Evolutionism – The Greatest Deception of all Time?
‘Because the truth is sometimes so difficult to believe, it escapes being known altogether’ Heraclitus, 500BC
I’ve put a question mark after the title because I know that most people reading this will immediately think to themselves that Darwinian evolutionism is true, correct and proven by science, and that the evidence for Darwinian evolutionism is all around us. As someone said to me recently, ‘It’s just obvious!’.
But is it? Is Darwinian evolutionism proven as truth, by the scientific method? Can it be shown to be true?
The answer is actually no, for many good scientific reasons.
Louis Pastor proved, in an experiment in Paris in the 19th century, that life cannot come from non-life. This is precisely what Darwinian evolutionists believe, that life evolved following something like a lightning strike on a slimy puddle over 4 billion years ago. Yet the finest scientists in the world have never been able replicate this, or even demonstrate or theorise as how it happened.
Then there is the second law of thermodynamics, known to us as entropy. Everything in the universe is breaking down, everything just seems to wear out, all systems break down, everything is going ‘down-hill’. Darwinian evolutionism is the only thing supposedly heading ‘up-hill’.
Genes contain information. Carl Sagan (a believer of Darwinian evolutionism) said that one cell (humans have many billions in our bodies) contains the equivalent of 100 million pages of the Encyclopedia Britannica. Well, who put that information there? Information cannot evolve! There is even a DNA alphabet, used for encoding information and replicating.
OK, what about the fossil record? Surely this demonstrates and proves the truth of Darwinian evolutionism? No, it doesn’t! Scientists have never found a proven transitional form, a fossil of a creature ‘evolving’ from one known species or kind, into another. It’s all pure conjecture, guesswork.
Lucy? No. Archaeopteryx? No! There may be a lot of fancy talk – but no proof. It’s all just talk. Stephen J Gould accused his fellow scientists of ‘telling just so stories’ (Rudyard Kipling’s stories for children, ‘How the elephant got its trunk’, etc.) as explanations for evolutionism.
Darwin wrote in his first book that he could see no problem with a bear taking to the water and evolving into a whale. He removed this from subsequent editions as he must have realised that the idea could not be back up with any evidence at all. But, in removing this he removed the very central idea, concept, belief and teaching of evolutionism – that one creature, given enough time – the evolutionists ‘magic ingredient’, can ‘evolve’ into another (quoted from interview with Richard Milton, ‘Shattering the Myths of Darwinism’)
Notably, much of the idea of evolutionism was laid out by Darwin’s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, in his book ‘Zoonomia’ (1794).
Evolutionism is also a very ancient belief. Walter Veith claims the ancient Egyptians taught that humans ‘evolved’ from slime on the banks of the Nile.
Evolutionism is therefore a teaching from the ‘mystery religions’ of Chaldea, Babylon, Egypt etc. a central tenet of the Hindu religion, which itself is the very basis of the New Age movement, the religious-philosophical doctrine the U.N, the Theosophical Society – H.P Blavatsky, Alice Bailey, et al. and in the writings of Teilhard de Chardin S.J, a Jesuit priest, called the ‘father of the New Age’.
Are you aware of the complete title of Darwin’s 1859 book? No? If you support Darwinian evolutionism you should know, because this is a contributory factor in what led to some very nasty events in the middle of the 20th century:
‘On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.’
Time for a paradigm shift…and it’s gonna’ hurt.
Below is a lecture by Dr G Thomas Sharp and a short interview with Dr David Berlinski.
For more information visit:
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.