian military.

This is exactly what we said when Merkel’s and Hollande’s trip to Moscow was first announced.

Der Spiegel gives us a summary of a report provided to Merkel by German intelligence that confirms what we previously said, that the Ukrainian army is bleeding to death, and is heading for total collapse:

“According to a report delivered recently to the Chancellery in Berlin by Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, the Ukrainian army is slowly disintegrating, demoralized by the separatist advances and short on personnel.

Even arms deliveries from the West, the BND believes, would be more likely to overwhelm the Ukrainian army than it would to make it a more effective fighting force.”

Der Spiegel also shows that the overriding fact that provoked Merkel to go to Moscow and launch the Minsk process was the encirclement of up to a quarter of the effective combat troops of the Ukrainian army by the rebel militia at Debaltsevo. The article says:

“Debaltseve is a small town in eastern Ukraine, held by 6,000 government troops, or perhaps 8,000. Nobody wants to say for sure. It is the heart of an army that can only put 30,000 soldiers into the field, a weak heart.

Until Sunday of last week, that heart was largely encircled by pro-Russian separatists and the troops could only be supplied by way of highway M03. Then, Monday came.

Separatist fighters began advancing across snowy fields towards the village of Lohvynove, a tiny settlement of 30 houses hugging the M03.

he separatists stormed an army checkpoint and killed a few officers. They then dug in — and the heart of the Ukrainian army was surrounded.

The situation in Debaltseve plunged the Ukrainian army into a desperate, almost hopeless, position, as the negotiators in Minsk well knew. Indeed, it was the reason the talks were so urgently necessary.”

Der Spiegel says Merkel launched the peace initiative in order to save what Der Spiegel calls “the heart of Ukraine’s army” from destruction. Der Spiegel even talks about the Europeans (ie. Merkel and Hollande) trying to “protect” the Ukrainian military at Debaltsevo. Der Spiegel’s words are:

“The Europeans……. insisted on an immediate cease-fire out of concern for the volatile situation facing the Ukrainian military.

The separatists, not surprisingly, wanted to delay the beginning of the cease-fire for as long as possible so as to give themselves time to completely conquer Debaltseve.

Poroshenko, too, seemed to prefer a delayed cease-fire — apparently not fully understanding the situation facing his military. The Europeans were trying to protect the Ukrainians from themselves.”

Secondly, as we have also previously said, Der Spiegel shows this was a Western not a Russian initiative. The Russians did not initiate it. Merkel did. According to Der Spiegel she first floated the idea at the end of January when she was dining at a restaurant in Strasbourg with Hollande and European Parliament President Martin Schultz.

This is the key to understanding what happened in Minsk. Because it is difficult for some in the West to acknowledge that the initiative was launched by Merkel because of the critical condition the Ukrainians are in and that this forced Merkel to make major concessions to Putin in Minsk, parts of the Western media are trying to deny the fact.

An article by Niall Ferguson in the Financial Times says it was Putin who invited Merkel and Hollande to Moscow in order to divide the West and prevent the US sending arms to Kiev. An editorial in the London Times says the same thing. Der Spiegel shows this is untrue.

Thirdly, as we have also said, the initiative was Merkel’s not Hollande’s. Hollande was brought along purely to give Merkel diplomatic cover. Der Spiegel does not openly say so, but a German Chancellor cannot afford to be seen cutting unilateral deals at the expense of other European states with the Russians in Moscow, as Ribbentrop and Molotov once did. This explains the following words in the Der Spiegel article, which Der Spiegel explicitly says originate with Merkel’s office:

“The Chancellery has continued to insist that a modern-day Yalta conference — whereby Ukraine is divided up between Russia and the West — is not in the cards.

And it was conspicuous that Merkel’s file folder that she had with her during the negotiations didn’t contain a single map.

The chancellor, Berlin officials say, is uninterested in taking part in negotiations over the precise route of the demarcation line between the separatist areas and those areas under Kiev’s control.”

This nervousness about appearing to cut unilateral deals with the Russians also explains why Der Spiegel focuses almost entirely on the negotiations in Minsk and almost entirely ignores the far more important negotiations that happened a few days before in Moscow, at which the Ukrainians were not present.

It was almost certainly in the talks with Putin in Moscow, where the Ukrainians were not present, that the broad outline of what was formally decided in Minsk was actually agreed. Merkel then flew to Washington to brief Obama and obtain his consent. Poroshenko was then presented in Minsk with what had previously been agreed, leaving him scope only to quibble over the technical details in a way that it is in Merkel’s interests to highlight (see below).

Der Spiegel also provides what is probably a fair account of the US view of the negotiations.

I have already explained why the US idea of providing arms to Ukraine is a really bad idea, failing to change the situation on the ground in Kiev’s favour whilst committing the US to send military advisers to Kiev in a way that would be seen as a commitment to Kiev by the US that would turn the Ukrainian conflict into a US-Russian proxy war.

The Der Spiegel article shows that this is very much the German view and that Obama privately shares it.  As Der Spiegel puts it:

“……the Ukrainians are currently unable to operate such high-tech equipment. They would have to receive extensive training from American advisers. That, though, would essentially make the US a party to the conflict, as Obama well knows…..”

The Der Spiegel article shows that this is also the Russian view. More interestingly, it also shows that far from being scared by the threat of US weapons being sent to Kiev, some Russian officials actually relish the prospect because of the political and military advantages it would give them.  In Der Spiegel’s words:

“American weapons deliveries…….don’t impress Putin one bit. On the contrary: Were US weapons and military trainers to turn up in Ukraine, the Russian people, 85 percent of whom already support Putin, would unanimously stand behind their president, one Kremlin insider, who does not belong to the hawkish camp, says. “Plus, we would be happy to see American weapons quickly fall into the hands of the separatists as captured loot.””

The Der Spiegel article admits the Russians entered the negotiations from a position of strength. This again is what we have been saying all along. We have repeatedly said that in the Ukrainian conflict it is Russia that holds all the cards. On the eve of the Minsk negotiations this has become obvious and was the reason why Merkel launched the peace initiative in the first place. As Der Spiegel says:

“The Russians took a tough line. They saw themselves as being in a position of strength, partly because of the situation in Debaltseve.”

Der Spiegel claims Merkel was able to extract one concession from Putin. Der Spiegel claims Putin agreed the forthcoming elections in the rebel regions will be limited to areas the rebel militia was to control in accordance with a ceasefire line agreed on 19th September 2014, and would not take place in territories the rebel militia has captured since the failure of the Ukrainian government’s offensive in January.

If Der Spiegel is right about this then this must have been agreed verbally because there is nothing in the text of the agreements that came out of Minsk that refers to it. Der Spiegel probably is right, because as the remainder of the article shows a great deal more was agreed verbally by Putin and Merkel than appears in writing.

In every other respect it was the Russians who got what they wanted and who basically dictated the terms.

The Minsk agreements make no mention of Crimea, implicitly confirming that Merkel now accepts it as Russian and that for Ukraine it is irretrievably lost.

Ukraine is obliged to pass a law before the end of March granting the rebel regions in the Donbass special status within Ukraine.   Ukraine is obliged to enact a new Constitution before the end of the year.  As I have previously said, this provides a time line for the settlement of the conflict that did not exist previously.

Far more importantly, Der Spiegel says that Ukraine is obliged to agree with the rebels the terms of the new law for the special status of their regions within Ukraine and is also obliged to agree the provisions of the new Constitution with them as well.

Der Spiegel chalks it up as a “success” for Poroshenko that he refused to talk to the rebel leaders directly. If however Der Spiegel is right and Poroshenko and the Ukrainian government are now required to agree with the rebels the terms of the law on the special status of their regions and the terms of the new Constitution, then this “success” looks extremely hollow.

Even more importantly, Der Spiegel says the two rebel regions are to have a veto over Ukraine’s future political orientation, including its joining either NATO or the EU. In Der Spiegel’s words:

“Russia has likely already achieved its minimum goal, that of preventing Ukraine from joining NATO or the European Union.

The deal agreed to in Minsk includes a kind of veto right for separatist areas in eastern Ukraine on important fundamental issues.

That right would apply to membership in military alliances and to membership in economic blocks such as the EU or Putin’s Eurasian Economic Union”.

These provisions do not appear in writing in the Minsk agreements. If they exist (which, given that the Der Spiegel article is sourced from Merkel’s office, they surely do) they must have been agreed verbally by Putin and Merkel, almost certainly during the talks in Moscow that preceded the ones in Minsk.

There would have been no point in asking Poroshenko to sign a document that contained these provisions since for political reasons he could never have signed it. However the Russians have obtained confirmation in writing that they may control Ukraine’s border until the new Constitution is agreed. This gives them a powerful tool which they can use to enforce the terms they dictated in Moscow and Minsk, even those that were only agreed verbally with Merkel, if or rather when the Ukrainians try to back out of them.

The talks in Moscow and Minsk also show that Merkel now accepts the reality the two rebel regions in the Donbass cannot be brought back under Kiev’s control.

Merkel has agreed a ceasefire line that gives the rebels control of the territory they captured following the failure of the government offensive in January. By doing so Merkel has implicitly accepted the political reality of what lies beyond the ceasefire line: the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics.

Der Spiegel says this quite explicitly:

“……it has become clear that the West is willing to accept Ukraine’s partition. Ukraine hasn’t just lost the Crimean Peninsula, it has now also lost territories in the east.”

Der Spiegel gives a detailed account of the various technical discussions concerning the proposed ceasefire.

Here again it is clear the Russians got everything they wanted.

The new ceasefire line cedes the rebels the territory they have captured since January.

The agreement for the withdrawal of heavy weapons behind respective buffer zones, if implemented, would give local superiority to the rebel militia on the front line by depriving the Ukrainian army of the heavy weapons and artillery it has used to counter them. It would also prevent the shelling by the Ukrainian army of rebel controlled population centres such as Donetsk, Lugansk and Gorlovka.

A disproportionate amount of attention is being given to these technical ceasefire provisions, which as we have discussed previously, will almost certainly never be fully implemented.  The far more important political agreements – discussed above – have gone unnoticed.

This is because of the secrecy of this process.

We previously discussed how the absence of French and German officials from the negotiations in Moscow was intended to prevent leaks and keep the negotiations private.

From the account Der Spiegel has provided, it appears that the most important agreements made in Moscow and Minsk were verbal, which is another way of keeping them private (though stenographic records and recordings of the conversations that set out these agreements certainly exist).

It is not difficult to understand the reasons for all this secrecy.

Der Spiegel calls the Minsk agreements a success for Merkel. It is difficult to see why. If implemented they mean the end of the West’s and the EU’s Ukraine project.

The whole purpose of the EU association agreement that began the crisis was to make Ukraine a part of the European Single Market with the ultimate aim of integrating Ukraine with the EU. That would have pulled Ukraine away from Russia.

If the agreements reached in Moscow and Minsk are fully implemented and the rebel regions are granted special status and autonomy within Ukraine, preserving their economic links with Russia, and have a right of veto over Ukraine ever joining the EU, then that objective can never be achieved.

The EuroMaidan “revolution”, so determinedly supported by the West, will have lost its point and will have failed.

Der Spiegel even explains how Merkel is using the debates about the technical issues to create confusion so as to hide her retreat on the key political issues:

“…..she has divided up the conflict into a multitude of technical details, with each appearing grotesquely minimal in comparison with what could ultimately happen. “Where there is a complete lack of trust, you can fight to the death about anything,” one of her advisors said during the US trip. Merkel’s answer is: Then you have to find a solution to each point of conflict, one after the other.”

Der Spiegel justifies Merkel’s retreat by invoking Realpolitik. A surprisingly large part of the article is devoted to what almost reads like a lecture on the subject. It can all be summed up by just one paragraph:

“Realpolitik focuses on power and powerlessness. It’s about realizing what you can achieve with what means and when it might be smarter to admit your own lack of power. Realpolitik has no illusions, it is bitter and, sometimes, it is brutal.”

Lest there be any doubt that this originates with Merkel herself, the article pointedly refers to her speech at the Munich Security Conference, which as it points out Poroshenko listened to in silence.

For fairly obvious reasons, Realpolitik – with its admission of powerlessness – is almost the last justification any Western politician wants to invoke. When a Western politician is forced to invoke Realpolitik to justify a policy, it is an almost certain sign of failure.

The Minsk agreements, both those made in writing and the far more important ones that appear to have been made verbally, do in fact represent the failure of Merkel’s earlier policy.

As we have discussed previously, Merkel failed to recognise the Ukrainian conflict as a civil war and treated it instead as a case of Russian “aggression” against Ukraine, which she thought she could reverse by imposing sanctions on Russia.

The Der Spiegel article shows that Merkel still sees the conflict as a case of “aggression” by Russia. However her bruising encounters with Putin in Milan and Brisbane showed her that Russia would not change its policy.

When it became clear in January that the Ukrainian army and the Ukrainian economy were facing disaster, she had no option but to reverse course.

The result is the peace initiative that has resulted in the agreements that were reached in Minsk, which she is now trying to justify by invoking Realpolitik.

Does this however mean that the Ukrainian conflict is coming to an end?

The short answer unfortunately is almost certainly no.

Though it does appear that Putin and Merkel have finally reached an understanding, it is far from certain that they can impose it on the two sides so as to end the war. What happened in Minsk shows why.

Der Spiegel says that on one occasion Putin had to put pressure on the rebel leaders to get them to sign the final agreement (known as the Minsk Memorandum) that came out of the negotiation. The Russians have in fact repeatedly shown that they are prepared to put pressure on the rebels to get them to agree to what they want.

Merkel however is still not able or willing to put analogous pressure on the Ukrainian government.

Not only did Poroshenko refuse to meet the rebel leaders or agree to any reference to federalisation in any document, calling the prospect of future negotiations between the Ukrainian government and the rebel regions into question, but amazingly he even refused to admit that a quarter of his army had been encircled in Debaltsevo.

The result is that no agreement was reached about the situation in Debaltsevo, putting the Ukrainian troops there in an impossible position.

The Ukrainian military refuses to withdraw from Debaltsevo. It cannot remove its heavy weapons from Debaltsevo (as under the Minsk agreements it is obliged to do).  Were it to do so they would have to be transported across rebel controlled territory, which could only be done with the consent of the rebels. The removal of the heavy weapons would leave the Ukrainian troops in Debaltsevo unarmed and defenceless.

The rebels therefore have sufficient cause to keep up their attack on Debaltsevo because the Ukrainians are not abiding by the Minsk Memorandum by keeping their heavy weapons and staying there. Since the Ukrainian troops in Debaltsevo are surrounded, their position is militarily untenable and will inevitably collapse.

Poroshenko’s refusal to acknowledge reality in Debaltsevo has therefore doomed the Ukrainian troops there. Cut off from relief or re-supply, unable to retreat or give up their weapons and unable to defend themselves effectively, they have been left with no choice but to surrender or die.

Der Spiegel tells us Merkel launched her peace initiative to save the Ukrainian troops in Debaltsevo. Given that this is so, the logical course was for her to take Poroshenko aside, tell him to face reality and warn him that continued Western support was conditional on his doing so. The obligation she took on herself on behalf of the Ukrainian troops in Debaltsevo demanded no less.

Der Spiegel contains no hint that Merkel ever did any such thing even though saving the Ukrainian troops in Debaltsevo was the ostensible purpose of the peace mission. Instead Der Spiegel gives us weak comments such as this

“The world must hope that the government troops trapped in Debaltseve really do lay down their weapons and don’t try to fight their way free.”

and this (with specific reference to Debaltsevo)

“The Europeans were trying to protect the Ukrainians from themselves”.

To which all one can say is that it is an astonishing abdication when hope takes the place of policy and that the Europeans are not  “protecting the Ukrainians from themselves” if they cannot face the Ukrainians with the truth.

The overall conclusion therefore continues to be that the Minsk agreements will not end the Ukrainian conflict. As I have recently discussed, the Ukrainian government has never abided by a single agreement it has made and it will certainly not abide by agreements made verbally and to which it is not a party. Judging by her behaviour over Debaltsevo, it seems that Merkel is still unable or unwilling to exert the necessary pressure on them to do so. The probability, bordering on certainty, is therefore that the conflict will continue.

Minsk does nonetheless represent a watershed.

Germany now recognises that the political objectives the West set itself in Ukraine cannot be achieved and is now looking for ways to limit the damage and to extricate itself from what increasingly looks like a debacle. I say Germany rather than Merkel, since it is clear Merkel has a consensus in Germany behind her.

Germany is not the West. There remain powerful forces in the US and elsewhere still intent on confrontation and escalation.  However no one reading the big Western newspapers over the last few weeks can fail to notice the growing sense of weariness and defeat there is about this conflict.

The conflict in Ukraine itself will grind on, probably until the government currently in power in Kiev falls, which will surely happen sooner or later. However, as a crisis in international relations, following the talks in Moscow and Minsk, it appears its peak has passed.


31 Responses to “CIA puppet regime in Kiev close to collapse”

  1. Nollidge says:

    Put not your trust in (Jewish) princes(ess) called Nuland.

    • sovereigntea says:

      Hasbera Quisling liar Liam Fox MP would like to pour petrol on the flames. As a coward chickenhawk Fox of course wont be taking part in the fighting but perhaps he will be accomodating to the bribery.

      Fox toes the propaganda line and lies to the public regarding Russian forces misrepresenting the situation for his paymasters.

      The Daily Mail report by its lack of balance and criticism belies their own Quisling stance and a lack of journalism.

      Britain and the West should start arming Ukrainian troops to help them fight back against heavily-armed Russian-backed rebels, ex-Defence Secretary Liam Fox has said.

      Dr Fox raised fears that the credibility of the entire Nato alliance was now at stake, claiming that the bitter battle in eastern Ukraine had raised the ‘shadow of conflict’ in Europe for the first time since the Cold War ended.

      The Conservative MP said it was now crucial that Kiev had the means to defend itself against the separatists who used state-of-the-art Russian weapons to overrun the key town of Debaltseve, despite a ceasefire brokered by Germany and France.

      Fox is only our bullshitted by John Kerry

      Yesterday, US secretary of state John Kelly warned Russia the west will not tolerate its ‘unacceptable’ actions in Ukraine – as thousands of pro-Kremlin supporters took to the streets of Moscow.

      We are confident that over the next few days we are going to make it clear that we are not going to play this game, not going to sit here and be part of this extraordinarily craven behavior at the expense of the sovereignty and integrity of a nation,’ he said.

      Kerry has conveniently forgotten Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, Yemen, Nicaragua and hundreds of other breaches of sovereignty commited by the US and its proxies.

      Read more:

    • sovereigntea says:

      ISIS propaganda outfit Site Intelligence run by former IDF Rita Katz now pushing “shopping centre attack” Westgate – Frank Lowy shopping centre billionaire is an associate of Larry “pull it” double 911 terror insurance Silverstein. Both are Jewish.

      LORD LEVY, one of Tony Blair’s closest and most trusted aides, was paid at least £250,000 by an Australian property group headed by one of the world’s richest men.

      The payments, which the company has attempted to keep private, are far higher than previously thought and began in 1999, the year Levy was appointed Blair’s envoy to the Middle East, reporting directly to the prime minister.

      They were authorised by Frank Lowy, the head of the Westfield corporation, who has business and political interests in Israel and whose company is seeking planning permission to develop shopping centres across Britain…

      Zionist Frank Lowy, Westfield shopping mall magnate has a deep connection with Israel. It is reported, he fought in a crack commando brigade during Israel’s War of Independence and is one of Australia’s donors to the United Israel Appeal, a Zionist charity that resettles Russian and Ethiopian Jews in Israel. It is said Lowy is Australia’s second richest man, his holdings being scattered round the world. According to the London Sunday Times, 14th April 2002, he planned to invest £30 million in property and the media in Israel.

      Site Intelligence report
      The Shabaab al-Mujahideen Movement, al-Qaeda’s branch in Somalia, released a documentary-style video on the September 2013 raid at the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya, and threatened that “Westgate was just the beginning, and with all hopes of peace forever dashed, Kenya’s darkest hour is yet to come”.

  2. Aldous says:

    Wouldn’t you want to know – who the Khazarian Mafia (KM) are and what the Khazarian Conspiracy (KC) is?

    What exactly is the Khazarian Mafia that is the predominant, the largest, most powerful Organized Crime Syndicate or Cabal in the World but now uses the United States of America, the City of London and Israel as its centers of operations?

    It is difficult to get accurate information about the history of the Khazarian Mafia because it has essentially been excised from the libraries and history books. Veterans Today Columnist and Financial Editor Mike Harris, who also has his own show, “The Short end of the Stick”, has really put a lot of the puzzle pieces together on this whole issue of Khazarian Mafia History.

    It turns out that a very secret occult group linked to ancient Babylonian “Black Magick” more commonly known as ancient Babylonian Talmudism or Kabbalism has endured over the centuries because of its secret, by incredibly parasitic anti-human, anti-society activities which most normal folks could never engage in.

    Their ability to engage in infant sacrifice which they believe give them direct Luciferian or satanic superhuman powers is notable and a true asset in acquiring power and wealth from unsuspecting masses who can not even imagine such behaviors.

    Their ability to covertly murder, rob, lie and cheat accompanied by a smile and a handshake as a normal way of doing business is very difficult for average humans to understand or even fathom.

    The covert ability of these Khazarian Mobsters to engage in massive financial fraud which is based on an age old occult religion of anti-human anti-society delusions of racial superiority (also known as Malignant Tribalism) is so unimaginable by the public at large that the KM gets away with incredible crimes un-accosted every day that passes and has for many years.×239.jpg

  3. Aldous says:

    US, UK mulling more sanctions against Russia – Kerry [nee Kohn]

    Is it just me, or is John Kerry’s (real name of his father is Fritz Kohn) infantile wearing of a boy scout-like US flag lapel badge, reminiscent of the Soviet era when they used to do the same? What’s the born liar trying to prove? That he’s not really an Israeli Firster? Or is his real flag of allegiance on the inside lapel – or possibly his zip-fly or even tattooed on associated and mutilated appendage?

    Here’s a picture of the out and out warmongering tawt(sic) without his bit of tacky lapel bling but still looking his hideous self.

  4. Zionist hijacked US destroyed Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Ukraine and now trying to do the same thing to Sri Lanka!

    “More Evidence Available of Involvement by Washington in the Removal of Mahinda Rajapaksa as Sri Lankan President”

  5. sovereigntea says:

    ISIS use IDF tactics — Relatives informed Raqqa is Being Slaughtered. – Christian Post

    Silently that a pregnant woman, who had gone into labor in the middle of the night and was severely in danger of losing her baby, was caught rushing to the hospital by ISIS patol troops. A patrol guard shot at her and her husband and forced them to return to their home.

    We have seen this Bolshevik tactic before.

    “1 Shot, 2 Kills” IDF T-Shirts

    The shirt on the left shows a pregnant woman, clearly meant to be Arab/Palestinian, in crosshairs and says “1 Shot 2 Kills.” The one on the right has a kid carrying a gun in crosshairs and says “The smaller, the harder,” or maybe “the smaller it is, the harder it is.” This next one has a woman crying next to a dead child and a condom wrapper situated like crosshairs and says “better use Durex.”

  6. sovereigntea says:

    Can you spot the Ukranian crocodile ?

    20.02.2015 Ukrainian crisis news. War in Ukraine, Donbass, Kiev, Europe, Russia, USA

  7. Could this be a plot aimed at bringing about additional intervention in Ukraine to kill more innocent people?

  8. Zionist hijacked Catholic Church and other branches of Zionist hijacked organized Christianity has caused too much misery – and Jesus Christ or the White race should not be blamed for these horrors committed by the usual suspects who colonized the world – and most of the the world is still clueless about who they really were/are.

    “…Not many text books or Western history will cover the crimes committed by either the Church or the colonial invaders. Crimes in the name of the Church for disbelievers of Christianity run into millions. The Crusades killed over 1million, the Inquisition led again to millions cruelly put to death, another million were killed accused of witch-hunting, Rudolph J. Rummel estimates that 14 million native North and South Americans were killed by Europeans. He also estimates 17m Africans to have been killed….”

  9. Aldous says:

    The Khazar Jew Induced White Liberal Guilt Complex:

    Whites are racist and evil. We hate White people. We hate our ancestors and our heritage. White Christians have enslaved and oppressed the great Black race.

    They made blacks live in slums and designed IQ tests to make this dynamic race of inventors, explorers and builders of civilisation seem stupid. We love the Blacks and their high culture!

    My wife and I had a doctor sterilise us so we couldn’t have any white-devil children. Now we are adopting black kids to correct society’s injustices.

    Someday all people in the world will be one mixed race and love each other like we do. Of course we’ll have to eliminate those Rotten Whites!

    Jewish spokesman: “Oh, these are good Goyim! They parrot what we teach them on TV and in our movies.”

  10. Ed Butt says:

    My Dad used to work on a liberal newspaper, the News Chronicle, which stopped publishing around 1960. I remember him talking to other reporters in the office and a regular theme was that the danger to world pease came from the USA and Israel – and the guys were no fans of Russia.
    55 years later little has changed.

  11. Lynn says:

    The whole thing is a company store set up to enslave us…. They no longer have any secrets so they have blown their cover. The same copy book used over and over has finally been exposed and they are named and shamed. We will be rounding them up and seeing them face justice once and for all. I truly believe this is their final curtain call.

  12. Organized Zionist Jewry is destroying Christianity in the Western nations [and the White race] while using the corrupt Christian church to destroy Buddhism in Sri Lanka – while orchestrating wars against Muslim people and their Islamic faith under the banner of fake “Muslim Terrorism”. And most people know nothing about what Jews continue to perpetrate against Whites and Muslims and Buddhists.

    Zio NGOs are causing havoc in Sri Lanka – even harassing the members of the medical profession. Unfortunately people in Sri Lanka including journalists and politicians have no clue about the danger posed by Zionists Jews who have hijacked the Catholic and the Christian Church which explains why the church support Zionist wars and other evil.

    How many people are aware that these evil things the Zionist Christians do to help the Jewish agenda are not the teachings of Jesus Christ?

    “World Vision Harassment of a Government Doctor in Sri Lanka”

    “Dr. Rakshita Weerakody is the Government Medical Officer in charge of the Wahalkada Government Rural Hospital in the Kebithigollewa Divisional Secretariat area of the Anuradhapura District. I represent the Buddhist Village Trust for Sri Lanka based in London. I visited Sri Lanka in January 2002 and observed the presence of World Vision in many parts of the country. I also received many reports from various sources regarding the unethical methods use by WV in many remote Sinhala Buddhist villages in the LTTE affected areas to recruit locals for their conversions surreptitiously and harass those who oppose them.

    The information of the above medical officer who was actively harassed by WV reached me all the way in London before I left for Sri Lanka in May 2002. On my arrival I visited this doctor and had an initial interview to ascertain the truth of this information, which I had received. I also requested a written report from him. The important information submitted in this report are given in point form with a view to inform the Buddhist public, The Ministry In charge of Buddha Sasana Affairs, and any interested party who are monitoring such unethical evangelical Christian activities of NGO’s…..”

    Read more here:

  13. Wasn’t this the plan of Jewish DHS all along?

    “The “War On Terror” Turns Inward – DHS Report Warns Of Right Wing Terror Threat”

    A new intelligence assessment, circulated by the Department of Homeland Security this month and reviewed by CNN, focuses on the domestic terror threat from right-wing sovereign citizen extremists and comes as the Obama administration holds a White House conference to focus efforts to fight violent extremism.

    Some federal and local law enforcement groups view the domestic terror threat from sovereign citizen groups as equal to — and in some cases greater than — the threat from foreign Islamic terror groups, such as ISIS, that garner more public attention.?

    The Homeland Security report, produced in coordination with the FBI, counts 24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010.

    The government says these are extremists who believe that they can ignore laws and that their individual rights are under attack in routine daily instances such as a traffic stop or being required to obey a court order.

  14. Terrorism and the drug trade and mass deception on a global scale!

    Please don’t miss reading and sharing this article:

  15. More Zionist terror and lies:

    Melanie Phillips gets her Zionist axxx kicked on Question Time

  16. Aldous says:

    An interesting article but with a disturbing paragraph regarding President Putin and the real possibility of him being ‘controlled opposition’.

    Central Bank Scam Explains World Malaise

    February 22, 2015

    “This book provides insights as to how private bankers since ancient times have…created money out of nothing
    as an interest bearing debt in order to arrogate supreme powers to themselves. It also provides a record, both ancient and modern, of civilizations which have flourished in an environment free from the burden of usury.” …

    … Western society has little credibility or moral legitimacy. But what about Putin’s Russia? Certainly it has been cast as the defender of humanity against the NWO. Certainly everything the Russians say makes much more sense than anything emanating from Washington, Ottawa or the capitals of Europe.

    But we must ask, would the Rothschilds destroy Russia only to let it slip out of their grasp? Not likely.

    While most Russians may be sincere, I fear Putin is controlled opposition. (I hope I am wrong.) You need two sides to have a war and justify arms expenditures. Putin meets regularly with Henry Kissinger; Russia still has a Rothschild bank. As the Protocols of Zion said, “no one has arisen to oppose us without our consent.”


  17. Zionist John Kerry to retract his lies

    Regardless of political changes in Colombo, it is important that patriotic Sri Lankans remain vigilant of the LTTE Tamil terrorists lobby and disinformation campaigns. The recent reference made by US Secretary John Kerry to Sri Lanka’s “30-year war with the Tamils” is undoubtedly a calculated attempt to distort the narrative and trump up the charges of “genocide.”

  18. “The “Secret Jew”: Warmonger John Kerry’s “Hidden” Jewishness ”

    “…The entire world has been subjected to a barrage of war-mongering propaganda against Syria by US Secretary of State John Kerry—but little known is the fact that Kerry’s family name is Kohn and that he is, by Jewish definition and Israel’s own immigration laws, a Jew.

    This fact puts the war-mongering by Kerry/Kohn into perspective, and also reveals just how deeply the Israeli/Zionist Supremacist tentacles run in the American government….”

  19. More lies and deception from warmongering Zionist “proud” Jew: John Kerry

    “John Kerry’s rhetoric on Isis insults our intelligence and conceals the reality of the situation in Syria”

    “Robert Fisk is the most respected European journalist in the world on the Mideast conflicts. In the months and days leading up to the Iraq War, Fisk exposed as I did the “weapons of mass destruction” Zionist lies against Iraq and warned the world that the war would unleash the most radical elements and perpetual conflict and bloodshed.

    Among other things he exposed the key Israeli role at Abu Ghraib in creating one of the biggest black marks against America in our history: the horrific tortures, including sexual tortures against Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib. He unearthed the details of the Israeli role in the massacres of Shatila and Sabre in Lebanon and in the key Zionist role in fomenting hate and war between Christians and Muslims in Lebanon as a way of weakening and defeating Lebanese abiliity to defend itself from Israeli land and water resources.

    Now he has sharpened his pen on the self-admitted “proud Jew,” John Kohn who hid his real family name politically masqueraded with the very Irish name of Kerry in the heavily Irish Massachusetts.

    Now Kerry (Kohn) talks about supporting the moderate opposition in Syria when in reality the only real moderate opposition in Syria is the secular Syrian Government which has the overwhelming support of Syrian Christians and of moderate Muslims. The most famous and revered Sunni Muslim cleric is the Sunni Grand Mufti of Syria who openly supports secular government and Syrian President Assad.

    Fisk points out that is the Syrian government and the Syrian Army which has been fighting with great courage the blood-thirsty ISIS and al Qaeda offshoot, al Nusra terrorists for years. Over all this time, the Zionist controlled State Department of Kohn and the Zionist media has painted the Syrian Government as the terrorists and the oppressors and the “rebels” as the “good guys.”

  20. Harriet says:

    I have been blocked from going to NoDisinfo website.

    Can anyone email and inform him please. This is a Zionist plot.

  21. “Deconstructing John Kerry’s Big Lies In London” By Stephen Lendman

    “An earlier article explained he disgraces the office he holds. He represents the worst of America’s dark side.

    He’s a world-class thug. Pure evil best describes him. He deplores peace. He supports war. He’s a longtime serial liar.

    He and his British counterpart in crime Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond met in London. Discussions focused on joint war plans on humanity.

    Kerry: Washington intends further steps “to counter violent extremism”

    Fact: Permanent US-dominated NATO wars will continue against existing American adversaries and new ones…..”

    Read more:

  22. Harriet says:

    Iceland got rid of Zionist Jewish Bankers who were ruining the country and now this exposure of McDonald’s poisonous food!

    We need to watch for the safety of Iceland politicians and other citizens because the Zionists can try their revenge on this nice country.

    “Iceland Did Something Epically Clever With The Last McDonald’s Meal They Ever Sold”

    So far, the meal on display has lived up to its “franken-food” reputation, showing not the slightest sign of decomposition and indubitably further sealing the deal on Iceland`s departure from the mega-chain.

    McDonald’s has been a hot topic among the CE community over the years, be sure to read more shocking facts about the franken-food chain in the links below.

    The 70 Ingredient Cancer Promoting McRib Sandwich: It’s Not Real Food

    This Is What’s REALLY In A McDonald’s Hamburger

    Domino’s, McDonald’s, & Wendy’s Are All Feeding You A Chemical Used In Silly Putty

    Watch The Video & You’ll Never Eat McDonald’s French Fries Again

  23. “Evil with a Nice Face – Part II” Written by Dr Preston James for Veterans Today

    “..All NSA raw data is directly downloaded to Israel via satellite and used by the Khazarian Mafia (KM) in their massive war against American, Americans and the rest of the World.

    Shadow governmentIt is high time the whole World gangs-up on this incredible Criminal Enterprise from Hell, the NSA, the destroyer of freedom and the creator of mass bondage, which is owned and controlled by Khazarian Mafia (KM) and is its obvious tool.

    So we now know for certain that stolen NSA Intel is used to deploy terrorism and engineer wars in order to produce incredible amounts of mass painful human death, human suffering and destruction of whole cities and nations like Iraq and Pakistan.

    And why is the Khazarian Mafia (KM) so obsessed with doing all this? There are actually esoteric reasons which have been disclosed in a prior article, but beyond that the KM has an age old agenda to take down the whole World and mass-murder approximately 90% of the population using a variety of sinister, covert and incredibly evil means.

    We now know that Terrorism is pre-engineered and deployed by the Khazarian mafia (KM) to serve as a justification to the masses to fight illegal wars on behalf of the Khazarian mafia, the World’s largest Organized Crime Cabal which is empowered by the criminal and inhuman Rothschild private Fiat Banksters, best described as the World Zionist Malignant Judaic Tribalists.

    The credit for this discovery of the Secret History of the Khazarian Mafia (KM) and much of the background regarding this evil malignant Tribes background must go to Veteran Today’s own Financial Editor, Columnist and Talk Show Host Mike Harris, who has done a magnificent job uncovering this hidden history of the evil Luciferian Cult that has ever arisen….”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.