NATO is using nuclear weapons, and intends to continue doing so

http://youtu.be/vgSE7riWByI?list=UU_B9iQ5THJFWHaYOLJOGE2Q

TAP – If you doubt the intention to go nuclear to establish world hegemony, and if you doubt that the actual use of nuclear weapons is happening today in Syria, watch this video.  Global Research is constantly warning that Washington has a philosophy that nuclear warfare is a realistic method of achieving world domination.

Published on Oct 25, 2013

Youtube – The biggest donor to Republican Party political groups said Tuesday that the United States should drop a nuclear bomb on Iran to spur the country to end its own nuclear program.
Adelson, a staunch Israel supporter, gave a whopping $92.8 million, along with his wife Miriam, to outside political groups during the 2012 election cycle. Imagine if his pet candidate were in office right now. Kaboom !

Global Research – The world is enveloped in a blanket of perpetual conflict. Invasions, occupation, illicit sanctions, and regime change have become currencies and orders of the day. One organization – the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) – is repeatedly, and very controversially, involved in some form or another in many of these conflicts led by the US and its allies. NATO spawned from the Cold War.

Its existence was justified by Washington and Western Bloc politicians as a guarantor against any Soviet and Eastern Bloc invasion of Western Europe, but all along the Alliance served to cement Washington’s influence in Europe and continue what was actually America’s post-World War II occupation of the European continent. In 1991 the raison d’être of the Soviet threat ended with the collapse of the USSR and the end of the Cold War. Nevertheless NATO remains and continues to alarmingly expand eastward, antagonizing Russia and its ex-Soviet allies. China and Iran are also increasingly monitoring NATO’s moves as it comes into more frequent contact with them.

The Globalization of NATO: Military Doctrine of Global Warfare

Author: Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

Yugoslavia was a turning point for the Atlantic Alliance and its mandate. The organization moved from the guise of a defensive posture into an offensive pose under the pretexts of humanitarianism. Starting from Yugoslavia, NATO began its journey towards becoming a global military force. From its wars in the Balkans, it began to broaden its international area of operations outside of the Euro-Atlantic zone into the Caucasus, Central Asia, East Africa, the Middle East, North Africa, and the Indian Ocean. It has virtually turned the Mediterranean Sea into a NATO lake with the NATO Mediterranean Dialogue and the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, while it seeks to do the same to the Black Sea and gain a strategic foothold in the Caspian Sea region. The Gulf Security Initiative between NATO and the Gulf Cooperation Council seeks to also dominate the Persian Gulf and to hem in Iran. Israel has become a de facto member of the military organization. At the same time, NATO vessels sail the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. These warships are deployed off the coasts of Somalia, Djibouti, and Yemen as part of NATO’s objectives to create a naval cordon of the seas controlling important strategic waterways and maritime transit routes.

The Atlantic Alliance’s ultimate aim is to fix and fasten the American Empire. NATO has clearly played an important role in complementing the US strategy for dominating Eurasia. This includes the encirclement of Russia, China, Iran, and their allies with a military ring subservient to Washington. The global missile shield project, the militarization of Japan, the insurgencies in Libya and Syria, the threats against Iran, and the formation of a NATO-like military alliance in the Asia-Pacific region are components of this colossal geopolitical project. NATO’s globalization, however, is bringing together a new series of Eurasian counter-alliances with global linkages that stretch as far as Latin America. The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) have been formed by Russia, China, and their allies as shields against the US and NATO and as a means to challenge them. As the globalization of NATO unfolds the risks of nuclear war become more and more serious with the Atlantic Alliance headed towards a collision course with Russia, China, and Iran that could ignite World War III.

Clarity Press (2012)
Pages: 411 with complete index

Now Available: Order directly from Global Research

THE GLOBALIZATION OF NATO

Global Research, December 10, 2014

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Responses to “NATO is using nuclear weapons, and intends to continue doing so”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    Now, he didn’t know my background, and I questioned his ability to think this out. “Curtis, no one is going to hurt you.”, I began. “You will have protection from the government (as much as it is), and they will not let anything happen to you.”. “No Gene”, he retorted. “He will kill me, my wife, my family, everyone.”. “Damn Curtis”, I said. “Who do you think it is? Bush!”. He looked at me quizzically. “No Gene. It is Sheldon Adelson! They want me to testify in a secret Grand Jury against Sheldon Adelson”!

    DAMN, I thought! (I don’t think I said it out loud).

    http://www.wikiarmy.com/index.php/art/15-breaking-news/86-plight-of-a-straw-man

  2. sovereigntea says:

    October 29, 2014 – “My guess is it is a test for micro nukes of some type, also called “uranium deuterium triggers.” …Jeff Smith, ex-IAEA Non-Proliferation investigator.

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/?s=syria+nuke&x=0&y=0

    It turns out that atomic bullets were invented in the USSR at the time when the country was striving for military parity with the US. They were not only created, but even tested. It goes about 14.3 mm and 12.7 mm caliber ammunition for heavy machine guns. Soviet engineers created a bullet of 7.62 mm – not for the Kalashnikov assault rifle, but for its machine gun. The cartridge was the most miniature nuclear weapon in the world.

    It is an open secret that any nuclear warhead should contain fissile material. For bombs, they take uranium 235 or plutonium 239. To make them work, the warhead made with the use of these metals should weigh more than one kilogram. In other words, the warhead should have a critical mass. When transuranic element was discovered – californium – or rather, its isotope with an atomic weight of 252, it was found that its critical mass was only 1.8 grams. In addition, the decay of the element would produce 5-8 neutrons at once. This is very effective fission, given the fact that uranium and plutonium produce only 2-3 neutrons. In a nutshell, it was enough to squeeze a tiny “pea” of the substance to cause a nuclear explosion. This led scientists to the idea of using californium in atomic bullets.

    http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/19-11-2014/129079-atomic_bullets-0/

  3. Anonymous says:

    Nato Cobra Imf and UN are all part of the NWO. Come on people join the dots up. This is how they have done it.

  4. sovereigntea says:

    Compare & contrast low yield tactical nuclear weapons footage.

    British Nuclear Test “Buffalo Round 2” 1.5 KT

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6MaXQwHBqs&feature=player_detailpage

    Davy Crockett type see footage at 09:00 note size of damage radius 300M

    Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #32

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nv_q8q6Z9_I

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.