Just heard Chris Spivey charged with harassing Lyn Rigby and 4 others by his saying Woolwich a hoax with pictures of Lee Rigby photoshopped plus offensive emails sent allegedly. Full story on his blog in his post ‘Above The Law’.
I’ll go and get the article in a minute. See also The Daily mail coverage he received last year. Not many bloggers get into the nationals.
* Apologies for any errors, I feel like shite with a stinking head cold
On the 15th of December I wrote an email to Temporary Police Inspector Paul Ahmed, which I published on this site that very same day.
Before I sent it I had a barrister check it over who apart from suggesting a couple of minor changes said that it was fine to send.
Now, as well as sending the email to Ahmed, I also sent a copy of it to:
- The Independent Police Complaints Commission
- Stephen Kavanagh: The Chief Constable of Essex
- Nick Alston: The Police Crime Commissioner for Essex
- James Duddridge: MP for Rochford & Southend East
Out of those five emails I received one ‘official’ response and that was from the IPCC acknowledging receipt of the email. However, I have heard nothing further from them… Which is an absolute fucking disgrace
Well, because the email that I sent was a legitimate complaint & protest about the Lies that TPI Paul Ahmed had been telling me as to the reason that he would be unable to deal with the complaint that I had lodged with the IPCC over my illegal arrests for the time being and since I had learned that this was a blatant lie I had also stated that I now wanted Ahmed removed from the investigation – or lack of it – and him added to the ever growing list of crimes that was/are being perpetrated against me and my family.
You can read the full email by clicking HERE
Now bear in mind that I had a barrister check the contents of the email before I sent it.
And as you will see, there is absolutely nothing contained within that email that is not fair comment.
Indeed, like it or not, I am a citizen of this country and I am entitled to be treated Fairly, Just and Without Prejudice… None of which have been applied to me and/or my family thus far.
After all, having caught and confronted a VERY SENIOR POLICEMAN BREAKING THE LAW and acting in collusion with others to avert a major scandal by burying the extremely serious complaint that I made against the police, whilst others try and convict me in a kangaroo court – should these unfit for office, criminals be allowed to just ignore the fact?
And when I say criminals, I publicly accuse all 4 men – and I use the term ‘men’ very loosely – as well as the wholly corrupt IPCC.
Now, when I say that the 4 fella’s & the IPCC ignored the email, I do mean that they did not act accordingly, as set out by law… They ignored the law, because they do not think that the law applies to them.
However, they did not ignore the email.
You see, on the 19th of December, four days after receiving the email I got a court summons through the post which had been “authorised” by the Essex Chief Constable, Stephen Kavanagh – one of the recipients of the aforementioned email… In other words a malicious, vengeful court summons sent purely out of spite.
Now, you can disagree with that assessment if ya fucking like, but the facts are that the‘summons’ was without doubt hastily assembled; unless of course all court summons are issued littered with errors (as I will evidence shortly), and furthermore was issued two days after receiving a damning communication directly affecting the person who authorised the summons.
And that is despite me not being due to answer bail for the bullshit charges until yesterday (18.01.2014).
The summons itself is an MG4D “Postal Requisition” and is actually very vague. Indeed, I do not think that I have been sent all of it as there is meant to be an info pack and as far as I can work out, the procedure should have been discussed with me when I was arrested… Which it wasn’t.
In fact, I am not even eligible to receive a “postal requisition” summons since I had bail conditions attached to my arrest. You see, everything that I have read about this type of summons states that if you have bail conditions attached then you CANNOT be charged in this manner.
However, according to an Essex
Mafia Police PDF (found HERE), there is an “element of discretion” where bail conditions were imposed.
Never the less, that doesn’t explain why this procedure wasn’t so much as mentioned when I was first arrested:
Postal Requisitions will replace the current process for issue of a summons to ensure
attendance at court and will streamline the original process providing greater efficiency.
Offenders considered suitable for postal requisitions will be identified at the initial arrest stage.
Once the evidence has been collected and a decision made as to suitability to proceed, the
process can be engaged without the need for the offender to return to the Police Station.
Hmmm, why do I not feel that all is above board here?
Never the less, the following is the first 2 sheets of the old fanny which was made up of 3 sheets of old fanny in total:
Okay, now before I break those charges down, you should take into account that according to the law on postal requisition summonses:
Postal requisitions are a replacement for the summons process – the means of advising
individuals who have not been charged, that they are nonetheless required to attend court. The
requisition process includes an evidence pack which the recipient is required to read and
Now, as I say, I never got any such “evidence pack” yet the above clearly lists “charges”, so I must have been charged … Unless I am reading the fucking thing wrong.
Never the less, lets have a look at this bullshit and how the police are wasting tax-payers money on vindictive, self serving, bollocks charges whilst real criminals go about their business unchallenged.
(1) Harassment without violence
Now, straight off, I can tell you that I am 99 percent certain that there is no such person as Lyn Rigby. If you have read my latest article “Behind the flag” about the Glasgow bin lorry hoax, you will hopefully know what I mean by that.
You see, like ALL of the players in the Glasgow false flag, those in the Woolwich false flag are just created personas and the person who plays any given character will have multiple other“sock puppets”. For example, the Glasgow hoax includes a person called Lucy Jane Ewing, the daughter of the ‘deceased’ Gillian Ewing.
Yet neither person exists outside of a Facebook profile. By that I mean that the person playing Lucy Jane is also the same person who is playing her sister Robyn Alexander and many other people to boot.
Indeed, there were people who took part in the Glasgow Fraud who also took part in the Woolwich fraud.
Never the less, I am obviously going to plead not guilty to ALL the charges and that gives me a right to trial by jury. And obviously it will be extremely interesting to see Lyn Rigby, Sara McClure, Robert Sargeant and the convicted criminal Gavin Vitler on the witness stand.
However, I have apparently harassed Lyn Rigby – not her real name – by publishing on MY Facebook page and on MY website the following:
A) That the murder of Lee Rigby was a hoax… It was, he never existed. Woops, there I go again with my harassment. Course, there are hundreds, nay thousands that have posted on their Facebooks and YouTube that the murder of Lee Rigby was a hoax… So I am being victimised then… And Lyn must be feeling pretty harassed.
Course the onus will be on the prosecution to prove that Rigby’s murder wasn’t a hoax.
Mind you, I never said that the Rigby murder was a hoax on my Facebook. I just posted the link to the articles which is an entirely different matter. However, it appears that according to British law – paid for by you people – that SAYING THE LEE RIGBY MURDER WAS A HOAX, is now a crime… And everything that I write on my website and Facebook is aimed at harassing Lyn Rigby – NOT HER REAL NAME – and apparently I should know that for a fact… KAVANAGH YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO YOUR UNIFORM AND POSITION… Sorry Lyn Rigby, no offence meant.
B) An assertion that Robert Sargeant , Lyn’s daughter’s partner was in fact Lee Rigby… Fuck me! They are going to throw away the key.
So, I am being persecuted for strongly believing something to be true… Course, I most certainly DO NOT believe for one minute that Robert Sargeant is Lee Rigby… Lee Rigby does not exist, never has – not as Rigby anyway.
Moreover, I said that a fella called Robert SARJEANT was pretending to be Lee Rigby… But fuck knows who Robert SARGEANT is.
But look what happens when you replace Rigby’s face with Sarjeants.
Course, quite who Sara McClure is in reality is also a matter up for debate. However, I will need to know because she will obviously have to be cross examined at the court case.
However, I also said, long before I said that Biggers Riggers was Sarjeant that he was also Karl Whittle. An ASSERTION that I stand by.
So why am I not being prosecuted for asserting that Rigby is SarJeant and not being prosecuted for saying that he is also Karl Whittle?
Now Karl Whittles death never made any sense to me and indeed I have written quite extensively about this during the course of writing about Rigby.
However, like all of these people who are ‘killed’ in hoaxes there is money to be made out of them and Whittle is no different.
The following is from his “funding” page and I have underlined the important bits:
Guardsman Karl Whittle died in Queen Elizabeth Hospital on 7 September 2012 having sustained gunshot wounds when his checkpoint was attacked by insurgents in the Nahr-e Saraj District of Helmand Province on 14 August 2012.
Born on 26 January 1990 and raised in Bristol, Guardsman Whittle joined the Army in 2009. Having completed the Combat Infantryman’s Course at the Infantry Training Centre at Catterick he moved to Nijmegen Company, Grenadier Guards, where he conducted public duties at the Royal Palaces and participated in state ceremonial tasks. Source
Now, strangely enough, Karl Whittles Facebook is still active.
Moreover, he has some very interesting friends. Lets have some photos.
But I am showing off a bit and going off track to boot.
And you can find the proof of that fundraiser for Rigby, held in Whittles by clicking HERE
Course, it is also my ASSERTION that Christopher Amos is Lee Rigby. Yet I am not in trouble for saying that either… A bit fucking strange, don’t cha think.
And of course, Amos told me himself that Sarjeant looked like Rigby… Why isn’t he in court then:
Lee rigby, wow you’ve discovered they look a like Source
Indeed, when I read back over mine and Chris’s chat, the more “interesting” it becomes.
Never the less, lets get back to this court summons of mine.
(c) An image of Lyn Rigby and her partner being interviewed in her home, showing photographs of Lee Rigby, with commentary asserting the the pictures of Lee are Photo Shopped and comments about the dog tag and poppy which Lyn Rigby is wearing.
Now, the photograph in question is a screenshot taken from an ITV news interview… So I am going to court for a screen shot taken from an ITV interview… And the comments that I made on the screen-shot of course.
In fact the photo found below is the photo in question that was not published anywhere else – not by me anyway – other than this site, which now constitutes a criminal offence in this country… If your name is Chris Spivey of course.
So let’s break it down.
63 Burnside Crescent is a registered business address for the Limited Company, masquerading as a charity that Lyn and her business partner Kevin (kenny) Williams set up called Team Lee United Forces (they tended to leave the Co Ltd off).
However, having launched the ‘charity’ they then abruptly stopped fundraising when my evidenced was released.
Of course, you can find out information about the Company via any old company check website… Or you could just click HERE
Now, this company, which was fundraising as a “charity”, but hadn’t actually applied for charity status (and still isn’t a registered charity) had already raised tens of thousands of pounds when they stopped fundraising – which coincided with the release of my evidence against them.
Now have a butchers at this:
Now to me, what I have written on these photos is much more derogatory than what I wrote on the one I am being prosecuted for… But I really can’t think why that should be, can you?
But as I say, the “charity” is still not registered. So surely when I called Ian an idiot on that photo, I was being generous. However, since Ian states that they were applying to the Charity Commission for registration, yet as I type this, they still don’t have it, can only mean that either they didn’t bother to apply or they were turned down.
Course, it didn’t help when I revealed that Lyn’s fellow director for the “charity” was heavily involved with the EDL.
Indeed, it has since transpired that Mr Williams has resigned from the “charity”… Something that he hadn’t done at the time when I exposed his EDL links.
So who is the criminal?
As for the photos that the summons mentions, well lets see the prosecution prove that they aren’t phot-shopped because I can certainly prove that they are.
And neither was their address made any more secret when they had a free garden makeover, showing the house inside and out.
Now this undeserved freebie makeover was carried out by the Forces Support Charity whom are really rather friendly with Mr Williams of the EDL.
Again, you can read more about the Rigby ‘charity’ by clicking HERE
I should tell you though that I have much more damning evidence on the connection between dear Mrs Riggers and the EDL… I think I will save that for court though… Roger that Mr Kavanagh.
Okay, back to the summons and ‘D’ is covered in the above.
(E) Details of the Address of Lee Rigby’s sister Sara McClure.
Oh, so that is who lives in Latrigg Crescent… I didn’t know for sure.
Course, I never published the house number, because I wasn’t sure what the house number was to be honest.
Never the less, it seems that the MSM can get away with publishing photos of Burnside Crescent with impunity.
Moreover, the Press association circulated the following photo:
And the Daily Mail published Lyn’s address in full in the article found HERE
The following two photos were taken from that article:
Look, the Chimp has even claimed ownership of the first photo… You couldn’t make this shit up.
Course, you have to ask yourself why wasn’t I told at the police interview that publishing a photo of someones house constituted “harassment”?
Indeed, why was I not told to remove the ‘offending’ items since technically I must still have been harassing poor Lyn ever since being arrested, mustn’t I?
And the only difference between me and the MSM is that I am uncovering crime, whereas the MSM is covering it up.
(F) Photographs of members of the Rigby Family and their Christmas Tree
So, that will be the photos that I took off their Facebook profiles… You know, THE ONES THAT THEY HAD ON SHOW FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE SO AS THEY COULD PERPETUATE THE MYTH OF THE RIGBY MURDER.
Once again, the only thing I have to say until I get into court is why didn’t the wholly corrupt Essex Plod tell me to remove the offending photos… You know, the ones that anyone on Facebook could access.
(G) Suggestion that either Lee Rigby never existed or that the family is involved with MI5.
And that is a crime is it?
Whatever the fuck you do, do not claim that Lee Rigby never existed because you will be in court quicker than two shakes of a gnats winky.
And I will repeat: Lee Rigby never existed as Lee Rigby… There ya go, I have broken the law again.
As for the suggestion that the family are involved with MI5… Isn’t it the “family’s” place to sue me for that allegation? Course, they won’t do that because the family is a fraud and involved with the Security Services.
I will remind you that you are paying for this police investigation… Just sayin’.
(G) A suggestion that Lee Rigby was a rapist.
I never suggested that at all.
Indeed what I wrote is:
Am I saying that Rigby was a rapist?
No, of course I’m not because I don’t know if he was or wasn’t. Source
So, completely the opposite then.
Course, you now have to ask yourself why the person/people responsible for the allegation are not being prosecuted.
And once again, the Plod were well aware that I had published this on my site – which is not a social media site – yet they never told me that I had harassed anyone by doing so when they interviewed me.
(I) An assertion that Kevin Vitler had visited Lyn Rigby’s address the week before posting on the 15th of July 2014.
So, am I being prosecuted for publishing too early then?
However, in the event I never asserted any such thing. The following is what I wrote:
And indeed, Vitler was spotted in Burnside Crescent last week in conversation with Sandra Lord and another woman.
Sandra Lord does of course live directly opposite Lyn.. Just sayin’.
Now, someone told me that information in an email. Indeed, until he did I had never even heard of Kevin Vitler. Vitler is of course a criminal who was banned from every pub in Middleton at one time.
I have already written about Mr Vitler and his Charity fundraising at the source links I have already published on here… I look forward to seeing Mr Vitler in court too.
However, the following is from my article “Charity begins at home”:
Poor Paula seems to be under the misapprehension that the money is going to young Jack… However like I proved in a previous article, not only did the Rigby family totally ignore Jack at the funeral and vigil held on the day before, Lyn couldn’t even get his birthday right in one interview that she gave.
And indeed, when you read the blurb, you will see that there is no mention of Jack whatsoever.
Never the less Jennette, who charges £5 (£6 with P+P when paid into her personal paypal account) for a Lee Rigby Patch, which according to one supplier would cost around £2.50 to buy (source) gave that £2511 figure “plus some other money I collected before I left” information out on the 25th of August 2013.
Yet that figure – rounded up to the nearest pound – had somewhat diminished by the 3rd of September… At least it had according to Vitler.
Am I saying that they are on the fiddle.
No, I am just reporting the evidenced facts.
However, if people are happy to give their hard earned to a fella who in 2005 had the maximum ban allowed (2 years) under the ‘Middleton Pubwatch scheme’, its no skin of my nose.
Are the police investigating Vitler and his *aherm,aherm ‘fundraising’?
Are they fuck!
Now I see little reason to go through the second lot of charges since they are the same as the first only they are on behalf of Sara McClure… They do like a ‘Mc’, do these useful idiots don’t they. And as I have already shown you, Sarah McClure is a multitude of people.
The 3rd charge is in regard to a PRIVATE email: Sent by public communication network an offensive/indecent/obscene/menacing message/matter.
Fuck me, that sounds serious despite the fact that I didn’t send any emails at all on the 13/07/2014… Not one.
However, on 12/07/2014 I did send myself an email with some photos that I used in a Rigby article. The reason that I did so was because they were on my other computer and as such it was easier to do that than fuck about going from one computer to the other. All the photos were used in the article and indeed were all in the public domain… I can’t hack into their accounts don’t cha know.
So, I am being prosecuted for an email that I sent to myself… Righto.
Or if the charge doesn’t refer to that, someone sent me an email on the 14th with some information on the Rigbys and Kevin Kenny Williams.
However, I neither asked for or expected this information, so if I am not being prosecuted for sending myself an email, I am being prosecuted for receiving an email from a person whom the Plod have not so much as bothered to get in touch with.
However, this begs the question: HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU HARASS SOMEONE IN AN EMAIL THAT THE “VICTIM” IS NEVER GOING TO SEE?
As for the final 4th charge which again is in regards to emails: Sent by public communication network an offensive/indecent/obscene/menacing message/matter.
This charge relates to emails sent between Me, Wolfie, Dogman, and an IT company that was helping us out when the MIT were bombarding the site with DDOS attacks.
The following is a sample of one of those emails:
Obviously with the Lee Rigby article nearing completion (which puts an end to any doubt that Rigbys murder was anything other than a staged event and I believe/hope is going to be massive and give an awful lot of people a kick up the arse) the site needs to be safe, as the security services will most certainly try and take it down.
There were also some other emails sent to myself from myself, again all of photos relating to the Rigby/Woolwich hoax.
Therefore, I ask again: How the fuck can private emails sent between people trying to keep a website running be construed as offensive/indecent/obscene/menacing message/matter?
And there you have it. What a fucking waste of time and public money.
As for sheet 3 of the 3 sheet summons, well, have a butchers for yourself.
Now, why the fuck has the Statement of Means been crossed out?
I can’t ask a solicitor because I can’t get one to act for me… They have all been warned against it, and I am not even fucking joking.
Course, it comes to something when your own MP, the Essex PCC, and the IPCC choose to ignore an extremely serious complaint of wrongdoing in high office. However, it totally beggars belief that a county’s Chief Constable can not only ignore that evidence, but can by way of response authorise a summons full of laughable charges.
I would therefore appreciate your support on this matter and would ask that you ALL email Kavanagh, Duddridge, Alston and the IPCC asking them in no uncertain terms just what the fuck is going on.
And I would appreciate the support of those who live near enough to me to turn up at court on friday the 23rd because obviously they are going to try and tuck me up… A film crew wouldn’t be a bad idea either.
Once again, you have a chance to make a difference… Lets go to war.