BBC taken to British court for 9/11 lies

Historic Court Case Against the BBC’s Cover Up of 9/11 Evidence

Global Research, February 14, 2013
The BBC is being challenged strongly for its refusal to present to the British public the available scientific evidence which contradicts the official version of events of 9/11. Thank you very much to all those who have sent letters to their MPs asking that the BBC be held to account for withholding this evidence that the public must be allowed to see.
As a further progression of this campaign, a great opportunity has arisen. 9/11 truth documentary maker Tony Rooke has been granted a court hearing where he is challenging the BBC’s support of terrorist activity through supporting the cover up of the true evidence of 9/11. The court case will take place on February 25th at 10.00am at the address below. Real 9/11 evidence has rarely, if ever, been presented in a British court room, so this is a rare opportunity.Any support from the public on the day would be fantastic and will help to send the message that the people want to know, and deserve to know, the truth about 9/11.
Horsham Magistrates’ Court [Court 3]
The Law Courts
Hurst Road
Horsham
West Sussex
England
RH12 2ET
This court case is based around Tony making a stand and refusing to pay his TV licence fee under Section 15 of The Terrorism Act 2000 Article 3 which states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism. The BBC has withheld scientific evidence which clearly demonstrates that the official version of events of 9/11 is not possible and could not have been carried out in entirety by those who have been accused by our officials. In addition, the BBC has actively blocked and smeared those attempting to bring this evidence to the public. 
By doing this the BBC are supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and are therefore supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account. A new and independent investigation is required to determine what really did occur on 9/11, and by whom, otherwise these unidentified terrorist elements will remain free to potentially commit further terrorist activities.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Responses to “BBC taken to British court for 9/11 lies”

  1. captrichhog says:

    The specific individual at BBC that may be mostly high ranking person in the attack on America is Greg Dyke. A political spouse is also implicated according to abel danger dot net which is referring to Greg and a “Dyke in the middle” attack; a play on words for “man in the middle” MitM attack which have been very common from World War Two going forward. If Tony Rooke would like an American or Canadian ‘expert witness’ abel danger dot net “Has Truth, Will Travel”. They have been on Edge Media multiple times and their “Captain Sherlock Solves 9/11” has played many times in Great Britain.

  2. Tony says:

    Google BBC building 7 collapse and you will see a BBC reporter Jane Stanley reporting. An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. I have never believed the BBC news ever since. It just makes a mockery of the news programming we the people receive.

  3. Anonymous says:

    It’s not just the BBC that should be taken to court… the government and the intelligence agencies involved too. Don’t forget also, the licence fee payer (as usual) pays for court costs. It’s no different to banker bailouts where the corrupt elite get bailed out by the serfs.

    Just like the Jimmy Savile scandal, the BBC were the scapegoat, while the real people behind 9/11 get away with murder (and I mean literally).

    The hole pyramid establishment system is corrupt from top down. This house of cards needs bringing down and a new system starting from afresh.

    – Cobalt

  4. Roy Wright says:

    I still remember when this was being reported live and i was like WTF is this a joke?

  5. Anonymous says:

    The BBC is a most disgusting organisation. Has anyone ever had the “pleasure” of watching the childrens Beeb channel?

    Lets just say that its down to the most base and sick side of toilet humour, with continual references to passing wind and bodily functions-no content that would inspire our kids to be civilised, its almost as if they are trying to de humanify. I read somewhere that a clear sign of satanic influence is obsession with the anal area and excrement.

    Dont even get me started on the other more usual propaganda..in virtually every scene the white boy is a dumbass, black boy is a natural leader and so brave/clever and worthy of the admiration of the usually blond girl. No I’m not racist, this is being done to subjegate white boys, encourage black boys to think we are losers, and then that in turn will result in resentment. Turning brother against brother till man is no more. Just who is behind this we need to be asking?.

  6. Jason Plant says:

    I am sure I have read somewhere that the public will not be allowed into this court, which if true seems very unfair as no doubt whatever happens will not get fed out to the public.

  7. sebastian tombs says:

    I watched a couple of BBC programmes on catch-up tv last week, fellow readers must be aware the these were quite blatantly propaganda excercises promoting, a)the old chestnut (now even theIPCC are retreating over), global warming (sic)and b) vaccinations.
    the first was about the earth’s orbit, clearly even their own evidence refuted the programme’s claims. The second was about winter viruses and hoe to avoid/cure the same. You had to get up to about 55 minutes of an hours broadcasting before their real agenda was revealed.

  8. Dragonfruitman says:

    Is anyone attending (can the public attend)?

    I live fairly close to Horsham.

  9. Tapestry says:

    Court hearings are open to the public apart from Family Courts where paedophiles operate in secret behind closed doors.

  10. Tapestry says:

    Please attend, Dragonfruitman, and send us a report.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.