I’ve not looked around the alternative media as yet for any different takes on the shootings in Paris (UPDATE – I have now).
Suffice it say that this attack mirrors the shootings in Sydney. City centre. People killed. Supposedly Moslem perpetrators. Lots of video/TV footage.
Is Jim Stone below correct? He says it’s all political theatre and a hoax event.
Ade sends – How convenient that someone filmed the action.
Much more blood here. Shooting Headshots in Ukraine with AK47. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OiBjT7XzJ-U
An event which is clearly designed to be shocking and maintain peoples’ interest in Middle eastern wars and set up division between peoples. Charlie Hebdo has been making religious hatred all seem as ridiculous as it is, and to those who want us all to take it seriously and put hatred into our hearts, their output must be frustrating.
Or is Hebdo itself an op? Given the state of the world, it’s pretty obviously stirring up trouble to spoof the leader of ISIS, and other Islamist figureheads.
In 2003 most people believed government assurances about Iraq’s WMD and Saddam Hussein’s willingness to use them against Western Europe, however stupid that seems now. Intelligent people are bound to see the ludicrous nature of these medieval wars, where religions, that fewer and fewer people in the world believe in, are being pitched against each other.
It’s out of desperation they’re resorting to running these kind of events in Sydney and now Paris to try to get us hooked into their war narratives. Only this morning I posted John Pilger saying that the victims in Sydney were killed by the Police. What’s the trickery with this one?
As for today’s episode of news drama, JIM STONE says –
Jan 7 2014
Terror attack in France – debunked
With question mark because the news is too early for a debunk. (update, debunked.) Here is the plot:
Comic magazine Charlie Hebdo produced anti Islamic cartoons.
Three well armed “terrorists” stormed the place with machine guns ablaze while screaming “Allahu Akbar”.
Terrorists escape completely, while shooting at police all over Paris, 10 dead.
UPDATE: BUSTED, THEY ARE SHOOTING BLANKS.
I just saw the key video that clearly shows a police officer getting shot in the head by an AK47 at point blank. Problems: No brain splatter, no blood splatter, white smoke off the barrel dispersing in a wide cloud (which blanks do,) no body lurch at bullet impact,
Updates continuing, discuss this on the Forum
Update: Month 1, day 7, hour 11. Here is the 11 theme again. Supposedly the “terrorists” struck at that time because they somehow knew all the top people for the publication would be there in a big meeting at that time. QUESTION: How would they know this? That is the type of info only an insider would have, how did an obviously professional hit team get that info?
Update: In THIS VIDEO there is no blood, and it looks like a drill. When the guy is shot, he just falls down like cops and robbers.
I got sick of cops and robbers as a kid, because even if you got the other guy he probably would not fall down. So I made a rule – everyone had to wear safety glasses, and we used bb guns because you would always jump if you really got hit. One pump only on multi pump guns. No one could fake not getting hit. WHY DID THIS GUY NOT JUMP WHEN SHOT? A game of cops and robbers (my style) calls B.S. on this.
Do Muslims always scream Allahu Akbar while they shoot places up? With no one identified, and only that phrase for incrimination, ANYONE COULD HAVE DONE IT, and that is IF it even happened and it is not just another psy op.
Another video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duM2St6vNj8
Another video Livecast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYlQJbsVs48
Supposedly they had a rocket launcher. How did they get that through customs?
UPDATE: Supposedly they were obvious professional hit men, and there was decent video shot of the whole thing. Video links here:
THEN there’s –