Ancient knowledge revealed

Toad Hall sends –

Ancient knowledge and geometry explained. 

This is all about the ancient knowledge as known and exploited by masons and the elites. It really is an incredibly well researched project, presented in a clear, concise and balanced way. It is all based on mathematical or physical evidence, rather than based on someone’s opinion (which a lot of these videos are). It’s a real eye opener to the level of correlation of power basis through the ages. 

You’ll no doubt love the section on the bank of England the church and all the correlation of key buildings in London which is all in around 2.50. 😉

It is very long, but I think you’ll appreciate it. 

Volume 1 (available on youtube). 


Secrets In Plain Sight is an awe inspiring exploration of great art, architecture, and urban design which skillfully unveils an unlikely intersection of geometry, politics, numerical philosophy, religious mysticism, new physics, music, astronomy, and world history.

Exploring key monuments and their positions in Egypt, Stonehenge, Jerusalem, Rome, Paris, London, Edinburgh, Washington DC, New York, and San Francisco brings to light a secret obsession shared by pharaohs, philosophers and kings; templars and freemasons; great artists and architects; popes and presidents, spanning the whole of recorded history up to the present time.

As the series of videos reveals how profound ancient knowledge inherited from Egypt has been encoded in units of measurement, in famous works of art, in the design of major buildings, in the layout of city streets and public spaces, and in the precise placement of obelisks and other important monuments upon the Earth, the viewer is led to perceive an elegant harmonic system linking the human body with the architectural, urban, planetary, solar, and galactic scales.

Volume 2 (trailer)

Did ancient architects know the dimensions of the Earth, Moon, and Sun? Were they capable of surveying vast distances with pinpoint precision? Did they encode their advanced understanding in monuments and units of measure? Are the second, foot, mile, nautical mile, and even the meter sacred measures from the distant past? Why do many of the world’s religions encode the same geometry in their most sacred symbols and temples? What does the Kaaba really symbolize? How are Stonhenge and the Dome of the Rock connected? Why do measurements of many disparate phenomena converge on a few specific numbers and ratios?

YouTube – Videos from this email
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

5 Responses to “Ancient knowledge revealed”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Coca cola is now on a low sugar Advertising Promo diet drive.

    Enjoy your DIET OPTION.

    Why nobody comments on the GREAT USA Export.

    DIET Chewing GUM.?

    Aspartame etc how do you get yours?


  2. Anonymous says:

    0.09.30 – Freemasonry is not a secret society as members are strongly admonished under pain of death not to reveal core secrets lol

    It’s like saying paedophiles aren’t sexual abusers. They just like having sex with the young.

    If freemasonry were not a secret society it would be transparent and members wouldn’t be threatened with death for ‘giving the skinny’ on the truth about freemasonry. He’s trying to come from the angle that because people know of freemasonry and the majority of its ranks are made up of lesser freemasons following orders it’s in the open, but what he’s not telling us is that the 99% of what freemasonry actually is, is kept secret within the inner circle. The outside circle, that of the masses, the willing dupes, the low ranked freemasons is nothing but a smokescreen.



  3. Toad Hall says:

    Difficult to answer on his behalf, but I think he is trying not to stray too far from the hypothesis of the documentary and his research.

    Which is based on the symbolism.

    He is not suggesting he has the answers to Masons or any other secret societies.

    Keep with it, it’s very interesting. I’ve watched the whole thing, in several settings and I thought it was pretty spectacular. I learnt a lot.

  4. salty says:

    A Once Existent Earth Year of 360 days

    360 Days per year: Further Evidence

    In part 1, it was shown that a physical law of proportion, of the same type as that discovered by Kepler, appears to govern the relative transformation of both the earth tropical year and the physical equatorial circumference of the planet. In accordance with the noted law, both of these variables were found to be transformed in direct proportion to one another. Moreover, it was also shown that under an earth year of 360 days with the stated law being operative, the actual (accompanying) equatorial circumference of the earth would have been almost exactly 21600 Ideal Geographical Miles (1 IGM = 6000 feet).
    Such intriguing connections would seem to provide significant support for the view that the earth itself may indeed, as the ancients believed, have once possessed an earth year of exactly 360 days in some remote era. However, is there any still further evidence that could aid confirmation? Most assuredly there is.

    Seconds of Arc & the Orbit of the Moon about the Earth
    Of angular measure, it was stated previously that the basic primary units were in accordance with a base-60 progression i.e. 360 (degrees) x60 > 21600 (minutes of arc) x60 > 1296000 (seconds of arc). However, with the law discovered in the previous section, it would seem quite clear, at the very least concerning the former two sets of figures, that there is indeed a real physical basis to the values as stated.

    Indeed, it has already been shown that the second value of note (21600) has a very real association with the earth, in that it was directly representative of its equatorial circumference in IGM, when the planet possessed 360 days to one complete yearly orbit. With this in mind, were one then to focus upon the number 21600, as an actual circular measure in terms of a real distance unit i.e. the ideal geographical mile, instead of the abstract minute of arc unit, then multiplying this value by 60, would generate a circle, extended into space from the surface of the earth, 60 times greater than the earth’s own physical circumference:

    • Hello Salty
      Something doesn’t feel right to me. Before I explain why, in your last paragraph are you meaning by multiplying the value by 60. means the earths 60 times bigger than they’ve told us? Now that would be interesting if the case

      The reason though im bothered is, above the impression I get above is the equatorial circumference of our earth is about 21600 miles

      I find this concerning, in view of Henrys maths findings in December.
      We managed to discover the maths being used on Atlantean Conspiracy dubay blog was not correct when calculating the earths curvature.

      And while Dubay looks like he initially has a point. And can then proceed with the psyop (I think psyops the case) claiming a flat earth.

      Henry blew this apart with his maths. The earths curvature is much more gentle. But there seems to still be a curvature, but one so gentle Dubays assertions are claiming earths flat. When my strong feeling is now, earth must be much much much bigger, and our UN known area consequently seems flat.

      So your circumference stuff above, cannot be right surely?
      This comment explains the situation better

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.