Evolution Is Nuts

Tap, here is something else that may interest you.

Hoyle was convinced that evolution was nonsense. He famously compared it to shaking a jar full of watch parts and thinking that if you shook the jar for long enough you would get a watch. The theory of evolution simply is inadequate. It can explain some things but it can’t explain everything by a long chalk.

The theory of evolution survives for ideological reasons. not biological ones. Of course they refuse to apply evolution theory to social and cultural matters where radical disfunctionality is being imposed by political correctness, and ancient, successful cultural forms are being abolished in favour of egalitarian, Marxist ones with no evolutionary survivability.

The result is of course a low birth rate and millions of patients with stress and depression in the doctor’s waiting rooms. The birth rate is kept down by means of a toxic children’s kulcha that makes one child all most parents can stand.

Best regards,

Gordon

TAP – Gordon, look no further than the high intake of sodium fluoride for the huge rates of depression in the USA – 20 million addicted to anti-depressants, themselves adding to the fluoride load, which messes up the pineal gland that controls mood and sleep.

We(The Tap Family!)’re about to have another child, due in three months!!! The kulcha hasn’t hit us yet. But that’s probably because we live a lot of the time in the Philippines where babies and mothers are first class citizens. Dads do alright too with nannies, cooks, maids, drivers, relatives and friends all willing to help with the first few years of a baby’s life. In the UK you’re on your own, sure enough, and baby-making is very hard work. That’s why they make visas almost impossible for genuine relationships, to keep access to the poor world where breeding is much easier, to a minimum. Only the corrupt get through.

UPDATE from Wikipedia –

Rejection of chemical evolution

In his later years, Hoyle became a staunch critic of theories of chemical evolution used to explain the naturalistic origin of life. With Chandra Wickramasinghe, Hoyle promoted the theory that life evolved in space, spreading through the universe via panspermia, and that evolution on earth is driven by a steady influx of viruses arriving via comets. In 1982, Hoyle presented Evolution from Space for the Royal Institution’s Omni Lecture.

After considering what he thought of as a very remote probability of evolution he concluded:
“ If one proceeds directly and straightforwardly in this matter, without being deflected by a fear of incurring the wrath of scientific opinion, one arrives at the conclusion that biomaterials with their amazing measure or order must be the outcome of intelligent design. No other possibility I have been able to think of… ”
—Fred Hoyle, [13]

Published in his 1982/1984 books Evolution from Space (co-authored with Chandra Wickramasinghe), Hoyle calculated that the chance of obtaining the required set of enzymes for even the simplest living cell was one in 1040,000. Since the number of atoms in the known universe is infinitesimally tiny by comparison (1080), he argued that even a whole universe full of primordial soup would grant little chance to evolutionary processes.

He claimed:
“ The notion that not only the biopolymer but the operating program of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial organic soup here on the Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order. ”

Hoyle compared the random emergence of even the simplest cell to the likelihood that “a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.” Hoyle also compared the chance of obtaining even a single functioning protein by chance combination of amino acids to a solar system full of blind men solving Rubik’s Cube simultaneously.[14] (See the watchmaker analogy for similar reasoning.)

Hoyle’s statements and this line of reasoning (at various levels of accuracy) appears frequently in support of intelligent design. Mainstream evolutionary biology rejects Hoyle’s interpretation of statistics, and supporters of modern evolutionary theory, such as Richard Dawkins, refer to this as “Hoyle’s fallacy”.
[edit]

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

7 Responses to “Evolution Is Nuts”

  1. Me says:

    “The theory of evolution survives for ideological reasons. not biological ones. Of course they refuse to apply evolution theory to social and cultural matters where radical disfunctionality is being imposed by political correctness, and ancient, successful cultural forms are being abolished in favour of egalitarian, Marxist ones with no evolutionary survivability.”

    Um, it’s physically impossible to apply evolution! It’s something that only happens to you! What occurs in petri-dishes and computers was itself influenced by evolution.

    I agree evolutionary theory cannot explain everything but it has, and will be, effectively applied to understanding of human affairs in a non-eugenics sense.

    I suspect evolutionary theory is destined to become considered something like Newton’s theory of gravity which was disproven but still remained useful in practice.

  2. Tapestry says:

    Darwin’s book was called ‘the origins of species’ from memory. Thta is being thoroughly contested here.

    Tesla said that gravity, magnetism and electricity were all one force. The sense of his notions has to be denied to stop the world from realising we could get electricity from the environment without the need for generation, fuels and wires.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Hi Tap, Again, this is not your topic, but I really wanted to let you know. CNN video “With home now nothing but ashes, Texas family vows to rebuild” By Rich Phillips, CNN September 7, 2011 8:25 a.m. EDT http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/09/06/texas.fires.family/index.html
    In this video, I found very strange scenes. When the home owner came to see her house, she found two small oak trees just in front of her house were intact with beautiful green leaves. Her house was completely burned down to the ground. Nothing left around her house. But still her lawn was beautifully green, too. CNN reporter showed the direction the fire came. He said the fire cross the highway which was a quarter mile away from her house. I could not see anything burned between highway and her house. All the trees and weeds were green. Even two wooden chairs were intact. I want you to check this CNN video to see this is normal. I feel this fire was manipulated, and the burned places were selected rather than random. Thank you.

  4. wasp says:

    I READ A BOOK MANY YEARS AGO ABOUT A SECRET NAVAL EXPERIMENT,& INVISIBILITY TELE TRANSPORTATION WHICH THEY, THEY LATER DENIED BUT SURROUNDED IN A CLOAK OF SECRECY.
    THIS EXPERIMENT CARRIED OUT BY NIKOLA TESLA RELATING TO UNIFIED FIELD THEORY PROJECT RAINBOW, BETTER KNOWN AS THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT, WHICH INVOLVED MAKING THE SHIP,U.S.S. ELDRIDGE INVISIBLE. H.F. GENERATORS HEAT UP THE SURROUNDING AIR & WATER TO PRODUCE A GREEN GLOW, RENDERING THE SHIP INVISIBLE , BUT TELE TRANSPORTATION WAS SAID TO HAVE OCCURRED. TESLA WAS ONE OF THE GREATEST SCIENTISTS EVER TO HAVE LIVED, WELL AHEAD OF HIS TIME MUCH OF HIS WORK HAS BEEN ATTRIBUTED TO EINSTEIN, & MARCONI.
    WHO WAS ACCREDITED BY JP MORGAN, WHO TESLA WORKED FOR, WITH THE PATENTS,FOR TESSLA’S INVENTIONS 30 YEARS AFTER HIS DEATH. IN SHORT, JP, OF CITY BANK RIPPED HIM OFF. HIS UNIFIED FIELD THEORY WOULD HAVE MEANT FREE ENERGY.ONE OF THE MANY CONSEQUENCES OF THIS EXPERIMENT WAS THAT ITEMS SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUSTED, IF THEY SUCCEEDED IN BENDING TIME & SPACE THEN, GOD KNOWS WHAT THEY CAN DO NOW. DOESN’T HIGH FREQUENCY WAVES & HEATING EFFECTS SUGGEST H.A.A.R.P ACTIVITY, ALSO AN INVENTION OF TESLA.

    REGARDS ……. WASP

  5. wasp says:

    INTERESTING POINT ‘Me’ RELATING TO CLASICAL & QUANTUM MECHANICS. WAVE PARTICLE DUALITY SPRINGS TO MIND, WHERE THE ELECTRON USING THE BOHR RUTHERFORD THEORY, CAN BE CONSIDERED A POINT CHARGE, WHILST THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION REPRESENTS THE ELECTRON, AS A SMEARED OUT CHARGE WITH A STATISTICAL PROBABILITY OF DISRIBUTION, IT THEN GETS VERY COMPLICATED, FOR THE MULTI ELECTRON ATOM, DUE TO SHEILDING EFFECTS & INTERACTIONS.
    WHICH IS ABOUT WHERE WE ARE AT
    WHEN CONSIDERING, FRED HOYLE & RICHARD DAWKINS, FRED HOYLE WAS LIKE TESLA AHEAD OF HIS TIME, & WHAT HE DID WITH WATCH PARTS, IS SIMILAR TO THE CLASSICAL EXPERIMENT OF BLACK & WHITE BEADS SHAKEN IN A TIN, THEY WILL ONLY INCREASE THE HOMOGENIETY OF THE SYSTEM. THIS INCREASE IN ENTROPY WILL NEVER PRODUCE TWO DISTINCT LAYERS OF BEADS. AN ORCHESTRA WITHOUT A CONDUCTOR IS IN CAPABLE OF FUNCTIONING,IN THE SAME WAY A DEVINE INTERVENTION MUST HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO GET THE SYSTEM GOING,IT COULD NEVER OCCURRED THROUGH EVOLUTION. EVOLUTION IS THE CULLING PROCESS TO DECREASE THE UNVIABLE VARIENTS, BUT DAWKINS WOULD DENY THIS.

    REGARDS ……… WASP

  6. Tapestry says:

    Most real science such as Tesla’s is suppressed for commercial reasons. We are taught an impossible nonsense at school and university, which has been created to hide what would otherwise enable us to live without oil, electricity generation and distribution by wire and so on. The scientists who become famous are the ones willing to create theories that the corporations approve of, carrying on the original deceptions.

    Medical science is exactly the same, which is why cancer is so rife, and still not curable. Yet the disease hardly exists in the rural areas of the third world where the diet includes the necessary vitamins for cells to defend themselves.

  7. Tapestry says:

    I just found a bunch of perfectly good comments in spam, no doubt directed there to stop them being found….

    some with interesting links to follow up.

    if your comments get blocked, use my email under my profile.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.