Woolwich. That’s odd. Where did the blood come from?

Julia said…
Why are the bystanders not frightened by a madman with an axe who is prepared to behead people? It is like a movie set. We have movies filmed in Bath quite often, and there are bystanders watching the movie, just like this. The only difference here with the Wool Witch movie, is that they have filmed the movie set for the news, and presented it as real. Blurring illusion and reality.

No matter how obvious it seems, there are plenty out there still believing it, and maybe they are testing us to see how trusting we are of what they feed us. If you buy into it, or give it attention, then you are feeding of it. If you are feeding off it, it affects you. And if you accept the food, they will give you more of it.

8:32 pm 

Anonymous said…

Couldn’t agree more Julia.

The blurring of reality with fiction.

That’s what Hollywood does best… casts a spell on the unsuspecting public.

– Cobalt

This ‘terror’ attack doesn’t have the quality of a B Movie.

  London Calling – Fake Terror Comes to London Town

The MSM reports another ‘Terror’ attack. This time a beheading in London.

But what is the truth of this incident? What does a critical observer see?

Where is the blood on this man’s light colored jacket?

We are informed by the BBC that he and the other man were hacking at the victim for minutes on end in a visceral bloodbath.  A large pool of blood can be seen in photographs taken looking down at the scene from above.

Other reports clearly state that the victim was beheaded.

Both of the attackers should be covered in blood – not just their hands.
Decapitation – Where is the head in this or any of the other photographs ?


From Chris Spivey’s Blog

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
Twenty fucking minutes for the old Bill to turn up.
No one thought to get the Army out?
All the early descriptions given are wrong. Why would they carry all those weapons. You can only use one. Why does the old lady suddenly disappear out of the video. 
Where have all the Police cars gone from the shoot out? I thought the whole area had been sealed off?
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

10 Responses to “Woolwich. That’s odd. Where did the blood come from?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    I’m pleased that there are people on the www picking this to pieces – but I don’t see anything suspicious.

    Would you consider that this may have happened exactly as reported by many witnesses and the media?

    Governments do use ‘false flag’, London 7/7 and 911 both – but I don’t see any inconsistencies…

  2. Hi Tap,

    Please take a look at my youtube video for this FAKE TERROR!



  3. Anonymous says:

    @anonymous. Do you think that ‘hacking’ someone with a knife or meat clever might result in just a few splahes of blood on your face & clothing. These would-be attackers only have blood on their hands. Why has it only sprayed on their hands and no where else?

    With arterial Bleeding, blood is spurted out being pumped form the heart, an average sized man has approx 8 pints of blood.

    It would literally be all over the road. You must have seen photos of murders or war before where people who have been stabbed make a very big mess.


  4. Anonymous says:

    The road markings have not disappeared either. Look at the positioning of the silver police 4×4. In the picture where they have supposedly disappeared we are looking on the wrong side of it.

  5. Anonymous says:

    The only thing that surprises me is the BBC didn’t report this false-flag event 20 minutes too early like one of their last botched-up attempts on ‘reporting’ world events:


  6. Anonymous says:

    If the guy was actually dead before these people starting attacking him there would be no arterial spray. If anything this is a positive in that the man may already have died after being hit by the car and hopefully did not suffer as much as it might be imagined. I also think the rest of this photo thing is just plain paranoid nonsense!

  7. Anonymous says:

    The woman didn’t disappear – I’ve seen the full video. But, clearly, the blood on the pavement has been added. This adds further suspicion to the unlikelihood that you can hack a mans head off with a meat cleaver and not get any blood on your clothes or cause a pool of blood on the ground.

    And these are just anomalies with the physical ‘evidence’. There are a number of inconsistencies with the witness testimonies too…

  8. Anonymous says:

    People are to paranoid, All you pictures are invalid, Watch the video the woman doesn’t dissapear the man moves to the left so she’s blocked from view then a couple seconds later she appears and just walks past. & all that blood was by the wall because they dragged him up to the wall to chop him, and no one is kneeling down any where the thing you claim to be someone kneeling is actually a rucksack. I agree with you though as to why there is no blood on the attackers accept their hands & also the video of the attackers being shot, strangely the camera doesn’t aim on them till the shots are fired, But still they don’t bleed? After being shot

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.