Is Ken Clarke a member of the Savile/Royalty paedophile ring?

Last night Pete Saunders, chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac), raised the question whether Savile could have been part of apaedophile ring. 

“It’s hard to accept that nobody else wasn’t in some kind of collusion with him. Who gave him a flat at Stoke Mandeville hospital? Who gave him access to vulnerable children in children’s wards?”

“CABINET minister Ken Clarke was dramatically dragged into the Jimmy Savile scandal yesterday. It emerged that BBC pervert Savile was “given the keys” to Broadmoor secure hospital around 1988 — when Mr Clarke was Health Secretary.” Jimmy Savile was given the keys to Broadmoor under Ken Clarke’s watch

The former health secretary Ken Clarke sought to distance himself from the decision yesterday.

Ken Clarke, (left) top UK government minister, reportedly groped boy’s penis.
“I talked about cabinet minister Ken Clarke MP groping my penis through my trousers in political lobbyist Ian Greer’s office. 

“How he gave me alcohol in an attempt to get me drunk. 

“I explained to Jack Malvern that there was even video evidence of the incident as we’d filmed it during our ‘cash for questions’ sting operation for The Cook Report.

“We had a camera in a briefcase which captured the sordid event.”

– Ben Fellows, former child actor

The cabinet office denies these allegations as follows –

The comments are a complete fabrication and highly defamatory. Mr Clarke has never been involved in any incidents of this kind. He was not involved in Cash for Questions – at the time he was a Minister and therefore could not ask questions. He is firmly heterosexual. Like most parliamentarians he vaguely knew Ian Greer but had no dealings with him. The most charitable interpretation is that it is a case of mistaken identity

Ben Fellows.

Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’

October 22, 2012

By Ben Fellows
21st Century Wire
The Jimmy Savile paedophile ring at the centre of the BBC has taken an interesting twist this week as this journalist has come to realise that accusations of child abuse and paedophilia only extend to the deceased.
If you’re a living, breathing human being in the entertainment industry mainstream media won’t expose you. If you are a paedophile or child abuser in the entertainment industry and are famous or powerful you can breath a sigh of relief – you won’t be exposed, at least not by the Murdoch empire.

The Times may have canned the story because of a name tied to SKY.

It all started when I was contacted by Ruth Lewy from The Timesnewspaper on October 16, 2012. She wanted me to do an exclusive interview about my experiences as a child actor when I had run the gauntlet of paedophiles in the entertainment industry. She wanted togive this a great showing” but she would also “want to be the only people you speak to until it appears in print this weekend.” All I asked for in return for giving The Times an exclusive was that the story would definitely run. She agreed to the terms and said that senior Times journalist Jack Malvern would interview me and a photographer would take some pictures of me for the article, which would appear on Saturday the 20th October 2012. So we arranged a time and a place to meet.
Jack Malvern a tall, balding ex-public school boy complete with the uniform of his generation was late to the meeting. When he did eventually arrive he had to go shopping for a new pad! When he did eventually arrive proper, he sat down in front of me at the Novotel in Greenwich and asked me specifically to name names of people who, I alleged, were suspected paedophiles or had abused me in some way while I was a minor.
For the next two hours I sat in the Novotel being interviewed intensely and having only one cup of tea. The deal was that I was happy to name alleged paedophiles and child abusers in the wider industry, based on my own experiences but the story had to run.
What was good about the article, I thought, was that The Times were going to be brave and publish the names of actual living breathing people, rather than dead people like Jimmy Savile or Wilfred Brambell. Famous and powerful people who could argue back, perhaps call me a liar or fantasist in an attempt to clear their name.
I talked about *******(Name redacted at the request of Cabinet Office) in political lobbyist Ian Greer’s office. How he gave me alcohol in an attempt to get me drunk. I explained to Jack Malvern that there was even video evidence of the incident as we’d filmed it during our “cash for questions” sting operation for The Cook Report, we had a camera in a briefcase which captured the sordid event.
I talked about a senior female BBC producer who likes to have sex with teenagers. Or I should say have sex with me when I was a teenager.  I continued with a long list of names of extremely well known actors, casting directors, producers, directors, writers and executives who had all abused me or attempted to abuse me sexually while I was a child actor.
I explained to Jack Malvern of The Times, that I only ever had sexual relations with women however that didn’t stop predatory gay men from attempting to get into my pants. As a child actor you are not responsible for your actions, you’re naïve, vulnerable and quite frankly an idiot, well I was. So, saying no when powerful industry people are telling you to take drugs with the implication that if you don’t – you won’t be hanging around for long, is highly unlikely. It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book and works really on children, now add sex, money and power into the mix and you’re lucky if you don’t spend life after being a child actor in rehab and therapy – of course some do.

So, from the age of 15 I was a regular at Stringfellows, Cafe De Paris and The Atlantic Bar and Grill. I attended many celebrities parties and private functions.
One party was in a house in the New Forest and I must have been around sixteen at the time. At the party was a certain founder of a child protection charity. I was given drugs, alcohol and was propositioned by men and women all night until I ended up passed out in the garden. I eventually got a cab back to my digs in a terrible state. You’d think that for someone who is known for their charitable works protecting children she might insist that this party was for adults only and make me go home or at least keep an eye on me and stop me from drinking – recognising the fact that I looked and was very young.
For consenting adults there is nothing wrong with sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. However, I was a teenager and was being introduced to a very murky world by so called “respectable” industry figures and celebrities.
Now, none of my story seemed to be a problem for Jack Malvern when he interviewed me, he was happy to publish what I said. After the interview I even checked to see if he was happy with what I said. The only issue was that later in the day he wanted to interview my mother about an incident when I was called into a casting for a major drinks company. I gave him my mother’s telephone number, he left two messages which she ignored as she didn’t want to talk to him. My mother never agreed to talk to Jack Malvern which is what I told him when I later informed him that she didn’t want to be interviewed as she’s a very private person and it was her choice. Jack Malvern didn’t seem to think it was an issue and left me with the impression that the article would run as planned on Saturday 20th October 2012.
Of course printed here are just a few stories of the many that I told him. He’d asked for names and I’d given them to him with details only one who was there would know. He even emphathised at one point and told me that my story rang true for him as he’d experienced similar problems with predatory gay men when he was a young journalist or so he told me.
Little did I know that the next BBC person I named was the one that would stop the article from coming out. The person who I am referring to shall remain nameless in this article, however they are a new star of SKY Television.  It seems that Sky have a lot invested in this person and like the BBC stopping the Jimmy Savile Newsnight programme Murdoch et al. have withdrawn an explosive article in The Times that threatened to reveal a far seedier side of their new star than they would like. Drug taking, inappropriate sexual behaviour and child abuse isn’t something the Murdoch empire want revealed.
Now, Jack Malvern of The Times may say that I’m an unreliable person or that they couldn’t corroborate the accusations I was making. But isn’t that what child abuse is all about? There are laws preventing people from making false allegations so why would I lie. In any case they said they’d run the article either with or without the names. So, why didn’t it run? My theory is that they didn’t want to give me the platform of appearing in The Times, just in case I mentioned names at a later date.
The Murdoch empire and BBC are clearly safe havens for child abusers to operate.
A society that takes the position of not believing victims, hiding the truth and protecting abusers for their own personal gain is a sad state of affairs. It is typical of a society gone mad, set up to procure children and to protect paedophiles. In other words children’s well-being comes down to simply politics. If you accuse someone of abuse and they happen to be famous or powerful then tough luck you lose. You won’t be believed, regardless of the validity of your claims by either the state or mainstream corporate media seems to be the message.
The irony is that the Murdoch empire, who has always been quick to name and shame is curiously reluctant when it comes to naming one of its own stars. It appears that the empire is only prepared to expose child abusers and paedophiles as long as it doesn’t affect its own reputation.
We’ve moved on from just phone hacking.
One of News International’s slogans on their Website is “We’re delivering more news, to more people, more often, in more ways than ever”. If the Murdoch press is willing to deny the public vital information which is in their interest to know, like exposing paedophiles and child abusers, then the question has to be – Are News International’s titles worth the paper they’re written on? Or more importantly, are the Murdochs responsible enough to run a media empire influencing millions of people all around the world.
If they’re hiding child abuse, then the answer is no.
Listen to The Ben Fellows Radio Show


from JUSTICE DENIED website –
Around this period Andrea (Davison) also found time to  work tirelessly  to expose pedophiles in the the Police  and in  the Government Such as Lord McAlpine the Tory Treasurer and Tory Derek Laud.  Both were close friends of long-time Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a close friend of Jimmy Savile  who recently was exposed as a pedophile.  She started to work with the then shadow Home Secretary Tony Blair who tried to get the then Home Secretary Kenneth Clark to take action against the Police.   But Clark who years later as Justice Secretary would  make sure Andrea  was prevented from having a fair trial refused to help and instead protected the paedophiles in his Government and in the Police.

Andrea   and  journalist Pete Sawyer continued the exposure through a magazine called Scallywag  who’s  editor    died mysteriously in Cyprus in 1995.  Scallywag  alsoexposed  that MI5 took foreign diplomats to the North Wales homes and secretly filmed them abusing and torturing boys to use the tapes for blackmail. This is a classic Intelligence modus operandi with regard to child abuse by the famous and influential – especially politicians that they want to control.. This all linked covert arms deals and child abuse.

 In Interviews the victims named many police officers  including DC Stephen Winnard of Derby   who later arrested Andrea in 2010,  and senior figures including Jimmy Saville and  Lord McAlpine and all these interviews  were kept  by Andrea.

Then the Tory  Government  ordered  a report  and Mr Jillings from Derbyshire Social Services  was ordered to make a full report into the abuse in Children’s Homes.  But  the Government  refused to publish the  report because it dammed the Police in North Wales and Derby and implicated Government ministers and senior Tory’s.
Then in 1991  the story  broke into the main stream  when the Independent  HTV and Private Eye publiciced the abuse.   Between 1991 and 1993, North Wales Police mounted a huge retrospective investigation and subsequently referred some 800 allegations to the Crown Prosecutions Service.  Fewer than 3% of these referrals proceeded to trial, much to the dismay and mystification of many of the alleged victims and of the adults who knew the extent and nature of the alleged abuse.

 Waterhouse Report Graphic

The North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal of Inquiry was announced in summer 1996 by William Hague, then Secretary of State for Wales.  The announcement followed more than a decade of abuse allegations, counter allegations, police investigations, the conviction of a handful of former social workers, the broken promise of a public inquiry, the suppression of at least one damning report on abuse in children’s homes in North Wales, and mounting public and political concern.   The Waterhouse Tribunal  of  Inquiry was commissioned but  the judge gave immunity from prosecution to all the paedophiles who gave evidence and so was a total whitewash.  The Judge also made it contempt of court for anyone to publish the names of the pedophiles and so the names could never be spoken and lay gathering dust  in Andrea’s home untill  one of the accused DC Stephen WInnard  Seized them. 
  • Stewart Cowan You know Henry, people know that there are paedophile rings full of influential people, who do the most horrendous things to children in secret and cover each others’ backs, but they won’t believe that these same people (if Clarke IS one) could meet together in secret Bilderberg meetings to discuss doing horrendous things politically.
  • Henry Curteis same game. paedophiles. psychopaths.  Satanists. power addiction. war.

    Hear David Icke .  24 minutes onwards.  From comments.  They vampire the energy of children.  It’s rampant in the higher echelons of the power structures that control our societies.  It is rampant amongst politicians.  100s of 1000s of children go missing in the States every year.  They keep the lid on it.  It’s incredible the scale of it.  The media won’t touch it.  The social services won’t touch it.  George Bush.  Edwrard Heath.  Serial killers. 

    The Satanists and the paedophiles get control of the media, politicians, lawyers, the medical hierarchy, social services.  They have a common need to meet out chaos on society.  The state is stealing our children, on the most extraordinary scale, in secret family Courts.  Children taken away from parents for no reason.  It’s happening all over the world. 

    Icke calls it Rothschild Zionism.  This is not anti-Semitism.  Zionism is a political system, a secret society.  You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist.   End of Zionism is peace.  Jewish people want peace.  Rothschild Zionism created Israel.  Israel is not the homeland of the Jewish people.  It is created by a secret society, Rothschild Zionism.

 Esther Rantzen, founder of Childline, said: “Unfortunately, when I heard rumours about Jimmy Savile some time ago, at no stage did I ever come across a child or witness or an adult survivor who actually told me of abuse by Jimmy Savile.”
One woman reportedly warned her about Savile.
Rantzen says that she has no recollection of the conversation.

More on Esther Rantzen

Stuart Syvret, a former health minister in Jersey who exposed allegations of child abuse there in 2007, said: “Undoubtedly Savile will have known senior police officers, other celebrities, people in the BBC. It’s the glue that holds the child abuse cover-up together, that these people protect each other.”
He said he “would be profoundly surprised” if there weren’t a paedophile ring within the BBC.


Kevin Field

Some great stuff on the site Henry, a while back when i was involved with the BBC, they brought out a crap kids prog called tellytubbies, everyone slammed it so the BBC did their own survey and said kids liked it, big surprise there.
Then they said that one of them was a poof because he had lipstick and carried a handbag and that was ok for kids.
The messages from the BBC in its soaps and general progs is that homosexuality is no longer deviant behaviour but mainstream and ok, if you watch the subliminal messaging they will call a man who has a real interest in a girl as “perving” her.
Now when the Jimmy Savile case broke the BBC ran round making sure that he was accused of abusing girls.  All the boys abused were airbrushed out.  Allan Freeman, “fluff” to his freinds used to abuse boys on a regular basis and the BBC pressured google to remove all trace of this . As soon as something came up google would take it down, soon it will be compulsory as predicted by Guy Burgess all those years ago
k Field
BTW larry the lamb was played by a pal of Churchills called Norman something
Doctors Against Racism

I feel i should explain why doctors all around the world from many countries have refused to help Mossad chief Meir Dagan, who is now seriously ill.
This man has countless murders on his conscience including Yasser Arafat jonathan Moyle and princess Diana, and was behind 9/11 ans 7/7 among other false flag attacks.
I belong to a group called “doctors against racism ” we go all over the world into conflicts and povert stricken ghettoes and treat the people, all people without exception, but israel under the guidance of this man Dagan, have refused to allow our doctors into Palestine, they poison the wells, dig over their  fields with armoured buldozers and shoot at ambulances.
As fast as our doctors can dig wells for the people they filled them in again, so that is why no one will treat this mass murderer
The sooner he meets his maker in hell the better 

Dr N Ahmed
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

9 Responses to “Is Ken Clarke a member of the Savile/Royalty paedophile ring?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    David Icke went into detail about the pedo rings and how far up they go (way past the BBC) on his Lion Sleeps No More talk:

    (skip to ~24:00 minutes)

  2. Anonymous says:

    The trouble with Icke is that he’s been listed as a member of the Isle of Wight Freemasonic club; his ex-wife is a total fruitcake with neon MK-Ultra programming written all over her blog profie and Icke get’s his information via his psychiatrist to the stars, who is also his handler. Worryingly, his ex also has a kind of ministry ‘outreach’ to vulnerable children in Far East! As he was a BBC employee before his ‘road to damascus’ experience, it follows that he fits the profile of a disinformation agent by pointing the finger away from himself and handlers whilst also ‘exposing’ truths (or at least some truths). His taking and promotion of Monatonic Gold is also suspect as it is obvious that he is one unhealthy, unfit specimen physcially (if not mentally). There is no ‘love’ emanating from him although he talks a lot about it.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Who is the Sky actor that Old Man Murd is covering for?

  4. Katy Bourne Sussex Police Crime Commissioner under attack over Paedophiles cover up
    Remove Martin Richards as Chief Constable and ask an outside Police Force to investigate corruption and gross misconduct inside Sussex Police Force

    A complaint made against Arun District Council in 2002 that a paedophile ring was operating within the council offices appears to have been interfered with by the Chief Constable who appears to be friends with the ex-Chief Executive of the Council. When the same council then used false documents to bankrupt the author of the statement, Sussex Police failed to take any action. Instead it appears that they actively encouraged the bankruptcy court by writing at very specific hearings denying any ongoing investigation or at the very least minimising their involvement – leaving the defendant in this case looking as though he was either lying or attempting to delay the court proceedings. The judge in the matter eventually lost patience and granted the bankruptcy order. The man’s £500,000 home was then sold for little over half price to the best friend of one of the original investigating officers. He was best man at the friends wedding.

    I’m now told that a new investigation into the Police handling of the original complaint is underway and several serving officers are to be investigated for misconduct.

    However, this second investigation also now appears to have been delayed by further influences from senior officers. The original investigating officer appears to have completely disappeared from the ranks of Sussex Police and is either suspended or on long term sick leave.

    Nick Herbert, the Police Minister was informed at the beginning of this year of the situation by the charity Shelter and promised a full and thorough investigation into Arun District Council and Sussex Police. Nothing has happened other than holding letters being sent out explaining that Sussex Police need more time. MP Peter Bottomley has also been asking questions and so far has nothing to report either.

    Likewise Sussex Police Authority when informed of the situation has asked the Chief Constable to answer the allegation of corruption within the local Police Force. Instead he has passed the matter to the Professional Standards department who are still trying their level best to bury the whole issue. They fail to answer emails or letters.

    Odd isn’t it that this is one of the longest serving Conservative Councils in the country and two Conservative MP’s can’t get answers.

    Or is it that they are afraid the answers will damage their parties reputation ?

    It beggars belief that a statement about a paedophile ring running inside a local authority would not be investigated fully. It further beggars belief that when the council use false documents to bankrupt the man who made the complaint that the Police fail yet again in their duties to uphold the law and not see that the councils action as revenge or worst an attempt to silence any further allegations.

    One is left asking the question ‘ how many children have continued to be abused in Littlehampton/Bognor Regis in the last 10 years since the complaint was originally made?’ Sussex Police need to answer the allegation that they have deliberately refused to investigate friends who work for Arun District Council and they need to be held to account as does the Chief Constable

  5. Just noticed there’s a brief Facebook comment from me. Icke may be telling the truth (this time), but I broadly agree with Anonymous at 1:22am. Icke is generally a disinfo agent. I have absolutely no doubt about it.

  6. Anonymous says:

    how can we report a paedophile named James Deakin who is in the philippine working for a magazine co.???

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.