New 911 Audio Recordings Appear Ten Years Late

Wolf laughing over a good job well done….all evidence that showed 911 to be an inside job, carefully ignored

From ‘Me’ in comments…

What do we make of the newly released 9/11 audio recordings purportedly from the plane cockpits? They faked the bin Laden video so it wouldn’t surprise me if this was faked.

That said, there apparently are victims missing from three flights that day, right? So something must have happened to the planes. They did not crash into WTC 2, which was hit by a ball, Pentagon, which was hit by a missile, and perhaps not WTC 1 either.

Evidence from air traffic controllers was actually destroyed prior to 9/11 commission.

“FAA manager destroyed 9/11 tapes
by Matthew L. Wald,
The New York Times

May 6, 2004

WASHINGTON, May 6 — At least six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, made a tape recording that same day describing the events, but the tape was destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it, the Transportation Department said in a report today.

The taping began before noon on Sept. 11 at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center, in Ronkonkoma, on Long Island, where about 16 people met in a basement conference room known as “the Bat Cave” and passed around a microphone, each recalling his or her version of the events a few hours earlier.”

What facts did THOSE tapes have on them?

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

6 Responses to “New 911 Audio Recordings Appear Ten Years Late”

  1. Tapestry says:

    There were no bodies to be found at the only crash site where an aircraft was found – Flight 93. It seems likely that any missing passengers and crew were disposed of in another way.

  2. Me says:

    Here’s a scenario. Just a hypothesis.

    Perhaps the terrorists who were training at flight school thought they were hijacking a plane with a bomb on board (or actually took a bomb on board) for traditional reasons terrorists used to hijack planes – not to fly them into buildings but to make political demands.

    They were then told to fly their hijacked planes to airbases where their demands were to be considered. They did that, but their demands weren’t met and the terrorists blew up the planes, or they were blown up for them.

  3. Tapestry says:

    very good analysis, georgesilver. thanks.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, this is not your topic but please check it out if you have time.
    Ben Fulford’s Sequel Sep. 6, 2011 The Secret Meeting Of “57”

    9-9-11 Ben Fulford Dr Van de Meer predicts monetary collapse of US starting Sept 30

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.