Wellaware is not boring. It’s misinformation. The section saying David Icke’s son is Richard Branson’s son is so hopeless, it’s laughable. Yet, as far as I can tell, many people are taking this seriously. Someone, who might prefer to remain nameless, sent it into Tap Blog comments today.
The fact that the elites are going to the effort of producing material such as this, at least shows they see David Icke as a threat. What is worrying is that millions of Americans are so easily taken in by such fare.
The actors who doubled as policemen and rioters at Occupy Wall St, and the false negro returning vet chanting ‘This is not a war zone’ (forgotten his name already!) is done to upset opponents of the government into not being sure if they can trust the leaders of the opposition. It’s the same with David Icke. Wellaware1 has a big following. It is well funded. I’ve yet to see anything which is other than total b/s. This kind of material betrays the evil minds who produce it. I’m wellaware. I hope you are!
THE COMMENT from someone who’s bought the wellaware story –
If you want to expose David Icke and all the rest of them this is how you do it. Do not assume that this is a mistake and stop investigating this series, I promise that if you look at this stuff closely enough you will realize the veracity of ALL of it, however difficult it may be to swallow at first. Follow the links…..one video leads to many, many more….the matrix is exposed….All credit for this work goes to Dallasgoldbug, aka Ed Chiarini, founder of wellaware1.com. Please share as much as possible before this entire body of work, which consisted of over 240 videos, is once again censored, as it has already been three times. Get this information while you can…..it is periodically purged…..The new arrival in the Truth Exposed series…..enjoy……http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQgX403h8MQ&feature=plcp&context=C378169aUDOEgsToPDskJ7RNV_KT3aqB57Xe66JA2S
When this was first posted I pointed out I was pretty certain Oathkeeper’s Stewart Rhodes was not Todd Kiel (infrastructure secretary).
The “photographic evidence” is not evidence. What he calls evidence is usually two pictures or video stills side by side and an assertion he makes that they are the same people.
The most scientific he gets is when he has an ear fetish – he likes to compare ears. Sometimes you can’t even see the ears for comparison, covered by hair or the photo is at a distance so you can hardly see it. He pronounces that the ear “fingerprint” is exactly the same.
It’s not impossible for news to be generated using actors. Perhaps there have been cases, and these can be used to sell wider disinformation.
Also, wellaware1’s voice doesn’t sound like someone who is desperate to get the truth out. Too cocky. Not passionate enough.