The stuff they don’t tell you about television. Who’s in control?

This is very interesting to watch.  We’ve seen it before, but it’s worth a revisit.   Many aspects which show you how biased TV is.  Half an hour was enough for me.  It started to make me angry and ill seeing George Bush pontificating, and the crushing of the African American voices in Los Angeles.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

13 Responses to “The stuff they don’t tell you about television. Who’s in control?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Anton Levay, head of the Satanic Church, did not let his children watch TV, as too damaging..! He called TV ‘the Satanic family altar’

  2. Anonymous says:

    Some chrurches are now saying dont watch TV, the BBChas been known to be promoting homosexuals for some time, then they scream they did not know that everyone from Allan Freeman John Barrowman Frankie Howard and Derren Brown were among those bringing boys onto the premises to abuse.
    The jews who run the BBC must have rubbed their hands in glee

  3. Anonymous says:

    Todays news
    The pentagon have said the US defence budget has lost $58.3 trillion. An important jew went missing and showed up in israel
    Questions must be asked

  4. Anonymous says:

    I sat through the movie “Paul” last night, and it was nothing but a poorly written and childishly base vehicle for the zionist anti Christian movement. Every opportunity was taken to rubbish those who believe as lunatics, bullies or cranks, all the while pushing the zionists stooge Darwin’s theory of evolution.

    Virtually all programming (yup thats what THEY call it) promotes normality with a negative slant, and you dont need to be some hardline evangalist to see it, being that obvious.

    And they want us to pay for it!..only the lads from ison could have that kind of brass neck.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Police are indergoing a internal row, witnesses have come forward implicating the leader of the UK jews Greville Janner in long term abuse of boys at Elm House and other care homes.
    The boys ( now grown men _ also believe missing boys were murdered in jewish rituals with Janner and other jews.
    We will see if they can get a conviction
    good luck boys

  6. Anonymous says:

    I am quite new to all this and i dont know what to think anymore.
    First David Icke my hero i find is an NWO plant, then Chris Bollyn who gave us the inside info on 9-11
    i am told is a bunko merchant.
    Then T Stokes whose lecturers i enjoyed so much is brandeda fake and a soviet spy.Then Chris spivey gets caught with emails admitting he is an antisemitec homosexual,
    Then England is ours, today we are all inundated with emails saying they are also fake ?
    i am getting so disilliusoned with it all

  7. Tapestry says:

    No one’s perfect, but all are potential sources – good, bad or morally confusing.

    I am not sure it’s so easy to categorise people anyway.

  8. Anonymous says:

    I agree with al this mud throwing i dont know how to tel who is genuine and who not ?
    but i am coming now to think Icke is a mossad plant,
    and Brian Gerrish i am not sure of either
    as neither will talk about the bolocaust

  9. Anonymous says:

    Ahh Confusion. This is exactly what ‘THEY’ want to happen.
    I keep an open mind even on sites that have been labeled as disinfo as some true facts can still be gleened and when gathered all other facts from everywhere available the truth does prevail.

    I usually get a guy feeling when something isn’t right

    As my grandmother used to say.. ‘Truth is to lies like the cream is to milk, It doesn.t matter how much you shake the bottle it will always separate and rise to the top

  10. Anonymous says:

    I mean gut feeling (typo)

  11. Tapestry says:

    If someone is spilling information, the site or source is always blacked. If someone’s shilling, they always reveal some truths to achieve credibility.

    Gut feeling is the way to steer through it all. The more you read stuff, the more pattern you can observe, and the picture has some clear pieces in it. To expect a full clear look at the shenanigans going on would not be a reasonable expectation. Just keep on looking and trying to form the picture.

  12. Chris Jones says:

    Well said

  13. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, This is the yardstick I use.
    Google the name of the person you require more information on.
    That part is fairly obvious, after the name put ‘debunked’.
    This will lead you to people who have spent some time and effort to attack that person.
    Read through the comments and decide if you think the information has validity, bearing in mind, what you already knew.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.