Why don’t they want you to know about hominoids?

There is good evidence from many parts of the world that human-like large beings exist and live, as they have done for millions of years.  Yet for some reason, the media always ridicules reported sightings, and witnesses occasionally disappear.

Could it be that such clear denial of the theory of evolution is simply too inconvenient to the powerful?

Evolution or Darwinism doesn’t measure up to the facts.  There are no intermediate human-like fossils, which could show we had a common ancestor with apes.  Human life suddenly started in relatively recent times, with no link ever discovered to help Darwin’s much propagated theories.

This film was passed off by the media as a fake.  It is not a fake.  Human origins are curious, but they are definitely not as taught in schools and colleges around the world.  Hominoids are far closer to human in nature than the Neanderthals which Darwinists claim are the last step in the chain from our original ancestors to humans.  See how well the one above walks.

The whole of (hi)story looks like some kind of cover-up, which it is.  Were we genetically engineered out of hominoids, if we didn’t evolve from a common ancestor with apes?  Is that why hominoids have been covered up by the media for centuries.

For more, read pp 156/157 of Everything you know is wrong Book One: Human Origins  by Lloyd Pye.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

16 Responses to “Why don’t they want you to know about hominoids?”

  1. plusone says:

    If you were to lay out a human skelaton next to a great ape skelaton could you seriously argue that these two creatures are not two brances of the same tree?

  2. Tapestry says:

    from the book –

    …after 4.0 million years of supposed evolution, the ultimate distillation of prehuman development was the heavy-boned, massively muscled, rather dimwitted brutes called Neanderthals, who – apart from upright posture – bear no physical relationship to modern humans. That means there is no legitimate way to connect humanity to Earth’s remote past, which means Darwinism does not, cannot and never will explain how mankind got here.

  3. Anonymous says:

    how does the author know that they were rather dimwitted, or brutes, or anything aboht what they were like?
    I suppose my real question is why are people so unbelieving of science yet will happily assume information from books like the one you mention with a much less judgemental attitude.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I read somewhere that Darwin was put up to his theory by powerful interests behind the quest to de- humanify mankind and move away from the idea we were God’s creation, it could be argued that same powerful group are very much in charge of the media and especially childrens tv today, where there is a most unhealthy obsession with bodily functions and the anal area (BBC programmes in particular).

    Apparently Darwin renounced it all on his deathbed.

  5. Tapestry says:

    I saw a comment about the need to be scientific. It has since disappeared, not removed by me. The shills sometimes do that too, I guess. They fear my rejoinders, quite clearly!

  6. Tapestry says:

    The giant skeletons were genuine or not. I am not sure yet.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Giant skeleton is a hoax apparently, digitally edited pictures, been going on for while this hoax and seems to be snow balling.

    http://news.nationalgeographic.co.uk/news/2007/12/071214-giant-skeleton.html

    http://gianthumanskeletons.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/giant-human-skeleton-hoaxes-by.html

  8. Anonymous says:

    So the pictures from the youtube link above is proven to be a hoax but what about this link

    http://gianthumanskeletons.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/two-giant-human-skeletons-recently-were.html

    Anyone got any info on this? looks interesting.

  9. plusone says:

    i posted that comment about the need to be scientific.
    i only asked how the author of the text printed above would know a neaderthal was dimwitted or a brute, and asked why people will question science but don’t question the books such as above with the same vigior.
    it did appear then dissapeared, weird.

  10. Tapestry says:

    The comment also disappeared from my email listings.
    I guess the author was working from brain size. A book has to spin the information a little or it’s not going to read too well.

  11. Tapestry says:

    That’s the key sensitivity of the Illuminati. They’ve lied about Neaderthals ever since, presenting them as the evolutionary pathway from ape-shared ancestry to modern humans. It must be on the instruction sheet of the shills to stop all discussion of the Neanderthals, as we might realise the lie. As if.

  12. Anonymous says:

    http://www.burlingtonnews.net/giants2.html

    i have no doubts they were real, check out mysterious universe.org, some great links on there.

    hope this helps.
    steve.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Soft tissue found in dinosaur bones, carbon 14 found in things supposed to millions of years old, the neanderthal jaw bone wrongly alligned to make it more ape like when in fact neanderthals were fully human, with no more differnce say than a skinny tall African compared to a short stocky Eskimo. Mere diversity, not an evolution stepping stone. Ther truth is evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups and they will do anything to deny intelligent creation. Evolution just cannot stand up to reason or real science which is why it remains an unproven hypothesis. See no inteligence allowed by Ben Stein which documents how teachers and scientists who don’t buy the evolution fairy tale lose their jobs.

  14. Tapestry says:

    I am friends with a history professor, who teaches pre-history. He won’t even reply to my emails or calls if I mention the evidence of previous high technology societies on earth. Why are people paying good money to be taught a load of bollocks?

  15. Toad Hall says:

    Tap: Lloyd Pye gives a major update of his years of research on the StarChild Skull.

    Recorded live at an out door setting under the London night Sky in September 2012, This AMMACH Project Field Report provides a concise summary and hard DNA data on the research on the adult nonhuman skull, misnamed SarChild.
    Taped in front of a small audience at StarChild Sponsor Belinda McKenzie Highgate residence. Interview by Joanne Summerscales, lighting and production by Miles Johnston of the AMMACH Project

    http://youtu.be/F8hsJyYlBz0

    Toady

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.