Ten Years On – 911 Explained.

Look carefully at the plane’s underbelly. What’s that lump doing sticking out of the bottom? See the video at the end for the explanation. It will surprise you.

I was sent this web address by a reader, and if anyone ever doubted whether 911 was a fabricated false flag event, with the events that happened being very different to the ones we were told at the time, this should help them make up their minds.

In confirmation watch what happened to the flight crews who never returned.

You can watch a long video needing an hour or so and see it all explained if you want, or spend just two minutes viewing these visual explanations of why the imagery of the towers being hit by planes are the work of computer graphics.

(The only problem might be that these films are themselves a deception, put out to confuse.  Yet who would do that and why?  With even MSM now starting to admit that 911 should be approached ‘with an open mind’ (Fox News), I am taking these films as genuine for the time being.)

There are a lot more details in the video, but this is enough for most people to see.  Things like how could the cockpit of the plane hitting the South Tower reappear intact and in line of flight, after passing through a steel building?  The networks realised this error and removed the clip from their archive and blanked the picture on 911 itself by covering it over with a banner, but many Americans had already videoed the error.

http://septemberclues.info/wtc_airplanes.htm

In some copies of the event, the smoke is white.  In others it is black.  Similar views of the towers have different backgrounds.  The number of inconsistencies concerning the images are so great, there is no point me listing them all out here.

Take your time with this.  It is an emotional journey to go through, which is fascinating and depressing all at the same time.  This was an act of war, in which many people died.  That in itself makes this hard to watch, but you owe it to yourself not be taken as a fool by the media.  Form your own conclusions, but at least look at the evidence.  And as I say, take your time.

Also from septemberclues is the estimation that the number of casualties in the towers was far lower –

Fortunately, a little solace may be found in the latest findings of this research : it is gradually emerging (see the Vicsim Report) that the list of 9/11 victims (approx. 2,928) is a mostly forged database of fictitious identities and forged/morphed photographs. 


Study the evidence.  Take your time.  I found the evidence compelling, especially when juxtaposed alongside many eyewitness reports which said they saw no planes, that they heard explosions, and some say they heard a missile.



Here is the detailed footage showing the reasons why the plane impacts are fake which the whole world believed to be a real event changing history at the time, including me.





FROM NORTH TRUTHSEEKER –


I didn’t know that Fox News has released information demonstrating 9/11 to be a scam.  One third of Americans now believe it to be so, which is another reason why The Tea Party is gaining ground.

TAP – The pulling of WTC 7, without any impact from any plane, missile or device, is the starting point for many sceptics. Once Flight 93 was shot down by a pilot disobeying orders, there was no cover story for how there was a plane available to crash into the building. WTC 7 was intended to be hit by a ‘plane’ like the Twin Towers, making it three impacts in New York City.


Fox News viewers, America’s most conservative and typically, most volatile “news junkies” are now being told that the 9/11 investigation was a coverup and the Building 7 demolition is proof of a massive conspiracy.  For America’s #1 news source to go this far, not on one show but two of their top rated journalists, Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera, has been a serious blow for all those who supported the Bush administration and believed in the “war on terror.”

No other network, no newspaper is touching this story, this “third rail” which debunks two wars, debunks “Osama bin Laden” and makes the case for America being a nation of dupes.  It doesn’t just stop at America.  Most of the world got “sucked in” on 9/11, buying in on an even that now has gone from historical milestone as a disaster to the greatest scam in world history.

Bush admissions, though it is doubtful he understand the nature of such admissions and the criminal implications, over Iran and his willingness to send Americans to a hopeless war for his personal aggrandizement are only part of a pattern of which 9/11 itself was a part.  If, as Fox News claims, Building 7 was a controlled demolition, then all of 9/11 was staged.  Any other assumption is insane.







So what killed the missing air hostesses?





AMERICA’S “WAR ON TERRORISM”
by Michel Chossudovsky
ISBN 0-9737147-1-9  (2005)
387 pages.
Global Research Online Price: US$14.00  (Retail $19.95)  
NEW: The Book is now available in pdf format at US $8.25 (scroll down for details)

In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky’s 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by “Islamic terrorists”.  Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.
The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy.
According to Chossudovsky, the  “war on terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “war on terrorism” is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World Order”, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.
September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

For a detailed assessment of when Bin Laden actually died, go to Osama Bin Elvis, an American Spectator article from 2009.











Pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane.

Graphics creation explained in more detail –

Here is a long explanation on how the missing passengers on 911 were liquidated.

Here is another bizarre clip of the plane approaching the tower where the software gets confused and first makes the ‘plane’ disappear behind the tower, until it suddenly reappears and disappears again just before something impacts the tower. This betrays the method used to convert the flying ball into an image of the plane, using the same kind of software that created the movie Avatar. Except here in 2001, rushing to get TV pictures out quickly, it malfunctioned.

Me explains –

on the close up you can see the light halo around the plane that has been graphically added to the background without the colours matching perfectly.

Notice also the whole footage as edited to just a few seconds before impact to minimise the amount of editing they had to do to hide the ball.

At 10-13 seconds in, continuing with the close-up slo-mo, the plane disappears, but you can still just make out a ball shape continuing toward the tower.

It is so dark in the shadow they haven’t bothered to add wings.

It gets particularly weird around 12-14 seconds when the ball seems to disappear then a plane shape reemerges into the light slightly higher than it was.

Before impact the ball becomes most visible at the back of the plane. It doesn’t look like a tail wing, the back of the plane has a round shaped attached to it.

On entry there is little damage until the ball goes in, and then the first sign of smoke is from a ball-shaped hole.

Also, the explosion on entry is in a different place (closer to the edge) than on the other close up CNN video.

TAP – the explosion looks much smaller in this clip (which was no doubt abandoned) than on the fully worked up versions.

UPDATE – In this video, the North Tower shows a flash before the plane ‘impacts’ the building. The slo-mo also enables you to wonder how the airoplane’s wings flew intact through the steel shell of the WTC, with nothing breaking off.

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Responses to “Ten Years On – 911 Explained.”

  1. Me says:

    I’ve found another video with possible poorly-hidden footage of the ball on it.

    Someone might want to mirror this before they pull it. Don’t know how myself. Has been viewed 12 million times though.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8u-I0GWs4&feature=related

    It’s claimed to be a rare view of 2nd hit from long distance. but it is an obvious fake.

    First, on the close up you can see the light halo around the plane that has been graphically added to the background without the colours matching perfectly.

    Notice also the whole footage as edited to just a few seconds before impact to minimise the amount of editing they had to do to hide the ball.

    At 10-13 seconds in, continuing with the close-up slo-mo, the plane disappears, but you can still just make out a ball shape continuing toward the tower.

    It is so dark in the shadow they haven’t bothered to add wings.

    It gets particularly weird around 12-14 seconds when the ball seems to disappear then a plane shape reemerges into the light slightly higher than it was.

    Before impact the ball becomes most visible at the back of the plane. It doesn’t look like a tail wing, the back of the plane has a round shaped attached to it.

    On entry there is little damage until the ball goes in, and then the first sign of smoke is from a ball-shaped hole.

    Also, the explosion on entry is in a different place (closer to the edge) than on the other close up CNN video.

  2. Me says:

    this might not be anything significant but compare the explosion on the right side of the tower in this video to the explosion on the next one
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5NNh6WnVZo&feature=related

    they seem different. in the one above the explosion along its face is almost simultaneous, whereas in the one below (20 seconds) a bit further away goes off, blowing a whole, without flame, then a bit closer goes off apparently noticeably later, blowing another whole, and flame pours out from there.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8u-I0GWs4

  3. Me says:

    I cannot spell “hole.”

    Here’s another link of interest

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc

    Shows how to use animation software to fake a plane crash.

  4. Tapestry says:

    Hi Tap

    Great stuff on your site today re. 9/11. Thank you for that.

    Regarding a change in the MSM’s reporting on 9/11, I too have noticed some subtle and some more overt changes just recently.
    Even on the BBC someone referred to, or announced an up-coming programme on this subject and to my amazement followed his bog standard announcement by adding a very barbed comment about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that had cost yet more lives. I only wish I had been recording it.

    As for Fox News (which I don’t see) and SkyNews also, which I do watch, I’ve noticed subtle changes in their reporting recently.
    I believe these companies are Murdoch owned. Could it be perhaps that the Murdoch owned organisations are no longer willing to
    “play ball” after loosing the BSkyB takeover and being hauled over the coles on phone hacking, I wonder ?

    Kind Regards

    Gillian

    Ps. Just a quick thought on Benjamin Fulford and the White Dragon Society. It would be good news if it is true! Time will tell
    no doubt. But if the elite do come under attack from the WDS aren’t they just going to sell it to the public as the West coming
    under attack from the Chinese and Japanese?

  5. Tapestry says:

    The White Dragon is apparently allied with White Knights from inside the system on our side of the world.

    Fox and Sky know that a significant section of viewers are aware about false flag terror. They are hedging their bets, and don’t want to be caught on the wrong side when the perpetrators are strung up. They are of course totally guilty.

  6. Twig says:

    Things that make me sceptical of the conspiracy theories, are:
    1. When they contradict each other, as in “there was no flight 93” and “…it was shot down by the USAF…”.

    2. It’s as easy to add an anti gravity ball as it is to add a plane.

    3. As previously stated, the musical soundtracks that accompany the conspiracy clips.

    4. Last, but not least, when there’s a book to sell.

    Having said all that I retain an open mind, but so far I am intrigued although unconvinced by the various pieces of “evidence” and their accompanying theories.

    1. See this
    2. For those who prefer a clip with a musical soundtrack

    “To a man with a hammer everything looks like a nail”

    Search YouTube for “9/11 Debunked” to challenge some of the theories.

    WV: Contray

  7. Twig says:

    The first hyperlink in my previous comment was corrupted during cutting and pasting, clear evidence that the conspiracy theorists are trying to suppress dissent.

    Try this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

  8. Twig says:

    Can any of you hear what this chap is saying at the end of the clip? It’s too quiet on my pc even with the volume on 100%.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMqgFaNvoP8&NR=1

  9. Me says:

    Tap, there was a fly-by UA jet at the time of the second attack.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc0E6wTgb5Q&feature=related

    From the September Clues video which is an essential watch from start to finish.

    Other video images of what could pass for a ball.

  10. Twig says:

    Info about the structural failure.
    http://www.nwodetox.info/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.