A baby being fed formula receives approximately 175 times more fluoride than a breast-fed infant.

10 Facts About Water Fluoridation Everyone Should Know

Water fluoridation may very well be one of the biggest medical related frauds of our history. It’s right up there with what we have been told about cancer, nutrition, AIDS etc. Here are 10 facts everyone should know about water fluoridation and why we should not be ingesting fluoride in our water. Also be sure to check out our short documentary on Fluoride.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aTfyo0Xz_c1. Bottle-fed infants receive the highest doses of fluoride as they rely solely on liquids for food, combined with their small size. A baby being fed formula receives approximately 175 times more fluoride than a breast-fed infant.

2. There is not a single process in your body that requires fluoride

3. A multi-million dollar U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) -funded study found no relation between tooth decay and the amount of fluoride ingested by children

4. Water fluoridation cannot prevent the oral health crises that results from inadequate nutrition and lack of dental care

5. Water fluoridation is a violation of your individual right to informed consent to medication

6. Forty-one percent of all American children aged 12-15 are now impacted by dental fluorosis, rising to more than sixty percent of children in fluoridated communities

7. The chemicals used to fluoridate water supplies are largely hazardous and highly toxic by-products of the fertilizer industry and have never been required to undergo randomized clinical trials for safety or effectiveness by any regulatory agency in the world

8. The U.S. FDA classifies ingested fluoride for purposes of reducing tooth decay as an “unapproved drug”

9. Ingesting fluoride has been found to damage soft tissues (brain, kidneys, and endocrine system), as well as teeth (dental fluorosis) and bones (skeletal fluorosis). There are also 24 studies demonstrating a strong relationship between fairly modest exposure to fluoride and reduced IQ in children

10. Fluoridation discriminates against those with low incomes. People on low incomes are least able to afford avoidance measures, such as reverse osmosis filters or bottled water

The image in this article is of packaging that holds the chemicals we put in our water for water fluoridation. Notice anything on the label? Personally I did a great deal of research into fluoride when we were putting together our Fluoride documentary. What I found EVERYWHERE I looked about fluoride is that the substances we use in our fluoridation practices are incredibly toxic and we would literally have to be turning a massive blind eye to not see this.

We worry about dropping a piece of food on the street and don’t want to eat it after but we have no problem putting chemicals more toxic than Lead directly into our water supply. There is a simple fact we have to come to realize and begin taking action on and that is, the administrations and “professionals” that approve or suggest what we should do medically and nutritionally with our bodies do not have our best interest at heart. Sure, a dentist or a doctor you go to is not trying to do anything bad to you, but the education they received on these subjects is based on an agenda from groups above them. We can’t simply brush this stuff off any longer as conspiracy either. Look into it, do a bit of research. It only takes a few moments of your time to uncover the truth about what is playing out here.






2 Responses to “A baby being fed formula receives approximately 175 times more fluoride than a breast-fed infant.”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    Here is the confirmation from the supplier YARA UK that the fluoride added to the water supply in the UK is raw heavy metal contaminated waste washed from the toxic waste gases in a fertilizer plant chimney. cadmium arsenic antimony mercury etc a witches brew of poisons that accumulate and interact over a lifetime administered without consent on the false premise of reducing tooth decay in children below the age of 16. Chronic disease is very profitable and toxic waste is very expensive to make safe here the two industries meet to poison people and induce sickness for profit. they and the proponents and false prophets of fluoridation are your mortal enemy.


    Cadmium is an extremely toxic metal commonly found in industrial workplaces. Due to its low permissible exposure limit, overexposures may occur even in situations where trace quantities of cadmium are found.

  2. sovereigntea says:

    A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA.

    The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955.

    It begins: “A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:”

    What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses.

    The range of CIA intentions was stunning.

    Some of my comments gleaned from studying that drug list—

    The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications, food additives, herbicides, and industrial chemicals (like fluorides) would eventually satisfy that requirement.

    The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.

    The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)

    The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.

    The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?

    The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.