Blair was groomed by the intelligence services from his early college days

Desmond Tutu: ‘Put Tony Blair in the dock for war crimes’

21st Century Wire says…Another blow to the legacy of Britain’s international man of mystery…Groomed by the intelligence services from his early college days, he didn’t bat an eyelid while lying to his electorate – and to the world about fictional WMD’s in Iraq, and he dazzled George W. Bush with his alluring pillow talk, used his cozy globalist-appointed positions and high-flying (albeit meaningless) titles to broker deals for JP Morgan investment elite, while he creates wonderous business opportunities on the backs of the world’s poor – he is the world’s most hated man, and he doesn’t drink Dos Equis (but he does drinks Cristal).Certainly, it’s a charmed life for the man with the fake smile. Recently, 21WIRE reported how he caused a PR meltdown at the international children’s charity, Save the Children, after someone tried to him a “Global Legacy Award” (spooky). The charity are now deeply regretting that move, calling the whole affair ‘a painful experience’.To add insult to injury, a former Nobel Peace Prize winner and international icon is now gunning for Britain’s most famous war criminal.Welcome to Tony’s World…
STILL COINING IT IN:  The Establishment are still protecting Blair with titles and jobs, while the people grow tired of his international charade.Guardian

Archbishop Desmond Tutu has called for Tony Blair and George Bush to be hauled before the international criminal court in The Hague and delivered a damning critique of the physical and moral devastation caused by the Iraq war.

Tutu, a Nobel peace prize winner and hero of the anti-apartheid movement, accuses the former British and US leaders of lying about weapons of mass destruction and says the invasion left the world more destabilised and divided “than any other conflict in history”.

1-Desmond-Tutu-UN-BlairWriting in the Observer, Tutu also suggests the controversial US and UK-led action to oust Saddam Hussein in 2003 created the backdrop for the civil war in Syria and a possible wider Middle East conflict involving Iran.

“The then leaders of the United States and Great Britain,” Tutu argues, “fabricated the grounds to behave like playground bullies and drive us further apart. They have driven us to the edge of a precipice where we now stand – with the spectre of Syria and Iran before us.”

But it is Tutu’s call for Blair and Bush to face justice in The Hague that is most startling. Claiming that different standards appear to be set for prosecuting African leaders and western ones, he says the death toll during and after the Iraq conflict is sufficient on its own for Blair and Bush to be tried at the ICC.

“On these grounds, alone, in a consistent world, those responsible for this suffering and loss of life should be treading the same path as some of their African and Asian peers who have been made to answer for their actions in The Hague,” he says.

The court hears cases on genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. To date, 16 cases have been brought before the court but only one, that of Thomas Lubanga, a rebel leader from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), has been completed. He was sentenced earlier this year to 14 years’ imprisonment for his part in war crimes in his home country.

Tutu’s broadside is evidence of the shadow still cast by Iraq over Blair’s post-prime ministerial career, as he attempts to rehabilitate himself in British public life. A longtime critic of the Iraq war, the archbishop pulled out of a South African conference on leadership last week because Blair, who was paid 2m rand (£150,000) for his time, was attending. It is understood that Tutu had agreed to speak without a fee.

In his article, the archbishop argues that as well as the death toll, there has been a heavy moral cost to civilisation, with no gain. “Even greater costs have been exacted beyond the killing fields, in the hardened hearts and minds of members of the human family across the world.

“Has the potential for terrorist attacks decreased? To what extent have we succeeded in bringing the so-called Muslim and Judeo-Christian worlds closer together, in sowing the seeds of understanding and hope?” Blair and Bush, he says, set an appalling example. “If leaders may lie, then who should tell the truth?” he asks.

“If it is acceptable for leaders to take drastic action on the basis of a lie, without an acknowledgement or an apology when they are found out, what should we teach our children?”

In a statement, Blair strongly contested Tutu’s views and said Iraq was now a more prosperous country than it had been under Saddam Hussein. “I have a great respect for Archbishop Tutu’s fight against apartheid – where we were on the same side of the argument – but to repeat the old canard that we lied about the intelligence is completely wrong as every single independent analysis of the evidence has shown…

(Advice to the former PM: that’s precisely the reason everyone hates you Tony, because you know you are wrong, but are not big enough to actually admit it)

Continue this Story at The Guardian

TAP – Is The Hague just a great way to run an enquiry into Blair’s war lies, and then find him innocent?  Sorry to be sceptical.  The fact that Blair still walks around free, getting richer is not a great advert for the ‘political class’, and they probably would like to to tidy up their old rubbish.  The whole world shouldn’t be running around one man and his preferences, but if that man happened to be a favoured son of Jacob Rothschild, then the world will be allowed to run around him, as long as Jacob lives.

In the above UK Column Livestream, Blair’s involvement in setting up the State child-stealing network is covered.  I recommend you listen in to Brian Gerrish documenting the scary stuff going on to adopt applied psychology techniques to ‘reframe’ people and children.  The people trained in this way are said by their colleagues to be ‘not acting normally’.  Suicides in children are being encouraged using NLP.  NLP is being used for political purposes.  The people taking away the children have had their minds interfered with.

Next up is an ICH on how the elites see their wealth as different to ours, as well as their lives and our lives.  Blair is clearly part of the same value system.  In his eyes he’s done no wrong.  He’s entitled to your life, your money and your children.

Gerrish covers the subject of Common Law Courts and the British Constitution Group.  The Common Law Courts are already functioning.  A judge was arrested in BIrkenhead with 600 people on the streets.  It’s already started which is why The Queen is moving rapidly towards abdication, putting out health rumours.

How American Corporations and the Super Rich Steal From the Rest of Us

Main Street is going broke. Wall Street is cashing in.

By Paul Buchheit

December 29, 2014 “ICH” – The Merriam-Webster definition of ‘steal’ is to take the property of another wrongfully and especially as a habitual or regular practice. Much of our country’s new wealth has been regularly taken by individuals or corporations in a wrongful manner, either through nonpayment of taxes or failure to compensate other contributors to their successes.

1. The Corporations

As schools and local governments are going broke around the country, companies who built their businesses with American research and education and technology and infrastructure are paying less in taxes than ever before. Incredibly, over half of U.S. corporate foreign profits are now being held in tax havens, double the share of just twenty years ago. Corporations are stealing from the nation that made them rich.

There are many examples of greed among individual firms. Based largely on 2014 SEC documents submitted by the companies themselves:

Exxon has almost 80% of its productive oil and gas wells in the U.S. but declared only 17% of its income here. The company used a theoretical tax to account for 83% of last year’s income tax bill, and paid less than 2% of its total income in current U.S. taxes.

Chevron has about 75% of its oil and gas wells and almost 90% of its pipeline mileage in the United States, yet the company claimed only 13% of last year’s income in the U.S., and paid almost nothing (less than 1/10 of 1%) in current U.S. taxes.

Pfizer had 40% of last year’s sales in the U.S., but claimed losses in the U.S. and $17 billion in profits overseas.

Bank of America, despite making 84% of its 2011-2013 revenue in the U.S., declared just 31% of its profits in the United States.

Citigroup had 43% of its 2011-2013 revenue in North America but declared less than 3% of its profits in the United States.

Apple still does most of its product and research development in the United States. Yet the company moved $30 billion in profits to an Irish subsidiary with no employees, with loopholes in place to avoid establishing residency in any country. The subsidiary files no returns and pays no taxes. Apple CEO Tim Cook said, “We pay all the taxes we owe.”

Google’s business is based on the Internet, the Digital Library Initiative, and the geographical database of the U.S. Census Bureau. Yet the company has gained recognition as one of the world’s biggest tax avoiders.

2. The Forbes 40

Defenders of inequality argue that fortunes are deserved because of innovation and hard work. But many of the 40 Americans who own as much as the poorest half of the country have relied on less deserving means of accumulating great fortunes (details here).

—Warren Buffett’s company (Berkshire Hathaway) made a $28 billion profit last year, yet claimed a $395 million refund.

—The Koch brothers have taken clean air and water from us.

—The Walton siblings take our tax money to subsidize their employees.

—Larry Ellison was #1 on Sam Pizzigati’s Greediest of 2014 list.

The rest of the Top 40 List (details here) is speckled with instances of fraud, tax avoidance, and billionaire subsidies. The worst is probably hedge fund manager John Paulson, who has built a $13 billion fortune after conspiring with Goldman Sachs in 2007 to bundle and bet against sure-to-fail subprime mortgages that took the homes from millions of Americans.

Speaking of hedge fund managers, the carried interest loophole allowed just 25 individuals to take almost $5 billion from society last year by claiming that their income is different from the rest of ours.


8 Responses to “Blair was groomed by the intelligence services from his early college days”

  1. Gordon says:

    This lot make Al Capone look like chicken feed which is exactly what Western civilization has become, thieving hoods and thugs promoting democracy and capitalism to steal, rape and plunder all in sundry while governments, royal families, heads of state, religious leaders and the like sit in godfather seats battling it out as to who can get one over on us next.
    Safe to say we’re being screwed to the hilt.

  2. sovereigntea says:

    Child Catcher Blair was the shyster that set targets for social services to steal twice as many children from their parents.

    How social services are paid bonuses to snatch babies for adoption

    But over the five years since I began investigating the scandal of forced adoptions, I have found a deeply secretive system which is too often biased against basically decent families.

    I have been told of routine dishonesty by social workers and questionable evidence given by doctors which has wrongly condemned mothers.

    Meanwhile, millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money has been given to councils to encourage them to meet high Government targets on child adoptions.

    Under New Labour policy, Tony Blair changed targets in 2000 to raise the number of children being adopted by 50 per cent to 5,400 a year.

    The annual tally has now reached almost 4,000 in England and Wales – four times higher than in France, which has a similar-sized population.

    Blair promised millions of pounds to councils that achieved the targets and some have already received more than £2million each in rewards for successful adoptions.

    Figures recently released by the Department for Local Government and Community Cohesion show that two councils – Essex and Kent – were offered more than £2million “bonuses” over three years to encourage additional adoptions.

    Four others – Norfolk, Gloucestershire, Cheshire and Hampshire – were promised an extra £1million.

    Read more:


    The Witchfinder examines another disturbing case in which hated circuit Judge, ‘His Honour’ Judge Cardinal withheld vital evidence from a woman desperate to be re-united with her disabled daughter, only to be overturned once again by a higher court.

  3. sovereigntea says:

    Judge Martin Cardinal AGAIN

    Grandmother is arrested at Ken Dodd show and held in the cells… just for hugging her teenage granddaughter: Fury as secretive Court of Protection sentences 72-year-old to three months for contempt

    Kathleen Danby, 72, was sentenced in her absence to three months in jail
    Accused of hugging vulnerable girl, 19, against wishes of social services

    Read more:

    By Christopher Booker

    It’s a mystery why judges and social workers think they have the legal authority to act in such an inhuman way

    Many will have been amazed by the story of Kathleen Danby, the 72-year-old grandmother given a three-month prison sentence after police produced CCTV footage showing her and her 18-year-old granddaughter running to embrace in a pub car park. The granny, who lives in Orkney, had travelled down to Derby to meet her beloved young relation in defiance of a 2007 court order, which has allowed them only to have “supervised contact” by telephone once a month.

    The girl, said to have a mental age of nine, is so unhappy in “care” that, according to Mrs Danby, she has run away 175 times. She was forbidden to see her father after he was jailed for roughly restraining her from “running into a busy road when she was having a temper tantrum”. He has twice since been in prison, once for waving at his daughter when he saw her in a passing taxi on her way to school.

    Martin Cardinal, the Court of Protection judge who sentenced Mrs Danby, said: “I am sure this grandmother needs restraint.” It was Judge Cardinal who made news last year when it was revealed that he had secretly jailed Wanda Maddocks – for removing her 80-year-old father from a care home where he had been placed by social workers, and where he was being so ill-treated that she feared for his life.

  4. pauline says:

    Child stealing by the state is nothing new,my dear beloved mother had her three children stolen from her in the early 1940`s,my three siblings were stolen into care on the say so of dirty,filthy lying neighbours who lived near my dear mother.
    My dear mother was refused any contact with her three very much loved children,I was born after my three siblings were stolen,and who were my three siblings put into care with along with their much prized ration books????yes you guessed it the neighbours who reported my dear mother to social services
    Myself and stepbrother he was also my mothers child born after me in the early 1950`s,were never allowed any contact with our other three siblings,the first contact my dear mother,or myself and younger brother had with these stolen siblings was in 1990,that was due to myself putting in a plea in a national newspaper for contact with my siblings,most sadly by that date my sister had very sadly passed away at a young age,not one person had tried to inform my mother of her daughters passing in 1969,a couple of months after the birth of her first child,my two remaining brothers said they were told by someone,themselves and my dear sister were the most cleanest well looked after children ever seen put into the care system not dirty nor were neither ill treated or neglected.

    If it was in my power to revenge the heartache suffered by my beloved mother,I would gladly shoot all social workers on sight,my beloved mum was never cruel or hurt my siblings or my self and younger brother,it was only on the pure evil lies told by the neighbours who stole my siblings for pure greed and highly saught after ration books.
    I am now in a position to fight these evil social services who currently have their eye on my young next door neighbours four children,I will fight for these four young children with all my strengh,I am ready and waiting to take on these evil child stealers who tear families apart with their cold hearts and no compassion for the families lives they tear apart for the devils work to totally destroy innocent families whose only crime is to love their dear children.

  5. Anonymous says:

    When will we have had enough…this is just sickening !! Blair is a monster and so are they all. One day they will stand before us and answer to us the people they have raped and pillaged.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.