Defendant turns tables on judge in court by demanding his ID, which he doesn’t have

It’s quite technical, full of drama, and a great challenge – taking away the authority of the judge. The defendant clearly knows exactly what he’s doing. It must take a lot of knowledge to carry out such a challenge. The judge is clearly not acting as an agent of the Crown. Australia is a corporation. He has no authority.

The technicalities are well explained afterwards,  why the plea has validity, and the judge has no authority in the court.  The Crown is The City Of London, which in turn is owned by The Vatican.  They rule us by the law of the sea.  The defendant makes clear that he ‘stands on the land’.  I’d love to understand more of tis, if I can get five minutes away from the noise of kids!  I hope you are in a place where you can take in more than I can.  Leave some comments for me.

 

COMMENT – Hey, Caught the same video on beforeitsnews.com. In it, the commentator asks for any other relevant resources. Perhaps you have a way to forward this.

http://www.supremelaw.org/ 

The relevant person, Paul Andrew Mitchell: 

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/resume.htm 

And the important point-of-departure document:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm 

Cheers.

GORDON comments –

Hi Tap,


With reference to your article ” Defendant turns tables on judge by demanding his ID.” The defendant is asking the judge to produce his “Oath Of Office” proving he is entitled to sit at the bench and judge the case. Without going into details you will recall such a case in Birkenhead back in 2011. http://birkenhead.fmotl.com/



Law of the land. 
  1. A phrase used in the Magna Carta to refer to the then established law of the kingdom (as distinct from Roman or civil law); today it refers to fundamental principles of justice commensurate with due process; “the United States Constitution declares itself to be `the supreme law of the land'”

    http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=law of the land


The law of the sea

  1. Law of the Sea is a body of international law that concerns the principals and rules by which public entities, especially states, interact in maritime matters, including navigational rights, sea mineral rights, and coastal waters jurisdiction. …

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_sea


Similarly, you may find interesting reading in the links below.



NO JUDGE IN AMERICA HAS LEGAL OATH OF OFFICE! 


The Secret People.


Kind regards,
Gordon
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

11 Responses to “Defendant turns tables on judge in court by demanding his ID, which he doesn’t have”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Another one where the common man stands up to this bent system called ‘the law’:

    Stephen Barry: Freeman fighting the unjust Council Tax:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-Us0UT2EfY

    Regards.
    – Cobalt

  2. Anonymous says:

    Since oliver cromwell the jews own
    the whole damn show not the vatican, please vlook it up
    buta good piece nonetheless

  3. Anonymous says:

    I have no time for the vatican, but Henry VIII threw out the vatican grip on england and that money then stayed in this country and we then built the greatest navy and lifted the lives of the people.
    But oliver cromwell allowed the jews to come in and build the bank of england and since that day we have all been held captive
    to them
    e g jews not vatican

  4. Anonymous says:

    Freeman on the Land and common law prevailing.

  5. Tapestry says:

    Nice idea that Henry VIII broke the power of The Vatican in England. The Vatican owns the City of London. He enjoyed a less entangled and direct relationship, but didn’t kick Rome out of the central role of controlling the money.

  6. Anonymous says:

    YOU GOTO SEE TO BELIEVE

    Who’s Running America and the CAP
    StopTheCrimeNew

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcruyJTfnCQ

    HETT

  7. Anonymous says:

    can anyone provide info for this to be used in british courts

  8. Anonymous says:

    By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.

    http://endrtimes.blogspot.fi/2014/03/our-country-shall-repudiate-every.html

  9. Anonymous says:

    Good evening to Finland from England, Some very interesting articles there thank you for sharing.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Remember a Judge is only a Hired person to do a Job. Not God, Nor Higher than you. They must remember that, and we need to keep reminding them. Since soooo many get big heads, that they are better than you. Yes they are a Judge, but that is a JOB that they were hired to do.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.