UK seeks powers to end lives of its citizens

In Holland,this started out as Euthanasia by request.It has now bee “developed” into a single judge being able to condemn someone to death with no input except from”experts”.   COMMENT

Britain’s Final Solution

We are all familiar with the atrocities of the Nazis. The same planning which slowly worked it’s way into the full blown evil that we look back on in horror, is at work again.
ARTICLE |  | BY PAT JOHNSTON

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


In the 1930s, Hitler and his colleagues were well aware that a programme of euthanasia would be opposed by the German public if it were introduced in it’s entirety from the outset, so they began by working to change public opinion slowly, but surely, via a campaign of propaganda. The National Socialist Racial and Political Office (NSRPA) produced leaflets, posters and short films to be shown in cinemas, pointing out to Germans the cost of maintaining asylums for the incurably ill and insane.
Resentment was built up in the minds of the public against those using up scarce resources, at the expense of those more worthy of receiving support, such as young men fighting and dying for their country.
As we saw in my last article in this series, the Aktion T4 Program grew from a single case – that of the euthanasia petition of a young boy, who was actually killed in 1939. This precedent was used to establish a program of killing children with severe disabilities from which the ‘guardian’ consent element soon disappeared.

Lord Falconer
The resulting “euthanasia decree”, written on Adolf Hitler’s personal notepaper, dated 1st September 1939, reads … “Reich Leader Bouhler and Dr. Brandt are charged with the responsibility for expanding the authority of physicians, to be designated by name, to the end that patients considered incurable according to the best available human judgement of their state of health, can be granted a mercy death.”
Here in the UK, we have already seen two attempts to change the laws around euthanasia and although these have failed the government is under increasing pressure to support a right-to-die law, beginning by de-criminalising those who travel abroad to seek assisted suicide. Lord Joffe, Patricia Hewitt, Lord Falconer and Baroness Jay are amongst those who are actively seeking to amend the law.
Their efforts are supported by a massive campaign to change public opinion, via high profile cases in the media, such as that of Debbie Purdy.
Having failed, at his first attempt, to achieve a change in the law through parliament, Lord Falconer has resorted to a more devious route in an unholy alliance with DEMOS, via The Commission on Assisted Dying. This unofficial commission funded by Terry Pratchett and Bernard Lewis is taking evidence from anyone who wishes to participate. The commission has produced a questionnaire containing such leading questions as: “If some form of assisted dying were to be legalised, what safeguards would be required to protect vulnerable people?” … and … “If some form of assisted dying were to be legalised, who do you think should make the decision on whether somebody who requests an assisted death should be eligible for assistance? Should this decision be made by doctors, by an independent judicial body such as a tribunal, or by another type of organisation?”

Baroness Warnock … Ready for her own programme?
We leave it to your imagination as to how the results from such a survey could be slanted towards giving the “desired” result, and then with all the kudos of DEMOS behind it, used to influence government.
Baroness Warnock, a veteran UK government advisor and one of Britains leading “moral philosophers” has no qualms about stating her views regarding the ending of the lives of those she deems unsuitable to continue living. Consider for instance her comments in an interview with the Church of Scotland’s magazine – Life and Work that:
“Elderly people suffering from dementia should consider ending their lives because they are a burden on the National Health System (NHS) and their families.”
or this one…..
“Pensioners in mental decline are ‘wasting people’s lives’ because of the care they require and should be allowed to opt for euthanasia even if they are not in pain.”
And if those don’t send a chill up your spine, how about this … she hoped people will soon be “licensed to put others down” if they are unable to look after themselves.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Responses to “UK seeks powers to end lives of its citizens”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Well she can set an example and show us all how it’s done.
    Come on Baroness…do the world a service and be the first to take the euthanasia pill!
    It’s easy to advise others when it’s not yourself having to follow that advice

  2. Anonymous says:

    Euthenasia is in some cases the most compassionate option, clearly, for those enduring unimaginable suffering long-term and in the absence of hope.

  3. Tapestry says:

    This is proposal of compulsory killing by the state

    i.e. murder

    allowing voluntary ending of one’s own life is easy to dress up until it can cover up compulsory ending of life

  4. Anonymous says:

    The devil is in he detail Tap, as always.

  5. Nollidge says:

    In Holland,this started out as Euthanasia by request.It has now bee “developed” into a single judge being able to condemn someone to death with no input except from”experts”.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.