297 scientists, experts, sign statement: GMOs not proven safe

by Jon Rappoport

February 5, 2014


The statement was drawn up by the European Network of Scientists for Social and
Environmental Responsibility.  It was released on October 21, 2013.

Please read this, Mr Paterson.
Since then, 297 scientists and experts have signed it.

Thus exploding the myth that “the science is settled.”

Exploding the claim that a consensus about GMOs has been reached.

You can read the statement and the signatories at ensser.org.

Here are two excerpts from the statement:

“As scientists, physicians, academics, and experts from disciplines relevant to
the scientific, legal, social and safety assessment aspects of
genetically modified
organisms (GMOs), we strongly reject claims by GM seed developers and
some scientists,
commentators, and journalists that there is a ‘scientific consensus’
on GMO safety
 and that the debate on this topic is ‘over’.”

“We feel compelled to issue this statement because the claimed consensus on GMO
safety does not exist. The claim that it does exist is misleading and
the currently available scientific evidence and the broad diversity of
opinion among
scientists on this issue. Moreover, the claim encourages a climate of
that could lead to a lack of regulatory and scientific rigour and
appropriate caution,
potentially endangering the health of humans, animals, and the environment.”

The number of scientists on either side of a question does not, alone,
imply a final
answer.  But it does indicate whether the question is closed or still open.  It
does indicate that those who claim the question is closed are wrong.

Completely wrong.

Monsanto PR and government PR and media PR are so many tongues wagging
in the wind.

In previous articles, I’ve highlighted dangers and lies re GMOs.  Here
I’m simply
reporting that a consensus about GMO safety is a delusion.

In other words, anybody can say “everybody knows…”  And if those
people have access
to, or control, major media, they can make a persuasive case.

But the persuasion is nothing more than one voice drowning out other voices.

Other voices who, for example, make this declaration:

(Signatory, Dr. Margarida Silva, biologist and professor at the
Portugese Catholic
University)—“…research has been mostly financed by the very
companies that depend
on positive outcomes for their business, and we now know that where money flows,
 influence grows. The few independent academics left must work double
shift to address
the vast array of unanswered questions and red flags that keep piling up.”

Or this voice: Signatory, Dr. Raul Montenegro, biologist, University of Cordoba,
 Argentina—“As things stand, the governments of these countries
[Argentina, Brazil]
deny that there is a [GMO] problem even in the face of numerous reports from the
 people who are affected and the doctors who must treat them.”

So far, there are 297 such voices.

Will CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX report this story in full and overturn
the false consensus?
 Will they make room for the 297 voices?

Of course not.  Their job is to invent consensus by consulting
“reliable sources.”
 Meaning: liars who also want to invent false consensus.

Jon Rappoport

The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED
Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

4 Responses to “297 scientists, experts, sign statement: GMOs not proven safe”

  1. Anonymous says:

    GM foods are rothschild,
    Lyn De Rothschild admitted this some back that they wanted total 100% control of the food suply, this is why you must grow as much as you possible can yourself, when jewish Britain was starving Germany
    in W W II people were growing in window boxes etc and eating grass and acorns, we dont want to be in this situation ourselves

  2. Anonymous says:

    I heard on the news that Owen Patterson’s retina has detached from his eye which explains why the guy is half blind. Hopefully after his operation he’ll be able to get up to speed and see the chemtrails that the rest of us see, but then the eye is attached to the brain which may be his underlying problem.


  3. Tapestry says:

    I’ve known Owen since he was thirteen. He may be sold out to big corporation all over the shop, but I wouldn’t wish him ill-will as regards his health.

    If he really trusts those evil perverts, and he does, then he will be suffering extreme disappointment and stress in office as Minister for the Environment, and will be wondering why the world is against him trying to apply rationality to a covertly operated intended disaster.

    If Owen was able to see the wood from the trees, and he realised what a crook Cameron was, he wouldn’t have been given the office he has.

    As a human being, he’s well-meant. I wish him a speedy recovery. I just wish he knew what he was fighting against.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.