Your charitable donation goes down the neck of the Directors
Mon 5:34 pm +00:00, 11 Nov 2013 4Hi Tap,
Just a quickie! I had look into the charity WSPA that I give £3’s a month to and to my horror saw what they pay certain members when I accessed the2010 annual report on page 44. Goodness me I have phoned up and cancelled straight away, but was told by telephone sales lady that they have to pay competative salaries, I will let you judge how competative the rates are below!
The emoluments of members of staff, including benefits in kind within the range;
£60,000 to £119,999 are:
2010
Number
£60,000 – £69,999 – 3
£70,000 – £79,999 4
£60,000 to £119,999 are:
2010
Number
£60,000 – £69,999 – 3
£70,000 – £79,999 4
£80,000 – £89,999 1
£90,000 – £99,999 1
£100,000 – £109,999 1
£110,000 – £119,999 1
£110,000 – £119,999 1
The pension costs paid in respect of these employees amounted to £30,632 (2009 £20,891).
Now I know lots of charities pay huge payment to directors but I just thought I would highlight my case.
Hope you have a nice day and keep posting as you really do post some brilliant pieces.
Kind regards,
James.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
There’s no law on how much of your donations goes to charity (it could literally just be 1% and it’s still legal). Charities just have to show on the books that *something* is going to the cause. That’s why I never give to charity… because some leech will be creaming off the top.
Hence the Bono charity gave 1%, and kept 99%.
Never give to any charity.
Iv know this for years…for every pound u give 99p spent on ad min ..staff ect …come back dick turpin …..Charity my aaaa …
Remember the appeal for money by Bush Jr & Clinton for Haiti? exactly 0% of the donations went to the people who needed it & most if not all went to building a nice new 5* hotel on the island (not open to islanders), the rest is sitting in Bush & Clinton’s respective bank accounts.