33 Responses to “911 planes were faked. Video proves beyond doubt.”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Henry this is brilliant, i was one of those who left in protest over the wasp trolling/disinfo stuff
    but i am back now and very impressed
    pete Wilson

  2. Anonymous says:

    this vid is incontravertible evidence, i bet those dancing israelis are not dancing now ?scumbags

  3. Fantastic. Thank you so much.

  4. Second thoughts. It does appear that the building is in front of the tower. Less so in the close-up.

  5. Anonymous says:

    This is the plane with the mysterious bulge on the underside so why not fake a more normal fuselage? Also a heavy fast aluminium jet could punch through a building which has an outer shell of window frames and glass. Lastly, even if this vid is a fake – possibly made to sell to news people – it doesn’t disprove the planes’ striking the towers. As to who was really behind the crime that is a different question

  6. Thanks – and see Large Mystery ‘Ball’ Hits the Second WTC Tower – There Was No Plane! @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2010/09/large-mystery-ball-hits-second-wtc.html

  7. Anonymous says:

    OK we now all know there were not any aircraft. This has been known for a long time.
    The video is interesting but you have to know the position of the building in question and it looks as though it is in the foreground.
    So although the video plane is a fake it is NOT because it shows the wing behind the building.

  8. john retsen says:

    I have not, until now, been one for leaving comments although I have read your blog for four years or so. Like most people on 9/11 I believed the story as it unfolded on TV. Back then I regret to say I was a supporter of Blair and Labour and simply felt that they were on the side of ‘right’and could be trusted. Also I was really busy having taken on a business which was totally involving leaving little time for me to care about current affairs. So it was second nature to believe what I saw and heard about 9/11. It was 2008 before I started to question what I knew. I’d inadvertently stumbled across a youtube video suggesting the official story wasn’t true. I found this idea preposterous and decided to examine the available evidence with a view to disproving the ‘conspiracists’. I’ve subsequently digested twenty or more books on the topic and watched, sceptically all related videos on the net. (I still find David Ray Griffin’s 2004 ‘9/11:The New Pearl Harbor’ the most articulate and compelling work on the subject and have bought many used copies to give to friends.) Over the course of the first year of investigation came my realisation that the official story is a fantasy and that the implications of such a big lie told by governments and reinforced by a complicit media are portentious to say the least. I questioned my own sanity. I didn’t expect such revelatory life-changing experiences in my mid-fifties. I thought I’d be happy settled and secure. Now I realise the parlous state the world is in better than ever. We are being lied to constantly, poisoned from the air and below ground. Agenda 21 is real and is being implemented right now. So, in a strange way, 9/11 was a catalyst for me which opened my eyes perhaps for the first time. Once open, they won’t close. Thanks for this blog Tap, you tackle some fascinating issues. I’m absolutely with you on fracking and would like to see you make more videos. Your approach was both erudite and convincing.

  9. Anonymous says:

    The building is in the foreground so the above video is not any evidence.
    The planes ARE fakes and this is a much better video


  10. First of all, for a full analysis of ‘The truth in seven minutes’ and of whether the portion of the building was in front/behind, readers might want to see this article http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=386&Itemid=60
    Anonymous said…’A heavy fast aluminium jet could punch through a building which has an outer shell of window frames and glass.’
    Lol! I’m going to be generous and assume that you’ve only just begun to scratch the surface of 9/11 evidence. But, for pity’s sake, do your homework. It’s been 13 years since the event and you still haven’t looked at the construction of the towers? The outer ‘shell’ was immensely strong, comprising 235 4inch box steel columns. The ‘plane’ ‘impacts’ across several floors of the building. Each floor was solid concrete with 0.25 inch steel re-bar. Can aluminium slice through steel and concrete? Could a plane do so with no diminution of velocity? Have a look at what damage a 5 ounce bird does to a ‘heavy aluminium plane’. See also http://nomoregames.net/?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes
    The plane is only ‘heavy’ because of the mass of the fuel it carries. Your assertion is akin to saying that I could throw a full beer can through a brick wall if I could throw it hard enough.
    Study the impact dynamics. It’s a physical impossibility. for more on no planes, please see also http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.php?ref=76&part=1&gen=2

    • Anonymous says:

      Maybe I’m wrong, but those planes are heavy and fast. I’ve read of small fighters crashing vertically into the ground and burying themselves. Now if someone wanted to simulate an attack for political and financial gain it would be easier to use remotely controlled real aircraft. The technology has existed for years. Far easier than holograms and explosives to simulate aircraft. There is the mysterious video of the towers turning to dust as they fall; I would have expected huge slabs of masonry. Strange, but if the government is behind it then it’s no surprise. Citizens are expendable either through incompetence, greed or malice or all three at once. And the thrown beer can analogy is no good. More like a metal thermos flask shot from a cannon. Yes it would go through. Whether it would cause a catastrophic collapse is another matter. Pity all the evidence was cleared away so quickly.

  11. Nollidge says:

    I’ve been reading on the web about the 9/11 theories for years.I refuse to get into the planes/no planes argument.For me,the clincher of it all is the untouched World Trade Center 7,which was videoed as coming down in a perfect controlled demolition freefall.

  12. Anonymous says:

    i run a cafe near a US airbase, the airmen come in and chat, i also get girls come in from a small factory nearby and they all enjoy each others company.
    I have had several high ranking airmen tell us that 9/11 was bullshit, they all know the israelis did it,with the help of some US people i have not had one say the official story is true

  13. Anonymous says:

    9-11 expert witness. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiA5OYdHneA This cost him his life. RIP Danny Jowenko

  14. Nollidge,
    You state that you have been reading ‘theories on the web’ for years. Have you actually studied the scientific evidence presented by Dr. Judy Wood? This is not theoretical, it is evidence that can and has been presented in a court of law.
    True: WTC7 was largely untouched by falling debris from WTC1 and WTC2.
    False: WTC7 was a classic controlled demolition. The seismic evidence alone provides proof of this. The collapse of this 47-storey building was whisper quiet on a seismic measurement (the recording was less than that of a pneumatic drill)

  15. Anonymous says:

    see also a YT vid ‘September Clues” which shows how all the MSM conspired together on that day

  16. Anonymous says:

    Great stuff Henry ! Before we all get in a twist over the details let’s just stick with the original subterfuge and outright lie and concentrate on prosecuting the guilty.
    For me the awakening occurred in my 30’s with ‘Dark Moon’ about the faked Nasa Apollo baloney. Whatever way we get there is unimportant; what we do with it is now the most fundamental thing. Our kids and grand kids should expect nothing less.
    Love and peace everyone.

  17. Anonymous says:

    i see all the vids have gone from youtube from moshe solomons, his radio show had a phone poll about 18 months back on 9 -11 and i wa sshocked how many people realised it was all faked up

  18. shirlz007 says:

    WHO BENIFITS!!! Each and every time!!!
    Any crime!!! WHO BENEIFITS… :/ The Jewish Cabal, the US military complex, CIA/NSA/private intell… every one got a piece of the pie!

    In terms of this little spat between Duff and Bollyn… could it not be a combination of both Nano-thermite & controlled demolition AND the use of micro-nuclear weapons.

    -The towers came down in controlled demolition, removing supporting structures one-by-one, causing the building to implode in on themselves (with evidence of nano-thermite)


    -much of the rubble and remains
    (60-70%?) disintegrated into thin air…
    -Use of small yield nuclear devices in basement structure. removing… OBLITERATING! foundation structures, directing energy upwards moments after the building imploded in on itself AND disintergrating 60-70% of the building (destroying most the crime scene evidence)


    Why would the real Men In Black look weird as fuck, with no eyebrows, eyelashes, and wearing wigs???


    I Know the answer!!! 😀
    No DNA or forensic markers being left at a scene. As minimal risk as possible for leaving ANY DNA, hair, forensic evidence!

    Interesting how the witness claimed that she felt they could read her mind 😉

  19. shirlz007 says:

    Israel is to deploy three submarines equipped with nuclear cruise missiles in the Persian Gulf, the Sunday Times reported on Sunday.
    “According to the Times report, one submarine had been sent over Israeli fears that ballistic missiles developed by Iran, and in the possession of Syria and Hezbollah, could be used to hit strategic sites within Israel, such as air bases and missile launchers.

    Dolphin, Tekuma, and Leviathan, all German-made Dolphin class submarines of the 7th navy Flotilla, have been reported as frequenting the Gulf in the past, however, according to the Sunday Times report, this new deployment is meant to ensure a permanent naval presence near the Iranian coastline.

    The submarines could be used if Iran continues its IMAGINARY program to produce an IMAGINARY nuclear bomb. “The 1,500km range of the submarines’ cruise missiles can reach any target in Iran,” a navy officer told the Times.


    Report: Israel to deploy nuclear-armed submarines off Iran coast

    Sunday Times quotes IDF official saying the 3 German-made long range submarines will gather intelligence, act as deterrent and potentially land Mossad agents.

    Maybe Israel should try launching Mossad agents into Iran? It may work?… Im sure she won’t have a shortage of volunteers from the IDF! 😀

  20. shirlz007 says:

    My initial gut feeling towards ‘holographic’ planes being used in the 9/11 ROTHSCHILD job… BULLS**T!!!

    I don’t know enough on the theory to be honest, but it’s quite plausible (and likely) this theory is complete fabrication & misinformation, put out to hide the real events.
    -Military planes where used in the PHYSICAL collision into twin towers.
    -Most probably remote controlled from an undisclosed location (possibly Jersey, Hudson)

    Dancing Israelis? (remote controlled?), Thousands of witnesses from NY to Jersey?, Countless video evidence tapes and footage… THIS IS SILLY!!!

    Back to the real Men in Black! does the Secret Shadow Government provide the black suite… or do you get to choose your own? (provide a receipt and claim the money back?)


  21. NPP says:

    Who made it? Can the camera person be authentically tracked down? Can the film be authentically examined? Yet again, if only this discussion was being had on a nationally credible broadcasting service. Yet again the blogosphere is left to address the many questions. Again, thank you TAP.

    Last night’s BBC Panorama on Saville: ‘Dr. Saville’ was never seen attending Thatcher’s at Xmas…
    Keep pushing everyone, regardless of our minor disagreements, keep pushing the mainstream presstitutes and MPs.

    At the very very least the official story is questionable. We the people want 9/11 to be questioned.

  22. shirlz007 says:

    NPP… I was in as much stitches as the two being interviewed regarding ‘Dr Saville’! LMAO! XD

    ”And what is it exactly ‘Dr Saville’ has a doctorate in? Debauched sexual activity? Paedophilia? Necrophilia?” :/
    Men In Black…
    Erm… I think you will find the stories, rumours and eye witness accounts of ‘Men In Black’ came decades before the movie! In the 50’s and 60’s (and continuing to this day)…

    I’d sell out to work for the MIB! (MI9 in British Intel lingo ;)… allegedly)… dump these idiots at the drop of a hat (A BLACK ONE), for the truth about extra-terrestrial activity on and around this planet! DAMN RIGHT I WOULD!


    ‘Allegedly’ top KGB officers, in the 50’s, 60′ and 70’s where issued top secret handbooks, detailing the 50+ different intelligent extra-terrestrial species known to have visited this planet, and/or made contact with Earth Governments.

    Pah… Jim Morrison – Five to One

  23. shirlz007 says:

    Dr Saville! sorry! HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!

    Take rumours of ‘Dr Saville’ visiting morgues and engaging in necrophiliac sexual activity, mix it with rumours and psychoanalytical descriptions of his incestuous and ‘Oedipus syndrome’ relationship with his own mother… and sprinkle it with the comment on the Louis Theroux interview regarding her death (AND I QUOTE!)
    ”I wanted to stay with her, on my own so I could have my way with her”

    Jesus Christ! From what dark corners of Hell did they drag Jimmy Saville from! SERIOUSLY! What the F**K!!!

  24. Anonymous says:

    Observation: The wing tip appears to vanish because it is behind the building.

    The argument that an aluminium shelled aircraft could not possibly penetrate a steel framed building does not account for the comparatively lightweight structure of the aircraft traveling at a few hundred miles per hour being shredded on impact by the strength of the building structure, sending aircraft debris and fuel – which caused conflagration and more debris to be expelled through and out the other side.

    Compare an egg being thrown with considerable force at steel mesh box. Not much left of the shell, and the contents will go through and out the other side.

    Holographic projections? Faked film footage? From so many sources, and so many eye witnesses at different angles? I think not, despite what the governments are capable of through black ops.

    Silent planes? Shielded by tall buildings and muffled by street noise, coupled with the fact that jet aircraft on approach are comparatively silent until they have passed and moving away accounts for that. But I don’t buy the ‘no planes’ theorists.

    Remote controlled aircraft? Quite possibly. False flag – yes. An inside job – yes.

  25. Anonymous says:

    The video of flight 175 does look like a CGI glitch, but it’s actually an optical illusion caused by telephoto lens foreshortening.

    The building behind which the plane wing is obscured is 28 Washington Street, which is some half a mile SOUTH of WTC building 2 (ie nearer the camera).

    This can be settled in under a minute by checking it on a map, so here’s a bing maps link of 28 Washington to verify for yourselves.


  26. Anonymous says:

    Z for Zebra, troll spotted swimming about.
    Request course to set for collision.

  27. Anonymous says:

    Bush was President at the time not Obama so why have they got Obama’s photo in there as the named murderer? Incorrect facts discredit.
    However, The right wing of the plane appears to vanish through the left corner of the trade centre tower before it hits Common with poor computer graphics

  28. Anonymous says:

    11:49 – Obama was POTUS at the time of Danny Jowenko’s death and therefore answerable.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.