Litvinenko Not Killed By Russia

Martina Litvinenko

Ex MI5 Gordon Logan was speaking to me today. We were discussing various aspects of nuclear contamination, and what strategies the elites have for surviving the contamination they are releasing into the environment, such as from Fukushima. He dropped into the conversation that there is no way the Russians assassinated Litvinenko.

As that topic is still very much alive in the media, and the murder is being used to blacken the reputation of Putin, this information is important. Litvinenko had earlier revealed that Romano Prodi, President of Italy, was the senior KGB (FSB) agent in Italy, as declared to the Euro Parliament by his MEP Gerard Batten (UKIP).

Litvinenko’s widow is demanding a full investigation into her husband’s murder with nuclear contamination, using Polonium. The Litvinenko Foundation website seems to have made up its mind in advance that Putin is the guilty party, which defeats the declared stated objective, of finding out whodunnit. She is demanding that Cameron raises the issue of the assassination in his next visit to Moscow.

If Gordon Logan is right, she would do well to reserve judgement as to who killed her husband. Putin is being set up for a war of revenge, and Martina Litvinenko is being used as a patsy.

Gordon Logan will hopefully write more on this topic in the next few days.

There is a pattern. As with Gaddafi being falsely accused of Lockerbie, with him agreeing to concede responsibility to buy off his accusers, and supply Al Megrahi as a scapegoat, this is no doubt building up similar false accusation against Putin, in preparation for taking military action against him, at a later stage in the propagation of NATO’s wars.

Martina’s Appeal

Statement by Martina released on 16 October 2011 in London

Dear Friends,

Last Thursday H.M. Coroner indicated that he is inclined to hold a full inquest into the death of my husband. I am prepared to do whatever it takes to find the truth about the unprecedented act of nuclear terrorism that killed Sasha Litvinenko and endangered the lives of thousands of my fellow Londoners.

To judge from inquests of similar complexity, such as those into the deaths of Princess Diana and the victims of the 7/7 bombings, these hearings may last weeks, if not months. At the very least, my legal costs are likely to run into six figures.

In these proceedings the evidence collected by the Metropolitan Police will be weighed against the story presented by Sasha’s accused murderer and his sponsors, with the unlimited resources of the Russian state at their disposal. I am sure that my legal team is the best in the world, but the reality is that compared to my adversaries I am severely constrained.

Martina, you could be working with the people who killed Sasha, to wrongly accuse others, who they are setting up for punitive military retaliation. That’s why this is all happening now, and has been held in abeyance for so long. With respect, they are using you for their own ends, and deceiving you as to who was responsible for killing Sasha.

This is a Rothschild anti-Putin bandwagon. Oil and resources are their game, not the acquisition of justice.

NEXT

Achtung Fraulein Hitler!
Sie ein den bereich von Herr Farage kommen.

It’s always a good piece of entertainment to watch Nigel Farage tearing chunks of fat from the bloated bureaucracy in the European Parliament on Youtube. I went to ukip.org this morning to catch up on his latest effort, in which he excoriates Barroso and Von Rompuy for firing the Greek and Italian Prime Ministers, yet refusing to permit elections.

‘Who gave you the right?’ he blasts, as they shift around uncomfortably in their seats, and as he verbally buries the Euro ever deeper into the mire. ‘We now a have a German dominated Europe,’ he points out, ‘which many attempted to stop with their blood.’

I was going to link to the session and pass on this excellent performance on to Tap readers, but all ‘Europarl’ Farage videos on Youtube this morning are black screen. Might I recommend a brief trip to www.ukip.org and play the video there. Well worth seeing.

All that’s needed for a follow-up is to read Fulford explaining that Angela Merkel is Adolf Hitler’s daughter.

The horror show is complete, and UKIP’s path to 10% plus is set.

As if that isn’t enough, here’s an example of credible holocaust denial. Germany should be made free of much of the guilt she holds about the war.

Reading Webster Tarpley’s unauthorised biography of George Bush, it is obvious that Hitler only came to power as he was supplied with guns by the Harriman/Bush network, and financed by the Bushes to overthrow the German Constitution. He believed he was being recruited to suppress communism in Germany, but was then manipulated into war by his bankers, who then changed sides and backed the Soviets against him, ensuring not the suppression of socialism and communism, but their growth. He was lifted out from Berlin as his reward for his part in destroying German independence, and the British Empire, on behalf of the Rothschilds.

The elites manipulate us to this day, still working to suppress nationality, commerce and democracy. The collapsing Euro is bringing in a Europe of unelected authoritarians. The Sovietisation of western Europe is happening. The Hitlers, descendants of the Rothschilds, are at it again.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

14 Responses to “Litvinenko Not Killed By Russia”

  1. Anonymous says:

    I don’t know about this Hitler’s daughter stuff, it tars bloggers of the right with the crackpot brush – true or not. Its a pity the right of Britain can’t federate in some way to provide a noteworthy non parliamentary opposition. First they would have to gain the courage to recognise themselves as allies and to do that they must totally reject the restraints of political correctness and defy the desire to retain some sort of establishment honour. Their is no honour left in the establishment they are too well conditioned and too timid
    ‘Telling the truth in a time of universal deceit is a revolutionary act’ – Orwell.

  2. Tapestry says:

    Fact is stranger than fiction. This blog is interested in the truth, not what is socially acceptable in British middle class dinner parties. In that world there is no truth visible. Bloggers are forced to start from scratch.

  3. Anonymous says:

    “As if that isn’t enough, here’s an example of credible holocaust denial.”

    To begin with it was assertion only.

    There is chemical evidence of gas chambers having been used due to residue left on the walls. There was plenty of ventilation to remove the gas, and presumably they could have used gas masks. They did not leave these buildings beside “pavements” so the doors did not need to be air tight. How many did they kill using gas? They had installed industrial incendiary ovens.

    His figure of 200,000-300,000 killed is not even supported by David Irving in an old youtube video you once posted. Can’t remember the number he said but I though the million word was used.

  4. Tapestry says:

    A numbers auction isn’t going to mean a lot. If there are counter arguments, who are your sources?

  5. Anonymous says:

    I can’t remember, and I’m not going to research. Fact is, genocide level crimes happened even if you only believed 200,000 died, which is a gross underestimation. You can call it a holocaust if you like.

    Look at what you’re doing. On the one hand you’re saying Merkel is Hitler, which is a powerful rhetorical statement. On the other you are attacking the very foundation of this statement, which is Hitler’s role in the holocaust.

    You can’t have it both ways. Either the degree of Hitler’s crimes was much more evil than his contemporaries Churchill, Stalin, Truman etc. or he wasn’t.

    If you’re saying Hitler was innocent then so is Merkel.

    Time to grow up about the holocaust. It’s a rhetorical discussion only and you are no better than the Rothschilds in exploiting the victims if you want to somehow spin it to your advantage.

    – Me

  6. Tapestry says:

    No spin.

    Merkel plausibly could be Hitler’s daughter. Hitler plausibly did not carry out the deliberate execution of six million Jews in gas chambers. But it is necessary to convince the British and others that Hitler was the equivalent of Saddam or Gaddafi. We sacrificed our empire to defeat Hitler in a war he didn’t even want. That fact had to be papered over.

    Once the facts are established, then the interpretation can begin.

    You are trying to say that facts are flexible to suit an argument, Me.

    I don’t agree.

    The relevance to today is that Hitler was put in place and manipulated to get involved in a war, by people who trained him and financed him and supplied him with weapons etc. (British and American)

    Merkel today is put in place to supervise the ending of national soveriegnty in Europe’s nation states in similar vein. The Euro crisis is being used to that end.

    Farage sees the process and complains about it in an impressive way, but even he would be unlikely to realise that the whole game is planned out years in advance to bring the EU into a totalitarian structure, just as WW2 did the same for many European countries. The central bankers don’t want democracy. They want total power over humanity, and are seeking to reduce the numbers of people as part of their creation of the totalitarian state they desire.

    6 billion or more people could die as a result if their schemes.

  7. Anonymous says:

    //Merkel plausibly could be Hitler’s daughter. Hitler plausibly did not carry out the deliberate execution of six million Jews in gas chambers.//

    You’re arguing with the Invisible Most Extreme Rothschild in the room because I didn’t say this. Who says 6 million were gassed? I don’t think mainstream historians say this.

    As someone who’s not totally researched the issue much since A-Level, and various history books since, I’m of the impression anywhere between 3-5 million died, a fraction of whom were killed in concentration camps, a subset of whom were gassed. Perhaps 1 million were gassed. Others had to dig their own graves before they were shot. Others were shot on the edge of villages and towns during ethnic cleansing.

    Rwanda showed these terribly high numbers are possible. So did the Armenian genocide, when about 1 million Armenians were shot. In comparison, the Germans were a well organized army and had more time to carry out genocide.

    //You are trying to say that facts are flexible to suit an argument, Me.//

    Maybe I wasn’t succeeding because I wasn’t trying?

    I’ve shown a clear contradiction in your argument. You can’t have Hitler innocent of the holocaust and then expect the reader to get scared at Merkel for being Hitler’s daughter.

    Just doesn’t make sense. And putting it in the same post makes it really obvious.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, This is the question I did ponder, Why did Tony Blair have a law passed to make it a crime in this Country to say the holocaust never happened.
    Recently through your blog I found out he is in fact a jew, so there is the answer.
    No democratic debate on the subject.
    Thought holocaust, was burning by fire, like the firestorms in Germany.

  9. Tapestry says:

    Blair did all the Zionists demanded of him and more.

    Me, you don’t follow the argument about the Hitlers. In both cases they advance the Rothschild cause of spreading world communism. Start there with your consequential analysis. The creation of the ‘holocaust’ narrative was a Rothschild device. I am asking readers for a deeper understanding of the period than the ‘Hitler was scary’ kiddies perception, itself a wartime narrative created to facilitate the creation and prosecution of war. Look above the way history is taught, to the fact we now know there was a higher cabal coordinating the war on all sides. From my perspective, it makes the wars much easier to understand, and the pieces of the jigsaw at last start to fit.

  10. Anonymous says:

    You don’t try to explain your argument. it is not immediately apparent that you come from best of intentions though i suspect you do.

    Even if photographic evidence is of the 200k only sociopath could make light of what happened. As it was bish didn’t seem that confident it was as low as 200,000. Sure there is manipulation of history, not disagree with that, however the facts are still appalling on all variations. Using rhetoric such as holocaust didn’t happen is percieved as uncaring and anti-jewish rather than anti-Zionist.

    On another subject
    http://www.youtube.com/v/KhnKHtfCeRo

  11. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, How come all the talk of Murder in the war centers on Jews.
    Far more Christians were done in, how come they are not even mentioned. Is this the propaganda you talk of. Like how Americans won the war. Like everybody else was rubbed out of the picture.

  12. Anonymous says:

    //Hi Tap, How come all the talk of Murder in the war centers on Jews.//

    Ethnic cleansing. They were singled out and rounded up into camps.

    That’s why.

    Also, I’ve heard talk of there being many other casualties in addition to the victims of the genocide/holocaust.

    The general principle is likely to be: when Jews talk about WWII they are most interested in the holocaust because it directly affected their family history, but when non-Jews talk about WWII they cover other aspects of the war more?

    The Rwandan and Armenian and Greek genocides happened. So did the Jewish. The Jewish genocide was engineered by globalists like IBM and Prescott Bush. That’s what should be emphasised.

    You’re just creating cognitive dissonance scaring children with Merkel daughter of Hitler, then claiming the Holocaust didn’t happen, which make the reader wonder if you think Hitler was less evil than Churchill (fire bombing of Dresden) and Truman (atomic bombing of Japan).

  13. Tapestry says:

    That’s the idea. to get people thinking. sorry about the cognitive dissonance.

  14. Anonymous says:

    How the actions of International Jewry in destroying our economies, society, morals, race and families taught me to beging to admire much of Adolf Hitler. It wont be coming out in a bookstore near you soon. It is however becoming the popular view.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.