Another Corpse (or corpses) Discovered Near A Royal Palace

In fact it could be corpses. The news story says only that ‘human remains’ were discovered on the Sandringham Estate by a dog-walker. The Police normally reveal if there is only one corpse or several, but in this case, they are going vague.

That does not assist in public confidence that the whole truth is being told. The Police seem unable or unwilling to give any details. Royal Spokesmen says only that enquiries should be addressed to The Police.

As with the poor reporting about the Gary Speed ‘suicide’ where no confirming details were provided, here again, the public is being asked to trust the media, the Police with nothing to go on. There is a huge police presence at the scene. Are the Police unable to determine anything? Into these voids pours all kind of thoughts and much doubt, and inevitably speculation.

Her Majesty pops out for a quick peek at the murder scene on horseback. The theatre is complete.

Not long ago, a corpse was discovered in a tree near Buckingham Palace three years after the moment of death. The public was asked to believe that the deceased was a crazed royal watcher, and no one noticed his demise. Don’t they know dead bodies do tend to smell a bit? With tens of thousands walking by each day the non-discovery story is high farce. They really do think we are stupid!

News Report

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

7 Responses to “Another Corpse (or corpses) Discovered Near A Royal Palace”

  1. Anonymous says:

    More info

    old corpse
    female – cannot comment on age
    cannot confirm whether she was clothed
    not yet clear if the woman was killed at the scene or taken there after death

    they do sound convinced it was a murder. so if the corpse was clothed there must be clear signs of the means of death.

  2. Anonymous says:

    if it’s an old corpse… and unburied, why was it found by a dog walker (member of public?) and not one of the 150 people who work at Sandringham? It was found just 1 mile from the house and not much further from the stables. Do these people wander about with their noses so high in the air they don’t notice what is at their feet?

  3. Tapestry says:

    Bit distracted dealing with inappropriate people in the Philippines stuffing poisons into my newborn son. I’ll get back onto this tomorrow.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I understand. I read with absolute horror your update on that. Evil. It’s worse because they lied to you. You couldn’t do anything to stop them, other than a home birth, I guess.

    BTW /w regard to this story I don’t think we can rule out the body was planted to be found on 1/1/2012 (11?).

    The body had been decomposing for months. So it’s not just strange the royals and staff did not find and report it with their movements and dogs, it might be considered strange other public dog owners who walked along that public path before this date did not find anything.

    I think people will also ask more questions if the deceased has no known relatives.

  5. Tapestry says:

    The whole thing smacks of managed news. Maintaining a dark cloud over events and distracting people from other things.

  6. Tapestry says:

    Like war with Iran and so on.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Probably right.

    //They will use “traditional methods” of identifying the victim after they could not establish a DNA profile.//

    They can resurrect a mammoth though.

    More and more it looks staged.

    Is world current news this week/month really that much more dramatic than last month though? Is that really the reason to stage a “murder mystery”?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.