Blair protected Savile

From Toad Hall

Tap, you might want to start a new thread for this. 

Prime Mininsters Questions today: Labour MP Tom Watson wants an investigation into a powerful paedophile ring in Parliament and people who worked in the past at Downing Street. Don’t forget, it was politicians who shelved “Operation Ore” when it was found politicians, police, and judges were on the list of those downloading child “porn”. 

Watson talks of a powerful paedophile ring with links to Parliament and Number 10.

See youtube clip:

More background on Tom’s Blog:

Also in evening standard just now:

More background on these allegations. Tom Watson said this afternoon that: “The evidence file used to convict Peter Righton, if it still exists, contains clear intelligence of a widespread paedophile ring.”

Peter Righton is a former leading childcare expert who was charged with possession of child pornography and a founder and member of the now-defunct Paedophile Information Exchange, which campaigned for the age of consent to be reduced to four. Righton was convicted of importing child pornography from Holland in 1992. 


That’s not a lot is it.  MPs are bound to try to create a bit of smoke and mirrors around the topic.
Until they start opening up about the real goings-on in detail,  talk of enquiries and investigations is bound to become the daily currency of the political class, desperate to hide who they really are, and what they really do.  A slight stammer from Cameron.  That’s not going to change the culture of power that they are made of.   Watson’s an old pro, who knows how to help take pressure off by giving the appearance of serious enquiry.  Cameron will be grateful for the feed.

T.Stokes London sent earlier –

Tony Blair while Prime Minister put a D Notice on Operation Ore
the US backed investigation into  pedophilia, this was to protect high flyers in Britian from investigation,
one of whom was Jimmy Savile who abused boys and girls for many years.

Tony himself was known as the cross dresser “Miranda ” at college and has a criminal record for worrying men in public toilets, the BBC hid up the sex crimes of people like Jimmy Savile because the BBC is the voice of government.

The disturbed sex life of comedian Frankie Howerd was also covered up by the BBC and the BBC has also been criticised for its very poor record in these matters, its coverage of the food aid convoys to Palestine has been so pro-Israel as to be a joke.

The control of the BBC has always been by the Jews who were behind the cover up.  Edwina Currie is the latest figure to admit she knew about Savile.  The next scandal about to break is how the BBC hid up the Lord Boothby/Cliff Richard/rent boys episode.

Below is the popular and well known actor Raymond Rollet, who in 1961 left a shop with some shirts under his arm.  When stopped by staff he said he was confused,  apologised and offered to pay.  He was convicted at court and fined, but his employers the BBC used this as an excuse and sacked him.  

He took his life same day.  How can the BBC be so lax in one area yet so harsh in another ?

TAP –  It’s odd how Savile was close with all Prime Ministers, including Thatcher, and the Royal family, or ‘The Firm’ as he called them in his interview with Louis Theroux.  Prime Ministers came and went, while Savile was a permanent fixture.  He was more of a government than they ever were.  The suggestion that he handled Prime Ministers on behalf of intelligence services is not totally fanciful.  Who gave Savile his position?

TV keeps running Savile as a problem of the culture of celebrity, a problem from the past, with the problem exclusively to do with Savile.  They said today 2500 people have come forward this month making allegations. No mention of anyone else other than Savile, of course.  Yet they must have recurring names other than his, of famous and powerful people – some as high as you can imagine.

The victims should realise that they’re going to be collected up and shuffled off out of media awareness as soon as possible, no doubt with offers of compensation which will take years to materialise, to buy silence.  The only information that’s going to spill will be on the internet.  Otherwise it will be daily boring waffle sounding the same each day designed to send everyone to sleep, referring only to the ‘JImmy Savile’ enquiries, when paedophilia is a universal of the British system of power.

Victims should set up their own blogs, and release their information on the internet themselves publicly.  The victims must realise by now they can’t trust the BBC or the government, surely.  Get online now.  Forget the offers of money.  Go public.  Or be squashed once more.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

15 Responses to “Blair protected Savile”

  1. Sackerson says:

    TB “has a criminal record for worrying men in public toilets.”

    Prove that!

  2. Anonymous says:

    Proof schmoof….. It’s all coming out…. To the good people it happened to… SPEAK UP! 2012.. A LIGHT WILL BE SHONE ON ALL THE DARKNESS OF THE WORLD… NOW IS YOUR TIME..TELL YOU STORIES

  3. Tapestry says:

    A Charles Lynton was prosecuted – his middle names.

  4. Tapestry says:

    It was posted on here recently. Try search.

  5. Anonymous says:

    bow st magistrates court 1982 , fine£50/ £500 depending where you look, for soliciting…



  6. Anonymous says:

    maybe someone should send all their links to MP mr watson via email..
    just a suggestion… give him a helping hand. digging up this filth and evil..may i suggest someone with some clout,hence not putting myself in the frame…peacensompri

  7. Toad Hall says:

    Well, I see your point tap, I still think it’s important that it was raised and in the public consciousness. My circles via social network are all now looking at alternative news sources, which they don’t normally. So even that is an achievement in my view.

    Here is Nick Davies article ‘The sheer scale of child sexual abuse in Britain’

    The Guardian
    Published April 1998

  8. Robert says:

    We know something is wrong in Government, but the photo of Blair and Saville is a well known made up photoshop hatch job.

    The crosss dressing well if he has a criminal record of course he would not have been an MP, it would have been stopped, as for cross dressing what in the 1960’s fr god sake most men looked like a women.

    I though David Icke has written this and we know he’s on another planet.

  9. Tapestry says:

    ‘well known’? who by. It’s only a scene in a field.

    Blair was prosecuted using his middle names, according to the sources for this.

    The sources for Blair and the Dunblane/paedophile D notice are many and various, including one regional newspaper, and ex-MI5 whistleblowers.

    Icke is a respected researcher. Many of his conclusions go into territory beyond the understandable, unless you read his books or go to his talks, or even then. There are many topics in the world that are hard to explain, the paranormal, and other things which are kept secret from the majority. The sexual manipulation of powerful people by other powerful people requires some understanding of these aspects. Icke dares to go there unlike most.

  10. Toad Hall says:

    This from BBC correspondent on twitter today.

    RT @rosschawkins: CPS tell me they don’t have “paedophile ring” evidence file @tom_watson mentioned at PMQs, CPS Mags case files destroyed after year

  11. treborc says:

    Then show us your source it for you to prove it since your making the accusations.

    Your really are bonkers if you think this would not have hit all the media, the fact is this is another Urban myth you have fallen for, even using his middle name in a court of law he would have had to have given his full name.

    V But even using his middle name no file exists, or of course you can prove me wrong by telling us your source.

    Some how I doubt your able to

  12. Tapestry says:

    So you accept the Dunblane Blair story.

    The use of wrong names for a prosecution has always seemed a little curious. Let’s see if any evidence arrives. The story has been around a long while, with no attempt at denial.

  13. Tapestry says:

    Google/UK legal records –

    ‘He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street Magistrates Court
    for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get
    sexual favour from the other man; little did he know that the toilet was
    being watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away with
    nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover
    who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court
    got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.’

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.