9 Responses to “Kosovo and Crimea. What’s the difference?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    I dont know a lot about these subjects, i am learning as i go, but on holiday in Devon we became freinds witha doctor and his wife who were moored on the next boat along from us.
    He told me he would be in awful trouble if he spoke publicly but all the chest conditions asthma etc
    are being blamed on smoking or passive smoking but he said its in the main chemtrails, so why are they afriad to speak out about it ?

  2. Anonymous says:

    The unelected JEWISH ex-banker Ukrainian Prime Minister backed by the West: Arseny Yatseniuk has vowed to track down and bring to justice all those promoting separatism in Crimea. He said yesterday “We will find all of them – if it takes one year, two years – and bring them to justice and try them in Ukrainian and international courts. The ground will burn beneath their feet.”

    Jews represent about 1% of the Ukrainian population. The Zionist West, yet again appoint a corrupt Jewish banker.

  3. pippakin says:

    The technical similarity is obvious and its typical of the EU and USA to be hypocritical about it. The really important thing is the difference in population.

    Kosovo was historically Serbian it has deep religious significance to Serbia. The area was taken over by immigrants and its those people who started the independence movement.

    Crimea is the exact opposite it was Russian until 1954 when Khrushchev appears to have had a brain storm. As long as the USSR existed it could be said the change didn’t matter but as soon as real independence happened the ethnic Russians who are the vast majority in Crimea demanded to return to Russia.

    I honestly can’t see what Ukraine has to complain about as for the EU USA its no surprise to see them living down to their usual standards.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Remember that when Hitler marched into Russia many people including the ukrainians welcomed him as a saviour from Stalin, same as in France you wont read this anywhere but my dad who was there said the French did not want the British there, they got on well with the germans and under the Vichy regime many did very well indeed

  5. julie says:

    As if we didn’t already know …

    Since the 27th of February 2014 Arseniy Yatsenyuk is “prime minister” of the present and entirely illegal regime of Ukraine. As we have learned from the intercepted Nuland – Pyatt telephone conversation, he is the preferred candidate of Victoria “Fuck the EU” Nuland, which is the reason why the US State Department made him the top echelon of its coup.

    Did you know that Mr. Yatsenyuk owns an organization called “Open Ukraine Foundation”? If you do, you might be surprised to learn that all traces of this foundation have been eradicated from the internet. The website of the Arseniy Yatsenyuk Foundation (openukraine.org) and its Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Open-Ukraine-Foundation) have simply disappeared. The Wikipedia entry still exists, but the links lead nowhere.

    As we know, the Internet forgets nothing and therefore a screen-shot of the website is still on hand. And what do we see there? A list of the foundation’s partners, and looking at it, you may say with some awe that it is an exceptionally impressive collection of the usual suspects. Which, we strongly suspect, must be the reason why the foundation is now defunct and its tracks have been obliterated.

    What follows is an extract from the list of partners:

    – Black Sea Trust for Regional Cooperation (A Project of the German Marshall Fund)
    – Chatham House
    – NATO Information and Documentation Centre
    – State Department of the United States of America
    – NED National Endowment for Democracy
    – Horizon Capital
    – Swedbank

    With such partners, and in this present scenario, it is small wonder that the page has been deleted. Because it can be clearly seen who stands right behind Mr. Arseniy Yatsenyuk and the coup.


  6. Anonymous says:

    Anon 1:06 pm, It’s not well known.
    Churchill had the Legal, Vichy Navy, sunk, without warning, many French died in the unannounced attack.
    This seems to have been airbrushed out of history.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.