By Jim Stone 

My much needed update on this topic and response:

“They” have definitely used their earthquake machine repeatedly, and I have felt both it and natural quakes. Let me start by telling you the difference in the feel –

How can you tell it was the earthquake machine, in solid concrete terms?

The most obvious for me was the feel. The second most obvious is that the earthquake machine somehow pulls on the surface of the earth, so any quake made by it registers at 15 KM depth or less. Typically they register at 10 KM depth. Natural quakes do not do that. Natural quakes are virtually always 50 km or more down, up to 700 km. On rare occasion they can be at 25 KM, but NEVER at 10 KM. The Japan earthquake was measured at 10 km depth, a dead giveaway.

As shown with the advertisement for the state wide Chiapas earthquake drill, The 20 March 2012 Chiapas quake coincided TO THE MINUTE with an earthquake drill for the exact same quake of the exact same magnitude, at the exact same location President Obama’s daughter was vacationing at the time. How can you have an earthquake exactly matching your drill scenario, with the exact same magnitude happening at the exact same time as your drill?

There is little doubt the powers that be did it to threaten Obama. Since the drill had everyone outdoors near the “epicenter” at the time the “quake” happened to match the drill, only a few hundred people died even though thousands of homes were destroyed. And Obama’s daughter was safely outside while the threat was delivered because of the drill. 

Interesting it is that so many other “terror” events have coincided with drills, which made this particular “coincidence” an OBVIOUS one, So if you do get hit by that earthquake down there in El Salvador, all you have to do is pay attention to what I have said here to know if it was an act of war or not. Check the magnitude and compare it against damage. If the damage is less than the rating for the quake, that’s an indicator. Pay attention to how the quake feels. If it’s a smooth ride absent any bumps and jolts, like accelerating in a jet at takeoff, that is another indicator. And most importantly, if it is at a depth of less than 15 KM, that’s the smoking gun.

For reference, the Chiapas report follows:

This was my initial report of the March 20 Chiapas quake

I felt the earthquake in Mexico city, it happened at high noon.

I was in a Starbucks next to the Sams Club in the Santa Fe district of Mexico City. The quake lasted about 20 seconds, and whatever the magnitude, people gawked at the swaying buildings. SO, tie whatever magnitude this was into the Tokyo footage on 3/11. This swayed buildings and flickered the power. How much does it take to sway buildings and cause power glitches? At any rate, I was unimpressed with the 3/11 Tokyo footage.

March 20 Mexico quake verified MAN MADE

A reader sent me a mail with a link to a report by Dutchsince, which claimed that the march 20 quake in Mexico was man made. I was skeptical, but then took a look at his report which documented that a very well planned and advertised earthquake drill matching the exact same scenario at the exact same magnitude at the exact same time had taken place. If you look at what I said in my initial report – it felt like accelerating back and forth, not a violent movement, and in mails I also added that it had no vibration of any sort. This matches the descriptions of the Fukushima quake that came out of Japan. 

Furthermore, if you read my mails from Japan, in there my writers said that all the quakes were happening at a depth of 10 KM and because of that, and the way the quakes felt un natural, they believed the spate of recent quakes in Japan were from an earthquake machine, the existence of which is documented in the Fukushima report. Well, the USGS said this quake happened at a depth of 10 km, which matches Japan exactly. Usually quakes are much deeper, and this similarity with Japan is suspicious ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING

THIS!!!UPDATE: LaVoz Del Norte pulled the article about the drill but I have a backup (linked below)

To Lavoz Del Norte and others who will bury the facts when they are inconvenient, Now you know what will happen on this site; (explanation to readers on the next line . . . . .

Note – The newspaper La Voz Del Norte, which posted this article has banned all access to it and all others on their site related to it. SO,

It’s a good thing I made a back up!

. . . . . . After a while in this business of busting lies and cover ups, you learn to do that!)
This text article is dated March 13, and verifies that indeed, this quake HAD TO BE man made and that the graphics for the drill, which the article speaks about are not phony.