The patsies died yesterday. Now for the witnesses. KIll before they spill.

High-ranking police officer involved in Charlie Hebdo found shot dead with his service weapon in his office.


“In November 2013, the Commissioner Fredou had discovered the lifeless body of his colleague, the 3rd ranking police officer of SRPJ Limoges, who had also committed suicide with his service weapon in his office. He was also 44 years old.

The Commissioner Fredou, like all agents SRPJ worked yesterday on the case of the massacre at the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo .

In particular, he surveyed the family of one of the victims.

He killed himself before completing its report.”

TAP – The Commissioner no doubt knew it was coming and talked.


Just over a year after Helric Fredoun discovered the lifeless body of the third ranking police officer SRPJ of Limoges, the second ranking service officer has committed suicide yesterday at his workplace with his service weapon.

We learned this morning, a Commissioner Helric Fredoun SRPJ Limoges has committed suicide last night in his office with his service weapon .

Information confirmed by his superiors. It is unknown at this time the reasons for his actions. He would have killed himself that night or in the early hours of the morning.

The Commissioner Helric Fredou  aged 45 years was from Limoges began his career in 1997 as a police officer at the regional office the judicial police of Versailles, before returning to Limoges. He was deputy director of the regional police service since 2012. His father was a former police officer, his mother was a nurse in the emergency context CHU Limoges. He was single and had no children.



11 Responses to “The patsies died yesterday. Now for the witnesses. KIll before they spill.”

  1. Gordon says:

    How often have we seen this same scenario played out over and over again. Our governments and their agencies can be read like a book.

  2. Mark says:

    It’s the blatancy, the leaving footprints. Multiple reasons why and we do well to understand. But when/will they go to far? The enemy sometimes can’t reist going too quick, too much and… too late – “Pop” – the info-dam breaks. Let’s pray, and for those witnesses, Mark.

  3. Aldous says:

    Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook says (4 weeks after this public declaration he died):

    The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaeda. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the devil only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US.

    Cook has previously written:
    Al-Qaida, literally “the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of Mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Cook is merely confirming what others have said. Former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski told the Senate that the war on terror is “a mythical historical narrative”.

    Not only has the U.S. government hyped Al Qaeda, but it has issued numerous fake terror alerts to scare people.

    There is a word for intentionally creating fear in order to manipulate opinion for political ends: terrorism. Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80’s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally “the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of Mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden’s organisation would turn its attention to the west.

  4. Julie says:

    BREAKING – Police Chief Helric Fredou Investigating Chalie Hebdo DIES MYSTERIOUSLY!

    And in French: Charlie hebdo : le n°2 de la police judiciaire s’est suicidé au commissariat.

  5. Julie says:

    Monday, February 08, 2010
    “Tales of the Holohoax” and Denmark’s anti-Muslim cartoons
    Satire demonized and criminalized in Britain, by Michael Hoffman.

    One grows weary of pointing to the disparity between how “Holocaust” revisionists and Muslim haters are treated in the media and the courts both legal and of public opinion. Kurt Westergaard, the artist who drew the anti-Mohammed cartoon in Denmark is a hero of the European Union. His “freedom of expression” is jealously guarded, and used as a pedagogic tool for hammering Muslims concerning the glories of modern Western human rights’ standards. When Muslims respond that the Danish cartoon was bigoted and racist, they are dismissed as backward peasants from Neanderthal societies who have yet to learn the rudiments of Enlightenment tolerance.

    Meanwhile, revisionist expression concerning Talmudic Judaism or the alleged execution gas chambers of Auschwitz is another matter entirely. In the latter case, the “racist” pejorative is gleefully pinned on revisionists by the media and the courts, thereby acting as a solvent for weakening any claims to apply the western heritage of freedom of the press to revisionist writers or satirists.

    Hence, Simon Sheppard, who received a lengthy prison sentence in part for distributing in England this writer’s satirical comic book Tales of the Holohoax is described by all British media, from the snooty BBC to the proletarian “Sun” newspaper, as a “racist.”

    The unjust assignment of this pejorative is the impregnable wall that has been erected to isolate Mr. Sheppard’s case from that of the anti-Muslim Danish cartoonists, and causes him to forfeit the civil liberties protections of Europe’s supposed guardians of freedom against Islamic fundamentalism. The possibility that Europe might need to be guarded against the racist tyranny of fundamentalist Orthodox Judaism is policed out of consideration.

    What precisely is there that is “racist” about the Tales of the Holohoax cartoons? The media do not scruple to attempt an analysis because they are under no pressure or obligation to do so. Satire is only a noble weapon when it is used against “demon Islam,” while Judaism and Holocaustianity are sacred dogmas in Europe. Satirizing these sacred cows is a “disgusting hate crime.”

    Westergaard is portrayed as a defiant saint, while Mr. Sheppard and his partner in “criminal” satire, Stephen Whittle (they are known collectively as the “Heretical Two”), are less than zero in the eyes of the Western gatekeepers of morality and history – “race hate criminals” – in the purple prose of the BBC. The fact that these two have been stigmatized as “racist” is sufficient to render the stigma a reality, even when the facts bear witness to the contrary.

    The “revisionist community,” with some notable exceptions (Lady Michelle Renouf, Dr. Robert Faurisson, Willis Carto, Herman Otten) is reluctant to mention Tales of the Holohoax in connection with the plight of the “Heretical Two.” The publication itself and the heretics who circulated it would now be a cause célébre if the current “revisionist community” had any of the public relations instincts of Ernst Zundel.

    In the 2009 Christmas list of imprisoned revisionists and their jailhouse mailing addresses circulated around the Internet and published in certain revisionist newsletters, under the names Sheppard and Whittle the reason given for their incarceration was an oddly generic one: “sought asylum in the U.S.” But the reason they were asylum seekers was noticeably absent. By this omission, reference to Tales of the Holohoax and its author were sent down the memory hole — by revisionists themselves.

    I have seen no sustained analogy concerning this writer or Mr. Sheppard, and Mr.Westergaard. And since it has been decided that Tales of the Holohoax shouldn’t be mentioned or discussed, no parallels are drawn between this writer’s satirical gas chamber cartoons and the anti-Muslim ones in Denmark. A magnificent opportunity is thereby lost.

    Culpability for this loss also rests with the Muslim and Arab media who have failed to compare the two sets of cartoons and the fate of the distributors.

    No European has gone to jail for satirizing Islam or its prophet. On the contrary, the defiance of the Danish cartoonists is celebrated, rewarded and protected, while Sheppard rots in a British prison for distributing a satire that pokes fun at Talmudic tall tales recycled for modern consumption during and after World War II.

  6. Gillian says:

    David Icke’s ‘Headline’ site seems to be being blocked now. At least it is to me.

    • Tapestry says:

      In the last few days since the Charlie Hebdo it’s been much harder to get a message out in comments on most sites.

      • Gillian says:

        That’s certainly true Tap. Most of the articles in the Telegraph are closed to comments. The Daily Mail isn’t too bad and on some articles now comments go straight up without being pre-moderated. One has to be careful not to use certain trigger words of course.
        Thank goodness for The Tap Blog and some others too. Some very good info on this site from regular contributors.

  7. Julie says:

    This is interesting. The Economist 2015 Cover is Filled With Cryptic Symbols and Dire Predictions.

    Are they having a laugh? Zoom in on Merkel’s hands. In the middle is the buttton
    of her jacket. The button with the hands so, give the impression of an all-seeing eye

  8. Arvillamarie says:

    Lol, I still have lots of material of Simon Sheppards at home I have had it for years now,I suppose it must be of historical material by now since he was first arrested.
    I know Lady Michelle Renouf personally she is a lovely person and is not afraid to have her collar felt, I remember a few years back she said something the powers that be did not like and they barred her from speaking or entering a venue someplace she had been welcome at for years,sorry I cant remember what the venue was now ,but I believe it could have been due to her friendship with the president of Iran,forgive me off the top of my head I cant spell his name.

  9. Arvillamarie says:

    My most sincere apologies I did a post re Simon Sheppard and Lady renouf under the wrong post,most severe SENILE dementia has struck me I feel.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.