10 Responses to “Does the mainstream media have any credibility?”

  1. 15 May 2014 8:31 am
    Anonymous says:

    So both events are false?

  2. 15 May 2014 8:43 am
    stedra rulz says:

    Yes, they were. Did you just notice it now?

  3. 15 May 2014 3:18 pm
    Anonymous says:

    Are there links to the original picture stories that we can see? I’d love to see where these came from. The use of the same photo of the same victim seems desperately amateur.
    Well spotted someone!

  4. 15 May 2014 3:42 pm
    Anonymous says:

    I was waiting for something like this to turn up. It had to happen sooner or later.
    If it’s genuine then what more proof do people need.
    Do you have any links for further info on it?

  5. 15 May 2014 10:12 pm
    Anonymous says:

    For more information on fake happenings, try Chris Spivey or Wellaware1.

  6. 15 May 2014 10:52 pm
    Anonymous says:

    3.18pm anon. I asked if there were links to these original news stories. Can we see the original news company logos which the banners on the photos seem to indicate?

    I thought not.

    This is a photoshop spoof story.

    The victims are different people. Look at their photos not at this pish. This is a Googlebot-linkage-hoax.

    Utter bull.

  7. 16 May 2014 10:29 am
    Jennifer says:

    Anon 10.52
    Try http://www.nodisinfo.com

  8. 16 May 2014 12:21 pm
    Tapestry says:

    Other blogs have covered the falsity of these events in depth. Tap won’t add to the output. The picture was a Facebook lift which sums up the situation nicely. No details were given.

  9. 16 May 2014 5:29 pm
    Anonymous says:

    The picture was a Facebook lift which was then run through a photo manipulator like Arcensoft Tiltshifter to make a slightly squewed perspective change. Yup they are same photo but been doctored by a hoaxer to look slightly different. You can see the real people and who they were. They were different people.

  10. 19 May 2014 5:16 am
    Tapestry says:

    This example may be false. I don’t have any way of knowing if it’s based on a truth or not. See my introduction in which I make it quite clear I don’t have time to check details in posts. But the picture tells a story, and shows how simple ways of communicating are often more effective. People don’t have time to read long texts.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.