The HOAX Beheading Of Aid Worker David Haines By ISIS.

Yet another hoax beheading by ISIS(L). This time to draw Britain into supporting an American led middle east conflict.
Compare frame 1.16 to 1.17 onwards and note two different men.

Kind regards,
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

8 Responses to “The HOAX Beheading Of Aid Worker David Haines By ISIS.”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Haines is the first man & Hennings is the second man.

  2. Anonymous says:

    haines is the first guy and hemming is the second – with way ts Fake

  3. Anonymous says:

    Noboby seems to have noticed that he seems to be holding the knife the wrong way round? Same on all three vids.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I have NEVER seen anything so £$%$ing ridiculous in my life. The people of the west deserve everything they get for allowing themselves to be stampeded into war by these obviously faked videos. Consider the following;
    Terrorist don’t cart prisoners all over the place – they don’t want to get caught, they usually do them in a room if the person is being held captive.
    They ALWAYS have two guys holding a flag, and a statement in arabic, after the statement these two usually help with the deed. Victims usually struggle. Which brings me to these three ‘victims’ who have all obligingly presented their extended necks for the ‘executioner’. Almost EVERY genuine beheading victim buries his chin in his chest as soon as the knife comes towards him-its natural instinct-most struggle violently. One guy would NEVER attempt a beheading on his own-UNLESS HE KNEW THE ‘VICTIM’ WOULD NOT STRUGGLE. -The last ‘victim’ looks for all the world like he’s at the barbers having a shave – in fact he signals he’s ready with a jaunty raise of the eyebrow.
    Jihadis NEVER use clip-on mikes for their victims – and certainly wouldn’t go to the bother of running the wires under their clothes – only professional film crews do that -AND they wouldn’t cut the film whilst they removed them. ALL beheading videos are taken in one go- and they show all of the gory details — with the aim of terrifying their enemies and inspiring their friends.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Yeah it is deffo two different men.

    The first one is David Haines.

    The second one is Alan Henning.

    Glad to have cleared that one up then.

    If anyone didn’t notice the two different men then if you read the bottom left quarter of the screen the video makers have helpfully given the two different men’s names. They hover helpfully in the dark strip with the squiggly writing just above the play bar.

  6. Anonymous says:

    SITE produced the videos, they made the videos, they are a bunch of lying scumbags who are deliberately pushing our countries into a war that will never end.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Re the video in the first part of this article… At the end of it there is a couple of minutes of someone talking to an in-house group. It doesn’t say who the man is, when it happened or who the group is he is talking to. But maybe others can piece it together.

    Here is the transcript of what he says:

    “I frankly think that crisis initiations are really tough and that it’s very hard for me to see how the United States………President can get us to war with Iran….
    Which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not company, that the traditional way that America gets to war is, what would be best for U.S. interests?!
    Some people might think Mr Roosevelt wanted to get us into WW2, as David mentioned, but you may recall, he had to wait for Pearl Harbour.
    Some people might think Mr Wilson wanted to get us into WW1…… you may recall, he had to wait for the Lucitania episode.
    Some people might think that Mr Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam… may recall, he had to wait fro the Gulf of Tonkin episode.
    We didn’t go to war with Spain until the U.S.S. Maine exploded. And may I point out that Mr Lincoln did not feel he could call up the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the Commander at Fort Sumpter to do exactly that thing which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.
    So, if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war. One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mention that explosion on August 17th……. We could step up the pressure!
    I mean look people….. Iranian submarines periodically go down! Some day one of them might not come up! Who would know why?!
    We can do a variety of things, if we wish to increase the pressure. I’m not advocating that…. But I’m just suggesting that … eh… eh… this is not ….eh…… an either/or proposition. It’s just sanctions have to succeed or other things!
    We are in the game of using covert means of against the Iranians……. We could get nastier!!!!!”

  8. Anonymous says:

    Can’t believe there are such deluded people out there.
    The killing is quite clearly not being done on camera…but it is quite clearly being done.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.