Whistleblower suffers trashing of reputation for exposing powerful child rapists and murderers

Judge Niclas Perry on BBC TV.

Sunday, 14 July 2013 11:26
Posted by 
I first met Andrea in North Wales in the 1990s when we discussed the child abuse networks there involving the rich and famous and she has been targeted and vilified by the state ever since and fitted up for a crime that she did not commit. Bizarrely, she was sentenced to two and a half years in jail in her absence by a judge who had represented alleged paedophiles at the Waterhouse North Wales abuse inquiry in the 1990s while Andrea had represented the victims.
Andrea is still seeking from outside the UK to expose the truth that she uncovered. We have kept in contact over the last year and she has asked me to publish her evidence to the present ‘Macur Review’ into North Wales abuse under Mrs Justice Macur.
‘During the 80’s and 90’s I was based in North Wales working for and with the Intelligence Services mainly on investigations concerning the illegal supply of arms and technology to Iraq, Iran and the former Yugoslavia. I was involved in an investigation into the transfer of Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) technology to Iraq. At one point I was working with a strictly military intelligence section and when the Gulf War started all the reserves were called up and I became involved in detecting sabotage and other matters.
During the course of the investigation clear links were identified between illegal arms sales, drugs trafficking, support for terrorist groups and the sale and distribution of child pornography, including snuff videos. The illegal arms trade is connected to a much larger organised criminal network. The fact that sections of the Conservative Government, the police and government agencies were involved made it more perilous and destructive to the fabric of society. No-one knew who is working for whom! I was later to give evidence of these matters in secret to Lord Justice Scott’s Inquiry into ‘Arms to Iraq’ (Sample Documents 1 and 2).
I became involved in the investigation of child abuse in 1989 whilst carrying out a search of a suspect XXXXXX premises. We found hard drugs and child pornography in video and photographic form. Some of it looked ritualistic. The suspect was involved with a company called xxxxxx Technology. xxxxxxx was engaged in research at a building connected with Bangor University. The investigation concerned tech transfer of biological weapons data to Iraq. xxxxxx lived close to and was associated with xxxxxxx who ran the xxx a gym in xxxxxxx. Following further investigation it was discovered that xxxxxx was distributing pornography on a large scale including child porn videos and highly priced snuff videos, where a child would be sexually abused and murdered on film. xxxxxx a former mercenary was involved with another mercenary xxxxxxx who had been in Angola xxxxxxxxxx were protected by the Police and certain sections of the intelligence community for which they worked, I understand, on contract …
… The paedophile network specifically included members of the police and the judiciary as well as businessmen, solicitors, politicians, security and intelligence insiders. This network by its very nature is linked to other types of organised crime with direct links to the lucrative child porn industry and sex trade, drug trafficking, arms dealing and terrorism. The people involved in these different branches of organised crime covered each other’s backs and actively supported each other to their mutual benefit …
… the fact that those organisations responsible for the care and protection of the children, and who could alone act on complaints, were actively involved in an apparent cover-up of the rape, sexual abuse and torture of those children was a matter which should have been properly investigated by an outside Police Force. This was never done. Neither did the Waterhouse Inquiry investigate the vast amount of evidence and testimony of the cover-up or the evidence of an elite paedophile ring.’
Anonymous said…
Tap we hear these stories about Police using the criminal justice
system to protect themselves over and over again.

Innocent people are victimised and the guilty protected.

Andrea Davison gives us an incite into why in her Macur Statement


A must read to understand Police corruption

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

4 Responses to “Whistleblower suffers trashing of reputation for exposing powerful child rapists and murderers”

  1. Anonymous says:

    In 1972 i was a rookie cop, and i found that several metropolitan detectives were investigating a child porn ring with tentacles up into the royals, there was some big names here in entertainment industry, but it was called off, there was much anger over this
    I can say there is much support in the police for an israeli boycott, its something discussed a lot.
    As the israeli are big offenders with exploiting child abusers around the world

  2. Anonymous says:

    The royal connection was probably sir anthony blunt, i listened to a radio show on truth radio a while back and this guy who knew him said Blunt was well known for silencing small boys, after they had had their fun with them. They often took orphaned boys
    with no families and then said they had run away.
    scum like this were never prosecuted as they were close to the queen

  3. Anonymous says:

    where are all these police and others who are in the know? why dont they all get together and expose all of this. we need to stop this.
    off track a bit have any of you watched a youtube film called Run from the cure. this got me very angry and upset, we need to stop being little people who do as we are told regardless of some stupid laws!
    why do we let tptb carry on making laws against humanity.

  4. Anonymous says:

    We must support Whistle Blowers like Andrea Davison I make the same appeal as David Icke please Donate what you can easily afford to help Andrea Davison have a Legal Defence. The Court have refused to allow her to fund her own defence in the hope that she will have no representation and they can keep the cover-up going. (copy and past this link) Please Donate at macurstatement.blogspot.com

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.