I think that transcript of the man speaking at the end of this video to an in-house Government group about the necessity to create false flag events to achieve the end goal of war speaks volumes. Do you or does anyone know exactly who that man is and who he was talking to?
“I frankly think that crisis initiations are really tough and that it’s very hard for me to see how the United States President can get us to war with Iran….
Which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not company, that the traditional way that America gets to war is, what would be best for U.S. interests?!
Some people might think Mr Roosevelt wanted to get us into WW2, as David mentioned, but you may recall, he had to wait for Pearl Harbour.
Some people might think Mr Wilson wanted to get us into WW1…… you may recall, he had to wait for the Lusitania episode.
Some people might think that Mr Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam…..you may recall, he had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode.
We didn’t go to war with Spain until the U.S.S. Maine exploded.
And may I point out that Mr Lincoln did not feel he could call up the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the Commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.
So, if in fact if the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war!
One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mention that explosion on August 17th……. We could step up the pressure!
I mean look people….. Iranian submarines periodically go down! Some day one of them might not come up! Who would know why?!
We can do a variety of things, if we wish to increase the pressure!
I’m not advocating that…. But I’m just suggesting that this is not an either/or proposition. It’s just sanctions have to succeed or other things!
We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians……. We could get nastier!!!!!”
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.