You Won’t Get Chemtrailing Until You Watch It Actually Happening. Then You Will.

I have worked out there’s no point talking to people about chemtrails except when they are actually being sprayed. It’s the progression of the trails into wider trails and then after 20 minutes into clouds that shows people that something odd is happening. They need about twenty minutes watching the sky under instruction, and then anyone can see it.

Once the attack on our living space is understood by enough people, opposition will build and the programme will have to stop. Next time you see chemtrailing in the sky, stop people immediately and show them. It’s the only chance you’ll get to convince your audience. No ridicule, I assure you, if you use this method.

California Skywatch has been observing chemtrails since 2002. Chemtrails were launched in the 1990s. They are secret atmospheric experiments, claims the Discovery Channel. They spray for weeks at a time then the planes disappear entirely for a while, but return again a few days or weeks later. The media that admits what’s going on (not all do) pretend they are geoengineering, designed to slow global warming. I don’t agree.

They are designed to accelerate a worldwide population reduction, by making humans progressively more sick and less able to fight off disease. The trails are 10 micron particulates which affect peoples’ lungs and cause heart and other serious problems.

On heavy chemtrail days, the military advises that families are kept inside, and advise them to shower regularly.

Civilians should be doing the same.

The pollution ends up in water. People should be filtering their water down to half a micron, to ensure all substances in their drinking water are removed. In the UK go to www.itdoesthejob.com and talk to the owner. I recommend this outfit.

Plants for consumption should be grown undercover.

A scientist found twenty times the normal level of aluminium in rainfall following chemtrailing. He also found raised levels of barium.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Responses to “You Won’t Get Chemtrailing Until You Watch It Actually Happening. Then You Will.”

  1. Anonymous says:

    How do they actually do it? Is it in the fuel? Pods attached to the planes? Piped out of the wings from tanks in the fuselage?

  2. Anonymous says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hh5z4a_eGs0&feature=related

    Chemtrail being switched on and off.

    – Me.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Saint’s heart stolen from Christ Cathedral.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17248394

    something we need to know TAP?

    HETT

  4. Anonymous says:

    Hello tap
    could it get any worse?
    Chem Plane ? Crashes In North Los Angeles
    blite13

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwqQhwcGT74&feature=related

    HETT

  5. Anonymous says:

    Excellent report Tap – Its more balanced and less sensational – more likely to win attention and lends to persuation – in my view.

    Appreciate your advice about filtering – but what does this mean in practice . How do you fit filters to routine water supplies in UK houses – are there commercially available products which are easily sourced ?

    Thanks,

    Sean

  6. Anonymous says:

    Sorry – persuasion – too much barium leads to bad spelling …

  7. Tapestry says:

    Read about water filtering in left side column. Call http://www.itdoesthejob.com

    The owner will explain all. Recommended. I have bought five systems for five properties.

  8. Anonymous says:

    http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Geo-politics/Climate-Change-for-National-and-International-Security.htm

    Not qualified to dissect all of this but maybe someone can who has a better understanding of this subject. The section on Geoengineering is enlightening and what does “Solar Radiation management geoengineering concepts indicate that corporations are already engaging in geoengineering research ,in some cases leading to conflict.”, (page 137) actually mean. Hope this is useful.

  9. Tapestry says:

    I don’t buy global warming, let alone geo-engineering being used to supposedly fix it.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.