UPDATE – What’s the real agenda here?
Has Jim Stone’s channel been taken over, and is being manipulated? His analysis technically makes sense as per usual, but the characters in the script don‘t add up. ‘Phillip Wood’ seems a wooden character, and his totally emtionless and politicised girlfriend seems like a front for a political campaign. Click link above. Stone talked of being pursued closely by government/CIA a few months ago, and he didn‘t know what their game was, although he emphasised he had no intention of suicide. Have these agencies decided to keep him alive but use him to get the alternative media to follow a false trail about MH370? When you listen to Sarah talking on the BBC, you start to get a picture of what the real news agenda is, and what this MH370 merrygoround is all about
This handout photo provided by the Wood family shows Philip
Jim Stone writes:
BLOCKBUSTER: THIS IS ACCURATE, BELIEVE IT OR NOT:
IBM ENGINEER TAKEN FROM HIJACKED FLIGHT 370 GOT A SELFIE OUT TO THE INTERNET.
This image, which appears black was posted as taken in a dark cell by an IBM engineer. The picture malfunctioned because the cell was too dark, but a critical piece of information was embedded in the Exif data, the coordinates to Diego Garcia, where the picture was taken. And it’s real, this is NOT a hoax.
The coordinates in the picture indicate that the photo was taken within 3 miles of Diego Garcia. It is NOT what comes up on Google. It is off a couple miles, so NO ONE GOOGLED THIS, thus helping to confirm it’s authenticity. I don’t know how big the island is, but if it has a runway, that certainly fits.
“I have been held hostage by unknown military personal after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded). I work for IBM and I have managed to hide my cellphone in my ass during the hijack. I have been separated from the rest of the passengers and I am in a cell. My name is Philip Wood. I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly.”
I cannot stress how important it is that the GPS coordinates in the photo do not perfectly match what Google says, because it proves that the source of those coordinates did not come from google, they really did come from the imaging device.
TAP – David (Tap Blog contributor who sent in the story)