More On How The Elite Is Deliberately Crashing The Market

Loads and loads of trouble blogging today.
Full-on interference with editing, pictures, links, hit-counter –
You name it. They’re at it.

I apologise for the lack of spacing in this post. I’ve been in and edited it three times. It reverts immediately to its raw downloaded version (now sorted by reverting to earlier versions of google – but pictures still not uploading).

Oh well, using the yardstick that they only interfere when you are exposing the real truth, this seems to be confirmation that the stuff we’re writing and finding these last few days is on the mark. Please read the post despite the lack of spacing. It’s done to stop you. Don’t let it.

The Dubious S&P Downgrade Many commentators questioned the validity of the downgrade that threatened to be another Lehman Brothers. Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, said in a statement: “The Treasury Department revealed that S&P’s decision was initially based on a $2 trillion error in accounting. However, even after this enormous error was corrected, S&P went ahead with the downgrade. This suggests that S&P had made the decision to downgrade independent of the evidence. [Emphasis added.]

Paul Krugman, writing in the New York Times, was also skeptical, stating: [E]verything I’ve heard about S&P’s demands suggests that it’s talking nonsense about the US fiscal situation. The agency has suggested that the downgrade depended on the size of agreed deficit reduction over the next decade, with $4 trillion apparently the magic number. Yet US solvency depends hardly at all on what happens in the near or even medium term: an extra trillion in debt adds only a fraction of a percent of GDP to future interest costs . . . . In short, S&P is just making stuff up — and after the mortgage debacle, they really don’t have that right. In an illuminating expose posted on Firedoglake on August 5, Jane Hamsher concluded: It’s becoming more and more obvious that Standard and Poor’s has a political agenda riding on the notion that the US is at risk of default on its debt based on some arbitrary limit to the debt-to-GDP ratio. There is no sound basis for that limit, or for S&P’s insistence on at least a $4 trillion down payment on debt reduction, any more than there is for the crackpot notion that a non-crazy US can be forced to default on its debt. . . . It’s time the media and Congress started asking Standard and Poors what their political agenda is and whom it serves. Who Drove the S&P Agenda?

Jason Schwarz shed light on this question in an article on Seeking Alpha titled “The Rise of Financial Terrorism”. He wrote: [A]fter the market close on Friday August 5th, we received word that S&P CEO Deven Sharma had taken control of the ratings agency and personally led the push for a U.S. downgrade. There is a lot of evidence that he has deliberately tried to trash the U.S. economy. Even after discovering that the S&P debt calculations were off by $2 trillion, Sharma made the decision to go ahead with the unethical downgrade. This is a guy who was a key contributor at the 2009 Bilderberg Summit that organized 120 of the world’s richest men and women to push for an end to the dollar as the global reserve currency.

[T]hrough his writings on “competitive strategy”

S&P CEO Sharma considers the United States the PROBLEM in today’s world, operating with what he implies is an unfair and reckless advantage. The brutal reality is that for “globalization” to succeed the United States must be torn asunder . . . Also named by Schwarz as a suspect in the market manipulations was Michel Barnier, head of European Regulation. Barnier triggered an alarming 513-point drop in the Dow on August 4, when he blocked the plan of Hans Hoogervorst, newly appointed Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board, to save Europe by adopting a new rule called IFRS 9. The rule would have eliminated mark-to-market accounting of sovereign debt from European bank balance sheets. Schwarz writes: We all should be experts on the dangers of mark-to-market accounting after observing the U.S. banking crisis of 2008/2009 and the Great Depression in the 1930s. Mark-to-market was repealed at 8:45 a.m on April 2, 2009, which finally put a stop to the short term liquidity crisis and at the same time ushered in a stock market recovery. Banks no longer had to raise capital as long term stability was brought back to the system. The exact same scenario would have happened in 2011 Europe under Hoogervorst’s plan. Without the threat of failure by those banks who hold high amounts of euro sovereign debt, investors would be free to move on from the European crisis and the stock market could resume its fundamental course. Schwarz notes that Barnier, like Sharma, was a confirmed attendee at past Bilderberger conferences. What, then, is the agenda of the Bilderbergers? The One World Company

Daniel Estulin, noted expert on the Bilderbergers, describes that secretive globalist group as “a medium of bringing together financial institutions which are the world’s most powerful and most predatory financial interests.” Writing in June 2011, he said: Bilderberg isn’t a secret society. . . . It’s a meeting of people who represent a certain ideology. . . . Not OWG [One World Government] or NWO [New World Order] as too many people mistakenly believe. Rather, the ideology is of a ONE WORLD COMPANY LIMITED. It seems the Bilderbergers are less interested in governing the world than in owning the world. The “world company” was a term first used at a Bilderberger meeting in Canada in 1968 by George Ball, U.S. Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs and a managing director of banking giants Lehman Brothers and Kuhn Loeb. The world company was to be a new form of colonialism, in which global assets would be acquired by economic rather than military coercion. The company would extend across national boundaries, aggressively engaging in mergers and acquisitions until the assets of the world were subsumed under one privately-owned corporation, with nation-states subservient to a private international central banking system.

Estulin continues: The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call THE ARISTOCRACY OF PURPOSE between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity. . . . This explains what George Ball . . . said back in 1968, at a Bilderberg meeting in Canada: “Where does one find a legitimate base for the power of corporate management to make decisions that can profoundly affect the economic life of nations to whose governments they have only limited responsibility?” That base of power was found in the private global banking system. Estulin goes on: The problem with today’s system is that the world is run by monetary systems, not by national credit systems. . . . [Y]ou don’t want a monetary system to run the world. You want sovereign nation-states to have their own credit systems, which is the system of their currency. . . . [T]he possibility of productive, non-inflationary credit creation by the state, which is firmly stated in the US Constitution, was excluded by Maastricht [the Treaty of the European Union] as a method of determining economic and financial policy. The world company acquires assets by preventing governments from issuing their own currencies and credit. Money is created instead by banks as loans at interest. The debts inexorably grow, since more is always owed back than was created in the original loans. (For more on this, see here.) If currencies are not allowed to expand to meet increased costs and growth, the inevitable result is a wave of bankruptcies, foreclosures, and sales of assets at firesale prices. Sales to whom? To the “world company.”

Global Research. Ellen Brown …….

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

5 Responses to “More On How The Elite Is Deliberately Crashing The Market”

  1. Tapestry says:

    Email from Gordon Logan

    Hi Tap,

    I discovered your blog ten days ago. An identity of views I think. You mentioned problems with your blog. I sympathize. I’ve had a bad connection for years, wherever I am.

    I triggered the Moscow Coup in 1991.

    There was an article in the Special Services Section of Nezavisimaya Gazeta on the 10th anniversary. It gives my view of what happened, but in Russian.

    There’s an article on Cryptome:

    They’re quite heavy reading so I don’t expect you to spend much time on it. It happened a long time ago but it was a masterpiece.

    I read the page on your blog about the Cook killing. Last year, I spoke to the waiter who poisoned him. I spoke to the cook too. She was innocent. An open and shut case, I would say, because there was nobody else worth killing in the Commons in 2005. They must have used a kind of snake poison.

    The Home Office has forced me and my family to live in China. They tricked my wife into leaving the UK with our daughter and they’ve been making it difficult for us even to visit. My daughter has missed two years of school.

    They seem to be worried about the Cook killing. His first wife lives near me in Edinburgh, which is where we should be right now.

    I think that a citizen’s arrest is called for. All the MPs who got the FCO to publish the details of Levy’s meetings in Israel after Cook’s funeral could turn up in the Highlands to lend a hand.

    My other big thing is so-called climate change. But I call it ‘covert environmental warfare’. I’ve been teaching university students here a course about it. Fukushima, Niigata and Sechuan in particular. A billion watts at 2.5 hz bounced off the ionosphere for a few days can do it. The secret is that the right frequency will trigger an exponentially greater amount of potential energy in the resonating medium. The same way that a soprano can break a glass.

    Best regards,

    Gordon Logan


    Lots here to read and take in. Gordon, could you add more details about the Robin Cook assassination please? Readers would be very interested to hear what exactly happened.

  2. Me says:

    According to this theory the Fukushima disaster began BEFORE the earthquake and tsunami which were both caused by desperate attempts to fix the atmosphere – which was ionizing – using HAARP.

    PART 1

    “In 2008 the production of uranium turned negative in terms of energy efficiency. In 2007 Putin announced that Russia will stop producing uranium, as it is unprofitable. At the end of 2008 Russia cut off the supply of uranium, thus 70% of the global supply was lost. Europe hadn’t prepared for this, so there was a need to fill the gap in production.

    There was excess uranium from the exploded facilities of Sellafield (UK) and Superphenix (Japan). This uranium however contained 3.5% of uranium-235 and 6% of lethal plutonium.

    Then a massive cargo of this plutonium was exported to Japan. During the first year everything was fine, until in 2010-2011 they started doing revisions to the reactors.

    When the reactors were opened they found out that there was three times more afterheat and steam than normal. It couldn’t fit in the drivers or “vetvel space” where it is supposed to normally vanish. So they opened the reactors and started blowing the air into the atmosphere.

    This continued, they opened more reactors and started releasing the air. This caused ionization levels over Japan to skyrocket.

    Then NATO and IEA which monitor the ionization levels were alarmed about the rising levels over Japan. First they tried to push the ionization down with chemtrails so that the nitrogensphere wouldn’t explode. This didn’t help.

    Then they started pushing the ionization cloud down with HAARP for 2.5 days according to Russian and Chinese sources. With this 1000 megawatt device they pushed massive amounts of energy to the atmosphere. They didn’t understand that this ionization cloud acts as an iron nail grounding all the energy to the soil. This energy then reached the rock foundation and piezoactive quartz crystals in the ground started vibrating.

    These vibrations caused the rock bed to become unstable. So this tectonic boundary under Japan started moving. This caused the tectonic boundary to release its energy leading to earthquake, leading to tsunami.

    When the tsunami came it cut off the electricity. This prevented the afterheat from the reactors to be pumped to the sea. They had to push it straight to the ether. When the hot steam was pushed upwards it started “breathing”. It took in oxygen which lead to hydrogen explosion.”

  3. Me says:

    PART 2

    “First the reactor 1 exploded. After a few days the reactor 3 exploded. At this point, as the rock foundation was tectonically active, the energy from the explosions went to the rockbed.

    Under Japan, about 2 kilometers deep, there is methane-gas-clutter which is methane in a form of ice. It is based on the sensitive balance of pressure, the temperature has to be about 2 degrees celcius. The impact hit there. Under the the reactos the leakage of neutron had drilled deep holes or pipes into the rock foundation. The methane-clutter under reactor 4 increased 168-times in volume. This is the theory of Nils-Axel Morner. And it exploded in a second, coming up through the pipe with huge speed. It hit the reactor 4, which was stopped and contained no uranium, thus everyone wondered why it even exploded.

    Pictures were never shown anywhere and the public wasn’t told about this. I’ve seen a picture where a 14 meter thick concrete wall had exploded because of the massive impact. The methane clutter came at a cosmic speed creating a blue one kilometer high flame through the reactor. It made a lane of half a kilometer in diameter under the reactors.

    15 minutes after the reactor 3 had exploded the reactor 2 suffered damage exploding. The whole chain of reactors exploded like this.

    Everywhere on Earth, starting in 600 meters there is a layer of methane clutter which is about 1 kilometer thick.

    Germany that realised this, gave a panic-alarm to shut down the inextinguishable reactors, 9 reactors were shut down immediately.

    They realised that these reactors couldn’t be used in any circumstances because of the methane-clutter causing the reactors to explode.

    In America they have lost about 10 reactors, also in France they have 2 reactors releasing smoke at the moment. This is happening all over the world.”

  4. Me says:

    PART 3

    [Interviewer: Would you please tell us, what is HAAARP?]

    HAARP is basically a microwave oven sending microwave frequencies under 3 megahertz or so. The basic principle is very simple. It’s like a microwave oven with its door open. It’s a system of antennas 3×3 kilometers in size.

    [Where is it being controlled from?]

    The closest one from here is in Norway under NATO control. They also have a couple in US and 2-3 in Russia. They are all over the place.

    The purpose of HAARP is to, for example: if we have ion-radiation cloud coming from a nuclear ??????????? …. with HAARP they can heat up the upper atmosphere so that the ionization cloud is dispersed. They can also control the direction of ionization clouds if they are threading cities. They can also make artificial rain. For example during Fukushima there was continuous rain for 2-3 days as they tried to clean the atmosphere. You can also control jet streams with HAARP.

    The main purpose of HAARP is to manualize what they are doing with chemtrails.

    [But in practice what kind of device are we talking about?]

    It’s a radio transmitter.

    [And is it somewhere up there, like a satellite?]

    No, it is on the ground. For example inAlaska there is a huge gas field which is producing energy to run the 1000 megawatt HAARP. So it requires a lot of energy. They are monstrous transmitters.

    They first started building these in Russia, on the coast of Estonia. There was a documentary about it on television. It is a pure war machine.

    [Who developed this device?]

    It has been said that Nikolai Tesla originally started the development. They say that in America they can for example change the direction of hurricanes. It has been rumored that the hurricane that “attacked” America was manufactured by the Russians and Chinese and the US tried to counter the attacks with their HAARP system. Now they are also talking about getting one to Finland too, in Kilpisjarvi.

    [So HAARP is not a single machine but different countries have their own units?]

    It is a weapon. It is meant to replace the atomic bomb at some point. It is a weapon that can be used even without a state of war. Americans at the moment are stealing rain from other neighbouring countries.

    [Can you create earthquakes with HAARP?]

    Yes. This is what happened in Fukushima, an earthquake was created. The Chinese and the Russian were measuring couple of days before the HAARP activity. It has been rumored on the internet that US attacked Japan because Japan didn’t agree to join their currency system. The point of my rant is however that HAARP was used to turn down the elevated ionization levels. So there is a difference in interpretation. They didn’t understand the situation at all. For example the changing of the atmosphere into an iron nail due to ionization radiation turns air lethal. It burns your lungs. I’ve seen in Olkiluoto a flock of birds flying over the omission chimney dropping down smoking and dead. Then the guards come and pick up the birds saying: “Don’t touch them, they are radioactive!””

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.