It’s a worry who’s lining up to take UKIP seats.

The area organisers of UKIP have been planted by MI5 since the beginning. 

Carswell is a shining gem of a politician surrounded by slime on all sides. 

The other Better Off Out Conservative MPs like Hollobone should quit the Conservatives if Carswell succeeds and wins Clacton as expected. 

They would then be a significant bloc of quality to head off the likely Dad’s Army which would be arriving in Westminster if the UKIP general rabble starts winning seats. 

That said, some of the rabble will be worth having and very entertaining.  MI5 are not in control of every constituency, despite their best efforts.

The ex-UKIP candidate at Clacton is now joining the Lib Dems.  If he’s a sign of the level of quality lining up for the future, then heaven help us. 

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

5 Responses to “It’s a worry who’s lining up to take UKIP seats.”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    UKIP appear to be another sham party, a front for the israel lobby.

    Brown noser Carswell kisses the arse of israel just like Cameron.

    On Israel’s illegal squatter ‘settlements’ and the closure of Palestinian lands…

    “What else is Israel supposed to do? Her actions are essentially defensive, not aggressive.”

    On Israel’s illegal Separation Wall…

    “The barrier needs to be built where it will provide security, not where we, using very outdated maps that take no account of an expansion, think it should go… Where there are disputes in Israel and Palestinians have objected to the siting of the barrier, there is judicial scrutiny. The process is not arbitrary. There is a mechanism that allows people who are concerned about where the barrier is being built to challenge the decision through the courts.”

    He’s talking about Israeli courts, of course. Hasn’t Mr Carswell heard that the International Court of Justice in 2004 ruled that the Wall is illegal?

  2. sovereigntea says:

    Wonder if UKIP will condemn the “antisemetic” hate speech below. Arabs being semites.

    A new book Scenes From School Life, written by Israelis Idan Yaron and Yoram Harpaz, is based on three-year “anthropological observations” of students in a secular high school – “the most average school we could find,” said Harpaz.
    A 10th grade female student in the study expressed revulsion towards “these Ishmaelites”, referring to the original Palestinians who are supposedly Israeli citizens.

    “For me, personally, Arabs are something I can’t look at and can’t stand… I’m ready to kill someone with my hands,” she said.
    The Israeli researchers quoted another student who learned from his synagogue on Shabbat that: “Aravim zeh erev rav (Arabs are a rabble) and Amalek, and there is a commandment to kill them all.”

    The professors observed that a Jewish student in the ninth grade objected to her classmates’ opinion, stating: “The desire for revenge will only foment a cycle of blood… certainly they (Palestinians) don’t all deserve to die.”

    As a result, the pupil was tormented and accused of being an “Arab lover and leftist”. During the break, students taunted her chanting: “Fie, fie, fie, the Arabs will die.” Racism in Israel is not an exception, but the social norm.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I’m not getting manoeuvred into and sucked down the controlled opposition UKIP cul-de-sac – or any so-called ‘democratic'(sic) political party cul-de-sac. Present day ‘democracy’ is a Jewish contrived and controlled construct and if such periodic voting changed anything, then they would make it illegal. Anyway, we haven’t the time any longer imho for being/remaining in denial and somewhat naively (if you’ll forgive me) believing putting a pointless cross on a worthless ballot paper is ‘doing one’s duty’ as it were for democracy and will change a damn thing. Also, “It’s not the votes that count but who counts the votes”.

    “Under the relentless thrust of accelerating over-population and increasing over-organization, and by means of ever more effective methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms—elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest—will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial—but Democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit.”

    – Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, published 1958

  4. Anonymous says:


    The UkipLibLabConspiracy

    Abridged from the original as published by the world renowned
    industrial leader, HENRY FORD, SR.

    Douglas Reed- Anti Gentilism Came before Anti Semitism

    September 1, 2014

    (Excerpt by

    Not anti-Semitism but anti-Gentilism came first. You have heard a lot in recent years about Hitler’s Nuremberg anti-Jewish laws, with their ban on intermarriage, which the Germans call race-defilement.

    A most intelligent and cultured and open-minded Jew in Budapest said to me, ‘After all, the Nuremberg laws are only the translation into German of our own Mosaic laws, with their ban on intermarriage with Gentiles’.

    Race-antagonism began, not with the Gentiles, but with the Jews. Their religion is based on it. This racial lunacy which you detest in the Germans has possessed the Jews for thousands of years. When they become powerful, they practise it; as they consolidate their position in one trade after another, in one profession or another, the squeeze-out of Gentiles begins. That was why you found, in Berlin and Vienna and Budapest and Prague and Bucharest, newspapers with hardly a Gentile on the editorial staff, theatres owned and managed by Jews presenting Jewish actors and actresses in Jewish plays praised by the Jewish critics of Jewish newspapers, whole streets with hardly a non-Jewish shop in them, whole branches of retail trade monopolized by Jews.

    Jews, if you know them well enough and understand these things enough for them to talk openly with you, will admit this. They cannot deny it.

    In the beginning was anti-Gentilism. This, not the perfidy of the Gentiles, prevents the assimilation of the Jews. This prevents them from ever becoming Germans or Poles or Italians. This keeps them welded together as alien communities in foreign lands, communities ultimately hostile to the Gentile.

    It is their religion? Good, but it is the reason why they cannot be assimilated.

    In the defeated countries, the Jews did not use the great power they achieved to promote and accelerate assimilation. They used it to increase the power and wealth of the Jews, and their intensive mutual collaboration, in that era to oust non-Jews from professions, trades and callings, was the outward and visible sign that anti-Gentilism remained within them.

    The race barriers that had existed against the Jews were broken down, every path was open; but the race-barrier within themselves still existed, and thus you had the misuse of this freedom and those grave signs of its abuse, the exploitation of cheap labour and of young non-Jewish womanhood, which were so repugnant a feature of life in Berlin and Vienna, and still are seen to-day, as I write, in Budapest and Prague.

    These are grave things, which need to be understood.

    The inner knowledge of this seemingly unbridgeable gulf causes many Jews to take on protective coloring, to change their names, to outdo their Gentile neighbours in vocal patriotism, to obscure the fact that they are Jews. Some, a few, marry Gentiles; to the main body of Jews they are renegades who have ‘married outside the faith’. Some, a few, have themselves baptized; but they remain Jews…..


    No Jew ever mistakes the man he is dealing with. He knows at once whether the other man is a Jew or a Gentile; it is the first question he asks himself.

    How many Gentiles know when they have to do with a Jew? How often have you heard, ‘Is he really a Jew? The thought never occurred to me. He doesn’t look like one’.

    – See more at:

  5. Ed Butt says:

    We seem to have a little paranoia setting in here guys. UKIP don’t have any MPs yet and already we are talking about them being infiltrated?
    I’ve said for years the only way we will get real government of the people by the people is by boycotting political parties. An MP is elected to serve the interests of all his constituents rather than to serve the interests of a party and its financial backers.
    We have to give UKIP a chance and understand that to some extent for the present they have to play by the rules other parties and the media have made.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.